Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use

Background:To develop and test brief nutrition and physical activity screening questions for children ages 2-11 years that could be used as a pragmatic screening tool to tailor counseling, track behavior change, and improve population health. Methods:A literature review identified existing validated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Childhood obesity 2020-10, Vol.16 (7), p.488-498
Hauptverfasser: Sullivan, Mikaela H., Sommer, Evan C., Schlundt, David, Shinall, Jennifer B., Haws, Kelly L., Bonnet, Kemberlee R., Burgess, Laura E., Po'e, Eli K., Barkin, Shari L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 7
container_start_page 488
container_title Childhood obesity
container_volume 16
creator Sullivan, Mikaela H.
Sommer, Evan C.
Schlundt, David
Shinall, Jennifer B.
Haws, Kelly L.
Bonnet, Kemberlee R.
Burgess, Laura E.
Po'e, Eli K.
Barkin, Shari L.
description Background:To develop and test brief nutrition and physical activity screening questions for children ages 2-11 years that could be used as a pragmatic screening tool to tailor counseling, track behavior change, and improve population health. Methods:A literature review identified existing validated questions for nutrition and physical activity behaviors in children ages 2-11 years. Response variation and concurrent validity was then assessed using a mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdsourcing survey employed in 2018. Additionally, cognitive interviews were conducted with both providers and parents of 2- to 11-year-old children to assess screening question priorities and perceived added value. Results:The literature review identified 260 questions, and 20 items were selected with expert guidance based on prespecified criteria (simplicity and potential utility for both clinical interactions during a well-child exam and population health). MTurk surveys yielded 1147 records that met eligibility criteria and revealed 6 items that had adequate response variation and were significantly correlated with parent-reported child BMI or BMI percentile, exhibiting concurrent validity. Cognitive interviews with 10 providers and 20 parents uncovered themes regarding suggestions and usability of the questions, eliminating 3 items due to parent and provider concerns. Combining quantitative and qualitative results, 3 nutrition and physical activity screening items remained for inclusion into the electronic health record (EHR). Conclusions:The three-pronged validation methodology produced a brief, 3-item child nutrition and physical activity screener to incorporate in the EHR, where it can inform tailored counseling for well-child care and be used to test associations with population health outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/chi.2020.0088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2428554877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2428554877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb1fa2c2642639b05149c743d5e1a4b1590ca86b707bc55e9bf3c07ddfa2ce2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rFDEYhwdRbKk9epWAF0FmzeckcxHqWK1Q_O45ZDLvdFNmkzXJrOx_b4ati3oylwTe5_eSH09VPSV4RbBqX9m1W1FM8QpjpR5Up5QIVlMim4fHd6NOqvOU7nA5rGUEt4-rE0YlJWV2WoW3sIMpbDfgMwojehMdjKhbu2lAH-ccXXbBI-MH9Hm9T86aCV3Y7HYu79E3GwG887foywxpARMaQ0SXE9gcg3cWXYGZ8hp9BRvigG4SPKkejWZKcH5_n1U37y6_d1f19af3H7qL69pyInLd92Q01NKG04a1PRaEt1ZyNggghvdEtNga1fQSy94KAW0_MovlMCwpoMDOqteHvdu538BgS71oJr2NbmPiXgfj9N8T79b6Nuy0FFIwLsqCF_cLYvix1NMblyxMk_EQ5qQpp0oIrqQs6PN_0LswR1_qFYq3VEnS8ELVB8rGkFKE8fgZgvViUxeberGpF5uFf_ZngyP9210B1AH4CX0Yk3XgLRyxoluIBitBF_Okc9kshrow-1yiL_8_yn4Bv1O87A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449287164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sullivan, Mikaela H. ; Sommer, Evan C. ; Schlundt, David ; Shinall, Jennifer B. ; Haws, Kelly L. ; Bonnet, Kemberlee R. ; Burgess, Laura E. ; Po'e, Eli K. ; Barkin, Shari L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Mikaela H. ; Sommer, Evan C. ; Schlundt, David ; Shinall, Jennifer B. ; Haws, Kelly L. ; Bonnet, Kemberlee R. ; Burgess, Laura E. ; Po'e, Eli K. ; Barkin, Shari L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:To develop and test brief nutrition and physical activity screening questions for children ages 2-11 years that could be used as a pragmatic screening tool to tailor counseling, track behavior change, and improve population health. Methods:A literature review identified existing validated questions for nutrition and physical activity behaviors in children ages 2-11 years. Response variation and concurrent validity was then assessed using a mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdsourcing survey employed in 2018. Additionally, cognitive interviews were conducted with both providers and parents of 2- to 11-year-old children to assess screening question priorities and perceived added value. Results:The literature review identified 260 questions, and 20 items were selected with expert guidance based on prespecified criteria (simplicity and potential utility for both clinical interactions during a well-child exam and population health). MTurk surveys yielded 1147 records that met eligibility criteria and revealed 6 items that had adequate response variation and were significantly correlated with parent-reported child BMI or BMI percentile, exhibiting concurrent validity. Cognitive interviews with 10 providers and 20 parents uncovered themes regarding suggestions and usability of the questions, eliminating 3 items due to parent and provider concerns. Combining quantitative and qualitative results, 3 nutrition and physical activity screening items remained for inclusion into the electronic health record (EHR). Conclusions:The three-pronged validation methodology produced a brief, 3-item child nutrition and physical activity screener to incorporate in the EHR, where it can inform tailored counseling for well-child care and be used to test associations with population health outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2153-2168</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/chi.2020.0088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32721216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW ROCHELLE: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Behavior ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children &amp; youth ; Clinical decision making ; Counseling ; Crowdsourcing ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Electronic Health Records ; Exercise ; Humans ; Interviews ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Literature reviews ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Original ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Pediatric Obesity - diagnosis ; Pediatric Obesity - epidemiology ; Pediatric Obesity - prevention &amp; control ; Pediatrics ; Primary care ; Questionnaires ; Science &amp; Technology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teenagers ; Validity ; Value added</subject><ispartof>Childhood obesity, 2020-10, Vol.16 (7), p.488-498</ispartof><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Oct 2020</rights><rights>Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>1</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000556085200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb1fa2c2642639b05149c743d5e1a4b1590ca86b707bc55e9bf3c07ddfa2ce2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb1fa2c2642639b05149c743d5e1a4b1590ca86b707bc55e9bf3c07ddfa2ce2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4546-205X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27933,27934,28257,28258</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32721216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Mikaela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Evan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlundt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinall, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haws, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Kemberlee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Po'e, Eli K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, Shari L.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use</title><title>Childhood obesity</title><addtitle>CHILD OBES</addtitle><addtitle>Child Obes</addtitle><description>Background:To develop and test brief nutrition and physical activity screening questions for children ages 2-11 years that could be used as a pragmatic screening tool to tailor counseling, track behavior change, and improve population health. Methods:A literature review identified existing validated questions for nutrition and physical activity behaviors in children ages 2-11 years. Response variation and concurrent validity was then assessed using a mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdsourcing survey employed in 2018. Additionally, cognitive interviews were conducted with both providers and parents of 2- to 11-year-old children to assess screening question priorities and perceived added value. Results:The literature review identified 260 questions, and 20 items were selected with expert guidance based on prespecified criteria (simplicity and potential utility for both clinical interactions during a well-child exam and population health). MTurk surveys yielded 1147 records that met eligibility criteria and revealed 6 items that had adequate response variation and were significantly correlated with parent-reported child BMI or BMI percentile, exhibiting concurrent validity. Cognitive interviews with 10 providers and 20 parents uncovered themes regarding suggestions and usability of the questions, eliminating 3 items due to parent and provider concerns. Combining quantitative and qualitative results, 3 nutrition and physical activity screening items remained for inclusion into the electronic health record (EHR). Conclusions:The three-pronged validation methodology produced a brief, 3-item child nutrition and physical activity screener to incorporate in the EHR, where it can inform tailored counseling for well-child care and be used to test associations with population health outcomes.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Pediatric Obesity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pediatric Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pediatric Obesity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>2153-2168</issn><issn>2153-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1rFDEYhwdRbKk9epWAF0FmzeckcxHqWK1Q_O45ZDLvdFNmkzXJrOx_b4ati3oylwTe5_eSH09VPSV4RbBqX9m1W1FM8QpjpR5Up5QIVlMim4fHd6NOqvOU7nA5rGUEt4-rE0YlJWV2WoW3sIMpbDfgMwojehMdjKhbu2lAH-ccXXbBI-MH9Hm9T86aCV3Y7HYu79E3GwG887foywxpARMaQ0SXE9gcg3cWXYGZ8hp9BRvigG4SPKkejWZKcH5_n1U37y6_d1f19af3H7qL69pyInLd92Q01NKG04a1PRaEt1ZyNggghvdEtNga1fQSy94KAW0_MovlMCwpoMDOqteHvdu538BgS71oJr2NbmPiXgfj9N8T79b6Nuy0FFIwLsqCF_cLYvix1NMblyxMk_EQ5qQpp0oIrqQs6PN_0LswR1_qFYq3VEnS8ELVB8rGkFKE8fgZgvViUxeberGpF5uFf_ZngyP9210B1AH4CX0Yk3XgLRyxoluIBitBF_Okc9kshrow-1yiL_8_yn4Bv1O87A</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Sullivan, Mikaela H.</creator><creator>Sommer, Evan C.</creator><creator>Schlundt, David</creator><creator>Shinall, Jennifer B.</creator><creator>Haws, Kelly L.</creator><creator>Bonnet, Kemberlee R.</creator><creator>Burgess, Laura E.</creator><creator>Po'e, Eli K.</creator><creator>Barkin, Shari L.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4546-205X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use</title><author>Sullivan, Mikaela H. ; Sommer, Evan C. ; Schlundt, David ; Shinall, Jennifer B. ; Haws, Kelly L. ; Bonnet, Kemberlee R. ; Burgess, Laura E. ; Po'e, Eli K. ; Barkin, Shari L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb1fa2c2642639b05149c743d5e1a4b1590ca86b707bc55e9bf3c07ddfa2ce2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Pediatric Obesity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pediatric Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pediatric Obesity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Mikaela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Evan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlundt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinall, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haws, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Kemberlee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Po'e, Eli K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkin, Shari L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Childhood obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sullivan, Mikaela H.</au><au>Sommer, Evan C.</au><au>Schlundt, David</au><au>Shinall, Jennifer B.</au><au>Haws, Kelly L.</au><au>Bonnet, Kemberlee R.</au><au>Burgess, Laura E.</au><au>Po'e, Eli K.</au><au>Barkin, Shari L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use</atitle><jtitle>Childhood obesity</jtitle><stitle>CHILD OBES</stitle><addtitle>Child Obes</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>488-498</pages><issn>2153-2168</issn><eissn>2153-2176</eissn><abstract>Background:To develop and test brief nutrition and physical activity screening questions for children ages 2-11 years that could be used as a pragmatic screening tool to tailor counseling, track behavior change, and improve population health. Methods:A literature review identified existing validated questions for nutrition and physical activity behaviors in children ages 2-11 years. Response variation and concurrent validity was then assessed using a mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdsourcing survey employed in 2018. Additionally, cognitive interviews were conducted with both providers and parents of 2- to 11-year-old children to assess screening question priorities and perceived added value. Results:The literature review identified 260 questions, and 20 items were selected with expert guidance based on prespecified criteria (simplicity and potential utility for both clinical interactions during a well-child exam and population health). MTurk surveys yielded 1147 records that met eligibility criteria and revealed 6 items that had adequate response variation and were significantly correlated with parent-reported child BMI or BMI percentile, exhibiting concurrent validity. Cognitive interviews with 10 providers and 20 parents uncovered themes regarding suggestions and usability of the questions, eliminating 3 items due to parent and provider concerns. Combining quantitative and qualitative results, 3 nutrition and physical activity screening items remained for inclusion into the electronic health record (EHR). Conclusions:The three-pronged validation methodology produced a brief, 3-item child nutrition and physical activity screener to incorporate in the EHR, where it can inform tailored counseling for well-child care and be used to test associations with population health outcomes.</abstract><cop>NEW ROCHELLE</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>32721216</pmid><doi>10.1089/chi.2020.0088</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4546-205X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2153-2168
ispartof Childhood obesity, 2020-10, Vol.16 (7), p.488-498
issn 2153-2168
2153-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2428554877
source MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Behavior
Child
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Clinical decision making
Counseling
Crowdsourcing
Data collection
Decision making
Electronic Health Records
Exercise
Humans
Interviews
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Literature reviews
Nutrition
Obesity
Original
Parents & parenting
Pediatric Obesity - diagnosis
Pediatric Obesity - epidemiology
Pediatric Obesity - prevention & control
Pediatrics
Primary care
Questionnaires
Science & Technology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teenagers
Validity
Value added
title Development of Brief Child Nutrition and Physical Activity Screening Questions for Electronic Health Record Use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-30T00%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Brief%20Child%20Nutrition%20and%20Physical%20Activity%20Screening%20Questions%20for%20Electronic%20Health%20Record%20Use&rft.jtitle=Childhood%20obesity&rft.au=Sullivan,%20Mikaela%20H.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=488-498&rft.issn=2153-2168&rft.eissn=2153-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/chi.2020.0088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2428554877%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449287164&rft_id=info:pmid/32721216&rfr_iscdi=true