Assessment of grassland phytomass with airborne video imagery

Airborne video imagery was evaluated for assessing phytomass production within grass plots fertilized with five rates of nitrogen. Video imagery was taken with two black-and-white video cameras—one visible light and the other visible/near-infrared light sensitive. Red (0.644–0.656-μm) and infrared (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote Sensing Environ.; (United States) 1986-12, Vol.20 (3), p.299-306
Hauptverfasser: Everitt, J.H, Hussey, M.A, Escobar, D.E, Nixon, P.R, Pinkerton, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Airborne video imagery was evaluated for assessing phytomass production within grass plots fertilized with five rates of nitrogen. Video imagery was taken with two black-and-white video cameras—one visible light and the other visible/near-infrared light sensitive. Red (0.644–0.656-μm) and infrared (0.815–0.827-μm) narrowband filters were used with the visible and visible/near-infrared light sensitive cameras, respectively. Hand-held red and infrared radiometric reflectance and phytomass measurements were made on the day that imagery was obtained. Red and infrared digital video data were obtained from the plots using an image processor. The plots were studied on two dates: 15 April and 22 May 1985. On 15 April, three phytomass levels could be distinguished within the infrared video image. Moreover, a infrared/red ratio video composite produced on an image processor enhanced differences among nitrogen treatments to the extent that generally four levels of phytomass could be identified. Coefficients of determination ( r 2), obtained by regressing red, infrared, and infrared/red reflectance, and red, infrared, and infrared/red digital video data on phytomass measurements were significant statistically. Imagery acquired on 22 May, however, showed few differences among treatments. This may have been caused by plant phenological and canopy architectural differences among the grass species. Nevertheless, video imagery should be a useful tool to assess phytomass production on rangelands when grasses are actively growing.
ISSN:0034-4257
1879-0704
DOI:10.1016/0034-4257(86)90050-7