Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology

This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology bro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research synthesis methods 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593
Hauptverfasser: Ferguson, Sarah L., Kerrigan, Monica Reid, Hovey, Katrina A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 593
container_issue 5
container_start_page 580
container_title Research synthesis methods
container_volume 11
creator Ferguson, Sarah L.
Kerrigan, Monica Reid
Hovey, Katrina A.
description This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jrsm.1436
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427304313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1266437</ericid><sourcerecordid>2440545425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P20AQhi1UJBBw4AcgrcSlPSTser_s3ioUSmkQEnC3NutxspHtTXfsUB_556yTiEOlzmVHep95tNKbJJeMThml6c06YDNlgquj5JRpmU_SLNNfPnednyQXiGsah-cqVfo0eZ_DFoJZunZJuhUQv9n40PWt6xwg8RVp3F8oSQPdypdIXEsCIJhgVwSHNl6gw-_kNwykBOvQ-XYH4YAdNKZz9iDAri9HY4Ctg7eDz9d-OZwnx5WpES4O71nyejd7vb2fzJ9-_rr9MZ9YLlM1EXQBGnKqbCXAWuBsUYoFMCbjZIZWeaYMUzKGQjDQipWVlFXGtTBac36WfN1rN8H_6QG7onFooa5NC77HIhWp5lRwNqLX_6Br34c2fi5SgkohRSoj9W1P2eARA1TFJrjGhKFgtBjrKMY6irGOyF7tWQjOfnKzB5YqJbiO-c0-f3M1DP8XFQ_PL4874wcUlJhR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440545425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-2879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-2887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>Decision Making ; Decisions ; Difficulty Level ; Investigations ; methods guidance ; Mixed Methods Research ; mixed research synthesis ; Novices ; Research Reports ; Researchers ; Synthesis ; systematic mixed studies review</subject><ispartof>Research synthesis methods, 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4382-2309 ; 0000-0002-6812-7177 ; 0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1266437$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><title>Research synthesis methods</title><description>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</description><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>methods guidance</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>mixed research synthesis</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>systematic mixed studies review</subject><issn>1759-2879</issn><issn>1759-2887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1P20AQhi1UJBBw4AcgrcSlPSTser_s3ioUSmkQEnC3NutxspHtTXfsUB_556yTiEOlzmVHep95tNKbJJeMThml6c06YDNlgquj5JRpmU_SLNNfPnednyQXiGsah-cqVfo0eZ_DFoJZunZJuhUQv9n40PWt6xwg8RVp3F8oSQPdypdIXEsCIJhgVwSHNl6gw-_kNwykBOvQ-XYH4YAdNKZz9iDAri9HY4Ctg7eDz9d-OZwnx5WpES4O71nyejd7vb2fzJ9-_rr9MZ9YLlM1EXQBGnKqbCXAWuBsUYoFMCbjZIZWeaYMUzKGQjDQipWVlFXGtTBac36WfN1rN8H_6QG7onFooa5NC77HIhWp5lRwNqLX_6Br34c2fi5SgkohRSoj9W1P2eARA1TFJrjGhKFgtBjrKMY6irGOyF7tWQjOfnKzB5YqJbiO-c0-f3M1DP8XFQ_PL4874wcUlJhR</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creator><creator>Hovey, Katrina A.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-2309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-7177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><author>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>methods guidance</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>mixed research synthesis</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>systematic mixed studies review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferguson, Sarah L.</au><au>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</au><au>Hovey, Katrina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1266437</ericid><atitle>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</atitle><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>580</spage><epage>593</epage><pages>580-593</pages><issn>1759-2879</issn><eissn>1759-2887</eissn><abstract>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jrsm.1436</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-2309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-7177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1759-2879
ispartof Research synthesis methods, 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593
issn 1759-2879
1759-2887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427304313
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Decision Making
Decisions
Difficulty Level
Investigations
methods guidance
Mixed Methods Research
mixed research synthesis
Novices
Research Reports
Researchers
Synthesis
systematic mixed studies review
title Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveraging%20the%20opportunities%20of%20mixed%20methods%20in%20research%20synthesis:%20Key%20decisions%20in%20systematic%20mixed%20studies%20review%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Research%20synthesis%20methods&rft.au=Ferguson,%20Sarah%20L.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=580&rft.epage=593&rft.pages=580-593&rft.issn=1759-2879&rft.eissn=1759-2887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jrsm.1436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440545425%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440545425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1266437&rfr_iscdi=true