Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology
This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology bro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research synthesis methods 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 593 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 580 |
container_title | Research synthesis methods |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ferguson, Sarah L. Kerrigan, Monica Reid Hovey, Katrina A. |
description | This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jrsm.1436 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427304313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1266437</ericid><sourcerecordid>2440545425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P20AQhi1UJBBw4AcgrcSlPSTser_s3ioUSmkQEnC3NutxspHtTXfsUB_556yTiEOlzmVHep95tNKbJJeMThml6c06YDNlgquj5JRpmU_SLNNfPnednyQXiGsah-cqVfo0eZ_DFoJZunZJuhUQv9n40PWt6xwg8RVp3F8oSQPdypdIXEsCIJhgVwSHNl6gw-_kNwykBOvQ-XYH4YAdNKZz9iDAri9HY4Ctg7eDz9d-OZwnx5WpES4O71nyejd7vb2fzJ9-_rr9MZ9YLlM1EXQBGnKqbCXAWuBsUYoFMCbjZIZWeaYMUzKGQjDQipWVlFXGtTBac36WfN1rN8H_6QG7onFooa5NC77HIhWp5lRwNqLX_6Br34c2fi5SgkohRSoj9W1P2eARA1TFJrjGhKFgtBjrKMY6irGOyF7tWQjOfnKzB5YqJbiO-c0-f3M1DP8XFQ_PL4874wcUlJhR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440545425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><description>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-2879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-2887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>Decision Making ; Decisions ; Difficulty Level ; Investigations ; methods guidance ; Mixed Methods Research ; mixed research synthesis ; Novices ; Research Reports ; Researchers ; Synthesis ; systematic mixed studies review</subject><ispartof>Research synthesis methods, 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4382-2309 ; 0000-0002-6812-7177 ; 0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjrsm.1436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1266437$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><title>Research synthesis methods</title><description>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</description><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>methods guidance</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>mixed research synthesis</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>systematic mixed studies review</subject><issn>1759-2879</issn><issn>1759-2887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1P20AQhi1UJBBw4AcgrcSlPSTser_s3ioUSmkQEnC3NutxspHtTXfsUB_556yTiEOlzmVHep95tNKbJJeMThml6c06YDNlgquj5JRpmU_SLNNfPnednyQXiGsah-cqVfo0eZ_DFoJZunZJuhUQv9n40PWt6xwg8RVp3F8oSQPdypdIXEsCIJhgVwSHNl6gw-_kNwykBOvQ-XYH4YAdNKZz9iDAri9HY4Ctg7eDz9d-OZwnx5WpES4O71nyejd7vb2fzJ9-_rr9MZ9YLlM1EXQBGnKqbCXAWuBsUYoFMCbjZIZWeaYMUzKGQjDQipWVlFXGtTBac36WfN1rN8H_6QG7onFooa5NC77HIhWp5lRwNqLX_6Br34c2fi5SgkohRSoj9W1P2eARA1TFJrjGhKFgtBjrKMY6irGOyF7tWQjOfnKzB5YqJbiO-c0-f3M1DP8XFQ_PL4874wcUlJhR</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creator><creator>Hovey, Katrina A.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-2309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-7177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</title><author>Ferguson, Sarah L. ; Kerrigan, Monica Reid ; Hovey, Katrina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-40be7e906cf4ecce31bd4be1155558a0f986a1654ec441e761df55f8374a7733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>methods guidance</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>mixed research synthesis</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>systematic mixed studies review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Katrina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferguson, Sarah L.</au><au>Kerrigan, Monica Reid</au><au>Hovey, Katrina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1266437</ericid><atitle>Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology</atitle><jtitle>Research synthesis methods</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>580</spage><epage>593</epage><pages>580-593</pages><issn>1759-2879</issn><eissn>1759-2887</eissn><abstract>This article identifies and unpacks three key decision points in a systematic mixed research synthesis, a mixed methods approach to research synthesis. The research community has increasingly recognized the value of synthesis studies in expanding our understanding of phenomena. Mixed‐methodology broadly has also gained ground as a pragmatic approach to research investigations. By leveraging mixed methods approaches in a synthesis review, systematic mixed studies review (SMSR) enables a broad and integrated summary of existing research on the topic. Yet SMSRs can be challenging to undertake given the complexity of working with research synthesis and mixed methods requirements. This methods guidance article presents information to assist novice researchers in navigating these critical decisions in SMSRs, and provides examples of how these were addressed by researchers in the two case studies provided. Implications of the SMSRs for the research community and future research directions are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jrsm.1436</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-2309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-7177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-7034</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-2879 |
ispartof | Research synthesis methods, 2020-09, Vol.11 (5), p.580-593 |
issn | 1759-2879 1759-2887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427304313 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Decision Making Decisions Difficulty Level Investigations methods guidance Mixed Methods Research mixed research synthesis Novices Research Reports Researchers Synthesis systematic mixed studies review |
title | Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveraging%20the%20opportunities%20of%20mixed%20methods%20in%20research%20synthesis:%20Key%20decisions%20in%20systematic%20mixed%20studies%20review%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Research%20synthesis%20methods&rft.au=Ferguson,%20Sarah%20L.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=580&rft.epage=593&rft.pages=580-593&rft.issn=1759-2879&rft.eissn=1759-2887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jrsm.1436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440545425%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440545425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1266437&rfr_iscdi=true |