Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement

The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2020-09, Vol.158 (3), p.343-348
Hauptverfasser: Ghafari, Joseph G., Ammoury, Makram J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 348
container_issue 3
container_start_page 343
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 158
creator Ghafari, Joseph G.
Ammoury, Makram J.
description The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resists tooth movement, regardless of bone thickness, and that teeth should be steered away from this bone during orthodontic treatment. However, individual variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment, offering the basis for inferences on the limits of mini-implant anchorage and the presumed influence of the regional acceleratory phenomenon through decortication and microperforation, 2 modalities advocated to effect faster tooth movement. •Variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment.•Efficacy of mini-implant anchorage during molar distalization varies.•Localized anatomic barriers in the molar region affect anchorage.•Regional acceleratory phenomenon is likely involved in the healing of decortication.•Acceleration of remodeling around the tooth being moved may be less important.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427293430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540620302857</els_id><sourcerecordid>2427293430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-5b67d16c45bb6638646e1d56ddd79b151de329c871b0e476dc46a324d5413c0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gZss3SS--U4WLqRoFQrd6HpIZl51QpOpM9OC_97UuhYe3M09D-4h5JZCRYGq-75q--BCxYBBBawCUGdkRqHRpdKSnZMZ1HVTSgHqklyl1ANAIxjMiFgfMNow-PGjmGLX2lx0YcQiYvIpt6PFIofpQv4shnDAAcd8TS427TbhzV_Oyfvz09vipVytl6-Lx1VpOVe5lJ3SjiorZNcpxWslFFInlXNONx2V1CFnja017QCFVs4K1XImnBSUW3B8Tu5Of3cxfO0xZTP4ZHG7bUcM-2SYYJo1XHCYqvxUtTGkFHFjdtEPbfw2FMzRkenNryNzdGSAmcnRRD2cKJxWHDxGk6zHabPzEW02Lvh_-R8tB2_d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427293430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ghafari, Joseph G. ; Ammoury, Makram J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G. ; Ammoury, Makram J.</creatorcontrib><description>The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resists tooth movement, regardless of bone thickness, and that teeth should be steered away from this bone during orthodontic treatment. However, individual variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment, offering the basis for inferences on the limits of mini-implant anchorage and the presumed influence of the regional acceleratory phenomenon through decortication and microperforation, 2 modalities advocated to effect faster tooth movement. •Variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment.•Efficacy of mini-implant anchorage during molar distalization varies.•Localized anatomic barriers in the molar region affect anchorage.•Regional acceleratory phenomenon is likely involved in the healing of decortication.•Acceleration of remodeling around the tooth being moved may be less important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2020-09, Vol.158 (3), p.343-348</ispartof><rights>2020 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-5b67d16c45bb6638646e1d56ddd79b151de329c871b0e476dc46a324d5413c0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-5b67d16c45bb6638646e1d56ddd79b151de329c871b0e476dc46a324d5413c0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0606-1472</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammoury, Makram J.</creatorcontrib><title>Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><description>The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resists tooth movement, regardless of bone thickness, and that teeth should be steered away from this bone during orthodontic treatment. However, individual variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment, offering the basis for inferences on the limits of mini-implant anchorage and the presumed influence of the regional acceleratory phenomenon through decortication and microperforation, 2 modalities advocated to effect faster tooth movement. •Variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment.•Efficacy of mini-implant anchorage during molar distalization varies.•Localized anatomic barriers in the molar region affect anchorage.•Regional acceleratory phenomenon is likely involved in the healing of decortication.•Acceleration of remodeling around the tooth being moved may be less important.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gZss3SS--U4WLqRoFQrd6HpIZl51QpOpM9OC_97UuhYe3M09D-4h5JZCRYGq-75q--BCxYBBBawCUGdkRqHRpdKSnZMZ1HVTSgHqklyl1ANAIxjMiFgfMNow-PGjmGLX2lx0YcQiYvIpt6PFIofpQv4shnDAAcd8TS427TbhzV_Oyfvz09vipVytl6-Lx1VpOVe5lJ3SjiorZNcpxWslFFInlXNONx2V1CFnja017QCFVs4K1XImnBSUW3B8Tu5Of3cxfO0xZTP4ZHG7bUcM-2SYYJo1XHCYqvxUtTGkFHFjdtEPbfw2FMzRkenNryNzdGSAmcnRRD2cKJxWHDxGk6zHabPzEW02Lvh_-R8tB2_d</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creator><creator>Ammoury, Makram J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0606-1472</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement</title><author>Ghafari, Joseph G. ; Ammoury, Makram J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-5b67d16c45bb6638646e1d56ddd79b151de329c871b0e476dc46a324d5413c0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghafari, Joseph G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammoury, Makram J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghafari, Joseph G.</au><au>Ammoury, Makram J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>343-348</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resists tooth movement, regardless of bone thickness, and that teeth should be steered away from this bone during orthodontic treatment. However, individual variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment, offering the basis for inferences on the limits of mini-implant anchorage and the presumed influence of the regional acceleratory phenomenon through decortication and microperforation, 2 modalities advocated to effect faster tooth movement. •Variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment.•Efficacy of mini-implant anchorage during molar distalization varies.•Localized anatomic barriers in the molar region affect anchorage.•Regional acceleratory phenomenon is likely involved in the healing of decortication.•Acceleration of remodeling around the tooth being moved may be less important.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0606-1472</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2020-09, Vol.158 (3), p.343-348
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2427293430
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Dentistry
title Overcoming compact bone resistance to tooth movement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A31%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overcoming%20compact%20bone%20resistance%20to%20tooth%20movement&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Ghafari,%20Joseph%20G.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=343-348&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427293430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427293430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0889540620302857&rfr_iscdi=true