Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience

Aim Vulvar carcinoma represents 3–5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1871-1878
Hauptverfasser: Pecorino, Basilio, Scibilia, Giuseppe, Ferrara, Martina, Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto, D'Agate, Maria Gabriella, Giambanco, Laura, Scollo, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1878
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1871
container_title The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
container_volume 46
creator Pecorino, Basilio
Scibilia, Giuseppe
Ferrara, Martina
Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto
D'Agate, Maria Gabriella
Giambanco, Laura
Scollo, Paolo
description Aim Vulvar carcinoma represents 3–5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of vulvar carcinoma underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 at Operative Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) were retrospective analyzed. Risk factors for relapse (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, type of surgery, lymphadenectomy, margins status, metastatic nodes and radiotherapy) were evaluated by logistic regression. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, metastatic inguinal nodes and type of surgery) was obtained by Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier curves either for the entire population and for comparison between positive and negative variables (margin status, nodes and radiotherapy) with log‐rank test to determine significance. Statistical significance was reached for P < 0.05. Results Type of surgery (radical local excision vs. radical vulvectomy) and positive inguinal nodes were identified as risk factors for relapse. Positive inguinal nodes and positive margins were identified as prognostic factors either for overall survival and disease specific survival; tumor size greater than 4 cm was identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Overall survival was 38.4% and it was significantly higher in the patients with negative margins and nodes. Conclusions Nodes status, resection margins, age and type of surgery represent prognostic factors have to be considered for adjuvant treatment in the patients affected from vulvar carcinoma.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jog.14368
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426537789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439099634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-8f78d7b0301c6aff4d4777739179b41ccc23b517d33e9a03274cc3dee6cfd3de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AiCs7pg98g4Is-dEuatGl9k6FTGUxQ8bFk12vJ6JKZtNN9e6P1SfBe7h5-dxz_KDpndMJCTde2mTDBs_wgGjEhZExlmh2GmQsW51Rmx9GJ92tKmSxYPorenpxtjPWdBlIr6KzzRJmK-N41GlRLOoeq26DpiDZk17c75QgoB9rYjbomz9o0LRIIAB3Bzy06jQbwNDqqVevx7LePo9e725fZfbxYzh9mN4sYeCryOK9lXskV5ZRBpupaVEKG4kV4byUYACR8lTJZcY6FojyRAoBXiBnUVeh8HF0Od7fOvvfou3KjPWDbKoO292UikizlUuZFoBd_6Nr2zoTvguIFLYqMi6CuBgXOeu-wLrdOb5Tbl4yW3xGHrab8iTjY6WA_dIv7_2H5uJwPG18fdH3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439099634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Pecorino, Basilio ; Scibilia, Giuseppe ; Ferrara, Martina ; Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto ; D'Agate, Maria Gabriella ; Giambanco, Laura ; Scollo, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Pecorino, Basilio ; Scibilia, Giuseppe ; Ferrara, Martina ; Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto ; D'Agate, Maria Gabriella ; Giambanco, Laura ; Scollo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Vulvar carcinoma represents 3–5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of vulvar carcinoma underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 at Operative Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) were retrospective analyzed. Risk factors for relapse (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, type of surgery, lymphadenectomy, margins status, metastatic nodes and radiotherapy) were evaluated by logistic regression. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, metastatic inguinal nodes and type of surgery) was obtained by Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier curves either for the entire population and for comparison between positive and negative variables (margin status, nodes and radiotherapy) with log‐rank test to determine significance. Statistical significance was reached for P &lt; 0.05. Results Type of surgery (radical local excision vs. radical vulvectomy) and positive inguinal nodes were identified as risk factors for relapse. Positive inguinal nodes and positive margins were identified as prognostic factors either for overall survival and disease specific survival; tumor size greater than 4 cm was identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Overall survival was 38.4% and it was significantly higher in the patients with negative margins and nodes. Conclusions Nodes status, resection margins, age and type of surgery represent prognostic factors have to be considered for adjuvant treatment in the patients affected from vulvar carcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jog.14368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Genital cancers ; Gynecology ; Medical prognosis ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nodes ; Obstetrics ; Patients ; prognostic factors ; Radiation therapy ; radiotherapy ; Risk factors ; single center ; Surgery ; Survival ; vulvar cancer</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1871-1878</ispartof><rights>2020 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-8f78d7b0301c6aff4d4777739179b41ccc23b517d33e9a03274cc3dee6cfd3de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-8f78d7b0301c6aff4d4777739179b41ccc23b517d33e9a03274cc3dee6cfd3de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjog.14368$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjog.14368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pecorino, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scibilia, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Agate, Maria Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giambanco, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scollo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><description>Aim Vulvar carcinoma represents 3–5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of vulvar carcinoma underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 at Operative Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) were retrospective analyzed. Risk factors for relapse (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, type of surgery, lymphadenectomy, margins status, metastatic nodes and radiotherapy) were evaluated by logistic regression. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, metastatic inguinal nodes and type of surgery) was obtained by Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier curves either for the entire population and for comparison between positive and negative variables (margin status, nodes and radiotherapy) with log‐rank test to determine significance. Statistical significance was reached for P &lt; 0.05. Results Type of surgery (radical local excision vs. radical vulvectomy) and positive inguinal nodes were identified as risk factors for relapse. Positive inguinal nodes and positive margins were identified as prognostic factors either for overall survival and disease specific survival; tumor size greater than 4 cm was identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Overall survival was 38.4% and it was significantly higher in the patients with negative margins and nodes. Conclusions Nodes status, resection margins, age and type of surgery represent prognostic factors have to be considered for adjuvant treatment in the patients affected from vulvar carcinoma.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Genital cancers</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>prognostic factors</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>single center</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>vulvar cancer</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AiCs7pg98g4Is-dEuatGl9k6FTGUxQ8bFk12vJ6JKZtNN9e6P1SfBe7h5-dxz_KDpndMJCTde2mTDBs_wgGjEhZExlmh2GmQsW51Rmx9GJ92tKmSxYPorenpxtjPWdBlIr6KzzRJmK-N41GlRLOoeq26DpiDZk17c75QgoB9rYjbomz9o0LRIIAB3Bzy06jQbwNDqqVevx7LePo9e725fZfbxYzh9mN4sYeCryOK9lXskV5ZRBpupaVEKG4kV4byUYACR8lTJZcY6FojyRAoBXiBnUVeh8HF0Od7fOvvfou3KjPWDbKoO292UikizlUuZFoBd_6Nr2zoTvguIFLYqMi6CuBgXOeu-wLrdOb5Tbl4yW3xGHrab8iTjY6WA_dIv7_2H5uJwPG18fdH3Q</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Pecorino, Basilio</creator><creator>Scibilia, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Ferrara, Martina</creator><creator>Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto</creator><creator>D'Agate, Maria Gabriella</creator><creator>Giambanco, Laura</creator><creator>Scollo, Paolo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience</title><author>Pecorino, Basilio ; Scibilia, Giuseppe ; Ferrara, Martina ; Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto ; D'Agate, Maria Gabriella ; Giambanco, Laura ; Scollo, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3548-8f78d7b0301c6aff4d4777739179b41ccc23b517d33e9a03274cc3dee6cfd3de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Genital cancers</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>prognostic factors</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>single center</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>vulvar cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pecorino, Basilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scibilia, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Agate, Maria Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giambanco, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scollo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pecorino, Basilio</au><au>Scibilia, Giuseppe</au><au>Ferrara, Martina</au><au>Di Stefano, Andrea Benedetto</au><au>D'Agate, Maria Gabriella</au><au>Giambanco, Laura</au><au>Scollo, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1871</spage><epage>1878</epage><pages>1871-1878</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim Vulvar carcinoma represents 3–5% of all female genital cancers; the main surgical treatment is radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze prognostic factors in the patients underwent to primary surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Methods One hundred and eighteen cases of vulvar carcinoma underwent surgery between 2006 and 2016 at Operative Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) were retrospective analyzed. Risk factors for relapse (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, type of surgery, lymphadenectomy, margins status, metastatic nodes and radiotherapy) were evaluated by logistic regression. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors (age, tumor size, FIGO stage, metastatic inguinal nodes and type of surgery) was obtained by Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier curves either for the entire population and for comparison between positive and negative variables (margin status, nodes and radiotherapy) with log‐rank test to determine significance. Statistical significance was reached for P &lt; 0.05. Results Type of surgery (radical local excision vs. radical vulvectomy) and positive inguinal nodes were identified as risk factors for relapse. Positive inguinal nodes and positive margins were identified as prognostic factors either for overall survival and disease specific survival; tumor size greater than 4 cm was identified as prognostic factors for overall survival. Overall survival was 38.4% and it was significantly higher in the patients with negative margins and nodes. Conclusions Nodes status, resection margins, age and type of surgery represent prognostic factors have to be considered for adjuvant treatment in the patients affected from vulvar carcinoma.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jog.14368</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8076
ispartof The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1871-1878
issn 1341-8076
1447-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426537789
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Age
Genital cancers
Gynecology
Medical prognosis
Metastases
Metastasis
Nodes
Obstetrics
Patients
prognostic factors
Radiation therapy
radiotherapy
Risk factors
single center
Surgery
Survival
vulvar cancer
title Prognostic factors and surgical treatment in vulvar carcinoma: Single center experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20factors%20and%20surgical%20treatment%20in%20vulvar%20carcinoma:%20Single%20center%20experience&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Pecorino,%20Basilio&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1871&rft.epage=1878&rft.pages=1871-1878&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jog.14368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439099634%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439099634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true