Local anesthesia combined with intra-articular ropivacaine can provide satisfactory pain control in ankle arthroscopic surgery: A retrospective cohort study
Background: Local anesthesia (LA) is widely used in knee arthroscopic surgery but not in ankle arthroscopy. Objective: To understand the effectiveness and safety of LA combined with ropivacaine in pain control for ankle arthroscopy. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Methods: We retrospectively col...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 2020-01, Vol.28 (2), p.2309499020938122-2309499020938122, Article 2309499020938122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Local anesthesia (LA) is widely used in knee arthroscopic surgery but not in ankle arthroscopy.
Objective:
To understand the effectiveness and safety of LA combined with ropivacaine in pain control for ankle arthroscopy.
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected data for patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy from April 2012 to April 2017. Patients were grouped by anesthesia method: LA, LA with ropivacaine (LA+R), spinal anesthesia (SA), and SA with ropivacaine (SA+R). Intra- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, complications, doses of supplemental pain medication, hospitalization cost and duration, and satisfaction with pain control during hospitalization were analyzed.
Results:
The study included 276 patients (LA: 93; LA+R: 124; SA: 31; SA+R: 28). The LA and LA+R groups had significantly higher intraoperative VAS scores (LA vs. SA, p = 0.001; LA vs. SA+R, p = 0.002; LA+R vs. SA, p = 0.00; LA+R vs. SA+R, p = 0.00), but fewer complications, than the SA and SA+R groups. The LA+R and SA+R groups had significantly better outcomes for postoperative pain control (LA vs. LA+R, p = 0.01; LA vs. SA+R, p = 0.01; SA vs. SA+R, p = 0.01; SA vs. LA+R, p = 0.03) and required less supplemental pain medication. Hospitalization cost was lower and duration shorter in the LA and LA+R groups than in the SA and SA+R groups. There was no significant difference in satisfaction among the four groups.
Limitations:
This was a single-center retrospective and relatively short-term study.
Conclusions:
LA+R which could be safely applied in ankle arthroscopy provided satisfactory pain control, reduced postoperative pain intensity, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and good cost-effectiveness. It can be safely applied in ankle arthroscopy for the specific patients with ankle osteoarthritis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2309-4990 1022-5536 2309-4990 |
DOI: | 10.1177/2309499020938122 |