The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality
Abstract Investigations on movement quality deficits associated with jump landing are numerous, however, these studies are often performed in laboratories with little distraction to the participant. This is contrary to how injury typically occurs secondary to sport-specific distraction where the ath...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sports medicine 2021-01, Vol.42 (1), p.90-95 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 95 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 90 |
| container_title | International journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Schnittjer, Amber Simon, Janet E. Yom, Jae Grooms, Dustin R. |
| description | Abstract
Investigations on movement quality deficits associated with jump landing are
numerous, however, these studies are often performed in laboratories with little
distraction to the participant. This is contrary to how injury typically occurs
secondary to sport-specific distraction where the athlete is cognitively loaded
during motor performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the
effect of a cognitive load on jump-landing movement quality. A dual-task design
was used to determine the effects of a dual-task on tuck jump movement quality
in 20 participants. There were three cognitive conditions (no cognitive task,
easy-cognitive task, and difficult-cognitive task). The dual task elicited
statistically significant changes in overall tuck jump score (movement quality)
across the conditions with tuck jump score increasing from 3.52±1.64
baseline to 4.37±1.25 with the easy-cognitive task to 4.67±1.24
with the difficult-cognitive task. The findings of this study may be useful to
screen for individuals at risk of lower extremity injury utilizing the tuck jump
when paired with a cognitive task. The screening would then identify individuals
who may have poor neuromuscular control when cognitively loaded. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1055/a-1195-2700 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426185811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481214249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-355ef32a980aeca24af4622f0aaf30bd16445d03196cc1563364cb1c7af469963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VlXsJuBFlNDevTpZS64uKCHU9pJmknTqPOpkp9N-boVVBXGXzce7JQegUyDUQIW50BKBERIeE7KE-cKYipiTfR30CQxpxSWkPHXm_JAS4AnaIeoxKxTiVfTSeLiweO2dN43HlsMajal5mTba2-K7VOZ5q_4GrEj-3xSrKdZlm5Ry_VGtb2LLBb4FkzeYYHTide3uyewfo_X48HT1Gk9eHp9HtJDJM0CZiQljHqFYx0dZoyrXr2jmitWNkloLkXKSEgZLGgJCMSW5mYIadU0qyAbrY5q7q6rO1vkmKzBubh162an1Cw58gFjFAoOd_6LJq6zK0CyoGCpxyFdTVVpm68r62LlnVWaHrTQIk6dZNdNKtm3TrBn22y2xnhU1_7PecAVxuQbPIwkC_J_9L-wJm1X7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481214249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Schnittjer, Amber ; Simon, Janet E. ; Yom, Jae ; Grooms, Dustin R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schnittjer, Amber ; Simon, Janet E. ; Yom, Jae ; Grooms, Dustin R.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Investigations on movement quality deficits associated with jump landing are
numerous, however, these studies are often performed in laboratories with little
distraction to the participant. This is contrary to how injury typically occurs
secondary to sport-specific distraction where the athlete is cognitively loaded
during motor performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the
effect of a cognitive load on jump-landing movement quality. A dual-task design
was used to determine the effects of a dual-task on tuck jump movement quality
in 20 participants. There were three cognitive conditions (no cognitive task,
easy-cognitive task, and difficult-cognitive task). The dual task elicited
statistically significant changes in overall tuck jump score (movement quality)
across the conditions with tuck jump score increasing from 3.52±1.64
baseline to 4.37±1.25 with the easy-cognitive task to 4.67±1.24
with the difficult-cognitive task. The findings of this study may be useful to
screen for individuals at risk of lower extremity injury utilizing the tuck jump
when paired with a cognitive task. The screening would then identify individuals
who may have poor neuromuscular control when cognitively loaded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/a-1195-2700</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32693426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cognition ; Female ; Humans ; Lower Extremity - physiology ; Male ; Movement ; Orthopedics & Biomechanics ; Plyometric Exercise - psychology ; Time and Motion Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2021-01, Vol.42 (1), p.90-95</ispartof><rights>Thieme. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-355ef32a980aeca24af4622f0aaf30bd16445d03196cc1563364cb1c7af469963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-355ef32a980aeca24af4622f0aaf30bd16445d03196cc1563364cb1c7af469963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1195-2700.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1195-2700$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3006,3007,27907,27908,54542,54543</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schnittjer, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yom, Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grooms, Dustin R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Investigations on movement quality deficits associated with jump landing are
numerous, however, these studies are often performed in laboratories with little
distraction to the participant. This is contrary to how injury typically occurs
secondary to sport-specific distraction where the athlete is cognitively loaded
during motor performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the
effect of a cognitive load on jump-landing movement quality. A dual-task design
was used to determine the effects of a dual-task on tuck jump movement quality
in 20 participants. There were three cognitive conditions (no cognitive task,
easy-cognitive task, and difficult-cognitive task). The dual task elicited
statistically significant changes in overall tuck jump score (movement quality)
across the conditions with tuck jump score increasing from 3.52±1.64
baseline to 4.37±1.25 with the easy-cognitive task to 4.67±1.24
with the difficult-cognitive task. The findings of this study may be useful to
screen for individuals at risk of lower extremity injury utilizing the tuck jump
when paired with a cognitive task. The screening would then identify individuals
who may have poor neuromuscular control when cognitively loaded.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Orthopedics & Biomechanics</subject><subject>Plyometric Exercise - psychology</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VlXsJuBFlNDevTpZS64uKCHU9pJmknTqPOpkp9N-boVVBXGXzce7JQegUyDUQIW50BKBERIeE7KE-cKYipiTfR30CQxpxSWkPHXm_JAS4AnaIeoxKxTiVfTSeLiweO2dN43HlsMajal5mTba2-K7VOZ5q_4GrEj-3xSrKdZlm5Ry_VGtb2LLBb4FkzeYYHTide3uyewfo_X48HT1Gk9eHp9HtJDJM0CZiQljHqFYx0dZoyrXr2jmitWNkloLkXKSEgZLGgJCMSW5mYIadU0qyAbrY5q7q6rO1vkmKzBubh162an1Cw58gFjFAoOd_6LJq6zK0CyoGCpxyFdTVVpm68r62LlnVWaHrTQIk6dZNdNKtm3TrBn22y2xnhU1_7PecAVxuQbPIwkC_J_9L-wJm1X7s</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Schnittjer, Amber</creator><creator>Simon, Janet E.</creator><creator>Yom, Jae</creator><creator>Grooms, Dustin R.</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><general>Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality</title><author>Schnittjer, Amber ; Simon, Janet E. ; Yom, Jae ; Grooms, Dustin R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-355ef32a980aeca24af4622f0aaf30bd16445d03196cc1563364cb1c7af469963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Orthopedics & Biomechanics</topic><topic>Plyometric Exercise - psychology</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schnittjer, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yom, Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grooms, Dustin R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schnittjer, Amber</au><au>Simon, Janet E.</au><au>Yom, Jae</au><au>Grooms, Dustin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>90-95</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Investigations on movement quality deficits associated with jump landing are
numerous, however, these studies are often performed in laboratories with little
distraction to the participant. This is contrary to how injury typically occurs
secondary to sport-specific distraction where the athlete is cognitively loaded
during motor performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the
effect of a cognitive load on jump-landing movement quality. A dual-task design
was used to determine the effects of a dual-task on tuck jump movement quality
in 20 participants. There were three cognitive conditions (no cognitive task,
easy-cognitive task, and difficult-cognitive task). The dual task elicited
statistically significant changes in overall tuck jump score (movement quality)
across the conditions with tuck jump score increasing from 3.52±1.64
baseline to 4.37±1.25 with the easy-cognitive task to 4.67±1.24
with the difficult-cognitive task. The findings of this study may be useful to
screen for individuals at risk of lower extremity injury utilizing the tuck jump
when paired with a cognitive task. The screening would then identify individuals
who may have poor neuromuscular control when cognitively loaded.</abstract><cop>Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>32693426</pmid><doi>10.1055/a-1195-2700</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0172-4622 |
| ispartof | International journal of sports medicine, 2021-01, Vol.42 (1), p.90-95 |
| issn | 0172-4622 1439-3964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2426185811 |
| source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
| subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Cognition Female Humans Lower Extremity - physiology Male Movement Orthopedics & Biomechanics Plyometric Exercise - psychology Time and Motion Studies Young Adult |
| title | The Effects of a Cognitive Dual Task on Jump-landing Movement Quality |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20a%20Cognitive%20Dual%20Task%20on%20Jump-landing%20Movement%20Quality&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Schnittjer,%20Amber&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=90-95&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/a-1195-2700&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481214249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481214249&rft_id=info:pmid/32693426&rfr_iscdi=true |