PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | European journal of cancer (1990) |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis Carbonell-Socias, Melchor Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció Monreal Clua, Sonia Manrique-Muñoz, Susana García Gorriz, Manel Burgos-Peláez, Rosa Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi Pamies Serrano, Mónica Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del Serrano-Castro, Susana Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa Pérez-Barragán, Carmen Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle Cossio-Gil, Yolima Gil-Moreno, Antonio |
description | Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery.
This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638.
From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality.
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
•Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ER |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804920303440</els_id><sourcerecordid>2447573854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAkbj0kjC248RBXFYVpZUqFUE5W4492XWUxIudrKj48zja0gMHTtbI33uaeY-QtxQKCrT60BfYG10wYFBAVQClz8iGyrrJQQr2nGygEU0uoWzOyKsYewCoZQkvyRlnlZQM5Ib8_vrt7mr7_f5jts2CnqwfXUSbzcHpIXPjYcARp9lNuwynvZ5M-gto_BHDQ6a7GUMWl7Bbp86HbO92e-NX1S83J8AeTxJ_1Mlwysw6PklekxedHiK-eXzPyY-rz_eX1_nt3Zeby-1tbrgs51xrTnnH2o4JrG2tqeDWCouaNqA549SU6dASWW3attVVKTpgreVGMLDGGn5OLk6-h-B_LhhnlY40OAx6Qr9ExUomZFPVjCX0_T9o75cwpe0SVdai5lKUiWInygQfY8BOHYIbdXhQFNRajerVWo1aq1FQqVRNEr17tF7aEe2T5G8XCfh0AjBlcXQYVDQO1_xcinxW1rv_-f8B5l2hYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447573854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery.
This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638.
From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality.
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
•Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32688208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Advanced ovarian cancer ; Aged ; Cancer ; Complete cytoreductive surgery ; Complexity ; Complications ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Disease Progression ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastric cancer ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; High-complexity surgery ; Humans ; Implementation Science ; Length of stay ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Oncology ; Ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data ; Peritoneal carcinomatosis ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery ; Peritoneum ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Recovery (Medical) ; Recurrent ovarian cancer ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5270-397X ; 0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804920303440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32688208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Gorriz, Manel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery.
This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638.
From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality.
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
•Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advanced ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Complete cytoreductive surgery</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>High-complexity surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation Science</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Recurrent ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAkbj0kjC248RBXFYVpZUqFUE5W4492XWUxIudrKj48zja0gMHTtbI33uaeY-QtxQKCrT60BfYG10wYFBAVQClz8iGyrrJQQr2nGygEU0uoWzOyKsYewCoZQkvyRlnlZQM5Ib8_vrt7mr7_f5jts2CnqwfXUSbzcHpIXPjYcARp9lNuwynvZ5M-gto_BHDQ6a7GUMWl7Bbp86HbO92e-NX1S83J8AeTxJ_1Mlwysw6PklekxedHiK-eXzPyY-rz_eX1_nt3Zeby-1tbrgs51xrTnnH2o4JrG2tqeDWCouaNqA549SU6dASWW3attVVKTpgreVGMLDGGn5OLk6-h-B_LhhnlY40OAx6Qr9ExUomZFPVjCX0_T9o75cwpe0SVdai5lKUiWInygQfY8BOHYIbdXhQFNRajerVWo1aq1FQqVRNEr17tF7aEe2T5G8XCfh0AjBlcXQYVDQO1_xcinxW1rv_-f8B5l2hYw</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creator><creator>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creator><creator>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creator><creator>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creator><creator>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creator><creator>García Gorriz, Manel</creator><creator>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creator><creator>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creator><creator>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creator><creator>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creator><creator>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creator><creator>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creator><creator>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creator><creator>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creator><creator>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creator><creator>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><author>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advanced ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Complete cytoreductive surgery</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>High-complexity surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation Science</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Recurrent ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Gorriz, Manel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</au><au>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</au><au>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</au><au>Monreal Clua, Sonia</au><au>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</au><au>García Gorriz, Manel</au><au>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</au><au>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</au><au>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</au><au>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</au><au>Serrano-Castro, Susana</au><au>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</au><au>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</au><au>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</au><au>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</au><au>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>149</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>149-158</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery.
This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638.
From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality.
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
•Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32688208</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8049 |
ispartof | European journal of cancer (1990), 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158 |
issn | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896722 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Adult Advanced ovarian cancer Aged Cancer Complete cytoreductive surgery Complexity Complications Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data Disease Progression Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Feasibility Studies Female Gastric cancer Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data High-complexity surgery Humans Implementation Science Length of stay Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Morbidity Mortality Oncology Ovarian cancer Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Patients Perioperative Care - methods Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data Peritoneal carcinomatosis Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery Peritoneum Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Recovery (Medical) Recurrent ovarian cancer Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROFAST:%20A%20randomised%20trial%20implementing%20enhanced%20recovery%20after%20surgery%20for%20highcomplexity%20advanced%20ovarian%20cancer%20surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Iglesias,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=149-158&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447573854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447573854&rft_id=info:pmid/32688208&rft_els_id=S0959804920303440&rfr_iscdi=true |