PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158
Hauptverfasser: Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis, Carbonell-Socias, Melchor, Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció, Monreal Clua, Sonia, Manrique-Muñoz, Susana, García Gorriz, Manel, Burgos-Peláez, Rosa, Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi, Pamies Serrano, Mónica, Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del, Serrano-Castro, Susana, Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa, Pérez-Barragán, Carmen, Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle, Cossio-Gil, Yolima, Gil-Moreno, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue
container_start_page 149
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 136
creator Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis
Carbonell-Socias, Melchor
Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció
Monreal Clua, Sonia
Manrique-Muñoz, Susana
García Gorriz, Manel
Burgos-Peláez, Rosa
Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi
Pamies Serrano, Mónica
Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del
Serrano-Castro, Susana
Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa
Pérez-Barragán, Carmen
Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle
Cossio-Gil, Yolima
Gil-Moreno, Antonio
description Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery. This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638. From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis. •Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ER
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804920303440</els_id><sourcerecordid>2447573854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAkbj0kjC248RBXFYVpZUqFUE5W4492XWUxIudrKj48zja0gMHTtbI33uaeY-QtxQKCrT60BfYG10wYFBAVQClz8iGyrrJQQr2nGygEU0uoWzOyKsYewCoZQkvyRlnlZQM5Ib8_vrt7mr7_f5jts2CnqwfXUSbzcHpIXPjYcARp9lNuwynvZ5M-gto_BHDQ6a7GUMWl7Bbp86HbO92e-NX1S83J8AeTxJ_1Mlwysw6PklekxedHiK-eXzPyY-rz_eX1_nt3Zeby-1tbrgs51xrTnnH2o4JrG2tqeDWCouaNqA549SU6dASWW3attVVKTpgreVGMLDGGn5OLk6-h-B_LhhnlY40OAx6Qr9ExUomZFPVjCX0_T9o75cwpe0SVdai5lKUiWInygQfY8BOHYIbdXhQFNRajerVWo1aq1FQqVRNEr17tF7aEe2T5G8XCfh0AjBlcXQYVDQO1_xcinxW1rv_-f8B5l2hYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447573854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery. This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638. From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis. •Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32688208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Advanced ovarian cancer ; Aged ; Cancer ; Complete cytoreductive surgery ; Complexity ; Complications ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Disease Progression ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastric cancer ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; High-complexity surgery ; Humans ; Implementation Science ; Length of stay ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Oncology ; Ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data ; Peritoneal carcinomatosis ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery ; Peritoneum ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Recovery (Medical) ; Recurrent ovarian cancer ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5270-397X ; 0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804920303440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32688208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Gorriz, Manel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery. This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638. From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis. •Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advanced ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Complete cytoreductive surgery</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>High-complexity surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation Science</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Recurrent ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAkbj0kjC248RBXFYVpZUqFUE5W4492XWUxIudrKj48zja0gMHTtbI33uaeY-QtxQKCrT60BfYG10wYFBAVQClz8iGyrrJQQr2nGygEU0uoWzOyKsYewCoZQkvyRlnlZQM5Ib8_vrt7mr7_f5jts2CnqwfXUSbzcHpIXPjYcARp9lNuwynvZ5M-gto_BHDQ6a7GUMWl7Bbp86HbO92e-NX1S83J8AeTxJ_1Mlwysw6PklekxedHiK-eXzPyY-rz_eX1_nt3Zeby-1tbrgs51xrTnnH2o4JrG2tqeDWCouaNqA549SU6dASWW3attVVKTpgreVGMLDGGn5OLk6-h-B_LhhnlY40OAx6Qr9ExUomZFPVjCX0_T9o75cwpe0SVdai5lKUiWInygQfY8BOHYIbdXhQFNRajerVWo1aq1FQqVRNEr17tF7aEe2T5G8XCfh0AjBlcXQYVDQO1_xcinxW1rv_-f8B5l2hYw</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creator><creator>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creator><creator>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creator><creator>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creator><creator>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creator><creator>García Gorriz, Manel</creator><creator>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creator><creator>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creator><creator>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creator><creator>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creator><creator>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creator><creator>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creator><creator>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creator><creator>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creator><creator>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creator><creator>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</title><author>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis ; Carbonell-Socias, Melchor ; Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció ; Monreal Clua, Sonia ; Manrique-Muñoz, Susana ; García Gorriz, Manel ; Burgos-Peláez, Rosa ; Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi ; Pamies Serrano, Mónica ; Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del ; Serrano-Castro, Susana ; Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa ; Pérez-Barragán, Carmen ; Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle ; Cossio-Gil, Yolima ; Gil-Moreno, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-aa313f2bf25e7d7a153dd5dea190a3231c40954e27cbbba645f02bd3c520dcdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advanced ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Complete cytoreductive surgery</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>High-complexity surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation Science</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Recurrent ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monreal Clua, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Gorriz, Manel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Castro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Iglesias, José Luis</au><au>Carbonell-Socias, Melchor</au><au>Pérez-Benavente, Ma Assumpció</au><au>Monreal Clua, Sonia</au><au>Manrique-Muñoz, Susana</au><au>García Gorriz, Manel</au><au>Burgos-Peláez, Rosa</au><au>Segurola Gurrutxaga, Hegoi</au><au>Pamies Serrano, Mónica</au><au>Pilar Gutiérrez-Barceló, Ma Del</au><au>Serrano-Castro, Susana</au><au>Balcells-Farré, Ma Teresa</au><au>Pérez-Barragán, Carmen</au><au>Scaillet-Houberechts, Axelle</au><au>Cossio-Gil, Yolima</au><au>Gil-Moreno, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>149</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>149-158</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs include multiple perioperative elements designed to achieve early recovery after surgery and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The PROFAST trial aimed to expand the evidence base for implementing ERAS in advanced gynaecologic oncology surgery. This prospective, interventional randomised clinical trial enrolled women undergoing surgery for either suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, at a reference hospital in gynaecologic oncology in Barcelona (Spain) and who were treated after either an ERAS protocol or conventional management (CM) protocol. All enrolled women who underwent cytoreductive surgery were included in the primary analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in LOS, and secondary outcomes were incidence and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rate of readmission and mortality within a 30-d follow-up period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02172638. From June 2014 to March 2018, 110 women were recruited, of which eleven were excluded. The ERAS group comprised 50 patients, and the CM group, 49 patients. Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and complexity of the cytoreductive surgery, with an overall medium/high Aletti surgical complexity score of 7.4. Overall compliance to the ERAS protocol was 92%. As compared with the patients in the CM group, patients in the ERAS group had a decreased median of LOS of two days (7 versus 9 days; p = 0.0099) and a decreased rate of readmission (6% versus 20%, p = 0.0334). No further significant differences were detected with respect to incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIB–IV) complications, Comprehensive Complication Index, reoperation during primary stay, or mortality. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the ERAS program had a decreased LOS and decreased rate of readmission as compared with those in CM, with no increased morbidity or mortality. This study provides important evidence for the benefits of ERAS management even for gynaecologic surgeries of medium/high complexity and suggests that ERAS should be a standard practice for cytoreductive surgeries for peritoneal carcinomatosis. •Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) decreases length of stay and readmission rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.•ERAS does not increase surgical morbidity in high complexity gynaecologic surgeries.•In ovarian cancer, ERAS is feasible, and a high rate of adherence can be achieved.•We recommend ERAS as standard practice for peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreduction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32688208</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-6751</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2020-09, Vol.136, p.149-158
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896722
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Advanced ovarian cancer
Aged
Cancer
Complete cytoreductive surgery
Complexity
Complications
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - methods
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Disease Progression
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)
Feasibility Studies
Female
Gastric cancer
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
High-complexity surgery
Humans
Implementation Science
Length of stay
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Mortality
Oncology
Ovarian cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology
Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology
Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Perioperative Care - methods
Perioperative Care - statistics & numerical data
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Peritoneal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary
Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery
Peritoneum
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Recovery (Medical)
Recurrent ovarian cancer
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title PROFAST: A randomised trial implementing enhanced recovery after surgery for highcomplexity advanced ovarian cancer surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROFAST:%20A%20randomised%20trial%20implementing%20enhanced%20recovery%20after%20surgery%20for%20highcomplexity%20advanced%20ovarian%20cancer%20surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Iglesias,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=149-158&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447573854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447573854&rft_id=info:pmid/32688208&rft_els_id=S0959804920303440&rfr_iscdi=true