A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies

•A key aspect of LCAs on waste management is to account for the material recovery.•This paper is a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of materials.•Guidelines are formulated to calculate the substitutability coefficient.•Substitutability coefficients of 10 secondary materials are given...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2020-08, Vol.114, p.331-340
Hauptverfasser: Rigamonti, L., Taelman, S.E., Huysveld, S., Sfez, S., Ragaert, K., Dewulf, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue
container_start_page 331
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 114
creator Rigamonti, L.
Taelman, S.E.
Huysveld, S.
Sfez, S.
Ragaert, K.
Dewulf, J.
description •A key aspect of LCAs on waste management is to account for the material recovery.•This paper is a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of materials.•Guidelines are formulated to calculate the substitutability coefficient.•Substitutability coefficients of 10 secondary materials are given.•The substitutability is calculated considering the technical functionality. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widespread tool used to guide decision-makers towards optimal strategic choices for sustainable growth. A key aspect of LCA studies of waste management systems where recycling activities are present is to account for resource recovery and the related substitution effects. Although multiple scientific papers assume a 1:1 substitution ratio between similar materials/products, this is often incorrect as the actual ratio is likely to vary. The focus of this paper is on the calculation of the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials based on technical characteristics. A state of the art literature review showed that many different calculation procedures were applied, which led to a wide variety of substitutability coefficients (sometimes provided under different terminology). In this perspective, the objective of this paper is to provide guidelines on the procedure to be followed to calculate the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials, based on technical characteristics. These guidelines are then applied to two waste management case studies, one dealing with bottom ashes from incineration and the other with plastic waste. In total, sixteen technical substitutability coefficients are given for ten secondary materials, based on state of the art and presented case studies. The paper thus represents a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management LCA studies. The guidelines presented may allow other case studies to enrich the list of coefficients, useful for all LCA practitioners in a harmonized way allowing a more correct evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with recycling activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X20303810</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425896683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-545a134cba4048e56082220b052cc23cf528e02a3f071b82925426d36404f8d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0Ry9NJtJd3JZC7CsqwfsOBFwVtIpytrhu70bCrtMvjnzTirR08FxfPWx8PYawGtAKHf7dsHR7NLrQQJLWxbEOoJ2wiz3TWyV_op28BO6QZU9_2CvSDaA4jeCHjOLjqpjQGtNuzXFaeCBx6W_ODyyGPi96tLJYZjTHe8_EBO60AllrW4IU6xHPkSOKFf0ujykc-uYI5uolO0XlSwtpK7wxlT4VMMyP3RT8gdERL96VJZx4j0kj0LNYivHusl-_bh5uv1p-b2y8fP11e3je-0LI3qlRNd7wfXQ29QaTBSShhASe9l54OSBkG6LsBWDEbupOqlHjtd8WBG012yt-e5h7zcr0jFzpE8TpNLuKxkZS-V2Wltuor2Z9TnhShjsIcc5_qnFWBP2u3enrXbk3YLW1u119ibxw3rMOP4L_TXcwXenwGsf_6MmC35iMnjGDP6Yscl_n_Db8_Al04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425896683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rigamonti, L. ; Taelman, S.E. ; Huysveld, S. ; Sfez, S. ; Ragaert, K. ; Dewulf, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, L. ; Taelman, S.E. ; Huysveld, S. ; Sfez, S. ; Ragaert, K. ; Dewulf, J.</creatorcontrib><description>•A key aspect of LCAs on waste management is to account for the material recovery.•This paper is a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of materials.•Guidelines are formulated to calculate the substitutability coefficient.•Substitutability coefficients of 10 secondary materials are given.•The substitutability is calculated considering the technical functionality. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widespread tool used to guide decision-makers towards optimal strategic choices for sustainable growth. A key aspect of LCA studies of waste management systems where recycling activities are present is to account for resource recovery and the related substitution effects. Although multiple scientific papers assume a 1:1 substitution ratio between similar materials/products, this is often incorrect as the actual ratio is likely to vary. The focus of this paper is on the calculation of the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials based on technical characteristics. A state of the art literature review showed that many different calculation procedures were applied, which led to a wide variety of substitutability coefficients (sometimes provided under different terminology). In this perspective, the objective of this paper is to provide guidelines on the procedure to be followed to calculate the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials, based on technical characteristics. These guidelines are then applied to two waste management case studies, one dealing with bottom ashes from incineration and the other with plastic waste. In total, sixteen technical substitutability coefficients are given for ten secondary materials, based on state of the art and presented case studies. The paper thus represents a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management LCA studies. The guidelines presented may allow other case studies to enrich the list of coefficients, useful for all LCA practitioners in a harmonized way allowing a more correct evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with recycling activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32688065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Environment ; Incineration ; LCA ; Recycling ; Refuse Disposal ; Secondary resources ; Substitutability coefficient ; Substitution ; Waste Management</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2020-08, Vol.114, p.331-340</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-545a134cba4048e56082220b052cc23cf528e02a3f071b82925426d36404f8d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-545a134cba4048e56082220b052cc23cf528e02a3f071b82925426d36404f8d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1498-6785 ; 0000-0001-5468-9577 ; 0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32688065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, S.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysveld, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragaert, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, J.</creatorcontrib><title>A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•A key aspect of LCAs on waste management is to account for the material recovery.•This paper is a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of materials.•Guidelines are formulated to calculate the substitutability coefficient.•Substitutability coefficients of 10 secondary materials are given.•The substitutability is calculated considering the technical functionality. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widespread tool used to guide decision-makers towards optimal strategic choices for sustainable growth. A key aspect of LCA studies of waste management systems where recycling activities are present is to account for resource recovery and the related substitution effects. Although multiple scientific papers assume a 1:1 substitution ratio between similar materials/products, this is often incorrect as the actual ratio is likely to vary. The focus of this paper is on the calculation of the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials based on technical characteristics. A state of the art literature review showed that many different calculation procedures were applied, which led to a wide variety of substitutability coefficients (sometimes provided under different terminology). In this perspective, the objective of this paper is to provide guidelines on the procedure to be followed to calculate the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials, based on technical characteristics. These guidelines are then applied to two waste management case studies, one dealing with bottom ashes from incineration and the other with plastic waste. In total, sixteen technical substitutability coefficients are given for ten secondary materials, based on state of the art and presented case studies. The paper thus represents a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management LCA studies. The guidelines presented may allow other case studies to enrich the list of coefficients, useful for all LCA practitioners in a harmonized way allowing a more correct evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with recycling activities.</description><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Incineration</subject><subject>LCA</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Secondary resources</subject><subject>Substitutability coefficient</subject><subject>Substitution</subject><subject>Waste Management</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6D0Ry9NJtJd3JZC7CsqwfsOBFwVtIpytrhu70bCrtMvjnzTirR08FxfPWx8PYawGtAKHf7dsHR7NLrQQJLWxbEOoJ2wiz3TWyV_op28BO6QZU9_2CvSDaA4jeCHjOLjqpjQGtNuzXFaeCBx6W_ODyyGPi96tLJYZjTHe8_EBO60AllrW4IU6xHPkSOKFf0ujykc-uYI5uolO0XlSwtpK7wxlT4VMMyP3RT8gdERL96VJZx4j0kj0LNYivHusl-_bh5uv1p-b2y8fP11e3je-0LI3qlRNd7wfXQ29QaTBSShhASe9l54OSBkG6LsBWDEbupOqlHjtd8WBG012yt-e5h7zcr0jFzpE8TpNLuKxkZS-V2Wltuor2Z9TnhShjsIcc5_qnFWBP2u3enrXbk3YLW1u119ibxw3rMOP4L_TXcwXenwGsf_6MmC35iMnjGDP6Yscl_n_Db8_Al04</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Rigamonti, L.</creator><creator>Taelman, S.E.</creator><creator>Huysveld, S.</creator><creator>Sfez, S.</creator><creator>Ragaert, K.</creator><creator>Dewulf, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies</title><author>Rigamonti, L. ; Taelman, S.E. ; Huysveld, S. ; Sfez, S. ; Ragaert, K. ; Dewulf, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-545a134cba4048e56082220b052cc23cf528e02a3f071b82925426d36404f8d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Incineration</topic><topic>LCA</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Secondary resources</topic><topic>Substitutability coefficient</topic><topic>Substitution</topic><topic>Waste Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, S.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysveld, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragaert, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rigamonti, L.</au><au>Taelman, S.E.</au><au>Huysveld, S.</au><au>Sfez, S.</au><au>Ragaert, K.</au><au>Dewulf, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>331</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>331-340</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•A key aspect of LCAs on waste management is to account for the material recovery.•This paper is a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of materials.•Guidelines are formulated to calculate the substitutability coefficient.•Substitutability coefficients of 10 secondary materials are given.•The substitutability is calculated considering the technical functionality. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widespread tool used to guide decision-makers towards optimal strategic choices for sustainable growth. A key aspect of LCA studies of waste management systems where recycling activities are present is to account for resource recovery and the related substitution effects. Although multiple scientific papers assume a 1:1 substitution ratio between similar materials/products, this is often incorrect as the actual ratio is likely to vary. The focus of this paper is on the calculation of the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials based on technical characteristics. A state of the art literature review showed that many different calculation procedures were applied, which led to a wide variety of substitutability coefficients (sometimes provided under different terminology). In this perspective, the objective of this paper is to provide guidelines on the procedure to be followed to calculate the substitutability coefficient for secondary materials, based on technical characteristics. These guidelines are then applied to two waste management case studies, one dealing with bottom ashes from incineration and the other with plastic waste. In total, sixteen technical substitutability coefficients are given for ten secondary materials, based on state of the art and presented case studies. The paper thus represents a step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management LCA studies. The guidelines presented may allow other case studies to enrich the list of coefficients, useful for all LCA practitioners in a harmonized way allowing a more correct evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with recycling activities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32688065</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2020-08, Vol.114, p.331-340
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425896683
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Environment
Incineration
LCA
Recycling
Refuse Disposal
Secondary resources
Substitutability coefficient
Substitution
Waste Management
title A step forward in quantifying the substitutability of secondary materials in waste management life cycle assessment studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A05%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20step%20forward%20in%20quantifying%20the%20substitutability%20of%20secondary%20materials%20in%20waste%20management%20life%20cycle%20assessment%20studies&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Rigamonti,%20L.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=331-340&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2425896683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425896683&rft_id=info:pmid/32688065&rft_els_id=S0956053X20303810&rfr_iscdi=true