Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study
Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings. RCT. Adults (n=7,812) aged 50–75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural hea...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of preventive medicine 2020-09, Vol.59 (3), p.404-411 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 411 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 404 |
| container_title | American journal of preventive medicine |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Hirko, Kelly A. Lennon, Sue A. Lucas, Todd Miller, David C. Jimbo, Masahito Leibfritz, Stephanie J. Knoff, Suzanne J. Janney, Carol A. Berg, Paul D. |
| description | Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings.
RCT.
Adults (n=7,812) aged 50–75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018.
A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits.
Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record.
Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425592736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379720301768</els_id><sourcerecordid>2447573070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-dcb35e12250024ea230abeff8a3039209ece9488c52f64fe5a085e3d25def70d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8FL15ap0nTtB6EZfFjYUHY1XPIJlPJ0o81aYX115tSTx48Dcw87zDzEHKdQpJCmt_tE9XgwWFCgUICLIG0PCGztBAspjmIUzIDkZUxE6U4Jxfe7wFAFGk5I-tVc3Ddl20_omVXdw51r-poqVqNLtpqh9iOM9tGKtoMLsy22PehdR8too1qTdfYbzTRth_M8ZKcVar2ePVb5-T96fFt-RKvX59Xy8U61iwXfWz0jnFMKeUANENFGagdVlWhGLCSQokay6woNKdVnlXIFRQcmaHcYCXAsDm5nfaG0z8H9L1srNdY16rFbvCSZpTzkgqWB_TmD7rvBteG6wKVCS4YCAhUNlHadd47rOTB2Ua5o0xBjorlXk6K5ahYApNBcYg9TDEMz35ZdNJri0GdsaNIaTr7_4IfmM2FYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447573070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hirko, Kelly A. ; Lennon, Sue A. ; Lucas, Todd ; Miller, David C. ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Leibfritz, Stephanie J. ; Knoff, Suzanne J. ; Janney, Carol A. ; Berg, Paul D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirko, Kelly A. ; Lennon, Sue A. ; Lucas, Todd ; Miller, David C. ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Leibfritz, Stephanie J. ; Knoff, Suzanne J. ; Janney, Carol A. ; Berg, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><description>Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings.
RCT.
Adults (n=7,812) aged 50–75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018.
A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits.
Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record.
Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p<0.001). Individuals randomized to the intervention group had 49% higher odds of being screened over follow-up than those randomized to the control group (OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.34, 1.65). A total of 13.2 screening invitations were needed to accomplish 1 additional screening over the usual care. Of the 233 fecal immunochemical test kits mailed to participants, 154 (66.1%) were returned, and 18 (11.7%) tested positive.
A mailed motivational messaging letter with a low-cost screening alternative increased colorectal cancer screening in this largely rural community with generally poor adherence to screening recommendations. Mailed colorectal cancer screening reminders using motivational messaging may be an effective method for increasing screening and reducing rural colorectal cancer disparities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affordability ; Colorectal cancer ; Intervention ; Medical screening ; Reminders ; Rural areas ; Rural communities</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2020-09, Vol.59 (3), p.404-411</ispartof><rights>2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-dcb35e12250024ea230abeff8a3039209ece9488c52f64fe5a085e3d25def70d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-dcb35e12250024ea230abeff8a3039209ece9488c52f64fe5a085e3d25def70d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0050-655X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirko, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Sue A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibfritz, Stephanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoff, Suzanne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janney, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><description>Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings.
RCT.
Adults (n=7,812) aged 50–75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018.
A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits.
Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record.
Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p<0.001). Individuals randomized to the intervention group had 49% higher odds of being screened over follow-up than those randomized to the control group (OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.34, 1.65). A total of 13.2 screening invitations were needed to accomplish 1 additional screening over the usual care. Of the 233 fecal immunochemical test kits mailed to participants, 154 (66.1%) were returned, and 18 (11.7%) tested positive.
A mailed motivational messaging letter with a low-cost screening alternative increased colorectal cancer screening in this largely rural community with generally poor adherence to screening recommendations. Mailed colorectal cancer screening reminders using motivational messaging may be an effective method for increasing screening and reducing rural colorectal cancer disparities.</description><subject>Affordability</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Reminders</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8FL15ap0nTtB6EZfFjYUHY1XPIJlPJ0o81aYX115tSTx48Dcw87zDzEHKdQpJCmt_tE9XgwWFCgUICLIG0PCGztBAspjmIUzIDkZUxE6U4Jxfe7wFAFGk5I-tVc3Ddl20_omVXdw51r-poqVqNLtpqh9iOM9tGKtoMLsy22PehdR8too1qTdfYbzTRth_M8ZKcVar2ePVb5-T96fFt-RKvX59Xy8U61iwXfWz0jnFMKeUANENFGagdVlWhGLCSQokay6woNKdVnlXIFRQcmaHcYCXAsDm5nfaG0z8H9L1srNdY16rFbvCSZpTzkgqWB_TmD7rvBteG6wKVCS4YCAhUNlHadd47rOTB2Ua5o0xBjorlXk6K5ahYApNBcYg9TDEMz35ZdNJri0GdsaNIaTr7_4IfmM2FYQ</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Hirko, Kelly A.</creator><creator>Lennon, Sue A.</creator><creator>Lucas, Todd</creator><creator>Miller, David C.</creator><creator>Jimbo, Masahito</creator><creator>Leibfritz, Stephanie J.</creator><creator>Knoff, Suzanne J.</creator><creator>Janney, Carol A.</creator><creator>Berg, Paul D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-655X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study</title><author>Hirko, Kelly A. ; Lennon, Sue A. ; Lucas, Todd ; Miller, David C. ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Leibfritz, Stephanie J. ; Knoff, Suzanne J. ; Janney, Carol A. ; Berg, Paul D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-dcb35e12250024ea230abeff8a3039209ece9488c52f64fe5a085e3d25def70d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Affordability</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Reminders</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirko, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Sue A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibfritz, Stephanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoff, Suzanne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janney, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirko, Kelly A.</au><au>Lennon, Sue A.</au><au>Lucas, Todd</au><au>Miller, David C.</au><au>Jimbo, Masahito</au><au>Leibfritz, Stephanie J.</au><au>Knoff, Suzanne J.</au><au>Janney, Carol A.</au><au>Berg, Paul D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>404-411</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to prevent or detect early colorectal cancer and reduce mortality; yet, adherence to screening recommendations remains low, particularly in rural settings.
RCT.
Adults (n=7,812) aged 50–75 years and due for colorectal cancer screening in a largely rural health system were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=3,906) or the control (n=3,906) group in September 2016, with analysis following through 2018.
A mailed motivational messaging screening reminder letter with an option to call and request a free at-home fecal immunochemical screening test (intervention) or the standard invitation letter detailing that the individual was due for screening (control). Multifaceted motivational messaging emphasized colorectal cancer preventability and the ease and affordability of screening, and communicated a limited supply of test kits.
Colorectal cancer screening participation within 6 months after mailed invitation was ascertained from the electronic medical record.
Colorectal cancer screening participation was significantly improved in the intervention (30.1%) vs the usual care control group (22.5%; p<0.001). Individuals randomized to the intervention group had 49% higher odds of being screened over follow-up than those randomized to the control group (OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.34, 1.65). A total of 13.2 screening invitations were needed to accomplish 1 additional screening over the usual care. Of the 233 fecal immunochemical test kits mailed to participants, 154 (66.1%) were returned, and 18 (11.7%) tested positive.
A mailed motivational messaging letter with a low-cost screening alternative increased colorectal cancer screening in this largely rural community with generally poor adherence to screening recommendations. Mailed colorectal cancer screening reminders using motivational messaging may be an effective method for increasing screening and reducing rural colorectal cancer disparities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-655X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0749-3797 |
| ispartof | American journal of preventive medicine, 2020-09, Vol.59 (3), p.404-411 |
| issn | 0749-3797 1873-2607 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2425592736 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Affordability Colorectal cancer Intervention Medical screening Reminders Rural areas Rural communities |
| title | Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Setting: A Randomized Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening%20in%20a%20Rural%20Setting:%20A%20Randomized%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Hirko,%20Kelly%20A.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=404-411&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447573070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447573070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0749379720301768&rfr_iscdi=true |