Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera)
Olfaction is a key sensory modality for many arthropods and could be used as a tool in pest management through manipulation of pest behavior. Management of Varroa destructor , important parasitic mites of honey bees, could be improved through better understanding of the chemical ecology of this host...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental & applied acarology 2020-08, Vol.81 (4), p.515-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 515 |
container_title | Experimental & applied acarology |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Light, Michael Shutler, Dave Cutler, G. Christopher Hillier, N. Kirk |
description | Olfaction is a key sensory modality for many arthropods and could be used as a tool in pest management through manipulation of pest behavior. Management of
Varroa destructor
, important parasitic mites of honey bees, could be improved through better understanding of the chemical ecology of this host-parasite relationship. We refined techniques of mounting mites to obtain electrophysiological recordings (electrotarsograms) of their responses to synthetic odor stimuli. Results of 271 electrotarsogram recordings from
V. destructor
revealed responses to 10 odorants relative to solvent controls. Electrotarsogram responses to methyl palmitate, ethyl palmitate, and 2-heptanol were highest at the lowest stimulus loading (10 ng) we tested, suggesting that
V. destructor
may have acute sensitivity to low concentrations of some odors. Results suggest that odorant origin (e.g., methyl oleate from honey bee larvae, geraniol from adult honey bee alarm pheromone, and α-terpineol, a plant secondary metabolite) can influence the degree of electrophysiological response.
Varroa destructor
tended to be more responsive to known attractants and repellents relative to previously unexplored odorants and some repellent terpenes. Electrotarsograms offer the potential for screening odors to determine their importance in
V. destructor
host detection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2424447690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424447690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2a2671332a8726ef162b11a6b87654f1a9071186cf92ee39be12bccefbd543003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpoNukf6AnQS9biNORZMv2cVmSJhDopclVyNpx4mXXcme0BN_y06t0A4EecprL9x5v3hPiq4ILBVD_YAVlawrQUABUuirmD2KhqloXbQ36o1iAsk3RKKs_ic_MW8gU2Gohni93GBLF5InjA_m9JOQpjowsU5Q8j-kR0xBk3ETyY2LZzfLeE0UvN8iJDiFFOpdeTjTsPc1y8uR5SChjL58ygTTKxzjiLDvMpsvVNLDc42439Ej--5k46f2O8cvrPRV3V5e_19fF7a-fN-vVbRFMpVOhvba1Mkb7ptYW-_xJp5S3XVPbquyVb6FWqrGhbzWiaTtUugsB-25TlQbAnIrl0Xei-OeQc7n9wCHH8CPGAztd6rIsa9u-oN_-Q7fxQGNOlymT6zUltJnSRypQZCbs3WsDToF7GcUdR3F5FPdvFDdnkTmKOMPjA9Kb9Tuqv_f-kWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430523409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera)</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Light, Michael ; Shutler, Dave ; Cutler, G. Christopher ; Hillier, N. Kirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Light, Michael ; Shutler, Dave ; Cutler, G. Christopher ; Hillier, N. Kirk</creatorcontrib><description>Olfaction is a key sensory modality for many arthropods and could be used as a tool in pest management through manipulation of pest behavior. Management of
Varroa destructor
, important parasitic mites of honey bees, could be improved through better understanding of the chemical ecology of this host-parasite relationship. We refined techniques of mounting mites to obtain electrophysiological recordings (electrotarsograms) of their responses to synthetic odor stimuli. Results of 271 electrotarsogram recordings from
V. destructor
revealed responses to 10 odorants relative to solvent controls. Electrotarsogram responses to methyl palmitate, ethyl palmitate, and 2-heptanol were highest at the lowest stimulus loading (10 ng) we tested, suggesting that
V. destructor
may have acute sensitivity to low concentrations of some odors. Results suggest that odorant origin (e.g., methyl oleate from honey bee larvae, geraniol from adult honey bee alarm pheromone, and α-terpineol, a plant secondary metabolite) can influence the degree of electrophysiological response.
Varroa destructor
tended to be more responsive to known attractants and repellents relative to previously unexplored odorants and some repellent terpenes. Electrotarsograms offer the potential for screening odors to determine their importance in
V. destructor
host detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Alarm pheromone ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Apis mellifera ; Aroma compounds ; Arthropods ; Attractants ; Bees ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemical ecology ; Ectoparasites ; Entomology ; Honey ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Low concentrations ; Metabolites ; Mites ; Odorants ; Odors ; Olfaction ; Palmitic acid ; Pest control ; Pests ; Repellents ; Sensory evaluation ; Terpenes ; Terpineol ; Varroa destructor</subject><ispartof>Experimental & applied acarology, 2020-08, Vol.81 (4), p.515-530</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2a2671332a8726ef162b11a6b87654f1a9071186cf92ee39be12bccefbd543003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2a2671332a8726ef162b11a6b87654f1a9071186cf92ee39be12bccefbd543003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1836-8981</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Light, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillier, N. Kirk</creatorcontrib><title>Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera)</title><title>Experimental & applied acarology</title><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><description>Olfaction is a key sensory modality for many arthropods and could be used as a tool in pest management through manipulation of pest behavior. Management of
Varroa destructor
, important parasitic mites of honey bees, could be improved through better understanding of the chemical ecology of this host-parasite relationship. We refined techniques of mounting mites to obtain electrophysiological recordings (electrotarsograms) of their responses to synthetic odor stimuli. Results of 271 electrotarsogram recordings from
V. destructor
revealed responses to 10 odorants relative to solvent controls. Electrotarsogram responses to methyl palmitate, ethyl palmitate, and 2-heptanol were highest at the lowest stimulus loading (10 ng) we tested, suggesting that
V. destructor
may have acute sensitivity to low concentrations of some odors. Results suggest that odorant origin (e.g., methyl oleate from honey bee larvae, geraniol from adult honey bee alarm pheromone, and α-terpineol, a plant secondary metabolite) can influence the degree of electrophysiological response.
Varroa destructor
tended to be more responsive to known attractants and repellents relative to previously unexplored odorants and some repellent terpenes. Electrotarsograms offer the potential for screening odors to determine their importance in
V. destructor
host detection.</description><subject>Alarm pheromone</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Aroma compounds</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Attractants</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical ecology</subject><subject>Ectoparasites</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Low concentrations</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Olfaction</subject><subject>Palmitic acid</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Repellents</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Terpineol</subject><subject>Varroa destructor</subject><issn>0168-8162</issn><issn>1572-9702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpoNukf6AnQS9biNORZMv2cVmSJhDopclVyNpx4mXXcme0BN_y06t0A4EecprL9x5v3hPiq4ILBVD_YAVlawrQUABUuirmD2KhqloXbQ36o1iAsk3RKKs_ic_MW8gU2Gohni93GBLF5InjA_m9JOQpjowsU5Q8j-kR0xBk3ETyY2LZzfLeE0UvN8iJDiFFOpdeTjTsPc1y8uR5SChjL58ygTTKxzjiLDvMpsvVNLDc42439Ej--5k46f2O8cvrPRV3V5e_19fF7a-fN-vVbRFMpVOhvba1Mkb7ptYW-_xJp5S3XVPbquyVb6FWqrGhbzWiaTtUugsB-25TlQbAnIrl0Xei-OeQc7n9wCHH8CPGAztd6rIsa9u-oN_-Q7fxQGNOlymT6zUltJnSRypQZCbs3WsDToF7GcUdR3F5FPdvFDdnkTmKOMPjA9Kb9Tuqv_f-kWE</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Light, Michael</creator><creator>Shutler, Dave</creator><creator>Cutler, G. Christopher</creator><creator>Hillier, N. Kirk</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1836-8981</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera)</title><author>Light, Michael ; Shutler, Dave ; Cutler, G. Christopher ; Hillier, N. Kirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-2a2671332a8726ef162b11a6b87654f1a9071186cf92ee39be12bccefbd543003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alarm pheromone</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Aroma compounds</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Attractants</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical ecology</topic><topic>Ectoparasites</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Low concentrations</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Olfaction</topic><topic>Palmitic acid</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Repellents</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Terpineol</topic><topic>Varroa destructor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Light, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, G. Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillier, N. Kirk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Light, Michael</au><au>Shutler, Dave</au><au>Cutler, G. Christopher</au><au>Hillier, N. Kirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera)</atitle><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle><stitle>Exp Appl Acarol</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>515-530</pages><issn>0168-8162</issn><eissn>1572-9702</eissn><abstract>Olfaction is a key sensory modality for many arthropods and could be used as a tool in pest management through manipulation of pest behavior. Management of
Varroa destructor
, important parasitic mites of honey bees, could be improved through better understanding of the chemical ecology of this host-parasite relationship. We refined techniques of mounting mites to obtain electrophysiological recordings (electrotarsograms) of their responses to synthetic odor stimuli. Results of 271 electrotarsogram recordings from
V. destructor
revealed responses to 10 odorants relative to solvent controls. Electrotarsogram responses to methyl palmitate, ethyl palmitate, and 2-heptanol were highest at the lowest stimulus loading (10 ng) we tested, suggesting that
V. destructor
may have acute sensitivity to low concentrations of some odors. Results suggest that odorant origin (e.g., methyl oleate from honey bee larvae, geraniol from adult honey bee alarm pheromone, and α-terpineol, a plant secondary metabolite) can influence the degree of electrophysiological response.
Varroa destructor
tended to be more responsive to known attractants and repellents relative to previously unexplored odorants and some repellent terpenes. Electrotarsograms offer the potential for screening odors to determine their importance in
V. destructor
host detection.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1836-8981</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8162 |
ispartof | Experimental & applied acarology, 2020-08, Vol.81 (4), p.515-530 |
issn | 0168-8162 1572-9702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2424447690 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Alarm pheromone Animal Ecology Animal Genetics and Genomics Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Apis mellifera Aroma compounds Arthropods Attractants Bees Biomedical and Life Sciences Chemical ecology Ectoparasites Entomology Honey Larvae Life Sciences Low concentrations Metabolites Mites Odorants Odors Olfaction Palmitic acid Pest control Pests Repellents Sensory evaluation Terpenes Terpineol Varroa destructor |
title | Electrotarsogram responses to synthetic odorants by Varroa destructor, a primary parasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A27%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrotarsogram%20responses%20to%20synthetic%20odorants%20by%20Varroa%20destructor,%20a%20primary%20parasite%20of%20western%20honey%20bees%20(Apis%20mellifera)&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20&%20applied%20acarology&rft.au=Light,%20Michael&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=515-530&rft.issn=0168-8162&rft.eissn=1572-9702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10493-020-00525-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424447690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430523409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |