Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep

Background and objectives The possibility of manipulating the immune response in lambs to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis to reduce production losses associated with infection was investigated. In a series of four experiments, attempts to immunize sheep via the mucosal r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parasite immunology 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.e12776-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Lundberg, Sara S., McNeilly, Tom N., McAnulty, Robin W., Greer, Andrew W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page e12776
container_title Parasite immunology
container_volume 42
creator Lundberg, Sara S.
McNeilly, Tom N.
McAnulty, Robin W.
Greer, Andrew W.
description Background and objectives The possibility of manipulating the immune response in lambs to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis to reduce production losses associated with infection was investigated. In a series of four experiments, attempts to immunize sheep via the mucosal route to modify the immune response and induce mucosal tolerance are outlined. Initially, a proof of concept study was conducted with lambs being injected with multiple doses of a somatic T colubriformis antigen without an adjuvant in the rectal submucosa and subsequently challenged with T colubriformis L3 larvae. This was followed by a dose‐response study comparing different antigen doses to identify the optimum dose of the nematode antigen for successful induction of mucosal tolerance. The final two studies were conducted to determine the larval stage specificity of the parasite antigen and the most suitable site of delivery required to stimulate mucosal tolerance. Methods In the proof of concept study, lambs either received repeated injections in the rectal submucosa at 3 × weekly intervals with 15 µg of L3, 11 µg of L4 and 21 µg of immature adult (L5) somatic T colubriformis antigens (ANT) or not (INF) prior to infection with T colubriformis. In the dose‐rate study, antigen dose rates of 100%, 50%, 10%, 1% or 0% of the antigen concentration used in the proof of concept study were compared while the larval stage study compared antigen from either L3, L4, L5 stages or combination of all (COMB) and the route of administration study compared antigen delivery into either the rectal submucosa (RE) or sub‐cutaneous injection (SC). Results During infection, lamb growth was improved by antigen treatment between days 21 and 42 in the proof of concept study (P = .009), for groups 10%, 50% and 100% in the dose‐rate study (P  .05 for all). Parasite‐specific IgA and IgE showed a dose‐response (the dose‐rate study), were not affected by larval stage (the larval stage study) and were greater in RE than SC (the route of administration study). IL‐4 production following lymphocyte stimulation was greatest in COMB (the larval stage study) and RE (the route of administration study). Conclusions Although antigen treatment improved performance, this was inconsistent and appeared to stimulate immunity rather than
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pim.12776
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2424444451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424444451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-dde9abf81ecdf1f763a53901bb9a5ab46f43ba20dbc6df887d5b84c1d502ab9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u_AMScKOLtPPITJJlKb6gokJdh3nalCQTZxKk_95pU10I3s09cL97OBwALhGcojCztqynCKcpOwJjRBiNCcTJMRhDlKA4z0g2AmfebyBEBDNyCkZhpZhQOgZv867Tddv5qLNR2ahe6qAq7XizV9HKlXJtfeds87Gteh9JW_XClca6uvThxWjZlbYJKvJrrdtzcGJ45fXFYU_A-_3davEYL18enhbzZSwxy1islM65MBnSUhlkUkY4JTlEQuSccpEwkxDBMVRCMmWyLFVUZIlEikLMRS7JBNwMvq2zn732XRHySF1VvNG29wVOcLIbigJ6_Qfd2N41IV2gwp0mDO2o24GSznrvtClaV9bcbQsEi13PRei52Pcc2KuDYy9qrX7Jn2IDMBuAr7LS2_-diten58HyGwTgiIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451354611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Lundberg, Sara S. ; McNeilly, Tom N. ; McAnulty, Robin W. ; Greer, Andrew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Sara S. ; McNeilly, Tom N. ; McAnulty, Robin W. ; Greer, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectives The possibility of manipulating the immune response in lambs to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis to reduce production losses associated with infection was investigated. In a series of four experiments, attempts to immunize sheep via the mucosal route to modify the immune response and induce mucosal tolerance are outlined. Initially, a proof of concept study was conducted with lambs being injected with multiple doses of a somatic T colubriformis antigen without an adjuvant in the rectal submucosa and subsequently challenged with T colubriformis L3 larvae. This was followed by a dose‐response study comparing different antigen doses to identify the optimum dose of the nematode antigen for successful induction of mucosal tolerance. The final two studies were conducted to determine the larval stage specificity of the parasite antigen and the most suitable site of delivery required to stimulate mucosal tolerance. Methods In the proof of concept study, lambs either received repeated injections in the rectal submucosa at 3 × weekly intervals with 15 µg of L3, 11 µg of L4 and 21 µg of immature adult (L5) somatic T colubriformis antigens (ANT) or not (INF) prior to infection with T colubriformis. In the dose‐rate study, antigen dose rates of 100%, 50%, 10%, 1% or 0% of the antigen concentration used in the proof of concept study were compared while the larval stage study compared antigen from either L3, L4, L5 stages or combination of all (COMB) and the route of administration study compared antigen delivery into either the rectal submucosa (RE) or sub‐cutaneous injection (SC). Results During infection, lamb growth was improved by antigen treatment between days 21 and 42 in the proof of concept study (P = .009), for groups 10%, 50% and 100% in the dose‐rate study (P &lt; .05 for all) and in RE in the route of administration study with no improvement observed in the larval stage study. No differences in faecal egg counts were observed (P &gt; .05 for all). Parasite‐specific IgA and IgE showed a dose‐response (the dose‐rate study), were not affected by larval stage (the larval stage study) and were greater in RE than SC (the route of administration study). IL‐4 production following lymphocyte stimulation was greatest in COMB (the larval stage study) and RE (the route of administration study). Conclusions Although antigen treatment improved performance, this was inconsistent and appeared to stimulate immunity rather than induce tolerance. Combined larval stages were more efficient than individual stages, and intra‐rectal administration was more effective than sub‐cutaneous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-9838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pim.12776</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32672355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Helminth - blood ; antigen ; Antigens ; Antigens, Helminth - administration &amp; dosage ; Antigens, Helminth - immunology ; Desensitization, Immunologic ; desensitizing ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology ; Immune response ; Immunity ; Immunization - veterinary ; Immunoglobulin A ; Immunoglobulin E ; Immunological tolerance ; Infections ; Intestinal parasites ; Larva ; Lymphocyte Activation ; Lymphocytes ; Male ; Mucosal immunity ; nematoda ; Rectum ; Sheep ; Sheep Diseases - immunology ; Sheep Diseases - parasitology ; tolerance ; Trichostrongylosis - immunology ; Trichostrongylosis - parasitology ; Trichostrongylosis - veterinary ; Trichostrongylus - immunology ; Trichostrongylus colubriformis</subject><ispartof>Parasite immunology, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.e12776-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-dde9abf81ecdf1f763a53901bb9a5ab46f43ba20dbc6df887d5b84c1d502ab9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-dde9abf81ecdf1f763a53901bb9a5ab46f43ba20dbc6df887d5b84c1d502ab9c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7302-8392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpim.12776$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpim.12776$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Sara S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeilly, Tom N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAnulty, Robin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep</title><title>Parasite immunology</title><addtitle>Parasite Immunol</addtitle><description>Background and objectives The possibility of manipulating the immune response in lambs to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis to reduce production losses associated with infection was investigated. In a series of four experiments, attempts to immunize sheep via the mucosal route to modify the immune response and induce mucosal tolerance are outlined. Initially, a proof of concept study was conducted with lambs being injected with multiple doses of a somatic T colubriformis antigen without an adjuvant in the rectal submucosa and subsequently challenged with T colubriformis L3 larvae. This was followed by a dose‐response study comparing different antigen doses to identify the optimum dose of the nematode antigen for successful induction of mucosal tolerance. The final two studies were conducted to determine the larval stage specificity of the parasite antigen and the most suitable site of delivery required to stimulate mucosal tolerance. Methods In the proof of concept study, lambs either received repeated injections in the rectal submucosa at 3 × weekly intervals with 15 µg of L3, 11 µg of L4 and 21 µg of immature adult (L5) somatic T colubriformis antigens (ANT) or not (INF) prior to infection with T colubriformis. In the dose‐rate study, antigen dose rates of 100%, 50%, 10%, 1% or 0% of the antigen concentration used in the proof of concept study were compared while the larval stage study compared antigen from either L3, L4, L5 stages or combination of all (COMB) and the route of administration study compared antigen delivery into either the rectal submucosa (RE) or sub‐cutaneous injection (SC). Results During infection, lamb growth was improved by antigen treatment between days 21 and 42 in the proof of concept study (P = .009), for groups 10%, 50% and 100% in the dose‐rate study (P &lt; .05 for all) and in RE in the route of administration study with no improvement observed in the larval stage study. No differences in faecal egg counts were observed (P &gt; .05 for all). Parasite‐specific IgA and IgE showed a dose‐response (the dose‐rate study), were not affected by larval stage (the larval stage study) and were greater in RE than SC (the route of administration study). IL‐4 production following lymphocyte stimulation was greatest in COMB (the larval stage study) and RE (the route of administration study). Conclusions Although antigen treatment improved performance, this was inconsistent and appeared to stimulate immunity rather than induce tolerance. Combined larval stages were more efficient than individual stages, and intra‐rectal administration was more effective than sub‐cutaneous.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</subject><subject>antigen</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth - immunology</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic</subject><subject>desensitizing</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunization - veterinary</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin A</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E</subject><subject>Immunological tolerance</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intestinal parasites</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mucosal immunity</subject><subject>nematoda</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><subject>Trichostrongylosis - immunology</subject><subject>Trichostrongylosis - parasitology</subject><subject>Trichostrongylosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Trichostrongylus - immunology</subject><subject>Trichostrongylus colubriformis</subject><issn>0141-9838</issn><issn>1365-3024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u_AMScKOLtPPITJJlKb6gokJdh3nalCQTZxKk_95pU10I3s09cL97OBwALhGcojCztqynCKcpOwJjRBiNCcTJMRhDlKA4z0g2AmfebyBEBDNyCkZhpZhQOgZv867Tddv5qLNR2ahe6qAq7XizV9HKlXJtfeds87Gteh9JW_XClca6uvThxWjZlbYJKvJrrdtzcGJ45fXFYU_A-_3davEYL18enhbzZSwxy1islM65MBnSUhlkUkY4JTlEQuSccpEwkxDBMVRCMmWyLFVUZIlEikLMRS7JBNwMvq2zn732XRHySF1VvNG29wVOcLIbigJ6_Qfd2N41IV2gwp0mDO2o24GSznrvtClaV9bcbQsEi13PRei52Pcc2KuDYy9qrX7Jn2IDMBuAr7LS2_-diten58HyGwTgiIw</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Lundberg, Sara S.</creator><creator>McNeilly, Tom N.</creator><creator>McAnulty, Robin W.</creator><creator>Greer, Andrew W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-8392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep</title><author>Lundberg, Sara S. ; McNeilly, Tom N. ; McAnulty, Robin W. ; Greer, Andrew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-dde9abf81ecdf1f763a53901bb9a5ab46f43ba20dbc6df887d5b84c1d502ab9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</topic><topic>antigen</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth - immunology</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic</topic><topic>desensitizing</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunization - veterinary</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin A</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E</topic><topic>Immunological tolerance</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intestinal parasites</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mucosal immunity</topic><topic>nematoda</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>Trichostrongylosis - immunology</topic><topic>Trichostrongylosis - parasitology</topic><topic>Trichostrongylosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Trichostrongylus - immunology</topic><topic>Trichostrongylus colubriformis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Sara S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeilly, Tom N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAnulty, Robin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parasite immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lundberg, Sara S.</au><au>McNeilly, Tom N.</au><au>McAnulty, Robin W.</au><au>Greer, Andrew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep</atitle><jtitle>Parasite immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Parasite Immunol</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e12776</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12776-n/a</pages><issn>0141-9838</issn><eissn>1365-3024</eissn><abstract>Background and objectives The possibility of manipulating the immune response in lambs to the gastrointestinal nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis to reduce production losses associated with infection was investigated. In a series of four experiments, attempts to immunize sheep via the mucosal route to modify the immune response and induce mucosal tolerance are outlined. Initially, a proof of concept study was conducted with lambs being injected with multiple doses of a somatic T colubriformis antigen without an adjuvant in the rectal submucosa and subsequently challenged with T colubriformis L3 larvae. This was followed by a dose‐response study comparing different antigen doses to identify the optimum dose of the nematode antigen for successful induction of mucosal tolerance. The final two studies were conducted to determine the larval stage specificity of the parasite antigen and the most suitable site of delivery required to stimulate mucosal tolerance. Methods In the proof of concept study, lambs either received repeated injections in the rectal submucosa at 3 × weekly intervals with 15 µg of L3, 11 µg of L4 and 21 µg of immature adult (L5) somatic T colubriformis antigens (ANT) or not (INF) prior to infection with T colubriformis. In the dose‐rate study, antigen dose rates of 100%, 50%, 10%, 1% or 0% of the antigen concentration used in the proof of concept study were compared while the larval stage study compared antigen from either L3, L4, L5 stages or combination of all (COMB) and the route of administration study compared antigen delivery into either the rectal submucosa (RE) or sub‐cutaneous injection (SC). Results During infection, lamb growth was improved by antigen treatment between days 21 and 42 in the proof of concept study (P = .009), for groups 10%, 50% and 100% in the dose‐rate study (P &lt; .05 for all) and in RE in the route of administration study with no improvement observed in the larval stage study. No differences in faecal egg counts were observed (P &gt; .05 for all). Parasite‐specific IgA and IgE showed a dose‐response (the dose‐rate study), were not affected by larval stage (the larval stage study) and were greater in RE than SC (the route of administration study). IL‐4 production following lymphocyte stimulation was greatest in COMB (the larval stage study) and RE (the route of administration study). Conclusions Although antigen treatment improved performance, this was inconsistent and appeared to stimulate immunity rather than induce tolerance. Combined larval stages were more efficient than individual stages, and intra‐rectal administration was more effective than sub‐cutaneous.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32672355</pmid><doi>10.1111/pim.12776</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-8392</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-9838
ispartof Parasite immunology, 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.e12776-n/a
issn 0141-9838
1365-3024
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2424444451
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Helminth - blood
antigen
Antigens
Antigens, Helminth - administration & dosage
Antigens, Helminth - immunology
Desensitization, Immunologic
desensitizing
Feces - parasitology
Female
Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology
Immune response
Immunity
Immunization - veterinary
Immunoglobulin A
Immunoglobulin E
Immunological tolerance
Infections
Intestinal parasites
Larva
Lymphocyte Activation
Lymphocytes
Male
Mucosal immunity
nematoda
Rectum
Sheep
Sheep Diseases - immunology
Sheep Diseases - parasitology
tolerance
Trichostrongylosis - immunology
Trichostrongylosis - parasitology
Trichostrongylosis - veterinary
Trichostrongylus - immunology
Trichostrongylus colubriformis
title Attempts to induce tolerance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attempts%20to%20induce%20tolerance%20to%20Trichostrongylus%20colubriformis%20infection%20in%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Parasite%20immunology&rft.au=Lundberg,%20Sara%20S.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e12776&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12776-n/a&rft.issn=0141-9838&rft.eissn=1365-3024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pim.12776&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424444451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451354611&rft_id=info:pmid/32672355&rfr_iscdi=true