Oxygen Surface Exchange and Tracer Diffusion in Differently Oriented Thin Films of Gd-Doped CeO2

The exchange of 18O between gaseous molecular oxygen and thin-film samples of Ce0.99Gd0.01O1.995 with two different, nominal surface orientations [(111) and (110)] was studied. Oxygen isotope exchange experiments were conducted in the temperature range of 573 ≤ T/K ≤ 673 at an oxygen activity of aO2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS applied materials & interfaces 2020-08, Vol.12 (32), p.36768-36777
Hauptverfasser: Waldow, Stephan P, Statham, Benjamin J, Wardenga, Hans F, Weirich, Thomas E, Klein, Andreas, De Souza, Roger A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The exchange of 18O between gaseous molecular oxygen and thin-film samples of Ce0.99Gd0.01O1.995 with two different, nominal surface orientations [(111) and (110)] was studied. Oxygen isotope exchange experiments were conducted in the temperature range of 573 ≤ T/K ≤ 673 at an oxygen activity of aO2 = 0.2. Subsequently, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements were performed on the thin-film samples to obtain 18O isotope depth profiles. All 18O diffusion profiles showed two features, suggesting spatially nonuniform oxygen tracer diffusion coefficients in the samples. A numerical solution to the diffusion equation was used to describe the experimental profiles and yielded oxygen tracer diffusion coefficients D* and oxygen surface exchange coefficients k*. Values of D* obtained were found, surprisingly, to be different for the two orientations and also orders of magnitude lower than values for ceramic samples in this temperature range. As possible explanations, we examine quantitatively the effect of halide anion impurities and the effect of ultrasmall columnar grains on oxygen tracer diffusion. Surface exchange coefficients for the (111) oriented surface were found to be roughly 1 order of magnitude higher than those for (110). We discuss two possible explanations for the observed behavior: the enrichment of anion impurities at the surface and the interaction between the surface and vapor water in the gas phase.
ISSN:1944-8244
1944-8252
DOI:10.1021/acsami.0c09605