Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort
Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five ye...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical pharmacology 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1120 |
container_title | British journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Rouyer, Magali François, Eric Sa Cunha, Antonio Monnereau, Alain Bignon, Emmanuelle Jové, Jérémy Lassalle, Régis Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile Moore, Nicholas Noize, Pernelle Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie Smith, Denis |
description | Aims
Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods
EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression.
Results
A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients.
Conclusions
BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bcp.14472 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2423514378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423514378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OGzEQh60K1IS0h74AmiM9bFjb8Tockyj8kZBAoZxXXu-4cbW7Tm1v29x4BG68H0-CQ6A35jKH-eY7_H6EfKP5mKY5rfRmTCcTyT6RIeWFyBhl4oAMc54XmWCCDshRCL_ynHJaiM9kwFkhiqmQQ_K0NAZ1tH-wwxDAGTDWh_j88NjYDkFj7P_ZVlVgO_hrmzod4naDsJrdQYtRhaii1aBd43zyqAa06jR6UFo7X9vuJ0QHsW9d72G-mp1D2-9eXAe71z6A8a6FuEZYrpbz-7ukWjsfv5BDo5qAX9_2iNyfL38sLrPrm4urxew600wKllW8oFLWnClEjsZwrJnMOfIzUaAQU6SSK2pqWtXTnEstdcXlmTFSCMk0Mj4iJ3vvxrvfPYZYtjZobBrVoetDySaMCzrhcprQ73tUexeCR1NufIrGb0ual7seytRD-dpDYo_ftH3VYv2ffA8-Aad7IIWK249N5Xxxu1e-AMX-ldI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423514378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods
EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression.
Results
A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients.
Conclusions
BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32656857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>anticancer drugs ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; cancer ; Cetuximab - therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; genotyping ; Humans ; Male ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; pharmacoepidemiology ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Pharmacological Society</rights><rights>2020 The British Pharmacological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1212-2817 ; 0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbcp.14472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbcp.14472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnereau, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jové, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassalle, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noize, Pernelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><title>British journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Aims
Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods
EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression.
Results
A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients.
Conclusions
BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</description><subject>anticancer drugs</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cetuximab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><issn>0306-5251</issn><issn>1365-2125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9OGzEQh60K1IS0h74AmiM9bFjb8Tockyj8kZBAoZxXXu-4cbW7Tm1v29x4BG68H0-CQ6A35jKH-eY7_H6EfKP5mKY5rfRmTCcTyT6RIeWFyBhl4oAMc54XmWCCDshRCL_ynHJaiM9kwFkhiqmQQ_K0NAZ1tH-wwxDAGTDWh_j88NjYDkFj7P_ZVlVgO_hrmzod4naDsJrdQYtRhaii1aBd43zyqAa06jR6UFo7X9vuJ0QHsW9d72G-mp1D2-9eXAe71z6A8a6FuEZYrpbz-7ukWjsfv5BDo5qAX9_2iNyfL38sLrPrm4urxew600wKllW8oFLWnClEjsZwrJnMOfIzUaAQU6SSK2pqWtXTnEstdcXlmTFSCMk0Mj4iJ3vvxrvfPYZYtjZobBrVoetDySaMCzrhcprQ73tUexeCR1NufIrGb0ual7seytRD-dpDYo_ftH3VYv2ffA8-Aad7IIWK249N5Xxxu1e-AMX-ldI</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Rouyer, Magali</creator><creator>François, Eric</creator><creator>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creator><creator>Monnereau, Alain</creator><creator>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creator><creator>Jové, Jérémy</creator><creator>Lassalle, Régis</creator><creator>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creator><creator>Moore, Nicholas</creator><creator>Noize, Pernelle</creator><creator>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creator><creator>Smith, Denis</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-2817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><author>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>anticancer drugs</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cetuximab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnereau, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jové, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassalle, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noize, Pernelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouyer, Magali</au><au>François, Eric</au><au>Sa Cunha, Antonio</au><au>Monnereau, Alain</au><au>Bignon, Emmanuelle</au><au>Jové, Jérémy</au><au>Lassalle, Régis</au><au>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</au><au>Moore, Nicholas</au><au>Noize, Pernelle</au><au>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</au><au>Smith, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1120</spage><epage>1128</epage><pages>1120-1128</pages><issn>0306-5251</issn><eissn>1365-2125</eissn><abstract>Aims
Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods
EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression.
Results
A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients.
Conclusions
BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>32656857</pmid><doi>10.1111/bcp.14472</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-2817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-5251 |
ispartof | British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128 |
issn | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2423514378 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | anticancer drugs Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols cancer Cetuximab - therapeutic use Cohort Studies Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics genotyping Humans Male Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis pharmacoepidemiology Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) |
title | Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20first%E2%80%90line%20cetuximab%20in%20wild%E2%80%90type%20RAS%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer%20according%20to%20tumour%20BRAF%20mutation%20status%20from%20the%20EREBUS%20cohort&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Rouyer,%20Magali&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1120&rft.epage=1128&rft.pages=1120-1128&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bcp.14472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2423514378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423514378&rft_id=info:pmid/32656857&rfr_iscdi=true |