Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort

Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five ye...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128
Hauptverfasser: Rouyer, Magali, François, Eric, Sa Cunha, Antonio, Monnereau, Alain, Bignon, Emmanuelle, Jové, Jérémy, Lassalle, Régis, Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile, Moore, Nicholas, Noize, Pernelle, Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie, Smith, Denis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1128
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1120
container_title British journal of clinical pharmacology
container_volume 87
creator Rouyer, Magali
François, Eric
Sa Cunha, Antonio
Monnereau, Alain
Bignon, Emmanuelle
Jové, Jérémy
Lassalle, Régis
Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile
Moore, Nicholas
Noize, Pernelle
Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie
Smith, Denis
description Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. Results A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. Conclusions BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bcp.14472
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2423514378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423514378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OGzEQh60K1IS0h74AmiM9bFjb8Tockyj8kZBAoZxXXu-4cbW7Tm1v29x4BG68H0-CQ6A35jKH-eY7_H6EfKP5mKY5rfRmTCcTyT6RIeWFyBhl4oAMc54XmWCCDshRCL_ynHJaiM9kwFkhiqmQQ_K0NAZ1tH-wwxDAGTDWh_j88NjYDkFj7P_ZVlVgO_hrmzod4naDsJrdQYtRhaii1aBd43zyqAa06jR6UFo7X9vuJ0QHsW9d72G-mp1D2-9eXAe71z6A8a6FuEZYrpbz-7ukWjsfv5BDo5qAX9_2iNyfL38sLrPrm4urxew600wKllW8oFLWnClEjsZwrJnMOfIzUaAQU6SSK2pqWtXTnEstdcXlmTFSCMk0Mj4iJ3vvxrvfPYZYtjZobBrVoetDySaMCzrhcprQ73tUexeCR1NufIrGb0ual7seytRD-dpDYo_ftH3VYv2ffA8-Aad7IIWK249N5Xxxu1e-AMX-ldI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423514378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. Results A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. Conclusions BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32656857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>anticancer drugs ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; cancer ; Cetuximab - therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; genotyping ; Humans ; Male ; Mutation ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; pharmacoepidemiology ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Pharmacological Society</rights><rights>2020 The British Pharmacological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1212-2817 ; 0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbcp.14472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbcp.14472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnereau, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jové, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassalle, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noize, Pernelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><title>British journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. Results A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. Conclusions BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</description><subject>anticancer drugs</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cetuximab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><issn>0306-5251</issn><issn>1365-2125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9OGzEQh60K1IS0h74AmiM9bFjb8Tockyj8kZBAoZxXXu-4cbW7Tm1v29x4BG68H0-CQ6A35jKH-eY7_H6EfKP5mKY5rfRmTCcTyT6RIeWFyBhl4oAMc54XmWCCDshRCL_ynHJaiM9kwFkhiqmQQ_K0NAZ1tH-wwxDAGTDWh_j88NjYDkFj7P_ZVlVgO_hrmzod4naDsJrdQYtRhaii1aBd43zyqAa06jR6UFo7X9vuJ0QHsW9d72G-mp1D2-9eXAe71z6A8a6FuEZYrpbz-7ukWjsfv5BDo5qAX9_2iNyfL38sLrPrm4urxew600wKllW8oFLWnClEjsZwrJnMOfIzUaAQU6SSK2pqWtXTnEstdcXlmTFSCMk0Mj4iJ3vvxrvfPYZYtjZobBrVoetDySaMCzrhcprQ73tUexeCR1NufIrGb0ual7seytRD-dpDYo_ftH3VYv2ffA8-Aad7IIWK249N5Xxxu1e-AMX-ldI</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Rouyer, Magali</creator><creator>François, Eric</creator><creator>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creator><creator>Monnereau, Alain</creator><creator>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creator><creator>Jové, Jérémy</creator><creator>Lassalle, Régis</creator><creator>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creator><creator>Moore, Nicholas</creator><creator>Noize, Pernelle</creator><creator>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creator><creator>Smith, Denis</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-2817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</title><author>Rouyer, Magali ; François, Eric ; Sa Cunha, Antonio ; Monnereau, Alain ; Bignon, Emmanuelle ; Jové, Jérémy ; Lassalle, Régis ; Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile ; Moore, Nicholas ; Noize, Pernelle ; Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie ; Smith, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b36177d32aee3eff3ed2703e3956e558e173a1fd1bd8037c7cb379ff75572ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>anticancer drugs</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cetuximab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouyer, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa Cunha, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnereau, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignon, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jové, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassalle, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noize, Pernelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouyer, Magali</au><au>François, Eric</au><au>Sa Cunha, Antonio</au><au>Monnereau, Alain</au><au>Bignon, Emmanuelle</au><au>Jové, Jérémy</au><au>Lassalle, Régis</au><au>Droz‐Perroteau, Cécile</au><au>Moore, Nicholas</au><au>Noize, Pernelle</au><au>Fourrier‐Réglat, Annie</au><au>Smith, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1120</spage><epage>1128</epage><pages>1120-1128</pages><issn>0306-5251</issn><eissn>1365-2125</eissn><abstract>Aims Poor efficacy has been reported for patients with BRAF mutations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods EREBUS is a French cohort study of wild‐type (wt) KRAS unresectable mCRC patients initiating a first‐line treatment with cetuximab from 2009 to 2010, followed for two years (five years for vital status). Molecular genetics platforms have provided additional RAS and BRAF mutation testing results. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to tumour mutation (mt) status: RASmt/BRAFany, RASwt/BRAFmt and RASwt/BRAFwt. Multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate association between mutation status and death or progression. Results A total of 389 patients were included in 65 centres and with a known tumour mutation status: 64 RASmt/BRAFany (21%), 33 RASwt/BRAFmt (13%) and 213 RASwt/BRAFwt (87%). Respective baseline characteristics were: median age 65, 64 and 63 years, male gender 63%, 64% and 69%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 75%, 76% and 79%, and liver‐only metastases 39%, 33% and 40%. Median progression‐free survival was 8.0 months [5.9–9.3] for patients with RASmt/BRAFany, 6.0 months [2.3–7.2] for patients with RASwt/BRAFmt, and 10.4 months [9.5–11.0] for patients with RASwt/BRAFwt. Respectively, median overall survival was 18.4 months [10.9–23.3], 9.7 months [6.9–16.6] and 29.3 months [26.3–36.1]. In multivariate analyses, progression (HR = 2.71 [1.79–4.10]) and death (HR = 2.79 [1.81–4.30]) were more likely for RASwt/BRAFmt vs RASwt/BRAFwt patients. Conclusions BRAF mutations were associated with markedly poorer outcomes in initially unresectable RASwt mCRC patients treated by cetuximab in first‐line treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>32656857</pmid><doi>10.1111/bcp.14472</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-2817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-4412</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-5251
ispartof British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021-03, Vol.87 (3), p.1120-1128
issn 0306-5251
1365-2125
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2423514378
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects anticancer drugs
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
cancer
Cetuximab - therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics
genotyping
Humans
Male
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
pharmacoepidemiology
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf - genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
title Effectiveness of first‐line cetuximab in wild‐type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer according to tumour BRAF mutation status from the EREBUS cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20first%E2%80%90line%20cetuximab%20in%20wild%E2%80%90type%20RAS%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer%20according%20to%20tumour%20BRAF%20mutation%20status%20from%20the%20EREBUS%20cohort&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Rouyer,%20Magali&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1120&rft.epage=1128&rft.pages=1120-1128&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bcp.14472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2423514378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423514378&rft_id=info:pmid/32656857&rfr_iscdi=true