Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis

Aim Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were previously shown to be capable of discriminating embryos with different qualities. Here we aimed to compare the specific response of the HESC secretome to implanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium (BCM) versus nonimplanted medium and identify cytokine c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1809-1818
Hauptverfasser: Xiong, Feng, Yao, ZhiHong, Chen, PeiLin, Sun, Qing, Zhong, HuiXian, Wan, CaiYun, Zeng, Yong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1818
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1809
container_title The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
container_volume 46
creator Xiong, Feng
Yao, ZhiHong
Chen, PeiLin
Sun, Qing
Zhong, HuiXian
Wan, CaiYun
Zeng, Yong
description Aim Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were previously shown to be capable of discriminating embryos with different qualities. Here we aimed to compare the specific response of the HESC secretome to implanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium (BCM) versus nonimplanted medium and identify cytokine candidates useful for the assessment of blastocyst implantation. Methods Cleavage embryos were individually cultured in one microdrop of medium for blastocyst formation. The BCM was collected after fresh blastocyst transfer on day 5 and used to supplement HESC culture medium. A high‐throughput antibody array covering 440 cytokines was used to detect the secretory proteins of HESCs supplemented with implanted or nonimplanted BCM. Results A total of 22 differentially expressed proteins were found out of 440 cytokines in the supernatant of HESCs supplemented with BCM from the implanted group compared to the nonimplanted group, including seven upregulated and 15 downregulated proteins. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in cell chemotaxis and motility, and ERK1/2 cascade regulation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggested that the mitogen‐activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt pathways were mainly involved. Conclusion HESCs specifically responded to BCM from different quality blastocysts, a finding that can be used to develop a novel approach for blastocyst quality assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jog.14359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2422004217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2422004217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-6efd9f0c8126f6f83862ac67fab9b9cf208726c3d18b51c8f3789c30cc9852ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtuFDEURUsIJELIgB1YYgKDSvypj80saoUEFCkTMi65Xc-JW_4U_iRqRiyBXWUfWUncaQQSEp48P_tc6z7fpnlH8DGp62QTbo5Jx3rxojkgXTe2eOyHl3XPOtJyPA6vmzcpbTAmoyD8oHlYBbfIKLO5A5RARcjBAVpi0MYCkl7abTIJBY1UsblEmJFxLsQsrflRm9vipEfg5yrL0UiLUo7B1arA2oRSWRYLDnyu8L3Jt1W-WPnc3kFMJSEf_N-ztZUpB7VN-fHnLxX8bLIJvl44mE1xn9BpNQfWOONl3P4x-LZ5paVNcPS7HjbXn8--rS7ay6vzL6vTy1axvhPtAHoWGitO6KAHzRkfqFTDqOVarIXSFPORDorNhK97orhmIxeKYaUE76kCdth82L9bf-h7gZQnZ9JuUukhlDTRjlKMO0rGir7_B92EEqvfHcUEFqIXtFIf95SKIaUIelqicXW0ieBpF2lV3UzPkVb2ZM_e12y2_wenr1fne8UTiNmrLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439099592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Xiong, Feng ; Yao, ZhiHong ; Chen, PeiLin ; Sun, Qing ; Zhong, HuiXian ; Wan, CaiYun ; Zeng, Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Feng ; Yao, ZhiHong ; Chen, PeiLin ; Sun, Qing ; Zhong, HuiXian ; Wan, CaiYun ; Zeng, Yong</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were previously shown to be capable of discriminating embryos with different qualities. Here we aimed to compare the specific response of the HESC secretome to implanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium (BCM) versus nonimplanted medium and identify cytokine candidates useful for the assessment of blastocyst implantation. Methods Cleavage embryos were individually cultured in one microdrop of medium for blastocyst formation. The BCM was collected after fresh blastocyst transfer on day 5 and used to supplement HESC culture medium. A high‐throughput antibody array covering 440 cytokines was used to detect the secretory proteins of HESCs supplemented with implanted or nonimplanted BCM. Results A total of 22 differentially expressed proteins were found out of 440 cytokines in the supernatant of HESCs supplemented with BCM from the implanted group compared to the nonimplanted group, including seven upregulated and 15 downregulated proteins. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in cell chemotaxis and motility, and ERK1/2 cascade regulation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggested that the mitogen‐activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt pathways were mainly involved. Conclusion HESCs specifically responded to BCM from different quality blastocysts, a finding that can be used to develop a novel approach for blastocyst quality assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jog.14359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>AKT protein ; Blastocysts ; blastocyst‐conditioned medium ; cascade amplification ; Cell culture ; Chemotaxis ; Cytokines ; Embryos ; endometrial stromal cell ; Endometrium ; Extracellular signal-regulated kinase ; Gene regulation ; Genomes ; implantation potential ; Kinases ; Protein kinase ; Proteins ; Quality control ; Secretome ; Stromal cells</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1809-1818</ispartof><rights>2020 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-6efd9f0c8126f6f83862ac67fab9b9cf208726c3d18b51c8f3789c30cc9852ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-6efd9f0c8126f6f83862ac67fab9b9cf208726c3d18b51c8f3789c30cc9852ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1385-3518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjog.14359$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjog.14359$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, ZhiHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, PeiLin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, HuiXian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, CaiYun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><description>Aim Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were previously shown to be capable of discriminating embryos with different qualities. Here we aimed to compare the specific response of the HESC secretome to implanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium (BCM) versus nonimplanted medium and identify cytokine candidates useful for the assessment of blastocyst implantation. Methods Cleavage embryos were individually cultured in one microdrop of medium for blastocyst formation. The BCM was collected after fresh blastocyst transfer on day 5 and used to supplement HESC culture medium. A high‐throughput antibody array covering 440 cytokines was used to detect the secretory proteins of HESCs supplemented with implanted or nonimplanted BCM. Results A total of 22 differentially expressed proteins were found out of 440 cytokines in the supernatant of HESCs supplemented with BCM from the implanted group compared to the nonimplanted group, including seven upregulated and 15 downregulated proteins. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in cell chemotaxis and motility, and ERK1/2 cascade regulation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggested that the mitogen‐activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt pathways were mainly involved. Conclusion HESCs specifically responded to BCM from different quality blastocysts, a finding that can be used to develop a novel approach for blastocyst quality assessment.</description><subject>AKT protein</subject><subject>Blastocysts</subject><subject>blastocyst‐conditioned medium</subject><subject>cascade amplification</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Chemotaxis</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>endometrial stromal cell</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Extracellular signal-regulated kinase</subject><subject>Gene regulation</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>implantation potential</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Protein kinase</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Secretome</subject><subject>Stromal cells</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtuFDEURUsIJELIgB1YYgKDSvypj80saoUEFCkTMi65Xc-JW_4U_iRqRiyBXWUfWUncaQQSEp48P_tc6z7fpnlH8DGp62QTbo5Jx3rxojkgXTe2eOyHl3XPOtJyPA6vmzcpbTAmoyD8oHlYBbfIKLO5A5RARcjBAVpi0MYCkl7abTIJBY1UsblEmJFxLsQsrflRm9vipEfg5yrL0UiLUo7B1arA2oRSWRYLDnyu8L3Jt1W-WPnc3kFMJSEf_N-ztZUpB7VN-fHnLxX8bLIJvl44mE1xn9BpNQfWOONl3P4x-LZ5paVNcPS7HjbXn8--rS7ay6vzL6vTy1axvhPtAHoWGitO6KAHzRkfqFTDqOVarIXSFPORDorNhK97orhmIxeKYaUE76kCdth82L9bf-h7gZQnZ9JuUukhlDTRjlKMO0rGir7_B92EEqvfHcUEFqIXtFIf95SKIaUIelqicXW0ieBpF2lV3UzPkVb2ZM_e12y2_wenr1fne8UTiNmrLQ</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Xiong, Feng</creator><creator>Yao, ZhiHong</creator><creator>Chen, PeiLin</creator><creator>Sun, Qing</creator><creator>Zhong, HuiXian</creator><creator>Wan, CaiYun</creator><creator>Zeng, Yong</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1385-3518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis</title><author>Xiong, Feng ; Yao, ZhiHong ; Chen, PeiLin ; Sun, Qing ; Zhong, HuiXian ; Wan, CaiYun ; Zeng, Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-6efd9f0c8126f6f83862ac67fab9b9cf208726c3d18b51c8f3789c30cc9852ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>AKT protein</topic><topic>Blastocysts</topic><topic>blastocyst‐conditioned medium</topic><topic>cascade amplification</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Chemotaxis</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>endometrial stromal cell</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Extracellular signal-regulated kinase</topic><topic>Gene regulation</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>implantation potential</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Protein kinase</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Secretome</topic><topic>Stromal cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, ZhiHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, PeiLin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, HuiXian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, CaiYun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiong, Feng</au><au>Yao, ZhiHong</au><au>Chen, PeiLin</au><au>Sun, Qing</au><au>Zhong, HuiXian</au><au>Wan, CaiYun</au><au>Zeng, Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1809</spage><epage>1818</epage><pages>1809-1818</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were previously shown to be capable of discriminating embryos with different qualities. Here we aimed to compare the specific response of the HESC secretome to implanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium (BCM) versus nonimplanted medium and identify cytokine candidates useful for the assessment of blastocyst implantation. Methods Cleavage embryos were individually cultured in one microdrop of medium for blastocyst formation. The BCM was collected after fresh blastocyst transfer on day 5 and used to supplement HESC culture medium. A high‐throughput antibody array covering 440 cytokines was used to detect the secretory proteins of HESCs supplemented with implanted or nonimplanted BCM. Results A total of 22 differentially expressed proteins were found out of 440 cytokines in the supernatant of HESCs supplemented with BCM from the implanted group compared to the nonimplanted group, including seven upregulated and 15 downregulated proteins. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in cell chemotaxis and motility, and ERK1/2 cascade regulation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis suggested that the mitogen‐activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt pathways were mainly involved. Conclusion HESCs specifically responded to BCM from different quality blastocysts, a finding that can be used to develop a novel approach for blastocyst quality assessment.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jog.14359</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1385-3518</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8076
ispartof The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2020-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1809-1818
issn 1341-8076
1447-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2422004217
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects AKT protein
Blastocysts
blastocyst‐conditioned medium
cascade amplification
Cell culture
Chemotaxis
Cytokines
Embryos
endometrial stromal cell
Endometrium
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
Gene regulation
Genomes
implantation potential
Kinases
Protein kinase
Proteins
Quality control
Secretome
Stromal cells
title Comparative secretome profile analysis of cultured immortalized human endometrial stromal cells supplemented with implanted versus nonimplanted blastocyst‐conditioned medium: A preliminary analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20secretome%20profile%20analysis%20of%20cultured%20immortalized%20human%20endometrial%20stromal%20cells%20supplemented%20with%20implanted%20versus%20nonimplanted%20blastocyst%E2%80%90conditioned%20medium:%20A%20preliminary%20analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Xiong,%20Feng&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1809&rft.epage=1818&rft.pages=1809-1818&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jog.14359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2422004217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439099592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true