Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process

The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2020-11, Vol.742, p.140400-140400, Article 140400
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Cong, Wei, Jingyue, Kong, Qiaoping, Fan, Dan, Qiu, Guanglei, Feng, Chunhua, Li, Fusheng, Preis, Sergei, Wei, Chaohai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140400
container_issue
container_start_page 140400
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 742
creator Wei, Cong
Wei, Jingyue
Kong, Qiaoping
Fan, Dan
Qiu, Guanglei
Feng, Chunhua
Li, Fusheng
Preis, Sergei
Wei, Chaohai
description The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that uses numerical representation to rank the preferences of each participating alternatives for evaluation of the advanced biological technologies in CW treatment. Based on survey results, six types reactor combinations were selected as the alternatives, which were further classified as two group according to COD load. The AHP methodology consists of weighting and ranking procedures considering technical, economic, environmental and administration factors defined as criteria layers. Eighteen indicators were chosen as sub-criteria layers. Inclusively beneficial and sustainable biological processes were assessed and ranked along the AHP implementation. The results placed technical indicators to the top position among the criteria layers in the weighting descending order ‘technical indicators > economic indicators > environmental indicators > administrative indicators’, whereas the weight of indicators in sub-criteria layers fitted in the range of 0.005 to 0.151. The inclusive priority calculation integrating all weight indices of criteria and sub-criteria layers resulted in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A/A/O) combination rising in the hierarchy of the low load group, whereas the oxic-hydrolytic-oxic (O/H/O) process was prioritized in the high load group. The accuracy and objectivity of AHP application was also supported by sensitivity and variability analyses that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. [Display omitted] •Methodology of optimum choice for biological treatment of coking wastewater was proposed.•A holistic analytic hierarchy process was developed for evaluating biological technologies.•The feasibility of AHP was verified by sensitivity and variability analyses.•Diversity in biological treatment processes justified by complex character of coking wastewater.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421110317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004896972033922X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2421110317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-cdd50823d128cf01fe50c9a6d94cdcad5756f71c40d6fd3e62974e0e4ee9ea293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CRS8racfM4VhUvqRIH4GzMetO6JHGx3aL-e1IVcWUvK61mZjUfY9cCJgJEcbueRHTJJ-p3EwlyuCpQACdsJKqyzgTI4pSNAFSV1UVdnrOLGNcwTFmJEXt_oZYwOd9z33C_Sa7bdvzD-dYvHZqWp0AmddQn3vjA0X-6fsm_TUz0bRIFvo2Hg-lNu08O-cpRMAFXe74JHinGS3bWmDbS1e8es7f7u9f5Y7Z4fniazxYZ5qpKGVo7hUrmVsgKGxANTQFrU9haoUVjp-W0aEqBCmzR2JwKWZeKgBRRTUbW-ZjdHHOHv19bikl3LiK1renJb6OWSgohIBflIC2PUgw-xkCN3gTXmbDXAvSBqV7rP6b6wFQfmQ7O2dFJQ5PdUPWgox7JujBQ1Na7fzN-AIR-h1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421110317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wei, Cong ; Wei, Jingyue ; Kong, Qiaoping ; Fan, Dan ; Qiu, Guanglei ; Feng, Chunhua ; Li, Fusheng ; Preis, Sergei ; Wei, Chaohai</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cong ; Wei, Jingyue ; Kong, Qiaoping ; Fan, Dan ; Qiu, Guanglei ; Feng, Chunhua ; Li, Fusheng ; Preis, Sergei ; Wei, Chaohai</creatorcontrib><description>The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that uses numerical representation to rank the preferences of each participating alternatives for evaluation of the advanced biological technologies in CW treatment. Based on survey results, six types reactor combinations were selected as the alternatives, which were further classified as two group according to COD load. The AHP methodology consists of weighting and ranking procedures considering technical, economic, environmental and administration factors defined as criteria layers. Eighteen indicators were chosen as sub-criteria layers. Inclusively beneficial and sustainable biological processes were assessed and ranked along the AHP implementation. The results placed technical indicators to the top position among the criteria layers in the weighting descending order ‘technical indicators &gt; economic indicators &gt; environmental indicators &gt; administrative indicators’, whereas the weight of indicators in sub-criteria layers fitted in the range of 0.005 to 0.151. The inclusive priority calculation integrating all weight indices of criteria and sub-criteria layers resulted in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A/A/O) combination rising in the hierarchy of the low load group, whereas the oxic-hydrolytic-oxic (O/H/O) process was prioritized in the high load group. The accuracy and objectivity of AHP application was also supported by sensitivity and variability analyses that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. [Display omitted] •Methodology of optimum choice for biological treatment of coking wastewater was proposed.•A holistic analytic hierarchy process was developed for evaluating biological technologies.•The feasibility of AHP was verified by sensitivity and variability analyses.•Diversity in biological treatment processes justified by complex character of coking wastewater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activated sludge process ; Analytical hierarchical process ; Coking wastewater ; Comprehensive evaluation ; Multi-criteria decision-making</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2020-11, Vol.742, p.140400-140400, Article 140400</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-cdd50823d128cf01fe50c9a6d94cdcad5756f71c40d6fd3e62974e0e4ee9ea293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-cdd50823d128cf01fe50c9a6d94cdcad5756f71c40d6fd3e62974e0e4ee9ea293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1769-3494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972033922X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Qiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Guanglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preis, Sergei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Chaohai</creatorcontrib><title>Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that uses numerical representation to rank the preferences of each participating alternatives for evaluation of the advanced biological technologies in CW treatment. Based on survey results, six types reactor combinations were selected as the alternatives, which were further classified as two group according to COD load. The AHP methodology consists of weighting and ranking procedures considering technical, economic, environmental and administration factors defined as criteria layers. Eighteen indicators were chosen as sub-criteria layers. Inclusively beneficial and sustainable biological processes were assessed and ranked along the AHP implementation. The results placed technical indicators to the top position among the criteria layers in the weighting descending order ‘technical indicators &gt; economic indicators &gt; environmental indicators &gt; administrative indicators’, whereas the weight of indicators in sub-criteria layers fitted in the range of 0.005 to 0.151. The inclusive priority calculation integrating all weight indices of criteria and sub-criteria layers resulted in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A/A/O) combination rising in the hierarchy of the low load group, whereas the oxic-hydrolytic-oxic (O/H/O) process was prioritized in the high load group. The accuracy and objectivity of AHP application was also supported by sensitivity and variability analyses that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. [Display omitted] •Methodology of optimum choice for biological treatment of coking wastewater was proposed.•A holistic analytic hierarchy process was developed for evaluating biological technologies.•The feasibility of AHP was verified by sensitivity and variability analyses.•Diversity in biological treatment processes justified by complex character of coking wastewater.</description><subject>Activated sludge process</subject><subject>Analytical hierarchical process</subject><subject>Coking wastewater</subject><subject>Comprehensive evaluation</subject><subject>Multi-criteria decision-making</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CRS8racfM4VhUvqRIH4GzMetO6JHGx3aL-e1IVcWUvK61mZjUfY9cCJgJEcbueRHTJJ-p3EwlyuCpQACdsJKqyzgTI4pSNAFSV1UVdnrOLGNcwTFmJEXt_oZYwOd9z33C_Sa7bdvzD-dYvHZqWp0AmddQn3vjA0X-6fsm_TUz0bRIFvo2Hg-lNu08O-cpRMAFXe74JHinGS3bWmDbS1e8es7f7u9f5Y7Z4fniazxYZ5qpKGVo7hUrmVsgKGxANTQFrU9haoUVjp-W0aEqBCmzR2JwKWZeKgBRRTUbW-ZjdHHOHv19bikl3LiK1renJb6OWSgohIBflIC2PUgw-xkCN3gTXmbDXAvSBqV7rP6b6wFQfmQ7O2dFJQ5PdUPWgox7JujBQ1Na7fzN-AIR-h1I</recordid><startdate>20201110</startdate><enddate>20201110</enddate><creator>Wei, Cong</creator><creator>Wei, Jingyue</creator><creator>Kong, Qiaoping</creator><creator>Fan, Dan</creator><creator>Qiu, Guanglei</creator><creator>Feng, Chunhua</creator><creator>Li, Fusheng</creator><creator>Preis, Sergei</creator><creator>Wei, Chaohai</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-3494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201110</creationdate><title>Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process</title><author>Wei, Cong ; Wei, Jingyue ; Kong, Qiaoping ; Fan, Dan ; Qiu, Guanglei ; Feng, Chunhua ; Li, Fusheng ; Preis, Sergei ; Wei, Chaohai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-cdd50823d128cf01fe50c9a6d94cdcad5756f71c40d6fd3e62974e0e4ee9ea293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge process</topic><topic>Analytical hierarchical process</topic><topic>Coking wastewater</topic><topic>Comprehensive evaluation</topic><topic>Multi-criteria decision-making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Qiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Guanglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chunhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preis, Sergei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Chaohai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Cong</au><au>Wei, Jingyue</au><au>Kong, Qiaoping</au><au>Fan, Dan</au><au>Qiu, Guanglei</au><au>Feng, Chunhua</au><au>Li, Fusheng</au><au>Preis, Sergei</au><au>Wei, Chaohai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2020-11-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>742</volume><spage>140400</spage><epage>140400</epage><pages>140400-140400</pages><artnum>140400</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The design of biological treatment process for the coking wastewater (CW) is complicated since wastewater treatment demand is gradually increasing lacking the systematic strategy in efficiency evaluation and advisable selection. Therefore, this study develops a holistic approach by means of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that uses numerical representation to rank the preferences of each participating alternatives for evaluation of the advanced biological technologies in CW treatment. Based on survey results, six types reactor combinations were selected as the alternatives, which were further classified as two group according to COD load. The AHP methodology consists of weighting and ranking procedures considering technical, economic, environmental and administration factors defined as criteria layers. Eighteen indicators were chosen as sub-criteria layers. Inclusively beneficial and sustainable biological processes were assessed and ranked along the AHP implementation. The results placed technical indicators to the top position among the criteria layers in the weighting descending order ‘technical indicators &gt; economic indicators &gt; environmental indicators &gt; administrative indicators’, whereas the weight of indicators in sub-criteria layers fitted in the range of 0.005 to 0.151. The inclusive priority calculation integrating all weight indices of criteria and sub-criteria layers resulted in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A/A/O) combination rising in the hierarchy of the low load group, whereas the oxic-hydrolytic-oxic (O/H/O) process was prioritized in the high load group. The accuracy and objectivity of AHP application was also supported by sensitivity and variability analyses that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. [Display omitted] •Methodology of optimum choice for biological treatment of coking wastewater was proposed.•A holistic analytic hierarchy process was developed for evaluating biological technologies.•The feasibility of AHP was verified by sensitivity and variability analyses.•Diversity in biological treatment processes justified by complex character of coking wastewater.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-3494</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2020-11, Vol.742, p.140400-140400, Article 140400
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2421110317
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Activated sludge process
Analytical hierarchical process
Coking wastewater
Comprehensive evaluation
Multi-criteria decision-making
title Selection of optimum biological treatment for coking wastewater using analytic hierarchy process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A04%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20of%20optimum%20biological%20treatment%20for%20coking%20wastewater%20using%20analytic%20hierarchy%20process&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Wei,%20Cong&rft.date=2020-11-10&rft.volume=742&rft.spage=140400&rft.epage=140400&rft.pages=140400-140400&rft.artnum=140400&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421110317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421110317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004896972033922X&rfr_iscdi=true