Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard to establish evidence for surgical practice but can be hindered by high costs, complexity, and time requirements. Recently, observational registries have been leveraged as platforms for clinical trials to address these limitations, though few...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2020-11, Vol.255, p.428-435
Hauptverfasser: Zolin, Samuel J., Petro, Clayton C., Prabhu, Ajita S., Fafaj, Aldo, Thomas, Jonah D., Horne, Charlotte M., Tastaldi, Luciano, Alkhatib, Hemasat, Krpata, David M., Rosenblatt, Steven, Rosen, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 435
container_issue
container_start_page 428
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 255
creator Zolin, Samuel J.
Petro, Clayton C.
Prabhu, Ajita S.
Fafaj, Aldo
Thomas, Jonah D.
Horne, Charlotte M.
Tastaldi, Luciano
Alkhatib, Hemasat
Krpata, David M.
Rosenblatt, Steven
Rosen, Michael J.
description Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard to establish evidence for surgical practice but can be hindered by high costs, complexity, and time requirements. Recently, observational registries have been leveraged as platforms for clinical trials to address these limitations, though few registry-based surgical RCTs have been conducted. Here, we present our group's approach to surgical registry-based RCTs and early results. To facilitate these trials, we focused on registry integration into surgeons' workflows, routine collection of patient-reported outcomes at clinic visits, and pragmatic trial design featuring broad inclusion criteria and standard of care follow-up. These features maximize generalizability and facilitate follow-up by minimizing visits and tests outside of normal practice. Since 2017, our group has completed enrollment in 4 registry-based RCTs with another 5 trials ongoing. Of these, 4 trials have been multicenter. Over 1000 patients have been enrolled in these studies, with follow-up rates of 90% or greater. Most of these trials are on track to complete enrollment in approximately 2 y from their start date. Beyond salary support, resource utilization is low. None of our trials has been terminated due to lack of resources or futility. Registry-based RCTs allow for efficient conduct of pragmatic surgical trials. Thoughtful study design, registry integration into surgeons' routines, and a team culture embracing research are paramount. We believe registry-based trials are the future of affordable, high-level, prospective surgical research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420147782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480420303449</els_id><sourcerecordid>2420147782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-e334b548f05a6bf20acb7e6498a44620ecf4f873d7658c2ac40e46d4b1605ee33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyyZJMwdhwngVWpeEkVoFDWluNMiqM8wE5B5Wv4Fr4MV2XNau5I94w0h5BTChEFKs6bqHEuYsAggiQCke-RCYU8CTORxvtkAsBYyDPgh-TIuQb8nqfxhBQFrowb7Sa8Ug6roFB9NXTmy8f50I92aFsfl9ao1l0Es5_vB_wMnpRVlVl1QT3Y4HltV0arNijQobL69Zgc1L6NJ39zSl5urpfzu3DxeHs_ny1CHccwhhjHvEx4VkOiRFkzULpMUfA8U5wLBqhrXmdpXKUiyTRTmgNyUfGSCkjQ01Nytrv7Zof3NbpRdsZpbFvV47B2knEGlKdpxnyV7qraDs5ZrOWbNZ2yG0lBbv3JRnp_cutPQiK9P89c7hj0P3wYtNJpg73GyljUo6wG8w_9CxUPeO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420147782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zolin, Samuel J. ; Petro, Clayton C. ; Prabhu, Ajita S. ; Fafaj, Aldo ; Thomas, Jonah D. ; Horne, Charlotte M. ; Tastaldi, Luciano ; Alkhatib, Hemasat ; Krpata, David M. ; Rosenblatt, Steven ; Rosen, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zolin, Samuel J. ; Petro, Clayton C. ; Prabhu, Ajita S. ; Fafaj, Aldo ; Thomas, Jonah D. ; Horne, Charlotte M. ; Tastaldi, Luciano ; Alkhatib, Hemasat ; Krpata, David M. ; Rosenblatt, Steven ; Rosen, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard to establish evidence for surgical practice but can be hindered by high costs, complexity, and time requirements. Recently, observational registries have been leveraged as platforms for clinical trials to address these limitations, though few registry-based surgical RCTs have been conducted. Here, we present our group's approach to surgical registry-based RCTs and early results. To facilitate these trials, we focused on registry integration into surgeons' workflows, routine collection of patient-reported outcomes at clinic visits, and pragmatic trial design featuring broad inclusion criteria and standard of care follow-up. These features maximize generalizability and facilitate follow-up by minimizing visits and tests outside of normal practice. Since 2017, our group has completed enrollment in 4 registry-based RCTs with another 5 trials ongoing. Of these, 4 trials have been multicenter. Over 1000 patients have been enrolled in these studies, with follow-up rates of 90% or greater. Most of these trials are on track to complete enrollment in approximately 2 y from their start date. Beyond salary support, resource utilization is low. None of our trials has been terminated due to lack of resources or futility. Registry-based RCTs allow for efficient conduct of pragmatic surgical trials. Thoughtful study design, registry integration into surgeons' routines, and a team culture embracing research are paramount. We believe registry-based trials are the future of affordable, high-level, prospective surgical research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Randomized controlled trials ; Registry-based trials ; Surgical registry ; Surgical research methods ; Trial design</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2020-11, Vol.255, p.428-435</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-e334b548f05a6bf20acb7e6498a44620ecf4f873d7658c2ac40e46d4b1605ee33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-e334b548f05a6bf20acb7e6498a44620ecf4f873d7658c2ac40e46d4b1605ee33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480420303449$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zolin, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petro, Clayton C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Ajita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafaj, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jonah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, Charlotte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tastaldi, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhatib, Hemasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krpata, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><description>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard to establish evidence for surgical practice but can be hindered by high costs, complexity, and time requirements. Recently, observational registries have been leveraged as platforms for clinical trials to address these limitations, though few registry-based surgical RCTs have been conducted. Here, we present our group's approach to surgical registry-based RCTs and early results. To facilitate these trials, we focused on registry integration into surgeons' workflows, routine collection of patient-reported outcomes at clinic visits, and pragmatic trial design featuring broad inclusion criteria and standard of care follow-up. These features maximize generalizability and facilitate follow-up by minimizing visits and tests outside of normal practice. Since 2017, our group has completed enrollment in 4 registry-based RCTs with another 5 trials ongoing. Of these, 4 trials have been multicenter. Over 1000 patients have been enrolled in these studies, with follow-up rates of 90% or greater. Most of these trials are on track to complete enrollment in approximately 2 y from their start date. Beyond salary support, resource utilization is low. None of our trials has been terminated due to lack of resources or futility. Registry-based RCTs allow for efficient conduct of pragmatic surgical trials. Thoughtful study design, registry integration into surgeons' routines, and a team culture embracing research are paramount. We believe registry-based trials are the future of affordable, high-level, prospective surgical research.</description><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Registry-based trials</subject><subject>Surgical registry</subject><subject>Surgical research methods</subject><subject>Trial design</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAeyyZJMwdhwngVWpeEkVoFDWluNMiqM8wE5B5Wv4Fr4MV2XNau5I94w0h5BTChEFKs6bqHEuYsAggiQCke-RCYU8CTORxvtkAsBYyDPgh-TIuQb8nqfxhBQFrowb7Sa8Ug6roFB9NXTmy8f50I92aFsfl9ao1l0Es5_vB_wMnpRVlVl1QT3Y4HltV0arNijQobL69Zgc1L6NJ39zSl5urpfzu3DxeHs_ny1CHccwhhjHvEx4VkOiRFkzULpMUfA8U5wLBqhrXmdpXKUiyTRTmgNyUfGSCkjQ01Nytrv7Zof3NbpRdsZpbFvV47B2knEGlKdpxnyV7qraDs5ZrOWbNZ2yG0lBbv3JRnp_cutPQiK9P89c7hj0P3wYtNJpg73GyljUo6wG8w_9CxUPeO8</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Zolin, Samuel J.</creator><creator>Petro, Clayton C.</creator><creator>Prabhu, Ajita S.</creator><creator>Fafaj, Aldo</creator><creator>Thomas, Jonah D.</creator><creator>Horne, Charlotte M.</creator><creator>Tastaldi, Luciano</creator><creator>Alkhatib, Hemasat</creator><creator>Krpata, David M.</creator><creator>Rosenblatt, Steven</creator><creator>Rosen, Michael J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research</title><author>Zolin, Samuel J. ; Petro, Clayton C. ; Prabhu, Ajita S. ; Fafaj, Aldo ; Thomas, Jonah D. ; Horne, Charlotte M. ; Tastaldi, Luciano ; Alkhatib, Hemasat ; Krpata, David M. ; Rosenblatt, Steven ; Rosen, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-e334b548f05a6bf20acb7e6498a44620ecf4f873d7658c2ac40e46d4b1605ee33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Registry-based trials</topic><topic>Surgical registry</topic><topic>Surgical research methods</topic><topic>Trial design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zolin, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petro, Clayton C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabhu, Ajita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fafaj, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jonah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, Charlotte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tastaldi, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhatib, Hemasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krpata, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zolin, Samuel J.</au><au>Petro, Clayton C.</au><au>Prabhu, Ajita S.</au><au>Fafaj, Aldo</au><au>Thomas, Jonah D.</au><au>Horne, Charlotte M.</au><au>Tastaldi, Luciano</au><au>Alkhatib, Hemasat</au><au>Krpata, David M.</au><au>Rosenblatt, Steven</au><au>Rosen, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>255</volume><spage>428</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>428-435</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard to establish evidence for surgical practice but can be hindered by high costs, complexity, and time requirements. Recently, observational registries have been leveraged as platforms for clinical trials to address these limitations, though few registry-based surgical RCTs have been conducted. Here, we present our group's approach to surgical registry-based RCTs and early results. To facilitate these trials, we focused on registry integration into surgeons' workflows, routine collection of patient-reported outcomes at clinic visits, and pragmatic trial design featuring broad inclusion criteria and standard of care follow-up. These features maximize generalizability and facilitate follow-up by minimizing visits and tests outside of normal practice. Since 2017, our group has completed enrollment in 4 registry-based RCTs with another 5 trials ongoing. Of these, 4 trials have been multicenter. Over 1000 patients have been enrolled in these studies, with follow-up rates of 90% or greater. Most of these trials are on track to complete enrollment in approximately 2 y from their start date. Beyond salary support, resource utilization is low. None of our trials has been terminated due to lack of resources or futility. Registry-based RCTs allow for efficient conduct of pragmatic surgical trials. Thoughtful study design, registry integration into surgeons' routines, and a team culture embracing research are paramount. We believe registry-based trials are the future of affordable, high-level, prospective surgical research.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.069</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2020-11, Vol.255, p.428-435
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420147782
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Randomized controlled trials
Registry-based trials
Surgical registry
Surgical research methods
Trial design
title Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: A New Paradigm for Surgical Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A48%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Registry-Based%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials:%20A%C2%A0New%20Paradigm%20for%20Surgical%20Research&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Zolin,%20Samuel%20J.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=255&rft.spage=428&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=428-435&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420147782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420147782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022480420303449&rfr_iscdi=true