EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension

EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement is a novel method to evaluate portal hypertension severity. In this study, we determined the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Twelve p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2021-03, Vol.93 (3), p.565-572
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Wei, Peng, Chunyan, Zhang, Song, Huang, Shuling, Shen, Shanshan, Xu, Guifang, Zhang, Feng, Xiao, Jiangqiang, Zhang, Ming, Zhuge, Yuzheng, Wang, Lei, Zou, Xiaoping, Lv, Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 572
container_issue 3
container_start_page 565
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 93
creator Zhang, Wei
Peng, Chunyan
Zhang, Song
Huang, Shuling
Shen, Shanshan
Xu, Guifang
Zhang, Feng
Xiao, Jiangqiang
Zhang, Ming
Zhuge, Yuzheng
Wang, Lei
Zou, Xiaoping
Lv, Ying
description EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement is a novel method to evaluate portal hypertension severity. In this study, we determined the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Twelve patients were prospectively enrolled. EUS-PPG measurements were performed using a 22-gauge FNA needle and a central venous pressure measurement monitor. The HVPG measurements were performed using the transjugular approach. If an HVPG measurement was not attainable and the patient underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment, a PPG was recorded as a reference standard during the procedure. We assessed the feasibility and safety of EUS-PPG and calculated the correlation between the 2 measurements. EUS-PPG measurements were successful in 11 patients (91.7%). Subsequent HVPG measurements failed in 2 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein occlusion subtype), 1 of whom underwent TIPS treatment to obtain transjugular PPG data. A small shunt was found during 1 HVPG measurement that introduced inaccuracy. Nine patients were included in the statistical analysis. Mean EUS-PPG and HVPG/PPG (transjugular) were 18.07 ± 4.32 mm Hg and 18.82 ± 3.43 mm Hg, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was .923 (P < .001). EUS-PPG measurement using a 22-gauge FNA needle was a safe and accurate method to evaluate portal hypertension and has the potential to supplement the measurement of HVPG in liver diseases. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800017317.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420135027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510720345314</els_id><sourcerecordid>2420135027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-762e4d6cea0dfc6f97e2ceee676af2915817079acb688965a1d9e8581f50f7423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8P4EaydDP1JNNJZnAlUi8guNCuQ5qcqSmdi0lG6dubodWlcCCHn-_8kI-QSwZTBkzcrKcrh1MOHKYg0hQHZMKgkpmQsjokE0hQVjCQJ-Q0hDUAlDxnx-Qk54IVTJYTUs8Xb9lqcBYt7Tsf9Yb2HkMYPNKV19ZhG2mDegyacXct7XUc40C_Xfyg2gwRaedpGJa7fd_zse3RR2yD69pzclTrTcCL_XtGFg_z9_un7OX18fn-7iUzeSViJgXHmRUGNdjaiLqSyA0iCil0zStWlEyCrLRZirKsRKGZrbBMaV1ALWc8PyPXu97ed58DhqgaFwxuNrrFbgiKzziwvAAuE8p2qPFdCB5r1XvXaL9VDNSoV61V0qtGvQpEmiLdXO3rh2WD9u_i12cCbncApk9-OfQqmOTKoHUeTVS2c__U_wCeK4yY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420135027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Wei ; Peng, Chunyan ; Zhang, Song ; Huang, Shuling ; Shen, Shanshan ; Xu, Guifang ; Zhang, Feng ; Xiao, Jiangqiang ; Zhang, Ming ; Zhuge, Yuzheng ; Wang, Lei ; Zou, Xiaoping ; Lv, Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wei ; Peng, Chunyan ; Zhang, Song ; Huang, Shuling ; Shen, Shanshan ; Xu, Guifang ; Zhang, Feng ; Xiao, Jiangqiang ; Zhang, Ming ; Zhuge, Yuzheng ; Wang, Lei ; Zou, Xiaoping ; Lv, Ying</creatorcontrib><description>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement is a novel method to evaluate portal hypertension severity. In this study, we determined the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Twelve patients were prospectively enrolled. EUS-PPG measurements were performed using a 22-gauge FNA needle and a central venous pressure measurement monitor. The HVPG measurements were performed using the transjugular approach. If an HVPG measurement was not attainable and the patient underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment, a PPG was recorded as a reference standard during the procedure. We assessed the feasibility and safety of EUS-PPG and calculated the correlation between the 2 measurements. EUS-PPG measurements were successful in 11 patients (91.7%). Subsequent HVPG measurements failed in 2 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein occlusion subtype), 1 of whom underwent TIPS treatment to obtain transjugular PPG data. A small shunt was found during 1 HVPG measurement that introduced inaccuracy. Nine patients were included in the statistical analysis. Mean EUS-PPG and HVPG/PPG (transjugular) were 18.07 ± 4.32 mm Hg and 18.82 ± 3.43 mm Hg, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was .923 (P &lt; .001). EUS-PPG measurement using a 22-gauge FNA needle was a safe and accurate method to evaluate portal hypertension and has the potential to supplement the measurement of HVPG in liver diseases. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800017317.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32615178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021-03, Vol.93 (3), p.565-572</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-762e4d6cea0dfc6f97e2ceee676af2915817079acb688965a1d9e8581f50f7423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-762e4d6cea0dfc6f97e2ceee676af2915817079acb688965a1d9e8581f50f7423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32615178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jiangqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuge, Yuzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Ying</creatorcontrib><title>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement is a novel method to evaluate portal hypertension severity. In this study, we determined the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Twelve patients were prospectively enrolled. EUS-PPG measurements were performed using a 22-gauge FNA needle and a central venous pressure measurement monitor. The HVPG measurements were performed using the transjugular approach. If an HVPG measurement was not attainable and the patient underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment, a PPG was recorded as a reference standard during the procedure. We assessed the feasibility and safety of EUS-PPG and calculated the correlation between the 2 measurements. EUS-PPG measurements were successful in 11 patients (91.7%). Subsequent HVPG measurements failed in 2 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein occlusion subtype), 1 of whom underwent TIPS treatment to obtain transjugular PPG data. A small shunt was found during 1 HVPG measurement that introduced inaccuracy. Nine patients were included in the statistical analysis. Mean EUS-PPG and HVPG/PPG (transjugular) were 18.07 ± 4.32 mm Hg and 18.82 ± 3.43 mm Hg, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was .923 (P &lt; .001). EUS-PPG measurement using a 22-gauge FNA needle was a safe and accurate method to evaluate portal hypertension and has the potential to supplement the measurement of HVPG in liver diseases. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800017317.)</description><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8P4EaydDP1JNNJZnAlUi8guNCuQ5qcqSmdi0lG6dubodWlcCCHn-_8kI-QSwZTBkzcrKcrh1MOHKYg0hQHZMKgkpmQsjokE0hQVjCQJ-Q0hDUAlDxnx-Qk54IVTJYTUs8Xb9lqcBYt7Tsf9Yb2HkMYPNKV19ZhG2mDegyacXct7XUc40C_Xfyg2gwRaedpGJa7fd_zse3RR2yD69pzclTrTcCL_XtGFg_z9_un7OX18fn-7iUzeSViJgXHmRUGNdjaiLqSyA0iCil0zStWlEyCrLRZirKsRKGZrbBMaV1ALWc8PyPXu97ed58DhqgaFwxuNrrFbgiKzziwvAAuE8p2qPFdCB5r1XvXaL9VDNSoV61V0qtGvQpEmiLdXO3rh2WD9u_i12cCbncApk9-OfQqmOTKoHUeTVS2c__U_wCeK4yY</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Zhang, Wei</creator><creator>Peng, Chunyan</creator><creator>Zhang, Song</creator><creator>Huang, Shuling</creator><creator>Shen, Shanshan</creator><creator>Xu, Guifang</creator><creator>Zhang, Feng</creator><creator>Xiao, Jiangqiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Ming</creator><creator>Zhuge, Yuzheng</creator><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Zou, Xiaoping</creator><creator>Lv, Ying</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension</title><author>Zhang, Wei ; Peng, Chunyan ; Zhang, Song ; Huang, Shuling ; Shen, Shanshan ; Xu, Guifang ; Zhang, Feng ; Xiao, Jiangqiang ; Zhang, Ming ; Zhuge, Yuzheng ; Wang, Lei ; Zou, Xiaoping ; Lv, Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-762e4d6cea0dfc6f97e2ceee676af2915817079acb688965a1d9e8581f50f7423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Guifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jiangqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuge, Yuzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Ying</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Wei</au><au>Peng, Chunyan</au><au>Zhang, Song</au><au>Huang, Shuling</au><au>Shen, Shanshan</au><au>Xu, Guifang</au><au>Zhang, Feng</au><au>Xiao, Jiangqiang</au><au>Zhang, Ming</au><au>Zhuge, Yuzheng</au><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Zou, Xiaoping</au><au>Lv, Ying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>565-572</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement is a novel method to evaluate portal hypertension severity. In this study, we determined the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension. Twelve patients were prospectively enrolled. EUS-PPG measurements were performed using a 22-gauge FNA needle and a central venous pressure measurement monitor. The HVPG measurements were performed using the transjugular approach. If an HVPG measurement was not attainable and the patient underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment, a PPG was recorded as a reference standard during the procedure. We assessed the feasibility and safety of EUS-PPG and calculated the correlation between the 2 measurements. EUS-PPG measurements were successful in 11 patients (91.7%). Subsequent HVPG measurements failed in 2 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein occlusion subtype), 1 of whom underwent TIPS treatment to obtain transjugular PPG data. A small shunt was found during 1 HVPG measurement that introduced inaccuracy. Nine patients were included in the statistical analysis. Mean EUS-PPG and HVPG/PPG (transjugular) were 18.07 ± 4.32 mm Hg and 18.82 ± 3.43 mm Hg, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was .923 (P &lt; .001). EUS-PPG measurement using a 22-gauge FNA needle was a safe and accurate method to evaluate portal hypertension and has the potential to supplement the measurement of HVPG in liver diseases. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800017317.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32615178</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.065</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2021-03, Vol.93 (3), p.565-572
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2420135027
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with acute or subacute portal hypertension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A52%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EUS-guided%20portal%20pressure%20gradient%20measurement%20in%20patients%20with%20acute%20or%20subacute%20portal%20hypertension&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Zhang,%20Wei&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=565-572&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420135027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420135027&rft_id=info:pmid/32615178&rft_els_id=S0016510720345314&rfr_iscdi=true