TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE
•Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas.•The literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one approach over the others•Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM.•In a 19- year experience, complete res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2020-09, Vol.196, p.106041-106041, Article 106041 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106041 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106041 |
container_title | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Zenga, Francesco Penner, Federica Cofano, Fabio Lavorato, Andrea Tardivo, Valentina Fontanella, Marco Maria Garbossa, Diego Stefini, Roberto |
description | •Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas.•The literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one approach over the others•Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM.•In a 19- year experience, complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).•The trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to the endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes.
Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas. The gold standard of treatment is generally surgery, however various approaches have been used and the literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one treatment over the others. The most debated techniques are traditional microscopic open approaches versus the endoscopic endonasal ones. The aim of this paper is to prove a valid surgical route that gathers the benefits of both endoscopic and transcranial routes.
Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM between January 2000 and January 2019 at the Neurosurgical Departments in Torino, Brescia and Legnano (Italy). The clinical features were collected in a database and compared with neuroimaging and outcomes. All patients were investigated with neuroimaging techniques. Clinical evaluations were performed 3–4 months and 1 year after surgery, together with neuroradiological follow-up.
All patients with OGM underwent Simpson grade I resection. The most common neurological symptom leading to neuroradiological evaluations were headaches (36 %), followed by behavioural changes (30 %), hyposmia/anosmia (12 %), visual impairments (6%) and focal deficits (6%). At 3–4 months follow-up 48 patients underwent a brain MRI (2 patients underwent a brain CT), and a complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).
Despite different techniques and studies supported by good evidence, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for OGMs. The data shown in this article suggests that the trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to an endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes, collecting benefits from both approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419417447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030384672030384X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2441553522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-78a10f7f405aaf44bd746729656f2b4758f78e92891d7f46ef70863d5d5b6e533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2K2zAURkVp6WSmfYVB0E03TvUvuasK42QMGSs4SemshGPL4JDEUykudNc3mnfqk1QhM11009WFy_m-ezkA3GI0xQiLT7tps--PbvTDlCByXgrE8CswwUqSRKRCvQYTRBFNFBPyClyHsEMIUSrUW3BFSaQRZROwWVe6XCWzypRrvYCrotysoF4uK6OzOzgzFTSLmc7WpnqA88qYrzm8z8uinBfmXq8-Qw1x-vvX00OuK5h_W-ZVkZdZ_g686ep9cO-f5w3YzPJ1dpcszLzI9CJpaCpOiVQ1Rp3sGOJ13TG2bWV8lqSCi45smeSqk8qlRKW4jZRwnURK0Ja3fCscp_QGfLz0Pvrh--jCyR760Lj9vj66YQyWMJwyLBmTEf3wD7obRn-M30WKYc4pJyRS4kI1fgjBu84--v5Q-58WI3sWb3f2Rbw9i7cX8TF4-1w_bg-u_Rt7MR2BLxfARR8_eudtaHp3bFzbe9ecbDv0_7vxB9oqjxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441553522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zenga, Francesco ; Penner, Federica ; Cofano, Fabio ; Lavorato, Andrea ; Tardivo, Valentina ; Fontanella, Marco Maria ; Garbossa, Diego ; Stefini, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco ; Penner, Federica ; Cofano, Fabio ; Lavorato, Andrea ; Tardivo, Valentina ; Fontanella, Marco Maria ; Garbossa, Diego ; Stefini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>•Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas.•The literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one approach over the others•Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM.•In a 19- year experience, complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).•The trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to the endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes.
Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas. The gold standard of treatment is generally surgery, however various approaches have been used and the literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one treatment over the others. The most debated techniques are traditional microscopic open approaches versus the endoscopic endonasal ones. The aim of this paper is to prove a valid surgical route that gathers the benefits of both endoscopic and transcranial routes.
Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM between January 2000 and January 2019 at the Neurosurgical Departments in Torino, Brescia and Legnano (Italy). The clinical features were collected in a database and compared with neuroimaging and outcomes. All patients were investigated with neuroimaging techniques. Clinical evaluations were performed 3–4 months and 1 year after surgery, together with neuroradiological follow-up.
All patients with OGM underwent Simpson grade I resection. The most common neurological symptom leading to neuroradiological evaluations were headaches (36 %), followed by behavioural changes (30 %), hyposmia/anosmia (12 %), visual impairments (6%) and focal deficits (6%). At 3–4 months follow-up 48 patients underwent a brain MRI (2 patients underwent a brain CT), and a complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).
Despite different techniques and studies supported by good evidence, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for OGMs. The data shown in this article suggests that the trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to an endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes, collecting benefits from both approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32604034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anosmia ; Anterior cranial fossa ; Brain cancer ; Endoscopy ; Headache ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Meningitis ; Neuroimaging ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Olfaction disorders ; Olfactory groove meningioma ; Patients ; Sinuses ; Skull base surgery ; Staphylococcus infections ; Surgery ; Trans frontal sinus approach ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.196, p.106041-106041, Article 106041</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-78a10f7f405aaf44bd746729656f2b4758f78e92891d7f46ef70863d5d5b6e533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-78a10f7f405aaf44bd746729656f2b4758f78e92891d7f46ef70863d5d5b6e533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4491-1725 ; 0000-0003-4725-0210 ; 0000-0001-6609-7018</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030384672030384X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32604034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavorato, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardivo, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE</title><title>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><description>•Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas.•The literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one approach over the others•Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM.•In a 19- year experience, complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).•The trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to the endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes.
Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas. The gold standard of treatment is generally surgery, however various approaches have been used and the literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one treatment over the others. The most debated techniques are traditional microscopic open approaches versus the endoscopic endonasal ones. The aim of this paper is to prove a valid surgical route that gathers the benefits of both endoscopic and transcranial routes.
Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM between January 2000 and January 2019 at the Neurosurgical Departments in Torino, Brescia and Legnano (Italy). The clinical features were collected in a database and compared with neuroimaging and outcomes. All patients were investigated with neuroimaging techniques. Clinical evaluations were performed 3–4 months and 1 year after surgery, together with neuroradiological follow-up.
All patients with OGM underwent Simpson grade I resection. The most common neurological symptom leading to neuroradiological evaluations were headaches (36 %), followed by behavioural changes (30 %), hyposmia/anosmia (12 %), visual impairments (6%) and focal deficits (6%). At 3–4 months follow-up 48 patients underwent a brain MRI (2 patients underwent a brain CT), and a complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).
Despite different techniques and studies supported by good evidence, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for OGMs. The data shown in this article suggests that the trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to an endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes, collecting benefits from both approaches.</description><subject>Anosmia</subject><subject>Anterior cranial fossa</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Meningitis</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Olfaction disorders</subject><subject>Olfactory groove meningioma</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Skull base surgery</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trans frontal sinus approach</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>0303-8467</issn><issn>1872-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM2K2zAURkVp6WSmfYVB0E03TvUvuasK42QMGSs4SemshGPL4JDEUykudNc3mnfqk1QhM11009WFy_m-ezkA3GI0xQiLT7tps--PbvTDlCByXgrE8CswwUqSRKRCvQYTRBFNFBPyClyHsEMIUSrUW3BFSaQRZROwWVe6XCWzypRrvYCrotysoF4uK6OzOzgzFTSLmc7WpnqA88qYrzm8z8uinBfmXq8-Qw1x-vvX00OuK5h_W-ZVkZdZ_g686ep9cO-f5w3YzPJ1dpcszLzI9CJpaCpOiVQ1Rp3sGOJ13TG2bWV8lqSCi45smeSqk8qlRKW4jZRwnURK0Ja3fCscp_QGfLz0Pvrh--jCyR760Lj9vj66YQyWMJwyLBmTEf3wD7obRn-M30WKYc4pJyRS4kI1fgjBu84--v5Q-58WI3sWb3f2Rbw9i7cX8TF4-1w_bg-u_Rt7MR2BLxfARR8_eudtaHp3bFzbe9ecbDv0_7vxB9oqjxc</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Zenga, Francesco</creator><creator>Penner, Federica</creator><creator>Cofano, Fabio</creator><creator>Lavorato, Andrea</creator><creator>Tardivo, Valentina</creator><creator>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creator><creator>Garbossa, Diego</creator><creator>Stefini, Roberto</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-1725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7018</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE</title><author>Zenga, Francesco ; Penner, Federica ; Cofano, Fabio ; Lavorato, Andrea ; Tardivo, Valentina ; Fontanella, Marco Maria ; Garbossa, Diego ; Stefini, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-78a10f7f405aaf44bd746729656f2b4758f78e92891d7f46ef70863d5d5b6e533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anosmia</topic><topic>Anterior cranial fossa</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Meningitis</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Olfaction disorders</topic><topic>Olfactory groove meningioma</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Skull base surgery</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trans frontal sinus approach</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavorato, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardivo, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zenga, Francesco</au><au>Penner, Federica</au><au>Cofano, Fabio</au><au>Lavorato, Andrea</au><au>Tardivo, Valentina</au><au>Fontanella, Marco Maria</au><au>Garbossa, Diego</au><au>Stefini, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>106041</spage><epage>106041</epage><pages>106041-106041</pages><artnum>106041</artnum><issn>0303-8467</issn><eissn>1872-6968</eissn><abstract>•Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas.•The literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one approach over the others•Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM.•In a 19- year experience, complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).•The trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to the endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes.
Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8–13 % of all intracranial meningiomas. The gold standard of treatment is generally surgery, however various approaches have been used and the literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one treatment over the others. The most debated techniques are traditional microscopic open approaches versus the endoscopic endonasal ones. The aim of this paper is to prove a valid surgical route that gathers the benefits of both endoscopic and transcranial routes.
Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM between January 2000 and January 2019 at the Neurosurgical Departments in Torino, Brescia and Legnano (Italy). The clinical features were collected in a database and compared with neuroimaging and outcomes. All patients were investigated with neuroimaging techniques. Clinical evaluations were performed 3–4 months and 1 year after surgery, together with neuroradiological follow-up.
All patients with OGM underwent Simpson grade I resection. The most common neurological symptom leading to neuroradiological evaluations were headaches (36 %), followed by behavioural changes (30 %), hyposmia/anosmia (12 %), visual impairments (6%) and focal deficits (6%). At 3–4 months follow-up 48 patients underwent a brain MRI (2 patients underwent a brain CT), and a complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).
Despite different techniques and studies supported by good evidence, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for OGMs. The data shown in this article suggests that the trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to an endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes, collecting benefits from both approaches.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32604034</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-1725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-0210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7018</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-8467 |
ispartof | Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.196, p.106041-106041, Article 106041 |
issn | 0303-8467 1872-6968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419417447 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Anosmia Anterior cranial fossa Brain cancer Endoscopy Headache Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Meningitis Neuroimaging Neurology Neurosurgery Olfaction disorders Olfactory groove meningioma Patients Sinuses Skull base surgery Staphylococcus infections Surgery Trans frontal sinus approach Veins & arteries |
title | TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A49%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TRANS-FRONTAL%20SINUS%20APPROACH%20FOR%20OLFACTORY%20GROOVE%20MENINGIOMAS:%20A%2019%E2%80%AFYEAR%20EXPERIENCE&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurology%20and%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Zenga,%20Francesco&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=106041&rft.epage=106041&rft.pages=106041-106041&rft.artnum=106041&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441553522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441553522&rft_id=info:pmid/32604034&rft_els_id=S030384672030384X&rfr_iscdi=true |