Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man

BACKGROUND:Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2020-09, Vol.102 (18), p.1600-1608
Hauptverfasser: Lamb, J.N., Jain, S., King, S.W., West, R.M., Pandit, H.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1608
container_issue 18
container_start_page 1600
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 102
creator Lamb, J.N.
Jain, S.
King, S.W.
West, R.M.
Pandit, H.G.
description BACKGROUND:Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with PFF revision following THR with PTS stems. METHODS:In a retrospective cohort study, 299,019 primary THRs using PTS stems from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1 to 8.2 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PFF revision was estimated for each variable using multivariable Cox survival regression analysis. RESULTS:Of 299,019 THR cases, 1,055 underwent revision for PFF at a median time of 3.1 years (IQR, 1.0 to 6.1 years). The mean age (and standard deviation) was 72 ± 9.7 years, 64.3% (192,365 patients) were female, and 82.6% (247,126 patients) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2. Variables associated with increased PFF were increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year), intraoperative fracture (HR, 2.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42 to 4.66]), ovaloid (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.16]) and round cross-sectional shapes (HR, 9.58 [95% CI, 2.29 to 40.12]), increasing stem offset (HR, 1.07 per millimeter), increasing head size (HR, 1.04 per millimeter), THR performed from 2012 to 2016 (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.78]), cobalt-chromium stem material (HR, 6.7 [95% CI, 3.0 to 15.4]), and cobalt-chromium stems with low-viscosity cement (HR, 22.88 [95% CI, 9.90 to 52.85]). Variables associated with a decreased risk of PFF revision were female sex (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59]), increasing stem length (HR, 0.97 per millimeter), and a ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85]). CONCLUSIONS:Increased risk of PFF revision was associated with PTS stems that are short, have high offset, are used with large femoral heads, are made of cobalt-chromium, or have ovaloid or round cross-sectional shapes. Large increases in PFF risk were associated with cobalt-chromium stems used with low-viscosity cement. Further study is required to confirm causation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.19.01242
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419417364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2419417364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3362-beea0de2f1cc0201b1ab72f979d5f9e1cc1025326f93acf1fa554c4ab07ab8363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1v0zAUxQMCsTJ45BX5EYml-CMfzd66aGWtxpjaIh4jJ7lezZK42A5T_3tu2tI3EA9RkuvfOb6-x0HwjtExZzT5tLharMYsG1PGI_48GLFYxCETk-RFMKKUszATcXwWvHbuB6U0imj6KjgTPKGRmPDRs2Cp3SOZycob64gylizhl3badMQocm8a7TZQk7Xcgg1Xjd6SHFroPNZWHtqD5B6s3lrj_Aa8rsgMWmNlQ2YWbXsLZKo8IGV1K-2OrI3HxRu0WsK2kdXe75JM8fdBO2934ZV06J-bjbEet-nrHVHWtAT9yZ302BwaLIzu_Emz7-O6e2hkV1-Q77IBd0HuUL8B25G5hWGBDM9gMncNDOf7Irs3wUslGwdvj-_z4Nvsep3fhLdfP8_z6W1YCZHwsASQtAauWFVRTlnJZJlylaVZHasMsMooj3GuKhOyUkzJOI6qSJY0leVEJOI8-HDwxUH97MH5otWuggb7AtO7gkcsi1gqkgjR8IBWOFNnQRXbw-gKRosh9GIIvWBZsQ8d-fdH675soT7Rf1JG4OMBeILSKFdp6Co4YXgt4jShTGT4RSdIT_6fzrXfB5KbvvMoZUepaTBy99j0T2CLDcjGb_7affQPzbBJlHARcpw6zVhCw6EUi9-qs-tT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419417364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lamb, J.N. ; Jain, S. ; King, S.W. ; West, R.M. ; Pandit, H.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J.N. ; Jain, S. ; King, S.W. ; West, R.M. ; Pandit, H.G.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with PFF revision following THR with PTS stems. METHODS:In a retrospective cohort study, 299,019 primary THRs using PTS stems from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1 to 8.2 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PFF revision was estimated for each variable using multivariable Cox survival regression analysis. RESULTS:Of 299,019 THR cases, 1,055 underwent revision for PFF at a median time of 3.1 years (IQR, 1.0 to 6.1 years). The mean age (and standard deviation) was 72 ± 9.7 years, 64.3% (192,365 patients) were female, and 82.6% (247,126 patients) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2. Variables associated with increased PFF were increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year), intraoperative fracture (HR, 2.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42 to 4.66]), ovaloid (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.16]) and round cross-sectional shapes (HR, 9.58 [95% CI, 2.29 to 40.12]), increasing stem offset (HR, 1.07 per millimeter), increasing head size (HR, 1.04 per millimeter), THR performed from 2012 to 2016 (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.78]), cobalt-chromium stem material (HR, 6.7 [95% CI, 3.0 to 15.4]), and cobalt-chromium stems with low-viscosity cement (HR, 22.88 [95% CI, 9.90 to 52.85]). Variables associated with a decreased risk of PFF revision were female sex (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59]), increasing stem length (HR, 0.97 per millimeter), and a ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85]). CONCLUSIONS:Increased risk of PFF revision was associated with PTS stems that are short, have high offset, are used with large femoral heads, are made of cobalt-chromium, or have ovaloid or round cross-sectional shapes. Large increases in PFF risk were associated with cobalt-chromium stems used with low-viscosity cement. Further study is required to confirm causation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01242</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32604382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>PHILADELPHIA: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Registries ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Science &amp; Technology ; Surgery ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2020-09, Vol.102 (18), p.1600-1608</ispartof><rights>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>25</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000576013900008</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3362-beea0de2f1cc0201b1ab72f979d5f9e1cc1025326f93acf1fa554c4ab07ab8363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7900-0174 ; 0000-0001-7392-8561 ; 0000-0002-7601-7736 ; 0000-0002-0166-9406 ; 0000-0001-7305-3654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32604382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, S.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, H.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J BONE JOINT SURG AM</addtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with PFF revision following THR with PTS stems. METHODS:In a retrospective cohort study, 299,019 primary THRs using PTS stems from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1 to 8.2 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PFF revision was estimated for each variable using multivariable Cox survival regression analysis. RESULTS:Of 299,019 THR cases, 1,055 underwent revision for PFF at a median time of 3.1 years (IQR, 1.0 to 6.1 years). The mean age (and standard deviation) was 72 ± 9.7 years, 64.3% (192,365 patients) were female, and 82.6% (247,126 patients) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2. Variables associated with increased PFF were increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year), intraoperative fracture (HR, 2.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42 to 4.66]), ovaloid (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.16]) and round cross-sectional shapes (HR, 9.58 [95% CI, 2.29 to 40.12]), increasing stem offset (HR, 1.07 per millimeter), increasing head size (HR, 1.04 per millimeter), THR performed from 2012 to 2016 (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.78]), cobalt-chromium stem material (HR, 6.7 [95% CI, 3.0 to 15.4]), and cobalt-chromium stems with low-viscosity cement (HR, 22.88 [95% CI, 9.90 to 52.85]). Variables associated with a decreased risk of PFF revision were female sex (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59]), increasing stem length (HR, 0.97 per millimeter), and a ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85]). CONCLUSIONS:Increased risk of PFF revision was associated with PTS stems that are short, have high offset, are used with large femoral heads, are made of cobalt-chromium, or have ovaloid or round cross-sectional shapes. Large increases in PFF risk were associated with cobalt-chromium stems used with low-viscosity cement. Further study is required to confirm causation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1v0zAUxQMCsTJ45BX5EYml-CMfzd66aGWtxpjaIh4jJ7lezZK42A5T_3tu2tI3EA9RkuvfOb6-x0HwjtExZzT5tLharMYsG1PGI_48GLFYxCETk-RFMKKUszATcXwWvHbuB6U0imj6KjgTPKGRmPDRs2Cp3SOZycob64gylizhl3badMQocm8a7TZQk7Xcgg1Xjd6SHFroPNZWHtqD5B6s3lrj_Aa8rsgMWmNlQ2YWbXsLZKo8IGV1K-2OrI3HxRu0WsK2kdXe75JM8fdBO2934ZV06J-bjbEet-nrHVHWtAT9yZ302BwaLIzu_Emz7-O6e2hkV1-Q77IBd0HuUL8B25G5hWGBDM9gMncNDOf7Irs3wUslGwdvj-_z4Nvsep3fhLdfP8_z6W1YCZHwsASQtAauWFVRTlnJZJlylaVZHasMsMooj3GuKhOyUkzJOI6qSJY0leVEJOI8-HDwxUH97MH5otWuggb7AtO7gkcsi1gqkgjR8IBWOFNnQRXbw-gKRosh9GIIvWBZsQ8d-fdH675soT7Rf1JG4OMBeILSKFdp6Co4YXgt4jShTGT4RSdIT_6fzrXfB5KbvvMoZUepaTBy99j0T2CLDcjGb_7affQPzbBJlHARcpw6zVhCw6EUi9-qs-tT</recordid><startdate>20200916</startdate><enddate>20200916</enddate><creator>Lamb, J.N.</creator><creator>Jain, S.</creator><creator>King, S.W.</creator><creator>West, R.M.</creator><creator>Pandit, H.G.</creator><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-7736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-9406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-3654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200916</creationdate><title>Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man</title><author>Lamb, J.N. ; Jain, S. ; King, S.W. ; West, R.M. ; Pandit, H.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3362-beea0de2f1cc0201b1ab72f979d5f9e1cc1025326f93acf1fa554c4ab07ab8363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, S.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, H.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamb, J.N.</au><au>Jain, S.</au><au>King, S.W.</au><au>West, R.M.</au><au>Pandit, H.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><stitle>J BONE JOINT SURG AM</stitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2020-09-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1600</spage><epage>1608</epage><pages>1600-1608</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with PFF revision following THR with PTS stems. METHODS:In a retrospective cohort study, 299,019 primary THRs using PTS stems from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1 to 8.2 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PFF revision was estimated for each variable using multivariable Cox survival regression analysis. RESULTS:Of 299,019 THR cases, 1,055 underwent revision for PFF at a median time of 3.1 years (IQR, 1.0 to 6.1 years). The mean age (and standard deviation) was 72 ± 9.7 years, 64.3% (192,365 patients) were female, and 82.6% (247,126 patients) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2. Variables associated with increased PFF were increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year), intraoperative fracture (HR, 2.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42 to 4.66]), ovaloid (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.16]) and round cross-sectional shapes (HR, 9.58 [95% CI, 2.29 to 40.12]), increasing stem offset (HR, 1.07 per millimeter), increasing head size (HR, 1.04 per millimeter), THR performed from 2012 to 2016 (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.78]), cobalt-chromium stem material (HR, 6.7 [95% CI, 3.0 to 15.4]), and cobalt-chromium stems with low-viscosity cement (HR, 22.88 [95% CI, 9.90 to 52.85]). Variables associated with a decreased risk of PFF revision were female sex (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59]), increasing stem length (HR, 0.97 per millimeter), and a ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85]). CONCLUSIONS:Increased risk of PFF revision was associated with PTS stems that are short, have high offset, are used with large femoral heads, are made of cobalt-chromium, or have ovaloid or round cross-sectional shapes. Large increases in PFF risk were associated with cobalt-chromium stems used with low-viscosity cement. Further study is required to confirm causation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>PHILADELPHIA</cop><pub>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>32604382</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.19.01242</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-7736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-9406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-3654</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2020-09, Vol.102 (18), p.1600-1608
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419417364
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Cohort Studies
Female
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Science & Technology
Surgery
United Kingdom
title Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A11%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Factors%20for%20Revision%20of%20Polished%20Taper-Slip%20Cemented%20Stems%20for%20Periprosthetic%20Femoral%20Fracture%20After%20Primary%20Total%20Hip%20Replacement:%20A%20Registry-Based%20Cohort%20Study%20from%20the%20National%20Joint%20Registry%20for%20England,%20Wales,%20Northern%20Ireland%20and%20the%20Isle%20of%20Man&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Lamb,%20J.N.&rft.date=2020-09-16&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1600&rft.epage=1608&rft.pages=1600-1608&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.19.01242&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2419417364%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419417364&rft_id=info:pmid/32604382&rfr_iscdi=true