Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature
The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients. To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in var...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2020-10, Vol.60 (4), p.828-846.e3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 846.e3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 828 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Heijltjes, Madelon T. van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W. Rietjens, Judith A.C. van der Heide, Agnes de Graeff, Alexander van Delden, Johannes J.M. |
description | The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients.
To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations.
We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death.
We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families.
The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419094831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392420305601</els_id><sourcerecordid>2419094831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-bc66d70e2b405026be6f24be0b0f30500f044ce77b5eb968f524d6b055159193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UGP1CAUB3BiNO7s6lcwGC9eWh-00MHbpllXk0k07nomlL7u0kzpCFQz3166sxrjyRMJ_OA93p-Q1wxKBky-G8vxYJyPx2kyvuTAoQRZAlNPyIZtm6qQglVPyQa2W1FUitdn5DzGEQBEJavn5KziQikm-Ib49t74O-fv6JdgbHIWI3Wepnuk3yLSeaDt7JPzy7xEeoO9SW721KQHceX7VezcgO_pJb05xoRTFpZ-xR8Of66Hq9u5hMGkJeAL8mww-4gvH9cLcvvh6rb9WOw-X39qL3eFrYVMRWel7BtA3tUggMsO5cDrDqGDoco7MEBdW2yaTmCn5HYQvO5lB0IwoZiqLsjb07OHMH9fMCY9uWhxvzce80c0r5kCVW8rlumbf-g4L8Hn5rISQjQN45CVOikb5hgDDvoQ3GTCUTPQayZ61H9lotdMNEgND828eqywdBP2f27-DiGD9gQwTyTPLehoHXqLvQtok-5n9x9lfgEq46IU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2455577120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Heijltjes, Madelon T. ; van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W. ; Rietjens, Judith A.C. ; van der Heide, Agnes ; de Graeff, Alexander ; van Delden, Johannes J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heijltjes, Madelon T. ; van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W. ; Rietjens, Judith A.C. ; van der Heide, Agnes ; de Graeff, Alexander ; van Delden, Johannes J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients.
To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations.
We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death.
We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families.
The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32599152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Continuous sedation ; Death ; Death & dying ; Deep Sedation ; End of life decisions ; end-of-life sedation ; Euthanasia ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use ; Literature reviews ; Netherlands ; Palliative Care ; palliative sedation ; Physical symptoms ; Psychological distress ; Sedation ; Systematic review ; Terminal Care ; terminal sedation</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-10, Vol.60 (4), p.828-846.e3</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-bc66d70e2b405026be6f24be0b0f30500f044ce77b5eb968f524d6b055159193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-bc66d70e2b405026be6f24be0b0f30500f044ce77b5eb968f524d6b055159193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32599152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heijltjes, Madelon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietjens, Judith A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heide, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graeff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Delden, Johannes J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients.
To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations.
We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death.
We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families.
The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Continuous sedation</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death & dying</subject><subject>Deep Sedation</subject><subject>End of life decisions</subject><subject>end-of-life sedation</subject><subject>Euthanasia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>palliative sedation</subject><subject>Physical symptoms</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Sedation</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Terminal Care</subject><subject>terminal sedation</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UGP1CAUB3BiNO7s6lcwGC9eWh-00MHbpllXk0k07nomlL7u0kzpCFQz3166sxrjyRMJ_OA93p-Q1wxKBky-G8vxYJyPx2kyvuTAoQRZAlNPyIZtm6qQglVPyQa2W1FUitdn5DzGEQBEJavn5KziQikm-Ib49t74O-fv6JdgbHIWI3Wepnuk3yLSeaDt7JPzy7xEeoO9SW721KQHceX7VezcgO_pJb05xoRTFpZ-xR8Of66Hq9u5hMGkJeAL8mww-4gvH9cLcvvh6rb9WOw-X39qL3eFrYVMRWel7BtA3tUggMsO5cDrDqGDoco7MEBdW2yaTmCn5HYQvO5lB0IwoZiqLsjb07OHMH9fMCY9uWhxvzce80c0r5kCVW8rlumbf-g4L8Hn5rISQjQN45CVOikb5hgDDvoQ3GTCUTPQayZ61H9lotdMNEgND828eqywdBP2f27-DiGD9gQwTyTPLehoHXqLvQtok-5n9x9lfgEq46IU</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Heijltjes, Madelon T.</creator><creator>van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W.</creator><creator>Rietjens, Judith A.C.</creator><creator>van der Heide, Agnes</creator><creator>de Graeff, Alexander</creator><creator>van Delden, Johannes J.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature</title><author>Heijltjes, Madelon T. ; van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W. ; Rietjens, Judith A.C. ; van der Heide, Agnes ; de Graeff, Alexander ; van Delden, Johannes J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-bc66d70e2b405026be6f24be0b0f30500f044ce77b5eb968f524d6b055159193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Continuous sedation</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death & dying</topic><topic>Deep Sedation</topic><topic>End of life decisions</topic><topic>end-of-life sedation</topic><topic>Euthanasia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>palliative sedation</topic><topic>Physical symptoms</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Sedation</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Terminal Care</topic><topic>terminal sedation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heijltjes, Madelon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietjens, Judith A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heide, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graeff, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Delden, Johannes J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heijltjes, Madelon T.</au><au>van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W.</au><au>Rietjens, Judith A.C.</au><au>van der Heide, Agnes</au><au>de Graeff, Alexander</au><au>van Delden, Johannes J.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>846.e3</epage><pages>828-846.e3</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>The use of continuous sedation until death (CSD) has been highly debated for many years. It is unknown how the use of CSD evolves over time. Reports suggest that there is an international increase in the use of CSD for terminally ill patients.
To gain insight in developments in the use of CSD in various countries and subpopulations.
We performed a search of the literature published between January 2000 and April 2020, in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library by using the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols guidelines. The search contained the following terms: continuous sedation, terminal sedation, palliative sedation, deep sedation, end-of-life sedation, sedation practice, and sedation until death.
We found 23 articles on 16 nationwide studies and 38 articles on 37 subpopulation studies. In nationwide studies on frequencies of CSD in deceased persons varied from 3% in Denmark in 2001 to 18% in The Netherlands in 2015. Nationwide studies indicate an increase in the use of CSD. Frequencies of CSD in the different subpopulations varied too widely to observe time trends. Over the years, more studies reported on the use of CSD for nonphysical symptoms including fear, anxiety, and psycho-existential distress. In some studies, there was an increase in requests for sedation of patients from their families.
The frequency of CSD seems to increase over time, possibly partly because of an extension of indications for sedation, from mainly physical symptoms to also nonphysical symptoms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32599152</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-10, Vol.60 (4), p.828-846.e3 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2419094831 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Anesthesia Continuous sedation Death Death & dying Deep Sedation End of life decisions end-of-life sedation Euthanasia Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use Literature reviews Netherlands Palliative Care palliative sedation Physical symptoms Psychological distress Sedation Systematic review Terminal Care terminal sedation |
title | Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20Practices%20in%20the%20Use%20of%20Continuous%20Sedation%20at%20the%20End%20of%20Life:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Heijltjes,%20Madelon%20T.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=846.e3&rft.pages=828-846.e3&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2419094831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2455577120&rft_id=info:pmid/32599152&rft_els_id=S0885392420305601&rfr_iscdi=true |