Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis
To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision ,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e988 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e976 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Sharma, Mayur John, Kevin Dietz, Nicholas Aljuboori, Zaid Madrigal, Fabian Carballo Adams, Shawn Wang, Dengzhi Ugiliweneza, Beatrice Drazin, Doniel Boakye, Maxwell |
description | To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions.
We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.
MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion.
Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418130441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875020313656</els_id><sourcerecordid>2418130441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFuEzEUtBCIVqU_wAH5yCXBa-96bcQlSklbKShIJWfLa78tDrv2YntB5Sf6yzhK6ZF3eU-jmZHeDEJvK7KsSMU_HJa_PcxLSihZEl6w9gU6r0QrFqLl8uXz3ZAzdJnSgZRhVS1a9hqdMdqIhrXNOXrcaJNDTPh2nMrl_D3ezdmEERLW3uIb0EP-jtc6At5nN7g_OrvgsfN4lzKEKcSQncFfCww-J7z3FuJ9OBpt57HTEd9NzgPezKno0ke8wl90_AH5zmiPr3TWnU6AV14PD8mlN-hVr4cEl0_7Au03n7-tbxbb3fXterVdmJrSvGgp6yhIsEYSLjoiLRWyEVx3kgLn0DEue85Jy4Tua9lbLaEHRgi1IFoq2QV6f_KdYvg5Q8pqdMnAMGgPYU6K1pWoGKnrqlDpiWpiSClCr6boRh0fVEXUsQt1UMcu1LELRXjB2iJ69-Q_dyPYZ8m_5Avh04kA5ctfDqJKpiRowLoIJisb3P_8_wKrRJyb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418130441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><description>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions.
We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.
MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion.
Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32585375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Health care utilization ; Humans ; Long-term ; Lumbosacral Region - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Outcomes ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Spinal Diseases - complications ; Spinal Diseases - epidemiology ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Spine fusion ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6481-7819 ; 0000-0001-5822-1680 ; 0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875020313656$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljuboori, Zaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dengzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drazin, Doniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions.
We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.
MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion.
Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long-term</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion</subject><subject>Spine fusion</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFuEzEUtBCIVqU_wAH5yCXBa-96bcQlSklbKShIJWfLa78tDrv2YntB5Sf6yzhK6ZF3eU-jmZHeDEJvK7KsSMU_HJa_PcxLSihZEl6w9gU6r0QrFqLl8uXz3ZAzdJnSgZRhVS1a9hqdMdqIhrXNOXrcaJNDTPh2nMrl_D3ezdmEERLW3uIb0EP-jtc6At5nN7g_OrvgsfN4lzKEKcSQncFfCww-J7z3FuJ9OBpt57HTEd9NzgPezKno0ke8wl90_AH5zmiPr3TWnU6AV14PD8mlN-hVr4cEl0_7Au03n7-tbxbb3fXterVdmJrSvGgp6yhIsEYSLjoiLRWyEVx3kgLn0DEue85Jy4Tua9lbLaEHRgi1IFoq2QV6f_KdYvg5Q8pqdMnAMGgPYU6K1pWoGKnrqlDpiWpiSClCr6boRh0fVEXUsQt1UMcu1LELRXjB2iJ69-Q_dyPYZ8m_5Avh04kA5ctfDqJKpiRowLoIJisb3P_8_wKrRJyb</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Sharma, Mayur</creator><creator>John, Kevin</creator><creator>Dietz, Nicholas</creator><creator>Aljuboori, Zaid</creator><creator>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creator><creator>Adams, Shawn</creator><creator>Wang, Dengzhi</creator><creator>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creator><creator>Drazin, Doniel</creator><creator>Boakye, Maxwell</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-7819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><author>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long-term</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion</topic><topic>Spine fusion</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljuboori, Zaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dengzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drazin, Doniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Mayur</au><au>John, Kevin</au><au>Dietz, Nicholas</au><au>Aljuboori, Zaid</au><au>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</au><au>Adams, Shawn</au><au>Wang, Dengzhi</au><au>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</au><au>Drazin, Doniel</au><au>Boakye, Maxwell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>e976</spage><epage>e988</epage><pages>e976-e988</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions.
We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge.
MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion.
Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32585375</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-7819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418130441 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Databases, Factual Female Health care utilization Humans Long-term Lumbosacral Region - surgery Male Middle Aged Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - complications Osteoporosis - epidemiology Outcomes Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Spinal Diseases - complications Spinal Diseases - epidemiology Spinal Diseases - surgery Spinal Fusion Spine fusion Treatment Outcome |
title | Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Impacting%20Outcomes%20and%20Health%20Care%20Utilization%20in%20Osteoporotic%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Lumbar%20Spine%20Fusions:%20A%20MarketScan%20Database%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Sharma,%20Mayur&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=e976&rft.epage=e988&rft.pages=e976-e988&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418130441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418130441&rft_id=info:pmid/32585375&rft_els_id=S1878875020313656&rfr_iscdi=true |