Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis

To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision ,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988
Hauptverfasser: Sharma, Mayur, John, Kevin, Dietz, Nicholas, Aljuboori, Zaid, Madrigal, Fabian Carballo, Adams, Shawn, Wang, Dengzhi, Ugiliweneza, Beatrice, Drazin, Doniel, Boakye, Maxwell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e988
container_issue
container_start_page e976
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 141
creator Sharma, Mayur
John, Kevin
Dietz, Nicholas
Aljuboori, Zaid
Madrigal, Fabian Carballo
Adams, Shawn
Wang, Dengzhi
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Drazin, Doniel
Boakye, Maxwell
description To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (>65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion. Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418130441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875020313656</els_id><sourcerecordid>2418130441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFuEzEUtBCIVqU_wAH5yCXBa-96bcQlSklbKShIJWfLa78tDrv2YntB5Sf6yzhK6ZF3eU-jmZHeDEJvK7KsSMU_HJa_PcxLSihZEl6w9gU6r0QrFqLl8uXz3ZAzdJnSgZRhVS1a9hqdMdqIhrXNOXrcaJNDTPh2nMrl_D3ezdmEERLW3uIb0EP-jtc6At5nN7g_OrvgsfN4lzKEKcSQncFfCww-J7z3FuJ9OBpt57HTEd9NzgPezKno0ke8wl90_AH5zmiPr3TWnU6AV14PD8mlN-hVr4cEl0_7Au03n7-tbxbb3fXterVdmJrSvGgp6yhIsEYSLjoiLRWyEVx3kgLn0DEue85Jy4Tua9lbLaEHRgi1IFoq2QV6f_KdYvg5Q8pqdMnAMGgPYU6K1pWoGKnrqlDpiWpiSClCr6boRh0fVEXUsQt1UMcu1LELRXjB2iJ69-Q_dyPYZ8m_5Avh04kA5ctfDqJKpiRowLoIJisb3P_8_wKrRJyb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418130441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><description>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P &lt; 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (&gt;65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion. Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32585375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Health care utilization ; Humans ; Long-term ; Lumbosacral Region - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Outcomes ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Spinal Diseases - complications ; Spinal Diseases - epidemiology ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Spine fusion ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6481-7819 ; 0000-0001-5822-1680 ; 0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875020313656$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljuboori, Zaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dengzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drazin, Doniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P &lt; 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (&gt;65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion. Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long-term</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion</subject><subject>Spine fusion</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFuEzEUtBCIVqU_wAH5yCXBa-96bcQlSklbKShIJWfLa78tDrv2YntB5Sf6yzhK6ZF3eU-jmZHeDEJvK7KsSMU_HJa_PcxLSihZEl6w9gU6r0QrFqLl8uXz3ZAzdJnSgZRhVS1a9hqdMdqIhrXNOXrcaJNDTPh2nMrl_D3ezdmEERLW3uIb0EP-jtc6At5nN7g_OrvgsfN4lzKEKcSQncFfCww-J7z3FuJ9OBpt57HTEd9NzgPezKno0ke8wl90_AH5zmiPr3TWnU6AV14PD8mlN-hVr4cEl0_7Au03n7-tbxbb3fXterVdmJrSvGgp6yhIsEYSLjoiLRWyEVx3kgLn0DEue85Jy4Tua9lbLaEHRgi1IFoq2QV6f_KdYvg5Q8pqdMnAMGgPYU6K1pWoGKnrqlDpiWpiSClCr6boRh0fVEXUsQt1UMcu1LELRXjB2iJ69-Q_dyPYZ8m_5Avh04kA5ctfDqJKpiRowLoIJisb3P_8_wKrRJyb</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Sharma, Mayur</creator><creator>John, Kevin</creator><creator>Dietz, Nicholas</creator><creator>Aljuboori, Zaid</creator><creator>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creator><creator>Adams, Shawn</creator><creator>Wang, Dengzhi</creator><creator>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creator><creator>Drazin, Doniel</creator><creator>Boakye, Maxwell</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-7819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</title><author>Sharma, Mayur ; John, Kevin ; Dietz, Nicholas ; Aljuboori, Zaid ; Madrigal, Fabian Carballo ; Adams, Shawn ; Wang, Dengzhi ; Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ; Drazin, Doniel ; Boakye, Maxwell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-723b2e9edc9068b09d289586ab92e66eb369f660738af49fda9efe3002de87293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long-term</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion</topic><topic>Spine fusion</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mayur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljuboori, Zaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Shawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dengzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drazin, Doniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Maxwell</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Mayur</au><au>John, Kevin</au><au>Dietz, Nicholas</au><au>Aljuboori, Zaid</au><au>Madrigal, Fabian Carballo</au><au>Adams, Shawn</au><au>Wang, Dengzhi</au><au>Ugiliweneza, Beatrice</au><au>Drazin, Doniel</au><au>Boakye, Maxwell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>e976</spage><epage>e988</epage><pages>e976-e988</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>To identify factors impacting long-term complications, reoperations, readmission rates, and health care utilization in patients with osteoporosis (OP) following lumbar fusions. We used International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision , and Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract data from MarketScan (2000–2016). Patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative diagnosis: OP or non-OP. We used multivariable generalized linear regression models to analyze outcomes of interest (reoperation rates, readmissions, complications, health care utilization) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. MarketScan identified 116,749 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with ≥24 months of follow-up; 6% had OP. OP patients had a higher incidence of complications (14% vs. 9%); were less likely to be discharged home (77% vs. 86%, P &lt; 0.05); had more new fusions or refusions at 6 months (2.9% vs. 2.1%), 12 months (5% vs. 3.8%), and 24 months (8.5% vs. 7.4%); incurred more outpatient services at 12 months (80 vs. 61) and 24 months (148 vs. 115); and incurred higher overall costs at 12 months ($22,932 vs. $17,017) and 24 months ($48,379 vs. $35,888). Elderly OP patients (&gt;65 years old) who underwent multilevel lumbar fusions had longer hospitalization, had higher complication rates, and incurred lower costs at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with young non-OP patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion. Patients of all ages with OP had higher complication rates and required revision surgeries at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with non-OP patients. Elderly OP patients having multilevel lumbar fusions were twice as likely to have complications and lower health care utilization compared with younger non-OP patients who underwent single-level fusion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32585375</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-7819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-4749</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2020-09, Vol.141, p.e976-e988
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418130441
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Databases, Factual
Female
Health care utilization
Humans
Long-term
Lumbosacral Region - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - complications
Osteoporosis - epidemiology
Outcomes
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Spinal Diseases - complications
Spinal Diseases - epidemiology
Spinal Diseases - surgery
Spinal Fusion
Spine fusion
Treatment Outcome
title Factors Impacting Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Osteoporotic Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusions: A MarketScan Database Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Impacting%20Outcomes%20and%20Health%20Care%20Utilization%20in%20Osteoporotic%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Lumbar%20Spine%20Fusions:%20A%20MarketScan%20Database%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Sharma,%20Mayur&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=e976&rft.epage=e988&rft.pages=e976-e988&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418130441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418130441&rft_id=info:pmid/32585375&rft_els_id=S1878875020313656&rfr_iscdi=true