Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair
BACKGROUND:In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2020-10, Vol.146 (4), p.883-890 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 890 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Etemad, Shervin A. Huang, Li-Ching Phillips, Sharon Stewart, Thomas G. Pierce, Richard A. Schneeberger, Steven J. Poulose, Benjamin K. |
description | BACKGROUND:In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sutures, staples, tacks) versus fixation-free mesh placement.
METHODS:Adults who underwent open, elective, retromuscular ventral hernia repair of 15 cm width or less with permanent synthetic mesh placement in a clean wound were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received mechanical mesh fixation to those who received fixation-free mesh placement. Thirty-day hernia recurrence was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of 30-day hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, wound events, pain, and abdominal wall function. One- and 2-year composite recurrence and 3-year cumulative composite recurrence were also evaluated.
RESULTS:A 3:1 propensity score match was performed on 299 fixation-free patients identifying 897 mechanical fixation patients, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m and mean age of 57.5 years. There was no difference in 30-day recurrence between mechanical and fixation-free approaches (0.2 percent versus 0 percent; p = 1). Median length of stay was longer for mechanical fixation (4 versus 3 days; p = 0.002). In the mechanical fixation group, pain scores were higher (worse pain, 46 versus 44; p = 0.001), and abdominal wall function scores were lower (worse function, 47 versus 60; p = 0.003), with no differences in rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, or wound events. There were no differences in long-term outcomes of 1- and 2-year composite recurrence, or 3-year cumulative composite recurrence.
CONCLUSION:For short-term technical durability, fixation-free mesh placement in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair is an acceptable alternative to mechanical fixation for hernia defects of 15 cm or less.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, III. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418120420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418120420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-37ea0f9953f1149bc81c0da00e2c6b29c401dfd7fef55dcc856e7ba52cfa90763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9ekmd3ezm41iKtUKhUqvXsNnM2mia1N3E6r83oVXEgw4MwzDPOzO8hJwzGDKIw6u7xf0QfkTIAnlA-kzy2BNc8EPSB_C5x0DyHjlx7hmAhX4gj0nP5zIGyUSfLEfZmypr9YSOVoYqOsnfVZ1XpTexiHSJelXmrw1SU1k632BJF1jbat043RTK0kcsa6sKOkVb5qodblRuT8mRUYXDs30dkIfJ9XI89Wbzm9vxaOZpAUx6fogKTBxL3zAm4lRHTEOmAJDrIOVxR2UmCw0aKTOtIxlgmCrJtVExhIE_IJe7vRtbtT-6OlnnTmNRqBKrxiVcsIhxEBxaVOxQbSvnLJpkY_O1sh8Jg6TzM2n9TH772cou9headI3Zt-jLwBaIdsC2Kmq07qVotmiTFaqiXv23W_wh7bAWEh4HDqzrvDZ95n8C1xCRKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418120420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Etemad, Shervin A. ; Huang, Li-Ching ; Phillips, Sharon ; Stewart, Thomas G. ; Pierce, Richard A. ; Schneeberger, Steven J. ; Poulose, Benjamin K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Etemad, Shervin A. ; Huang, Li-Ching ; Phillips, Sharon ; Stewart, Thomas G. ; Pierce, Richard A. ; Schneeberger, Steven J. ; Poulose, Benjamin K.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sutures, staples, tacks) versus fixation-free mesh placement.
METHODS:Adults who underwent open, elective, retromuscular ventral hernia repair of 15 cm width or less with permanent synthetic mesh placement in a clean wound were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received mechanical mesh fixation to those who received fixation-free mesh placement. Thirty-day hernia recurrence was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of 30-day hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, wound events, pain, and abdominal wall function. One- and 2-year composite recurrence and 3-year cumulative composite recurrence were also evaluated.
RESULTS:A 3:1 propensity score match was performed on 299 fixation-free patients identifying 897 mechanical fixation patients, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m and mean age of 57.5 years. There was no difference in 30-day recurrence between mechanical and fixation-free approaches (0.2 percent versus 0 percent; p = 1). Median length of stay was longer for mechanical fixation (4 versus 3 days; p = 0.002). In the mechanical fixation group, pain scores were higher (worse pain, 46 versus 44; p = 0.001), and abdominal wall function scores were lower (worse function, 47 versus 60; p = 0.003), with no differences in rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, or wound events. There were no differences in long-term outcomes of 1- and 2-year composite recurrence, or 3-year cumulative composite recurrence.
CONCLUSION:For short-term technical durability, fixation-free mesh placement in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair is an acceptable alternative to mechanical fixation for hernia defects of 15 cm or less.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32590514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Female ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Recurrence ; Surgical Mesh ; Surgical Stapling ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-10, Vol.146 (4), p.883-890</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2020American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-37ea0f9953f1149bc81c0da00e2c6b29c401dfd7fef55dcc856e7ba52cfa90763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-37ea0f9953f1149bc81c0da00e2c6b29c401dfd7fef55dcc856e7ba52cfa90763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etemad, Shervin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Li-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulose, Benjamin K.</creatorcontrib><title>Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sutures, staples, tacks) versus fixation-free mesh placement.
METHODS:Adults who underwent open, elective, retromuscular ventral hernia repair of 15 cm width or less with permanent synthetic mesh placement in a clean wound were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received mechanical mesh fixation to those who received fixation-free mesh placement. Thirty-day hernia recurrence was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of 30-day hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, wound events, pain, and abdominal wall function. One- and 2-year composite recurrence and 3-year cumulative composite recurrence were also evaluated.
RESULTS:A 3:1 propensity score match was performed on 299 fixation-free patients identifying 897 mechanical fixation patients, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m and mean age of 57.5 years. There was no difference in 30-day recurrence between mechanical and fixation-free approaches (0.2 percent versus 0 percent; p = 1). Median length of stay was longer for mechanical fixation (4 versus 3 days; p = 0.002). In the mechanical fixation group, pain scores were higher (worse pain, 46 versus 44; p = 0.001), and abdominal wall function scores were lower (worse function, 47 versus 60; p = 0.003), with no differences in rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, or wound events. There were no differences in long-term outcomes of 1- and 2-year composite recurrence, or 3-year cumulative composite recurrence.
CONCLUSION:For short-term technical durability, fixation-free mesh placement in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair is an acceptable alternative to mechanical fixation for hernia defects of 15 cm or less.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, III.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9ekmd3ezm41iKtUKhUqvXsNnM2mia1N3E6r83oVXEgw4MwzDPOzO8hJwzGDKIw6u7xf0QfkTIAnlA-kzy2BNc8EPSB_C5x0DyHjlx7hmAhX4gj0nP5zIGyUSfLEfZmypr9YSOVoYqOsnfVZ1XpTexiHSJelXmrw1SU1k632BJF1jbat043RTK0kcsa6sKOkVb5qodblRuT8mRUYXDs30dkIfJ9XI89Wbzm9vxaOZpAUx6fogKTBxL3zAm4lRHTEOmAJDrIOVxR2UmCw0aKTOtIxlgmCrJtVExhIE_IJe7vRtbtT-6OlnnTmNRqBKrxiVcsIhxEBxaVOxQbSvnLJpkY_O1sh8Jg6TzM2n9TH772cou9headI3Zt-jLwBaIdsC2Kmq07qVotmiTFaqiXv23W_wh7bAWEh4HDqzrvDZ95n8C1xCRKQ</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Etemad, Shervin A.</creator><creator>Huang, Li-Ching</creator><creator>Phillips, Sharon</creator><creator>Stewart, Thomas G.</creator><creator>Pierce, Richard A.</creator><creator>Schneeberger, Steven J.</creator><creator>Poulose, Benjamin K.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair</title><author>Etemad, Shervin A. ; Huang, Li-Ching ; Phillips, Sharon ; Stewart, Thomas G. ; Pierce, Richard A. ; Schneeberger, Steven J. ; Poulose, Benjamin K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-37ea0f9953f1149bc81c0da00e2c6b29c401dfd7fef55dcc856e7ba52cfa90763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - surgery</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etemad, Shervin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Li-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneeberger, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulose, Benjamin K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etemad, Shervin A.</au><au>Huang, Li-Ching</au><au>Phillips, Sharon</au><au>Stewart, Thomas G.</au><au>Pierce, Richard A.</au><au>Schneeberger, Steven J.</au><au>Poulose, Benjamin K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>890</epage><pages>883-890</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:In open retromuscular ventral hernia repair, fixation-free mesh placement is increasingly prevalent and may minimize pain; the main concern with this technique is short-term technical failure and hernia recurrence. This study compared outcomes following mechanical mesh fixation (i.e., sutures, staples, tacks) versus fixation-free mesh placement.
METHODS:Adults who underwent open, elective, retromuscular ventral hernia repair of 15 cm width or less with permanent synthetic mesh placement in a clean wound were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received mechanical mesh fixation to those who received fixation-free mesh placement. Thirty-day hernia recurrence was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of 30-day hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of readmission, reoperation, wound events, pain, and abdominal wall function. One- and 2-year composite recurrence and 3-year cumulative composite recurrence were also evaluated.
RESULTS:A 3:1 propensity score match was performed on 299 fixation-free patients identifying 897 mechanical fixation patients, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m and mean age of 57.5 years. There was no difference in 30-day recurrence between mechanical and fixation-free approaches (0.2 percent versus 0 percent; p = 1). Median length of stay was longer for mechanical fixation (4 versus 3 days; p = 0.002). In the mechanical fixation group, pain scores were higher (worse pain, 46 versus 44; p = 0.001), and abdominal wall function scores were lower (worse function, 47 versus 60; p = 0.003), with no differences in rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, or wound events. There were no differences in long-term outcomes of 1- and 2-year composite recurrence, or 3-year cumulative composite recurrence.
CONCLUSION:For short-term technical durability, fixation-free mesh placement in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair is an acceptable alternative to mechanical fixation for hernia defects of 15 cm or less.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>32590514</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000007165</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-10, Vol.146 (4), p.883-890 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2418120420 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Female Hernia, Ventral - surgery Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans Male Middle Aged Prosthesis Implantation - methods Recurrence Surgical Mesh Surgical Stapling Sutures Treatment Outcome |
title | Advantages of a Fixation-Free Technique for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A57%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advantages%20of%20a%20Fixation-Free%20Technique%20for%20Open%20Retromuscular%20Ventral%20Hernia%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Etemad,%20Shervin%20A.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=890&rft.pages=883-890&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418120420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418120420&rft_id=info:pmid/32590514&rfr_iscdi=true |