Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models
Objectives This study was conducted to evaluate the association of geographic distance with robotic telestenting performance by comparing performance measures in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models of telestenting. Background Robotic telestenting, in which percutaneous coronary interve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2021-02, Vol.97 (3), p.E327-E332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | E327 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Madder, Ryan D. VanOosterhout, Stacie Parker, Jessica Sconzert, Kalyna Li, Yao Kottenstette, Nicholas Madsen, Abigail Sungur, John‐Michael Bergman, Per |
description | Objectives
This study was conducted to evaluate the association of geographic distance with robotic telestenting performance by comparing performance measures in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models of telestenting.
Background
Robotic telestenting, in which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed on a remotely located patient, might improve PCI access, but has not been attempted over vast distances likely required to reach many underserved regions.
Methods
Telestenting performance was compared in regional (Boston to New York [206 miles]) and transcontinental (Boston to San Francisco [3,085 miles]) ex vivo models of telestenting, wherein a physician in Boston attempted robotic PCI on endovascular simulators in New York and San Francisco, respectively. PCI was attempted over both wired and fifth generation (5G)‐wireless networks. Outcome measures included procedural success, procedural time, and perceived latency.
Results
Procedural success was achieved in 20 consecutive target lesions in the regional model and in 16 consecutive target lesions in the transcontinental model. The transcontinental model had a greater latency than the regional model over both wired (121.5 ± 2.4 ms vs. 67.8 ± 0.9 ms; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.29115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2417401108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2417401108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-cebd7777f2b3ffa48cf8ab8ac03d64f7f7dd18221cf02dbe343c1d0d0922074e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNFD23xtd_co6ycUBFH0tmSTSUnZTWqyRXrzEXxGn8TUVg-Cc5kZ5scP5o_QMcEjgjEdS6lGtCAk3UF9klI6zOjkZXc7k4JPeugghDnGuJjQYh_1GE1zVnDeR88PrnadkUkHDYQObGfsLFmA1863wkpIjE06L2yQbn2LgGgSYVXiYWacjcvCw-f7h2yMNTKurVPQhEO0p0UT4GjbB-jp-uqxvB1O72_uyovpULKUpUMJtcpiaVozrQXPpc5FnQuJmZpwnelMKZJTSqTGVNXAOJNEYYULSnHGgQ3Q2ca78O51GT-oWhMkNI2w4JahopxkHBOC84ie_kHnbunjB2uqwBlmWdQP0PmGkt6F4EFXC29a4VcVwdU67SqmXX2nHdmTrXFZt6B-yZ94IzDeAG-mgdX_pqosLzfKL6Jyitw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490703734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Madder, Ryan D. ; VanOosterhout, Stacie ; Parker, Jessica ; Sconzert, Kalyna ; Li, Yao ; Kottenstette, Nicholas ; Madsen, Abigail ; Sungur, John‐Michael ; Bergman, Per</creator><creatorcontrib>Madder, Ryan D. ; VanOosterhout, Stacie ; Parker, Jessica ; Sconzert, Kalyna ; Li, Yao ; Kottenstette, Nicholas ; Madsen, Abigail ; Sungur, John‐Michael ; Bergman, Per</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This study was conducted to evaluate the association of geographic distance with robotic telestenting performance by comparing performance measures in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models of telestenting.
Background
Robotic telestenting, in which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed on a remotely located patient, might improve PCI access, but has not been attempted over vast distances likely required to reach many underserved regions.
Methods
Telestenting performance was compared in regional (Boston to New York [206 miles]) and transcontinental (Boston to San Francisco [3,085 miles]) ex vivo models of telestenting, wherein a physician in Boston attempted robotic PCI on endovascular simulators in New York and San Francisco, respectively. PCI was attempted over both wired and fifth generation (5G)‐wireless networks. Outcome measures included procedural success, procedural time, and perceived latency.
Results
Procedural success was achieved in 20 consecutive target lesions in the regional model and in 16 consecutive target lesions in the transcontinental model. The transcontinental model had a greater latency than the regional model over both wired (121.5 ± 2.4 ms vs. 67.8 ± 0.9 ms; p < .001) and 5G‐wireless networks (162.5 ± 1.1 ms vs. 86.6 ± 0.6 ms; p < .001), but perceived latencies were graded “imperceptible” in all cases in both models. Transcontinental and regional models did not have significantly different procedural times over wired (4.1 ± 1.9 min vs. 9.0 ± 7.1 min; p = .051) or 5G‐wireless (3.0 ± 0.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.2; p = .36) networks.
Conclusions
Transcontinental robotic manipulation of coronary devices is now possible and was not associated with adverse performance compared to robotic telestenting conducted regionally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32583944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular system ; Latency ; robotic PCI ; Robotics ; telehealth ; Telemedicine ; Wireless networks</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2021-02, Vol.97 (3), p.E327-E332</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-cebd7777f2b3ffa48cf8ab8ac03d64f7f7dd18221cf02dbe343c1d0d0922074e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-cebd7777f2b3ffa48cf8ab8ac03d64f7f7dd18221cf02dbe343c1d0d0922074e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3751-2910</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.29115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.29115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madder, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanOosterhout, Stacie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sconzert, Kalyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottenstette, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sungur, John‐Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Per</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Objectives
This study was conducted to evaluate the association of geographic distance with robotic telestenting performance by comparing performance measures in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models of telestenting.
Background
Robotic telestenting, in which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed on a remotely located patient, might improve PCI access, but has not been attempted over vast distances likely required to reach many underserved regions.
Methods
Telestenting performance was compared in regional (Boston to New York [206 miles]) and transcontinental (Boston to San Francisco [3,085 miles]) ex vivo models of telestenting, wherein a physician in Boston attempted robotic PCI on endovascular simulators in New York and San Francisco, respectively. PCI was attempted over both wired and fifth generation (5G)‐wireless networks. Outcome measures included procedural success, procedural time, and perceived latency.
Results
Procedural success was achieved in 20 consecutive target lesions in the regional model and in 16 consecutive target lesions in the transcontinental model. The transcontinental model had a greater latency than the regional model over both wired (121.5 ± 2.4 ms vs. 67.8 ± 0.9 ms; p < .001) and 5G‐wireless networks (162.5 ± 1.1 ms vs. 86.6 ± 0.6 ms; p < .001), but perceived latencies were graded “imperceptible” in all cases in both models. Transcontinental and regional models did not have significantly different procedural times over wired (4.1 ± 1.9 min vs. 9.0 ± 7.1 min; p = .051) or 5G‐wireless (3.0 ± 0.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.2; p = .36) networks.
Conclusions
Transcontinental robotic manipulation of coronary devices is now possible and was not associated with adverse performance compared to robotic telestenting conducted regionally.</description><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>robotic PCI</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>telehealth</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNFD23xtd_co6ycUBFH0tmSTSUnZTWqyRXrzEXxGn8TUVg-Cc5kZ5scP5o_QMcEjgjEdS6lGtCAk3UF9klI6zOjkZXc7k4JPeugghDnGuJjQYh_1GE1zVnDeR88PrnadkUkHDYQObGfsLFmA1863wkpIjE06L2yQbn2LgGgSYVXiYWacjcvCw-f7h2yMNTKurVPQhEO0p0UT4GjbB-jp-uqxvB1O72_uyovpULKUpUMJtcpiaVozrQXPpc5FnQuJmZpwnelMKZJTSqTGVNXAOJNEYYULSnHGgQ3Q2ca78O51GT-oWhMkNI2w4JahopxkHBOC84ie_kHnbunjB2uqwBlmWdQP0PmGkt6F4EFXC29a4VcVwdU67SqmXX2nHdmTrXFZt6B-yZ94IzDeAG-mgdX_pqosLzfKL6Jyitw</recordid><startdate>20210215</startdate><enddate>20210215</enddate><creator>Madder, Ryan D.</creator><creator>VanOosterhout, Stacie</creator><creator>Parker, Jessica</creator><creator>Sconzert, Kalyna</creator><creator>Li, Yao</creator><creator>Kottenstette, Nicholas</creator><creator>Madsen, Abigail</creator><creator>Sungur, John‐Michael</creator><creator>Bergman, Per</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-2910</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210215</creationdate><title>Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models</title><author>Madder, Ryan D. ; VanOosterhout, Stacie ; Parker, Jessica ; Sconzert, Kalyna ; Li, Yao ; Kottenstette, Nicholas ; Madsen, Abigail ; Sungur, John‐Michael ; Bergman, Per</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-cebd7777f2b3ffa48cf8ab8ac03d64f7f7dd18221cf02dbe343c1d0d0922074e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>robotic PCI</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>telehealth</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madder, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanOosterhout, Stacie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sconzert, Kalyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottenstette, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sungur, John‐Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Per</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madder, Ryan D.</au><au>VanOosterhout, Stacie</au><au>Parker, Jessica</au><au>Sconzert, Kalyna</au><au>Li, Yao</au><au>Kottenstette, Nicholas</au><au>Madsen, Abigail</au><au>Sungur, John‐Michael</au><au>Bergman, Per</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2021-02-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>E327</spage><epage>E332</epage><pages>E327-E332</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This study was conducted to evaluate the association of geographic distance with robotic telestenting performance by comparing performance measures in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models of telestenting.
Background
Robotic telestenting, in which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed on a remotely located patient, might improve PCI access, but has not been attempted over vast distances likely required to reach many underserved regions.
Methods
Telestenting performance was compared in regional (Boston to New York [206 miles]) and transcontinental (Boston to San Francisco [3,085 miles]) ex vivo models of telestenting, wherein a physician in Boston attempted robotic PCI on endovascular simulators in New York and San Francisco, respectively. PCI was attempted over both wired and fifth generation (5G)‐wireless networks. Outcome measures included procedural success, procedural time, and perceived latency.
Results
Procedural success was achieved in 20 consecutive target lesions in the regional model and in 16 consecutive target lesions in the transcontinental model. The transcontinental model had a greater latency than the regional model over both wired (121.5 ± 2.4 ms vs. 67.8 ± 0.9 ms; p < .001) and 5G‐wireless networks (162.5 ± 1.1 ms vs. 86.6 ± 0.6 ms; p < .001), but perceived latencies were graded “imperceptible” in all cases in both models. Transcontinental and regional models did not have significantly different procedural times over wired (4.1 ± 1.9 min vs. 9.0 ± 7.1 min; p = .051) or 5G‐wireless (3.0 ± 0.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.2; p = .36) networks.
Conclusions
Transcontinental robotic manipulation of coronary devices is now possible and was not associated with adverse performance compared to robotic telestenting conducted regionally.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32583944</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.29115</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-2910</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2021-02, Vol.97 (3), p.E327-E332 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2417401108 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cardiovascular system Latency robotic PCI Robotics telehealth Telemedicine Wireless networks |
title | Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A32%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20telestenting%20performance%20in%20transcontinental%20and%20regional%20pre%E2%80%90clinical%20models&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Madder,%20Ryan%20D.&rft.date=2021-02-15&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=E327&rft.epage=E332&rft.pages=E327-E332&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.29115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2417401108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490703734&rft_id=info:pmid/32583944&rfr_iscdi=true |