Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment
•Women receiving labor epidural analgesia have different distinctive preferences.•The pain-control group placed emphasis to have control over epidural dosage.•The instrumental-delivery-averse group placed emphasis on the risk of instrumental delivery.•Willingness-to-pay analysis was consistent with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2020-11, Vol.66, p.109919-109919, Article 109919 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 109919 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 109919 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical anesthesia |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Tan, Chin Wen Ozdemir, Semra Baid, Drishti Rehena, Sultana Tan, Zach Ze Yan Sia, Alex Tiong Heng Finkelstein, Eric Sng, Ban Leong |
| description | •Women receiving labor epidural analgesia have different distinctive preferences.•The pain-control group placed emphasis to have control over epidural dosage.•The instrumental-delivery-averse group placed emphasis on the risk of instrumental delivery.•Willingness-to-pay analysis was consistent with the groups' preferences. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109919 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2416266551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818020309089</els_id><sourcerecordid>2445352403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-71358f2c3f0bfd9544c74ceff2e1646d00c0ff1d7ecdc831696ddaea01ce5da63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFVxhZYlE2Ga5_k3TVqoKCVAkWsLY89vXgKJMEO6ng7XE0LQs2rCxdf_fY5xxCtgx2DJh-3-0618fBDrjjwNdh27L2BdmwphaVVLw9IxtoFa8a1sA5uci5A4BywV6Rc8FVDVCzDdl_tXPEYc5XdEoYMOHgMFM7eDon67EaQ6B-SXE40N7uxyVRnGIZ2L5Atj9gjvaa3lIfs0s4I3U_xuiQ4q8JUzwW6dfkZbB9xjdP5yX5_vHDt7tP1cOX-893tw-VE1LMVc2EagJ3IsA--FZJ6WrpMASOTEvtARyEwHyNzrtGMN1q7y1aYA6Vt1pckncn3SmNPxfMszmWP2Hfl5DGJRsumeZaK8UK-vYftCvOip2VkkooLkEUSp8ol8acSzpmKo5s-m0YmLUF05nnFszagjm1UBa3T_LL_oj-79pz7AW4OQFY8niMmEx2cU3ex4RuNn6M_3vjD1uUnKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2445352403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tan, Chin Wen ; Ozdemir, Semra ; Baid, Drishti ; Rehena, Sultana ; Tan, Zach Ze Yan ; Sia, Alex Tiong Heng ; Finkelstein, Eric ; Sng, Ban Leong</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Chin Wen ; Ozdemir, Semra ; Baid, Drishti ; Rehena, Sultana ; Tan, Zach Ze Yan ; Sia, Alex Tiong Heng ; Finkelstein, Eric ; Sng, Ban Leong</creatorcontrib><description>•Women receiving labor epidural analgesia have different distinctive preferences.•The pain-control group placed emphasis to have control over epidural dosage.•The instrumental-delivery-averse group placed emphasis on the risk of instrumental delivery.•Willingness-to-pay analysis was consistent with the groups' preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32570071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Childbirth & labor ; Editing ; Epidural ; Epidural analgesia ; Labor analgesia ; Pain ; Patients ; Preferences ; Software ; Supervision ; Willingness to pay for preference analysis ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-11, Vol.66, p.109919-109919, Article 109919</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-71358f2c3f0bfd9544c74ceff2e1646d00c0ff1d7ecdc831696ddaea01ce5da63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818020309089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Chin Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baid, Drishti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehena, Sultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zach Ze Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sia, Alex Tiong Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sng, Ban Leong</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>•Women receiving labor epidural analgesia have different distinctive preferences.•The pain-control group placed emphasis to have control over epidural dosage.•The instrumental-delivery-averse group placed emphasis on the risk of instrumental delivery.•Willingness-to-pay analysis was consistent with the groups' preferences.</description><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Epidural</subject><subject>Epidural analgesia</subject><subject>Labor analgesia</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Willingness to pay for preference analysis</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFVxhZYlE2Ga5_k3TVqoKCVAkWsLY89vXgKJMEO6ng7XE0LQs2rCxdf_fY5xxCtgx2DJh-3-0618fBDrjjwNdh27L2BdmwphaVVLw9IxtoFa8a1sA5uci5A4BywV6Rc8FVDVCzDdl_tXPEYc5XdEoYMOHgMFM7eDon67EaQ6B-SXE40N7uxyVRnGIZ2L5Atj9gjvaa3lIfs0s4I3U_xuiQ4q8JUzwW6dfkZbB9xjdP5yX5_vHDt7tP1cOX-893tw-VE1LMVc2EagJ3IsA--FZJ6WrpMASOTEvtARyEwHyNzrtGMN1q7y1aYA6Vt1pckncn3SmNPxfMszmWP2Hfl5DGJRsumeZaK8UK-vYftCvOip2VkkooLkEUSp8ol8acSzpmKo5s-m0YmLUF05nnFszagjm1UBa3T_LL_oj-79pz7AW4OQFY8niMmEx2cU3ex4RuNn6M_3vjD1uUnKY</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Tan, Chin Wen</creator><creator>Ozdemir, Semra</creator><creator>Baid, Drishti</creator><creator>Rehena, Sultana</creator><creator>Tan, Zach Ze Yan</creator><creator>Sia, Alex Tiong Heng</creator><creator>Finkelstein, Eric</creator><creator>Sng, Ban Leong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment</title><author>Tan, Chin Wen ; Ozdemir, Semra ; Baid, Drishti ; Rehena, Sultana ; Tan, Zach Ze Yan ; Sia, Alex Tiong Heng ; Finkelstein, Eric ; Sng, Ban Leong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-71358f2c3f0bfd9544c74ceff2e1646d00c0ff1d7ecdc831696ddaea01ce5da63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Epidural</topic><topic>Epidural analgesia</topic><topic>Labor analgesia</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Willingness to pay for preference analysis</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Chin Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baid, Drishti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehena, Sultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Zach Ze Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sia, Alex Tiong Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sng, Ban Leong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Chin Wen</au><au>Ozdemir, Semra</au><au>Baid, Drishti</au><au>Rehena, Sultana</au><au>Tan, Zach Ze Yan</au><au>Sia, Alex Tiong Heng</au><au>Finkelstein, Eric</au><au>Sng, Ban Leong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>109919</spage><epage>109919</epage><pages>109919-109919</pages><artnum>109919</artnum><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>•Women receiving labor epidural analgesia have different distinctive preferences.•The pain-control group placed emphasis to have control over epidural dosage.•The instrumental-delivery-averse group placed emphasis on the risk of instrumental delivery.•Willingness-to-pay analysis was consistent with the groups' preferences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32570071</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109919</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-11, Vol.66, p.109919-109919, Article 109919 |
| issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2416266551 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Childbirth & labor Editing Epidural Epidural analgesia Labor analgesia Pain Patients Preferences Software Supervision Willingness to pay for preference analysis Writing |
| title | Patients' preferences and trade-off during labour epidural analgesia: A discrete choice experiment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20preferences%20and%20trade-off%20during%20labour%20epidural%20analgesia:%20A%20discrete%20choice%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Tan,%20Chin%20Wen&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=109919&rft.epage=109919&rft.pages=109919-109919&rft.artnum=109919&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109919&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2445352403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2445352403&rft_id=info:pmid/32570071&rft_els_id=S0952818020309089&rfr_iscdi=true |