Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin

Optimal conditioning and graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2020-09, Vol.34 (9), p.e14018-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ousia, Samar, Kalra, Amit, Williamson, Tyler S., Prokopishyn, Nicole, Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam, Khan, Faisal M., Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor, Jamani, Kareem, Duggan, Peter R., Daly, Andrew, Russell, James A., Storek, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 9
container_start_page e14018
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 34
creator Ousia, Samar
Kalra, Amit
Williamson, Tyler S.
Prokopishyn, Nicole
Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam
Khan, Faisal M.
Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor
Jamani, Kareem
Duggan, Peter R.
Daly, Andrew
Russell, James A.
Storek, Jan
description Optimal conditioning and graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobulin and post‐transplant methotrexate and cyclosporine. We retrospectively studied 700 patients with hematologic malignancies who received blood stem cells from 7 to 8/8 HLA‐matched unrelated or related donors. Median follow‐up of surviving patients was 5 years. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and chronic GVHD/relapse‐free survival (cGRFS) were 58%, 55%, and 40%. Risk factors for poor OS, RFS, and cGRFS were (1). high to very high disease risk index (DRI), (2). high recipient age, and (3). cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seropositive recipient with seronegative donor (D−R+). The latter risk factor applied particularly to patients with lymphoid malignancies. Neither donor other than HLA‐matched sibling (7‐8/8 unrelated) nor one HLA allele mismatch was risk factors for poor OS, RFS, or cGRFS. In conclusion, the above regimen results in excellent long‐term outcomes. The outcomes are negatively impacted by older age, high or very high DRI, and CMV D−R+ serostatus, but not by donor unrelatedness or one HLA allele mismatch.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.14018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2416264314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416264314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3958-ae1e8cd7d3c6d4ffe718fde924a9735984d11e322ea7b76f493be356ad5c529c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQRi1ERIbAggsgL0GaSdp2_y7RCBKkSJFQWLfKdjkYue3BdjPqXY7AMTgXJ8HDhOxSmyqVXr1FfYS8YdU5K3WhcjxndcX6Z2TFxDBsqorx52RVDRUvcytOycuUvpdty9rmBTkVvOlEL-oV-X2FE-SwCxazVVShczRH8GnnwGca5qzChImCyRjptKALIB1k-xOpCl7bbIO3_o7ubf5GjZs1RJDW45rKOc3OgF9TF_Z_7n_pkJDmkMFRGfRCbYygLRwEawpe03IobS5jLq5lCmrJSO9ckLOz_hU5MeASvn7oZ-Trp4-326vN9c3l5-2H640SQ9NvABn2SndaqFbXxmDHeqNx4DUMnWiGvtaMoeAcoZNda-pBSBRNC7pRDR-UOCPvjt5dDD9mTHmcbDq8BTyGOY28Zi1va8Hqgr4_oiqGlCKacRftBHEZWTUeghlLMOO_YAr79kE7ywn1I_k_iQJcHIG9dbg8bRq3t1-Oyr90Op46</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416264314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ousia, Samar ; Kalra, Amit ; Williamson, Tyler S. ; Prokopishyn, Nicole ; Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam ; Khan, Faisal M. ; Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor ; Jamani, Kareem ; Duggan, Peter R. ; Daly, Andrew ; Russell, James A. ; Storek, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ousia, Samar ; Kalra, Amit ; Williamson, Tyler S. ; Prokopishyn, Nicole ; Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam ; Khan, Faisal M. ; Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor ; Jamani, Kareem ; Duggan, Peter R. ; Daly, Andrew ; Russell, James A. ; Storek, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Optimal conditioning and graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobulin and post‐transplant methotrexate and cyclosporine. We retrospectively studied 700 patients with hematologic malignancies who received blood stem cells from 7 to 8/8 HLA‐matched unrelated or related donors. Median follow‐up of surviving patients was 5 years. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and chronic GVHD/relapse‐free survival (cGRFS) were 58%, 55%, and 40%. Risk factors for poor OS, RFS, and cGRFS were (1). high to very high disease risk index (DRI), (2). high recipient age, and (3). cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seropositive recipient with seronegative donor (D−R+). The latter risk factor applied particularly to patients with lymphoid malignancies. Neither donor other than HLA‐matched sibling (7‐8/8 unrelated) nor one HLA allele mismatch was risk factors for poor OS, RFS, or cGRFS. In conclusion, the above regimen results in excellent long‐term outcomes. The outcomes are negatively impacted by older age, high or very high DRI, and CMV D−R+ serostatus, but not by donor unrelatedness or one HLA allele mismatch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32573834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>conditioning ; myeloablative ; outcomes ; stem cell transplant</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2020-09, Vol.34 (9), p.e14018-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3958-ae1e8cd7d3c6d4ffe718fde924a9735984d11e322ea7b76f493be356ad5c529c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3958-ae1e8cd7d3c6d4ffe718fde924a9735984d11e322ea7b76f493be356ad5c529c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6879-268X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ousia, Samar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tyler S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopishyn, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Faisal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamani, Kareem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storek, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Optimal conditioning and graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobulin and post‐transplant methotrexate and cyclosporine. We retrospectively studied 700 patients with hematologic malignancies who received blood stem cells from 7 to 8/8 HLA‐matched unrelated or related donors. Median follow‐up of surviving patients was 5 years. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and chronic GVHD/relapse‐free survival (cGRFS) were 58%, 55%, and 40%. Risk factors for poor OS, RFS, and cGRFS were (1). high to very high disease risk index (DRI), (2). high recipient age, and (3). cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seropositive recipient with seronegative donor (D−R+). The latter risk factor applied particularly to patients with lymphoid malignancies. Neither donor other than HLA‐matched sibling (7‐8/8 unrelated) nor one HLA allele mismatch was risk factors for poor OS, RFS, or cGRFS. In conclusion, the above regimen results in excellent long‐term outcomes. The outcomes are negatively impacted by older age, high or very high DRI, and CMV D−R+ serostatus, but not by donor unrelatedness or one HLA allele mismatch.</description><subject>conditioning</subject><subject>myeloablative</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>stem cell transplant</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQRi1ERIbAggsgL0GaSdp2_y7RCBKkSJFQWLfKdjkYue3BdjPqXY7AMTgXJ8HDhOxSmyqVXr1FfYS8YdU5K3WhcjxndcX6Z2TFxDBsqorx52RVDRUvcytOycuUvpdty9rmBTkVvOlEL-oV-X2FE-SwCxazVVShczRH8GnnwGca5qzChImCyRjptKALIB1k-xOpCl7bbIO3_o7ubf5GjZs1RJDW45rKOc3OgF9TF_Z_7n_pkJDmkMFRGfRCbYygLRwEawpe03IobS5jLq5lCmrJSO9ckLOz_hU5MeASvn7oZ-Trp4-326vN9c3l5-2H640SQ9NvABn2SndaqFbXxmDHeqNx4DUMnWiGvtaMoeAcoZNda-pBSBRNC7pRDR-UOCPvjt5dDD9mTHmcbDq8BTyGOY28Zi1va8Hqgr4_oiqGlCKacRftBHEZWTUeghlLMOO_YAr79kE7ywn1I_k_iQJcHIG9dbg8bRq3t1-Oyr90Op46</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Ousia, Samar</creator><creator>Kalra, Amit</creator><creator>Williamson, Tyler S.</creator><creator>Prokopishyn, Nicole</creator><creator>Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam</creator><creator>Khan, Faisal M.</creator><creator>Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor</creator><creator>Jamani, Kareem</creator><creator>Duggan, Peter R.</creator><creator>Daly, Andrew</creator><creator>Russell, James A.</creator><creator>Storek, Jan</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-268X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin</title><author>Ousia, Samar ; Kalra, Amit ; Williamson, Tyler S. ; Prokopishyn, Nicole ; Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam ; Khan, Faisal M. ; Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor ; Jamani, Kareem ; Duggan, Peter R. ; Daly, Andrew ; Russell, James A. ; Storek, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3958-ae1e8cd7d3c6d4ffe718fde924a9735984d11e322ea7b76f493be356ad5c529c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>conditioning</topic><topic>myeloablative</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>stem cell transplant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ousia, Samar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalra, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tyler S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopishyn, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Faisal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamani, Kareem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storek, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ousia, Samar</au><au>Kalra, Amit</au><au>Williamson, Tyler S.</au><au>Prokopishyn, Nicole</au><au>Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam</au><au>Khan, Faisal M.</au><au>Jimenez‐Zepeda, Victor</au><au>Jamani, Kareem</au><au>Duggan, Peter R.</au><au>Daly, Andrew</au><au>Russell, James A.</au><au>Storek, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e14018</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14018-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Optimal conditioning and graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobulin and post‐transplant methotrexate and cyclosporine. We retrospectively studied 700 patients with hematologic malignancies who received blood stem cells from 7 to 8/8 HLA‐matched unrelated or related donors. Median follow‐up of surviving patients was 5 years. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and chronic GVHD/relapse‐free survival (cGRFS) were 58%, 55%, and 40%. Risk factors for poor OS, RFS, and cGRFS were (1). high to very high disease risk index (DRI), (2). high recipient age, and (3). cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seropositive recipient with seronegative donor (D−R+). The latter risk factor applied particularly to patients with lymphoid malignancies. Neither donor other than HLA‐matched sibling (7‐8/8 unrelated) nor one HLA allele mismatch was risk factors for poor OS, RFS, or cGRFS. In conclusion, the above regimen results in excellent long‐term outcomes. The outcomes are negatively impacted by older age, high or very high DRI, and CMV D−R+ serostatus, but not by donor unrelatedness or one HLA allele mismatch.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>32573834</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14018</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-268X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2020-09, Vol.34 (9), p.e14018-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2416264314
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects conditioning
myeloablative
outcomes
stem cell transplant
title Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low‐dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hematopoietic%20cell%20transplant%20outcomes%20after%20myeloablative%20conditioning%20with%20fludarabine,%20busulfan,%20low%E2%80%90dose%20total%20body%20irradiation,%20and%20rabbit%20antithymocyte%20globulin&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Ousia,%20Samar&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e14018&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14018-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416264314%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416264314&rft_id=info:pmid/32573834&rfr_iscdi=true