The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language
Some concepts are more essential for human communication than others. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of agent-backgrounding is sufficiently important for communication that linguistic structures for encoding this concept are present in young sign languages. Agent-backgrounding con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 2020-10, Vol.203, p.104332-104332, Article 104332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104332 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104332 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 203 |
creator | Rissman, Lilia Horton, Laura Flaherty, Molly Senghas, Ann Coppola, Marie Brentari, Diane Goldin-Meadow, Susan |
description | Some concepts are more essential for human communication than others. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of agent-backgrounding is sufficiently important for communication that linguistic structures for encoding this concept are present in young sign languages. Agent-backgrounding constructions serve to reduce the prominence of the agent – the English passive sentence a book was knocked over is an example. Although these constructions are widely attested cross-linguistically, there is little prior research on the emergence of such devices in new languages. Here we studied how agent-backgrounding constructions emerge in Nicaraguan Sign Language (NSL) and adult homesign systems. We found that NSL signers have innovated both lexical and morphological devices for expressing agent-backgrounding, indicating that conveying a flexible perspective on events has deep communicative value. At the same time, agent-backgrounding devices did not emerge at the same time as agentive devices. This result suggests that agent-backgrounding does not have the same core cognitive status as agency. The emergence of agent-backgrounding morphology appears to depend on receiving a linguistic system as input in which linguistic devices for expressing agency are already well-established. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415301080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027720301517</els_id><sourcerecordid>2466058202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-b3598e83b77801ca74d32a7e3d60078b8e4989c0e6262b616eca37c33fefb1d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS3UCra0X6G11AuXbP0nsb3cEAJaaUUPwNly7EnW24292MlKfPs6WsqhF06jGf3mzeg9hL5RsqSEih_bpY198KOPYckIm6c15-wELaiSvJKKqw9oQQglFWFSnqFPOW8JITWT6hSdcdY0q4byBdo8bgDbOAxT8NaM_gDYD_uYRhMs4Nhh00MYq9bYP32KU3A-9Jf45uAdzECX4oA3cYDs-4BNcPi-yCTTTybgh3m2NqE0PXxGHzuzy_DltZ6jp9ubx-uf1fr33a_rq3Vl61qVQ7xZKVC8lVIRao2sHWdGAneCEKlaBfVKrSwBwQRrBRVgDZeW8w66ljrBz9HFUXef4vMEedSDzxZ2OxMgTlmzmja8-KJIQb__h27jlEL5rlBCkEYVawslj5RNMecEnd4nP5j0oinRcxh6q9_C0HMY-hhG2fz6qj-1A7i3vX_uF-DqCEAx5OAh6Wz97KvzCeyoXfTvHvkL7oCfMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466058202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rissman, Lilia ; Horton, Laura ; Flaherty, Molly ; Senghas, Ann ; Coppola, Marie ; Brentari, Diane ; Goldin-Meadow, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Lilia ; Horton, Laura ; Flaherty, Molly ; Senghas, Ann ; Coppola, Marie ; Brentari, Diane ; Goldin-Meadow, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Some concepts are more essential for human communication than others. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of agent-backgrounding is sufficiently important for communication that linguistic structures for encoding this concept are present in young sign languages. Agent-backgrounding constructions serve to reduce the prominence of the agent – the English passive sentence a book was knocked over is an example. Although these constructions are widely attested cross-linguistically, there is little prior research on the emergence of such devices in new languages. Here we studied how agent-backgrounding constructions emerge in Nicaraguan Sign Language (NSL) and adult homesign systems. We found that NSL signers have innovated both lexical and morphological devices for expressing agent-backgrounding, indicating that conveying a flexible perspective on events has deep communicative value. At the same time, agent-backgrounding devices did not emerge at the same time as agentive devices. This result suggests that agent-backgrounding does not have the same core cognitive status as agency. The emergence of agent-backgrounding morphology appears to depend on receiving a linguistic system as input in which linguistic devices for expressing agency are already well-established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32559513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agency ; Agents ; Cognitive ability ; Communication ; Encoding ; Gesture ; Language ; Language emergence ; Linguistics ; Morphology ; Semantics ; Sign language ; Sign languages ; Typology</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2020-10, Vol.203, p.104332-104332, Article 104332</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-b3598e83b77801ca74d32a7e3d60078b8e4989c0e6262b616eca37c33fefb1d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-b3598e83b77801ca74d32a7e3d60078b8e4989c0e6262b616eca37c33fefb1d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8319-2284 ; 0000-0002-3796-2719</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Lilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaherty, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senghas, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brentari, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldin-Meadow, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Some concepts are more essential for human communication than others. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of agent-backgrounding is sufficiently important for communication that linguistic structures for encoding this concept are present in young sign languages. Agent-backgrounding constructions serve to reduce the prominence of the agent – the English passive sentence a book was knocked over is an example. Although these constructions are widely attested cross-linguistically, there is little prior research on the emergence of such devices in new languages. Here we studied how agent-backgrounding constructions emerge in Nicaraguan Sign Language (NSL) and adult homesign systems. We found that NSL signers have innovated both lexical and morphological devices for expressing agent-backgrounding, indicating that conveying a flexible perspective on events has deep communicative value. At the same time, agent-backgrounding devices did not emerge at the same time as agentive devices. This result suggests that agent-backgrounding does not have the same core cognitive status as agency. The emergence of agent-backgrounding morphology appears to depend on receiving a linguistic system as input in which linguistic devices for expressing agency are already well-established.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Agents</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Gesture</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language emergence</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sign language</subject><subject>Sign languages</subject><subject>Typology</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS3UCra0X6G11AuXbP0nsb3cEAJaaUUPwNly7EnW24292MlKfPs6WsqhF06jGf3mzeg9hL5RsqSEih_bpY198KOPYckIm6c15-wELaiSvJKKqw9oQQglFWFSnqFPOW8JITWT6hSdcdY0q4byBdo8bgDbOAxT8NaM_gDYD_uYRhMs4Nhh00MYq9bYP32KU3A-9Jf45uAdzECX4oA3cYDs-4BNcPi-yCTTTybgh3m2NqE0PXxGHzuzy_DltZ6jp9ubx-uf1fr33a_rq3Vl61qVQ7xZKVC8lVIRao2sHWdGAneCEKlaBfVKrSwBwQRrBRVgDZeW8w66ljrBz9HFUXef4vMEedSDzxZ2OxMgTlmzmja8-KJIQb__h27jlEL5rlBCkEYVawslj5RNMecEnd4nP5j0oinRcxh6q9_C0HMY-hhG2fz6qj-1A7i3vX_uF-DqCEAx5OAh6Wz97KvzCeyoXfTvHvkL7oCfMg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Rissman, Lilia</creator><creator>Horton, Laura</creator><creator>Flaherty, Molly</creator><creator>Senghas, Ann</creator><creator>Coppola, Marie</creator><creator>Brentari, Diane</creator><creator>Goldin-Meadow, Susan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-2284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-2719</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language</title><author>Rissman, Lilia ; Horton, Laura ; Flaherty, Molly ; Senghas, Ann ; Coppola, Marie ; Brentari, Diane ; Goldin-Meadow, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-b3598e83b77801ca74d32a7e3d60078b8e4989c0e6262b616eca37c33fefb1d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Agents</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Gesture</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language emergence</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sign language</topic><topic>Sign languages</topic><topic>Typology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rissman, Lilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flaherty, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senghas, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brentari, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldin-Meadow, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rissman, Lilia</au><au>Horton, Laura</au><au>Flaherty, Molly</au><au>Senghas, Ann</au><au>Coppola, Marie</au><au>Brentari, Diane</au><au>Goldin-Meadow, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>203</volume><spage>104332</spage><epage>104332</epage><pages>104332-104332</pages><artnum>104332</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>Some concepts are more essential for human communication than others. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of agent-backgrounding is sufficiently important for communication that linguistic structures for encoding this concept are present in young sign languages. Agent-backgrounding constructions serve to reduce the prominence of the agent – the English passive sentence a book was knocked over is an example. Although these constructions are widely attested cross-linguistically, there is little prior research on the emergence of such devices in new languages. Here we studied how agent-backgrounding constructions emerge in Nicaraguan Sign Language (NSL) and adult homesign systems. We found that NSL signers have innovated both lexical and morphological devices for expressing agent-backgrounding, indicating that conveying a flexible perspective on events has deep communicative value. At the same time, agent-backgrounding devices did not emerge at the same time as agentive devices. This result suggests that agent-backgrounding does not have the same core cognitive status as agency. The emergence of agent-backgrounding morphology appears to depend on receiving a linguistic system as input in which linguistic devices for expressing agency are already well-established.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32559513</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-2284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-2719</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2020-10, Vol.203, p.104332-104332, Article 104332 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415301080 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agency Agents Cognitive ability Communication Encoding Gesture Language Language emergence Linguistics Morphology Semantics Sign language Sign languages Typology |
title | The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20communicative%20importance%20of%20agent-backgrounding:%20Evidence%20from%20homesign%20and%20Nicaraguan%20Sign%20Language&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Rissman,%20Lilia&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=203&rft.spage=104332&rft.epage=104332&rft.pages=104332-104332&rft.artnum=104332&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466058202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466058202&rft_id=info:pmid/32559513&rft_els_id=S0010027720301517&rfr_iscdi=true |