Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study

Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) in oral, topical, and intra‐dermal injection routes showed efficacy in melasma treatment. Micro‐needling and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were reported to enhance the drug delivery of TXA. Aims This study aimed at comparing the use of micro‐needling and frac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2021-02, Vol.20 (2), p.460-465
Hauptverfasser: Mekawy, Khaled M. M., Sadek, Ahmed, Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 465
container_issue 2
container_start_page 460
container_title Journal of cosmetic dermatology
container_volume 20
creator Mekawy, Khaled M. M.
Sadek, Ahmed
Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.
description Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) in oral, topical, and intra‐dermal injection routes showed efficacy in melasma treatment. Micro‐needling and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were reported to enhance the drug delivery of TXA. Aims This study aimed at comparing the use of micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser for drug delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma. Patients/Methods Thirty female patients with bilateral symmetrical facial melasma were subjected to micro‐needling, for one side of the face, and fractional CO2 laser, for the other, followed by an immediate topical application of TXA solution 4 mg/mL. Patients received six biweekly sessions. Results Two weeks after the last session, a significant reduction in baseline modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) score was observed on both sides. The mean ± SD baseline mMASI dropped from 3.43 ± 1.84 to 1.59 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 57.73%, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocd.13537
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415297039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415297039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3997-d32732458be904dbce455d0a3d2b57732ad47281158968247c998dd34dfe61c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReN_4AIalMRktUEpxZ8Z7NG503VA4VQwtI7Q6s3Przmf0SWQcdenZcHLOxw_5ENoh2QFJdfjktTkgjDOxhNZJLtiIkoIv__UsW0MbMT5lGRGS8FW0xigvKGNiHb3fWB3859tHB2Cc7R7wC4Q4RNwEpXvrO-WwVqH2HTbWT60B7FSEgBsfsAFnEz7DvsF9UB1MVWs1VtoabDvcP0Iag-pb6Po500K626ojfIzjxNk-PdsoDTj2g5ltoZVGuQjbP-cmuj87vRtfjK5vzy_Hx9cjzaQUI8OoYDTnZQ0yy02tIefcZIoZWnORVsrkgpaE8FIWJc2FlrI0huWmgYLogm2ivUXuJPjnAWJftTZqcC793w-xojnhVIqMyYTuL9CkKMYATTUJtlVhVpGsmquv5uqrb_UJ3v3JHeoWzB_66zoBZAG8Wgezf6Kqq9vxySL0C6Z1kcE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415297039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mekawy, Khaled M. M. ; Sadek, Ahmed ; Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mekawy, Khaled M. M. ; Sadek, Ahmed ; Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) in oral, topical, and intra‐dermal injection routes showed efficacy in melasma treatment. Micro‐needling and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were reported to enhance the drug delivery of TXA. Aims This study aimed at comparing the use of micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser for drug delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma. Patients/Methods Thirty female patients with bilateral symmetrical facial melasma were subjected to micro‐needling, for one side of the face, and fractional CO2 laser, for the other, followed by an immediate topical application of TXA solution 4 mg/mL. Patients received six biweekly sessions. Results Two weeks after the last session, a significant reduction in baseline modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) score was observed on both sides. The mean ± SD baseline mMASI dropped from 3.43 ± 1.84 to 1.59 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 57.73%, P &lt; .001) and from 3.51 ± 1.84 to 1.78 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 55.82%, P &lt; .001) in the micro‐needling–treated side and in the fractional CO2 laser–treated side, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two sides (P = .81). Conclusions Micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser are equally safe and effective for the delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13537</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32562337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; fractional CO2 laser ; Humans ; Lasers, Gas - adverse effects ; Low-Level Light Therapy ; Melanosis - drug therapy ; melasma ; micro‐needling ; Tranexamic Acid</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021-02, Vol.20 (2), p.460-465</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3997-d32732458be904dbce455d0a3d2b57732ad47281158968247c998dd34dfe61c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3997-d32732458be904dbce455d0a3d2b57732ad47281158968247c998dd34dfe61c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5138-9883</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocd.13537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocd.13537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mekawy, Khaled M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadek, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</creatorcontrib><title>Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) in oral, topical, and intra‐dermal injection routes showed efficacy in melasma treatment. Micro‐needling and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were reported to enhance the drug delivery of TXA. Aims This study aimed at comparing the use of micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser for drug delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma. Patients/Methods Thirty female patients with bilateral symmetrical facial melasma were subjected to micro‐needling, for one side of the face, and fractional CO2 laser, for the other, followed by an immediate topical application of TXA solution 4 mg/mL. Patients received six biweekly sessions. Results Two weeks after the last session, a significant reduction in baseline modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) score was observed on both sides. The mean ± SD baseline mMASI dropped from 3.43 ± 1.84 to 1.59 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 57.73%, P &lt; .001) and from 3.51 ± 1.84 to 1.78 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 55.82%, P &lt; .001) in the micro‐needling–treated side and in the fractional CO2 laser–treated side, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two sides (P = .81). Conclusions Micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser are equally safe and effective for the delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma.</description><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fractional CO2 laser</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lasers, Gas - adverse effects</subject><subject>Low-Level Light Therapy</subject><subject>Melanosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>melasma</subject><subject>micro‐needling</subject><subject>Tranexamic Acid</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonReN_4AIalMRktUEpxZ8Z7NG503VA4VQwtI7Q6s3Przmf0SWQcdenZcHLOxw_5ENoh2QFJdfjktTkgjDOxhNZJLtiIkoIv__UsW0MbMT5lGRGS8FW0xigvKGNiHb3fWB3859tHB2Cc7R7wC4Q4RNwEpXvrO-WwVqH2HTbWT60B7FSEgBsfsAFnEz7DvsF9UB1MVWs1VtoabDvcP0Iag-pb6Po500K626ojfIzjxNk-PdsoDTj2g5ltoZVGuQjbP-cmuj87vRtfjK5vzy_Hx9cjzaQUI8OoYDTnZQ0yy02tIefcZIoZWnORVsrkgpaE8FIWJc2FlrI0huWmgYLogm2ivUXuJPjnAWJftTZqcC793w-xojnhVIqMyYTuL9CkKMYATTUJtlVhVpGsmquv5uqrb_UJ3v3JHeoWzB_66zoBZAG8Wgezf6Kqq9vxySL0C6Z1kcE</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Mekawy, Khaled M. M.</creator><creator>Sadek, Ahmed</creator><creator>Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-9883</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study</title><author>Mekawy, Khaled M. M. ; Sadek, Ahmed ; Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3997-d32732458be904dbce455d0a3d2b57732ad47281158968247c998dd34dfe61c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fractional CO2 laser</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lasers, Gas - adverse effects</topic><topic>Low-Level Light Therapy</topic><topic>Melanosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>melasma</topic><topic>micro‐needling</topic><topic>Tranexamic Acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mekawy, Khaled M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadek, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mekawy, Khaled M. M.</au><au>Sadek, Ahmed</au><au>Seddeik Abdel‐Hameed, Ahmad K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>460-465</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) in oral, topical, and intra‐dermal injection routes showed efficacy in melasma treatment. Micro‐needling and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were reported to enhance the drug delivery of TXA. Aims This study aimed at comparing the use of micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser for drug delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma. Patients/Methods Thirty female patients with bilateral symmetrical facial melasma were subjected to micro‐needling, for one side of the face, and fractional CO2 laser, for the other, followed by an immediate topical application of TXA solution 4 mg/mL. Patients received six biweekly sessions. Results Two weeks after the last session, a significant reduction in baseline modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) score was observed on both sides. The mean ± SD baseline mMASI dropped from 3.43 ± 1.84 to 1.59 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 57.73%, P &lt; .001) and from 3.51 ± 1.84 to 1.78 ± 1.51 (mean reduction 55.82%, P &lt; .001) in the micro‐needling–treated side and in the fractional CO2 laser–treated side, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two sides (P = .81). Conclusions Micro‐needling and fractional CO2 laser are equally safe and effective for the delivery of TXA in the treatment of facial melasma.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>32562337</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocd.13537</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-9883</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-2130
ispartof Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021-02, Vol.20 (2), p.460-465
issn 1473-2130
1473-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415297039
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Combined Modality Therapy
Female
fractional CO2 laser
Humans
Lasers, Gas - adverse effects
Low-Level Light Therapy
Melanosis - drug therapy
melasma
micro‐needling
Tranexamic Acid
title Micro‐needling versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for delivery of tranexamic acid in the treatment of melasma: A split‐face study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Micro%E2%80%90needling%20versus%20fractional%20carbon%20dioxide%20laser%20for%20delivery%20of%20tranexamic%20acid%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20melasma:%20A%20split%E2%80%90face%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Mekawy,%20Khaled%20M.%20M.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=460-465&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocd.13537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415297039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415297039&rft_id=info:pmid/32562337&rfr_iscdi=true