Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?
Objectives Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent. Methodology About 50 patients, where bilateral catar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.e13588-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e13588 |
container_title | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Stahnke, Thomas Mukwanseke, Edith Kilangalanga, Ngoy J. Hopkins, Adrian Stachs, Oliver Guthoff, Rudolf F. |
description | Objectives
Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent.
Methodology
About 50 patients, where bilateral cataract extraction was indicated, were included in this study performed at the St. Joseph's Eye Hospital in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Small incision cataract surgery technique (SICS) was applied with the implantation of 6 mm PMMA lenses in the capsular bag. IOL refractive power choice was made to achieve a post‐operative refraction of −0.5 dpt for the eye selected for far vision. The second eye received an implant heading for a post‐operative myopia of −1.5 dpt suitable for intermediated and near vision. According to the literature, monovision criteria have been regarded as fulfilled when (a) far vision was 0.5 (logMAR) or better and (b) near vision was P3 (0.40, Decimal 32 cm) or better. Spectacle dependence after bilateral cataract surgery heading for monovision was analysed using a dedicated questionnaire.
Results
Out of all 50 patients 22 (44%) fulfilled the above defined criteria of monovision in terms of post‐operative refraction and visual acuity. About 19 out of these 22 (86.3%) patients were happy without glasses. Two of them used bifocal spectacles, whereas the remaining patient refused spectacles. About 28 patients did not fulfill monovision criteria. Out of these 28 patients, however, 9 (32.1%) of them are happy without glasses.
Conclusion
In view of the described local circumstances aiming for monovision after bilateral cataract surgery is a suitable approach to optimise cataract surgical outcomes with no extra costs for surgery but considerable improvement of patient's visual performance in daily life. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijcp.13588 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415294727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2415294727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4638-cbbed47ba21445fd2103142d11c83feab2d949055d7633ce634fffc448ccfaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqWw8AAoEgtCSvFvkk4IRQUKRTB0txzHpq7SpNgJqFsfghFerk-CSwoDA3e5dzj69N0DwDGCfeTnwszkoo8IS5Id0EUxxSHCFO36m0RJyCBBHXDg3AxCzFgC90GHYBZhAlEXDFNRCytkHbjGPiu7DEwZ3JvSTYUT69X7yAX1VFkViGBRCKkCXdlgvfp4qMrq1ThTlevV5-Uh2NOicOpou3tgcj2cpLfh-PFmlF6NQ0kjkoQyy1RO40xgRCnTOUa-G8U5QjIhWokM5wM6gIzlcUSIVBGhWmtJaSKlFoL0wFkbu7DVS6NczefGSVUUolRV47j_muEBjXHs0dM_6KxqbOnLeYpGFMXei6fOW0rayjmrNF9YMxd2yRHkG7d845Z_u_XwyTayyeYq_0V_ZHoAtcCbKdTynyg-ukuf2tAv-ZeFlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446417503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stahnke, Thomas ; Mukwanseke, Edith ; Kilangalanga, Ngoy J. ; Hopkins, Adrian ; Stachs, Oliver ; Guthoff, Rudolf F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stahnke, Thomas ; Mukwanseke, Edith ; Kilangalanga, Ngoy J. ; Hopkins, Adrian ; Stachs, Oliver ; Guthoff, Rudolf F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent.
Methodology
About 50 patients, where bilateral cataract extraction was indicated, were included in this study performed at the St. Joseph's Eye Hospital in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Small incision cataract surgery technique (SICS) was applied with the implantation of 6 mm PMMA lenses in the capsular bag. IOL refractive power choice was made to achieve a post‐operative refraction of −0.5 dpt for the eye selected for far vision. The second eye received an implant heading for a post‐operative myopia of −1.5 dpt suitable for intermediated and near vision. According to the literature, monovision criteria have been regarded as fulfilled when (a) far vision was 0.5 (logMAR) or better and (b) near vision was P3 (0.40, Decimal 32 cm) or better. Spectacle dependence after bilateral cataract surgery heading for monovision was analysed using a dedicated questionnaire.
Results
Out of all 50 patients 22 (44%) fulfilled the above defined criteria of monovision in terms of post‐operative refraction and visual acuity. About 19 out of these 22 (86.3%) patients were happy without glasses. Two of them used bifocal spectacles, whereas the remaining patient refused spectacles. About 28 patients did not fulfill monovision criteria. Out of these 28 patients, however, 9 (32.1%) of them are happy without glasses.
Conclusion
In view of the described local circumstances aiming for monovision after bilateral cataract surgery is a suitable approach to optimise cataract surgical outcomes with no extra costs for surgery but considerable improvement of patient's visual performance in daily life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32562301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Cataract - therapy ; Cataract Extraction - methods ; Cataracts ; Democratic Republic of the Congo ; Eye ; Eye surgery ; Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods ; Lenses, Intraocular - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia ; Patients ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Refraction ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Vision ; Vision, Monocular ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.e13588-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4638-cbbed47ba21445fd2103142d11c83feab2d949055d7633ce634fffc448ccfaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4638-cbbed47ba21445fd2103142d11c83feab2d949055d7633ce634fffc448ccfaa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2425-7268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcp.13588$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcp.13588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stahnke, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukwanseke, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilangalanga, Ngoy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stachs, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthoff, Rudolf F.</creatorcontrib><title>Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?</title><title>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Objectives
Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent.
Methodology
About 50 patients, where bilateral cataract extraction was indicated, were included in this study performed at the St. Joseph's Eye Hospital in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Small incision cataract surgery technique (SICS) was applied with the implantation of 6 mm PMMA lenses in the capsular bag. IOL refractive power choice was made to achieve a post‐operative refraction of −0.5 dpt for the eye selected for far vision. The second eye received an implant heading for a post‐operative myopia of −1.5 dpt suitable for intermediated and near vision. According to the literature, monovision criteria have been regarded as fulfilled when (a) far vision was 0.5 (logMAR) or better and (b) near vision was P3 (0.40, Decimal 32 cm) or better. Spectacle dependence after bilateral cataract surgery heading for monovision was analysed using a dedicated questionnaire.
Results
Out of all 50 patients 22 (44%) fulfilled the above defined criteria of monovision in terms of post‐operative refraction and visual acuity. About 19 out of these 22 (86.3%) patients were happy without glasses. Two of them used bifocal spectacles, whereas the remaining patient refused spectacles. About 28 patients did not fulfill monovision criteria. Out of these 28 patients, however, 9 (32.1%) of them are happy without glasses.
Conclusion
In view of the described local circumstances aiming for monovision after bilateral cataract surgery is a suitable approach to optimise cataract surgical outcomes with no extra costs for surgery but considerable improvement of patient's visual performance in daily life.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Cataract - therapy</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Democratic Republic of the Congo</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision, Monocular</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>1368-5031</issn><issn>1742-1241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqWw8AAoEgtCSvFvkk4IRQUKRTB0txzHpq7SpNgJqFsfghFerk-CSwoDA3e5dzj69N0DwDGCfeTnwszkoo8IS5Id0EUxxSHCFO36m0RJyCBBHXDg3AxCzFgC90GHYBZhAlEXDFNRCytkHbjGPiu7DEwZ3JvSTYUT69X7yAX1VFkViGBRCKkCXdlgvfp4qMrq1ThTlevV5-Uh2NOicOpou3tgcj2cpLfh-PFmlF6NQ0kjkoQyy1RO40xgRCnTOUa-G8U5QjIhWokM5wM6gIzlcUSIVBGhWmtJaSKlFoL0wFkbu7DVS6NczefGSVUUolRV47j_muEBjXHs0dM_6KxqbOnLeYpGFMXei6fOW0rayjmrNF9YMxd2yRHkG7d845Z_u_XwyTayyeYq_0V_ZHoAtcCbKdTynyg-ukuf2tAv-ZeFlA</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Stahnke, Thomas</creator><creator>Mukwanseke, Edith</creator><creator>Kilangalanga, Ngoy J.</creator><creator>Hopkins, Adrian</creator><creator>Stachs, Oliver</creator><creator>Guthoff, Rudolf F.</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2425-7268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?</title><author>Stahnke, Thomas ; Mukwanseke, Edith ; Kilangalanga, Ngoy J. ; Hopkins, Adrian ; Stachs, Oliver ; Guthoff, Rudolf F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4638-cbbed47ba21445fd2103142d11c83feab2d949055d7633ce634fffc448ccfaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Cataract - therapy</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Democratic Republic of the Congo</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision, Monocular</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stahnke, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukwanseke, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilangalanga, Ngoy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stachs, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthoff, Rudolf F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stahnke, Thomas</au><au>Mukwanseke, Edith</au><au>Kilangalanga, Ngoy J.</au><au>Hopkins, Adrian</au><au>Stachs, Oliver</au><au>Guthoff, Rudolf F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e13588</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13588-n/a</pages><issn>1368-5031</issn><eissn>1742-1241</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent.
Methodology
About 50 patients, where bilateral cataract extraction was indicated, were included in this study performed at the St. Joseph's Eye Hospital in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Small incision cataract surgery technique (SICS) was applied with the implantation of 6 mm PMMA lenses in the capsular bag. IOL refractive power choice was made to achieve a post‐operative refraction of −0.5 dpt for the eye selected for far vision. The second eye received an implant heading for a post‐operative myopia of −1.5 dpt suitable for intermediated and near vision. According to the literature, monovision criteria have been regarded as fulfilled when (a) far vision was 0.5 (logMAR) or better and (b) near vision was P3 (0.40, Decimal 32 cm) or better. Spectacle dependence after bilateral cataract surgery heading for monovision was analysed using a dedicated questionnaire.
Results
Out of all 50 patients 22 (44%) fulfilled the above defined criteria of monovision in terms of post‐operative refraction and visual acuity. About 19 out of these 22 (86.3%) patients were happy without glasses. Two of them used bifocal spectacles, whereas the remaining patient refused spectacles. About 28 patients did not fulfill monovision criteria. Out of these 28 patients, however, 9 (32.1%) of them are happy without glasses.
Conclusion
In view of the described local circumstances aiming for monovision after bilateral cataract surgery is a suitable approach to optimise cataract surgical outcomes with no extra costs for surgery but considerable improvement of patient's visual performance in daily life.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>32562301</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijcp.13588</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2425-7268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-5031 |
ispartof | International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2020-10, Vol.74 (10), p.e13588-n/a |
issn | 1368-5031 1742-1241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2415294727 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Acuity Cataract - therapy Cataract Extraction - methods Cataracts Democratic Republic of the Congo Eye Eye surgery Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods Lenses, Intraocular - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Myopia Patients Polymethylmethacrylate Refraction Surgery Surgical outcomes Vision Vision, Monocular Visual Acuity - physiology |
title | Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cataract%20surgery%20in%20Kinshasa%E2%80%94Is%20there%20a%20place%20for%20%E2%80%9CMonovision%E2%80%9D?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice%20(Esher)&rft.au=Stahnke,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e13588&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13588-n/a&rft.issn=1368-5031&rft.eissn=1742-1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcp.13588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2415294727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446417503&rft_id=info:pmid/32562301&rfr_iscdi=true |