Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit
This study evaluated if coatings with chitosan (Chi) and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C., PEA) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg, PEJ) processing by-products are effective to control the development of rot caused by Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, L. viticol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2020-10, Vol.331, p.108694-108694, Article 108694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108694 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108694 |
container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
container_volume | 331 |
creator | Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves da Costa Lima, Maiara de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá dos Santos Lima, Marcos Magnani, Marciane Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva de Souza, Evandro Leite |
description | This study evaluated if coatings with chitosan (Chi) and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C., PEA) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg, PEJ) processing by-products are effective to control the development of rot caused by Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, L. viticola, L. euphorbicola, L. theobromae and L. hormozganensis in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit. Effects of formulated coatings on some physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya were investigated. Twenty-six different phenolics were found in PEA and PEJ, including flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins and phenolic acids. Chi (1–5 mg/mL), PEA and PEJ (25–100 mg/mL) separately caused mycelial growth inhibition on all isolates. Combinations of Chi (3 and 4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 and 75 mg/mL) or PEJ (75 and 100 mg/mL) had additive interactions. Coatings with Chi (4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 or 75 mg/mL) or PEA (75 or 100 mg/mL) inhibited rot development in papaya fruit infected with Lasiodiplodia isolates during 8 days of room temperature storage. Coatings with 4 mg/mL Chi and 75 mg/mL PEA or 100 mg/mL PEJ were the most effective to control rot development. These coatings did not affect negatively physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya fruit during storage. Coatings with combined Chi and PEA or PEJ could be novel strategies to control postharvest rot caused by Lasiodiplodia in papaya fruit.
•Coatings with chitosan (Chi) and fruit phenolic-rich extracts were formulated.•Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extracts had additive effects against Lasidiplodia.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract reduced rot severity in papaya.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract maintained papaya quality.•Formulated coatings should be novel strategies to control rot in papaya. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2412221233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160520301884</els_id><sourcerecordid>2412221233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-b6c5b8bacdf941143248e169013545bee707b7cac0b4a4ca4720c3ffc59867ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuu1DAMhisEEocD7xDE5pxFS5KmtyWUqzQIFsA2ct10JlUnKUkKzEPzDng0HAmxYpPI1mf_dvJn2VPBC8FF_Xwu7Dx5Px4tBl9ILs_5tu7UvexKtE2Xl6rm97MrYttc1Lx6mD2KceacV2XJr7JfvYdk3T6yHzYdGB5s8hEcAzey9WCcXyzmweKBmZ8pACY2BX9kgCb4BdjNB1hWuz9YYOYIYW8dJGCvir64ZT6wGYYtWYSByE-LdYRRyt-lvpplIfClCftbtgaPJkaahQ2nnKJxI7XkGXqXSIwFnxjCFs1IANtBtH6060IHsLiuBbOOrbDCiTr3QDPDXbgjkSlsNj3OHkywRPPkz32dfXnz-nP_Lt99fPu-f7HLsWxlyocaq6EdAMepU0KoUqrWiLrjoqxUNRjT8GZoEJAPChSCaiTHcpqw6tq6ASyvs5tLX1rj22Zi0kcbkbYFZ_wWtVRCSilkWRL67B909ltwNB1RqlNtLdsz1V0o-uUYg5n0Giw9-EkLrs9G0LP-ywj6bAR9MQLV9pdaQxt_tyboiNY4NKMNBpMevf2PLr8B2gjE_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449486283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves ; da Costa Lima, Maiara ; de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá ; dos Santos Lima, Marcos ; Magnani, Marciane ; Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva ; de Souza, Evandro Leite</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves ; da Costa Lima, Maiara ; de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá ; dos Santos Lima, Marcos ; Magnani, Marciane ; Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva ; de Souza, Evandro Leite</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated if coatings with chitosan (Chi) and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C., PEA) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg, PEJ) processing by-products are effective to control the development of rot caused by Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, L. viticola, L. euphorbicola, L. theobromae and L. hormozganensis in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit. Effects of formulated coatings on some physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya were investigated. Twenty-six different phenolics were found in PEA and PEJ, including flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins and phenolic acids. Chi (1–5 mg/mL), PEA and PEJ (25–100 mg/mL) separately caused mycelial growth inhibition on all isolates. Combinations of Chi (3 and 4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 and 75 mg/mL) or PEJ (75 and 100 mg/mL) had additive interactions. Coatings with Chi (4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 or 75 mg/mL) or PEA (75 or 100 mg/mL) inhibited rot development in papaya fruit infected with Lasiodiplodia isolates during 8 days of room temperature storage. Coatings with 4 mg/mL Chi and 75 mg/mL PEA or 100 mg/mL PEJ were the most effective to control rot development. These coatings did not affect negatively physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya fruit during storage. Coatings with combined Chi and PEA or PEJ could be novel strategies to control postharvest rot caused by Lasiodiplodia in papaya fruit.
•Coatings with chitosan (Chi) and fruit phenolic-rich extracts were formulated.•Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extracts had additive effects against Lasidiplodia.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract reduced rot severity in papaya.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract maintained papaya quality.•Formulated coatings should be novel strategies to control rot in papaya.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Byproducts ; Carica papaya ; Chitosan ; Coatings ; Edible coatings ; Flavonoids ; Fruit by-products ; Fruit decay ; Fruit rot ; Fruits ; Lasiodiplodia ; Malpighia emarginata ; Mycelia ; Myrciaria cauliflora ; Papayas ; Parameters ; Phenolic acids ; Phenolics ; Phenols ; Postharvest treatment ; Room temperature ; Tannins</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2020-10, Vol.331, p.108694-108694, Article 108694</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 16, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-b6c5b8bacdf941143248e169013545bee707b7cac0b4a4ca4720c3ffc59867ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-b6c5b8bacdf941143248e169013545bee707b7cac0b4a4ca4720c3ffc59867ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5994-9005 ; 0000-0003-4927-9383</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160520301884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Lima, Maiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Lima, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Marciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Evandro Leite</creatorcontrib><title>Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><description>This study evaluated if coatings with chitosan (Chi) and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C., PEA) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg, PEJ) processing by-products are effective to control the development of rot caused by Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, L. viticola, L. euphorbicola, L. theobromae and L. hormozganensis in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit. Effects of formulated coatings on some physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya were investigated. Twenty-six different phenolics were found in PEA and PEJ, including flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins and phenolic acids. Chi (1–5 mg/mL), PEA and PEJ (25–100 mg/mL) separately caused mycelial growth inhibition on all isolates. Combinations of Chi (3 and 4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 and 75 mg/mL) or PEJ (75 and 100 mg/mL) had additive interactions. Coatings with Chi (4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 or 75 mg/mL) or PEA (75 or 100 mg/mL) inhibited rot development in papaya fruit infected with Lasiodiplodia isolates during 8 days of room temperature storage. Coatings with 4 mg/mL Chi and 75 mg/mL PEA or 100 mg/mL PEJ were the most effective to control rot development. These coatings did not affect negatively physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya fruit during storage. Coatings with combined Chi and PEA or PEJ could be novel strategies to control postharvest rot caused by Lasiodiplodia in papaya fruit.
•Coatings with chitosan (Chi) and fruit phenolic-rich extracts were formulated.•Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extracts had additive effects against Lasidiplodia.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract reduced rot severity in papaya.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract maintained papaya quality.•Formulated coatings should be novel strategies to control rot in papaya.</description><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Carica papaya</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Edible coatings</subject><subject>Flavonoids</subject><subject>Fruit by-products</subject><subject>Fruit decay</subject><subject>Fruit rot</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Lasiodiplodia</subject><subject>Malpighia emarginata</subject><subject>Mycelia</subject><subject>Myrciaria cauliflora</subject><subject>Papayas</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Phenolic acids</subject><subject>Phenolics</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Postharvest treatment</subject><subject>Room temperature</subject><subject>Tannins</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNksuu1DAMhisEEocD7xDE5pxFS5KmtyWUqzQIFsA2ct10JlUnKUkKzEPzDng0HAmxYpPI1mf_dvJn2VPBC8FF_Xwu7Dx5Px4tBl9ILs_5tu7UvexKtE2Xl6rm97MrYttc1Lx6mD2KceacV2XJr7JfvYdk3T6yHzYdGB5s8hEcAzey9WCcXyzmweKBmZ8pACY2BX9kgCb4BdjNB1hWuz9YYOYIYW8dJGCvir64ZT6wGYYtWYSByE-LdYRRyt-lvpplIfClCftbtgaPJkaahQ2nnKJxI7XkGXqXSIwFnxjCFs1IANtBtH6060IHsLiuBbOOrbDCiTr3QDPDXbgjkSlsNj3OHkywRPPkz32dfXnz-nP_Lt99fPu-f7HLsWxlyocaq6EdAMepU0KoUqrWiLrjoqxUNRjT8GZoEJAPChSCaiTHcpqw6tq6ASyvs5tLX1rj22Zi0kcbkbYFZ_wWtVRCSilkWRL67B909ltwNB1RqlNtLdsz1V0o-uUYg5n0Giw9-EkLrs9G0LP-ywj6bAR9MQLV9pdaQxt_tyboiNY4NKMNBpMevf2PLr8B2gjE_Q</recordid><startdate>20201016</startdate><enddate>20201016</enddate><creator>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves</creator><creator>da Costa Lima, Maiara</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá</creator><creator>dos Santos Lima, Marcos</creator><creator>Magnani, Marciane</creator><creator>Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva</creator><creator>de Souza, Evandro Leite</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-9383</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201016</creationdate><title>Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit</title><author>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves ; da Costa Lima, Maiara ; de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá ; dos Santos Lima, Marcos ; Magnani, Marciane ; Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva ; de Souza, Evandro Leite</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-b6c5b8bacdf941143248e169013545bee707b7cac0b4a4ca4720c3ffc59867ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Carica papaya</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Edible coatings</topic><topic>Flavonoids</topic><topic>Fruit by-products</topic><topic>Fruit decay</topic><topic>Fruit rot</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Lasiodiplodia</topic><topic>Malpighia emarginata</topic><topic>Mycelia</topic><topic>Myrciaria cauliflora</topic><topic>Papayas</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Phenolic acids</topic><topic>Phenolics</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Postharvest treatment</topic><topic>Room temperature</topic><topic>Tannins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Lima, Maiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Lima, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Marciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Evandro Leite</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, Ana Cristina Alves</au><au>da Costa Lima, Maiara</au><au>de Oliveira, Kataryne Árabe Rimá</au><au>dos Santos Lima, Marcos</au><au>Magnani, Marciane</au><au>Câmara, Marcos Paz Saraiva</au><au>de Souza, Evandro Leite</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><date>2020-10-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>331</volume><spage>108694</spage><epage>108694</epage><pages>108694-108694</pages><artnum>108694</artnum><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated if coatings with chitosan (Chi) and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C., PEA) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg, PEJ) processing by-products are effective to control the development of rot caused by Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, L. viticola, L. euphorbicola, L. theobromae and L. hormozganensis in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit. Effects of formulated coatings on some physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya were investigated. Twenty-six different phenolics were found in PEA and PEJ, including flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins and phenolic acids. Chi (1–5 mg/mL), PEA and PEJ (25–100 mg/mL) separately caused mycelial growth inhibition on all isolates. Combinations of Chi (3 and 4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 and 75 mg/mL) or PEJ (75 and 100 mg/mL) had additive interactions. Coatings with Chi (4 mg/mL) and PEA (50 or 75 mg/mL) or PEA (75 or 100 mg/mL) inhibited rot development in papaya fruit infected with Lasiodiplodia isolates during 8 days of room temperature storage. Coatings with 4 mg/mL Chi and 75 mg/mL PEA or 100 mg/mL PEJ were the most effective to control rot development. These coatings did not affect negatively physicochemical parameters indicative of postharvest quality of papaya fruit during storage. Coatings with combined Chi and PEA or PEJ could be novel strategies to control postharvest rot caused by Lasiodiplodia in papaya fruit.
•Coatings with chitosan (Chi) and fruit phenolic-rich extracts were formulated.•Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extracts had additive effects against Lasidiplodia.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract reduced rot severity in papaya.•Coatings with Chi and fruit phenolic-rich extract maintained papaya quality.•Formulated coatings should be novel strategies to control rot in papaya.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108694</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-9383</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2020-10, Vol.331, p.108694-108694, Article 108694 |
issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2412221233 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Byproducts Carica papaya Chitosan Coatings Edible coatings Flavonoids Fruit by-products Fruit decay Fruit rot Fruits Lasiodiplodia Malpighia emarginata Mycelia Myrciaria cauliflora Papayas Parameters Phenolic acids Phenolics Phenols Postharvest treatment Room temperature Tannins |
title | Coatings with chitosan and phenolic-rich extract from acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) or jabuticaba (Plinia jaboticaba (Vell.) Berg) processing by-product to control rot caused by Lasiodiplodia spp. in papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coatings%20with%20chitosan%20and%20phenolic-rich%20extract%20from%20acerola%20(Malpighia%20emarginata%20D.C.)%20or%20jabuticaba%20(Plinia%20jaboticaba%20(Vell.)%20Berg)%20processing%20by-product%20to%20control%20rot%20caused%20by%20Lasiodiplodia%20spp.%20in%20papaya%20(Carica%20papaya%20L.)%20fruit&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Gomes,%20Ana%20Cristina%20Alves&rft.date=2020-10-16&rft.volume=331&rft.spage=108694&rft.epage=108694&rft.pages=108694-108694&rft.artnum=108694&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2412221233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449486283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168160520301884&rfr_iscdi=true |