Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production
The present study evaluated the sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production from seaweeds. A total of 22 macroalgal species were collected at different seasons and screened based on lipid and carbohydrate contents as well as biomass production. The promising species was selected, based on the relativ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2020-09, Vol.27 (26), p.32481-32493 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 32493 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 26 |
| container_start_page | 32481 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Osman, Mohamed E. H. Abo-Shady, Atef M. Elshobary, Mostafa E. Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O. Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah |
| description | The present study evaluated the sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production from seaweeds. A total of 22 macroalgal species were collected at different seasons and screened based on lipid and carbohydrate contents as well as biomass production. The promising species was selected, based on the relative increase in energy compounds (REEC, %), for further energy conversion. Seasonal and annual biomass yields of the studied species showed significant variations. The rhodophyte
Amphiroa compressa
and the chlorophyte
Ulva intestinalis
showed the highest annual biomass yield of 75.2 and 61.5 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively. However, the highest annual carbohydrate productivity (ACP) and annual lipid productivity (ALP) were recorded for
Ulva fasciata
and
Ulva intestinalis
(17.0 and 3.0 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively). The later was selected for further studies because it showed 14.8% higher REEC value than
Ulva fasciata.
Saturated fatty acids (SAFs) showed 73.4%, with palmitic acid as a dominant fatty acid (43.8%). Therefore, biodiesel showed high saturation degree, with average degree of unsaturation (ADU) of 0.508. All the measured biodiesel characteristics complied the international standards. The first route of biodiesel production (R1) from
Ulva intestinalis
showed biodiesel recovery of 32.3 mg g
−1
dw. The hydrolysate obtained after saccharification of the whole biomass (R2) and lipid-free biomass (R3) contained 1.22 and 1.15 g L
−1
, respectively, reducing sugars. However, bioethanol yield from R3 was 0.081 g g
−1
dw, which represented 14.1% higher than that of R2. Therefore, application of sequential biofuel production using R3 resulted in gross energy output of 3.44 GJ ton
−1
dw, which was 170.9% and 82.0% higher than R1 and R2, respectively. The present study recommended the naturally-grown
Ulva intestinalis
as a potential feedstock for enhanced energy recovery through sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410705878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432263387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-30e5e7dcdadde7eeccab87b55450df1be066eeb00ed0566260febd846f0a72e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8FL16qkyZN2qMs_oMFD-o5pMl0t0s3WZNW8dubtYLgwdMww-_NPOYRck7higLI60gpK0UOBeRQl4zn9IDMqKA8l7yuD8kMap6GjPNjchLjBhJZF3JGts8mILrOrTLfZhH1B6KNWetDFsc46M7ppses6Xw7Yp8FNP4dw2c2rIMfV-ukeBvRDZ3u94ztMCZKO7vvcFhr5_tsF7wdzdB5d0qOWt1HPPupc_J6d_uyeMiXT_ePi5tlblhVDzkDLFFaY7W1KBGN0U0lm7LkJdiWNghCIDYAaKEUohDQYmMrLlrQskDB5uRy2ptOJ39xUNsuGux77dCPURWcgoSyklVCL_6gGz8Gl9wlihWFYKySiSomygQfY8BW7UK31eFTUVD7BNSUgEp_Vd8JKJpEbBLFBLsVht_V_6i-AKuPjEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432263387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Osman, Mohamed E. H. ; Abo-Shady, Atef M. ; Elshobary, Mostafa E. ; Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O. ; Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</creator><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed E. H. ; Abo-Shady, Atef M. ; Elshobary, Mostafa E. ; Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O. ; Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production from seaweeds. A total of 22 macroalgal species were collected at different seasons and screened based on lipid and carbohydrate contents as well as biomass production. The promising species was selected, based on the relative increase in energy compounds (REEC, %), for further energy conversion. Seasonal and annual biomass yields of the studied species showed significant variations. The rhodophyte
Amphiroa compressa
and the chlorophyte
Ulva intestinalis
showed the highest annual biomass yield of 75.2 and 61.5 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively. However, the highest annual carbohydrate productivity (ACP) and annual lipid productivity (ALP) were recorded for
Ulva fasciata
and
Ulva intestinalis
(17.0 and 3.0 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively). The later was selected for further studies because it showed 14.8% higher REEC value than
Ulva fasciata.
Saturated fatty acids (SAFs) showed 73.4%, with palmitic acid as a dominant fatty acid (43.8%). Therefore, biodiesel showed high saturation degree, with average degree of unsaturation (ADU) of 0.508. All the measured biodiesel characteristics complied the international standards. The first route of biodiesel production (R1) from
Ulva intestinalis
showed biodiesel recovery of 32.3 mg g
−1
dw. The hydrolysate obtained after saccharification of the whole biomass (R2) and lipid-free biomass (R3) contained 1.22 and 1.15 g L
−1
, respectively, reducing sugars. However, bioethanol yield from R3 was 0.081 g g
−1
dw, which represented 14.1% higher than that of R2. Therefore, application of sequential biofuel production using R3 resulted in gross energy output of 3.44 GJ ton
−1
dw, which was 170.9% and 82.0% higher than R1 and R2, respectively. The present study recommended the naturally-grown
Ulva intestinalis
as a potential feedstock for enhanced energy recovery through sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Biomass energy production ; Carbohydrates ; Diesel ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Energy conversion ; Energy output ; Energy recovery ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Ethanol ; Fatty acids ; International standards ; Lipids ; Palmitic acid ; Productivity ; Research Article ; Saccharification ; Seaweeds ; Species ; Sugar ; Ulva fasciata ; Ulva intestinalis ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020-09, Vol.27 (26), p.32481-32493</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-30e5e7dcdadde7eeccab87b55450df1be066eeb00ed0566260febd846f0a72e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-30e5e7dcdadde7eeccab87b55450df1be066eeb00ed0566260febd846f0a72e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2784-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abo-Shady, Atef M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshobary, Mostafa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</creatorcontrib><title>Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><description>The present study evaluated the sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production from seaweeds. A total of 22 macroalgal species were collected at different seasons and screened based on lipid and carbohydrate contents as well as biomass production. The promising species was selected, based on the relative increase in energy compounds (REEC, %), for further energy conversion. Seasonal and annual biomass yields of the studied species showed significant variations. The rhodophyte
Amphiroa compressa
and the chlorophyte
Ulva intestinalis
showed the highest annual biomass yield of 75.2 and 61.5 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively. However, the highest annual carbohydrate productivity (ACP) and annual lipid productivity (ALP) were recorded for
Ulva fasciata
and
Ulva intestinalis
(17.0 and 3.0 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively). The later was selected for further studies because it showed 14.8% higher REEC value than
Ulva fasciata.
Saturated fatty acids (SAFs) showed 73.4%, with palmitic acid as a dominant fatty acid (43.8%). Therefore, biodiesel showed high saturation degree, with average degree of unsaturation (ADU) of 0.508. All the measured biodiesel characteristics complied the international standards. The first route of biodiesel production (R1) from
Ulva intestinalis
showed biodiesel recovery of 32.3 mg g
−1
dw. The hydrolysate obtained after saccharification of the whole biomass (R2) and lipid-free biomass (R3) contained 1.22 and 1.15 g L
−1
, respectively, reducing sugars. However, bioethanol yield from R3 was 0.081 g g
−1
dw, which represented 14.1% higher than that of R2. Therefore, application of sequential biofuel production using R3 resulted in gross energy output of 3.44 GJ ton
−1
dw, which was 170.9% and 82.0% higher than R1 and R2, respectively. The present study recommended the naturally-grown
Ulva intestinalis
as a potential feedstock for enhanced energy recovery through sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Energy conversion</subject><subject>Energy output</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>International standards</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Palmitic acid</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Saccharification</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Ulva fasciata</subject><subject>Ulva intestinalis</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8FL16qkyZN2qMs_oMFD-o5pMl0t0s3WZNW8dubtYLgwdMww-_NPOYRck7higLI60gpK0UOBeRQl4zn9IDMqKA8l7yuD8kMap6GjPNjchLjBhJZF3JGts8mILrOrTLfZhH1B6KNWetDFsc46M7ppses6Xw7Yp8FNP4dw2c2rIMfV-ukeBvRDZ3u94ztMCZKO7vvcFhr5_tsF7wdzdB5d0qOWt1HPPupc_J6d_uyeMiXT_ePi5tlblhVDzkDLFFaY7W1KBGN0U0lm7LkJdiWNghCIDYAaKEUohDQYmMrLlrQskDB5uRy2ptOJ39xUNsuGux77dCPURWcgoSyklVCL_6gGz8Gl9wlihWFYKySiSomygQfY8BW7UK31eFTUVD7BNSUgEp_Vd8JKJpEbBLFBLsVht_V_6i-AKuPjEE</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Osman, Mohamed E. H.</creator><creator>Abo-Shady, Atef M.</creator><creator>Elshobary, Mostafa E.</creator><creator>Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O.</creator><creator>Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production</title><author>Osman, Mohamed E. H. ; Abo-Shady, Atef M. ; Elshobary, Mostafa E. ; Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O. ; Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-30e5e7dcdadde7eeccab87b55450df1be066eeb00ed0566260febd846f0a72e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Energy conversion</topic><topic>Energy output</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>International standards</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Palmitic acid</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Saccharification</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Ulva fasciata</topic><topic>Ulva intestinalis</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abo-Shady, Atef M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshobary, Mostafa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osman, Mohamed E. H.</au><au>Abo-Shady, Atef M.</au><au>Elshobary, Mostafa E.</au><au>Abd El-Ghafar, Mahasen O.</au><au>Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>32481</spage><epage>32493</epage><pages>32481-32493</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production from seaweeds. A total of 22 macroalgal species were collected at different seasons and screened based on lipid and carbohydrate contents as well as biomass production. The promising species was selected, based on the relative increase in energy compounds (REEC, %), for further energy conversion. Seasonal and annual biomass yields of the studied species showed significant variations. The rhodophyte
Amphiroa compressa
and the chlorophyte
Ulva intestinalis
showed the highest annual biomass yield of 75.2 and 61.5 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively. However, the highest annual carbohydrate productivity (ACP) and annual lipid productivity (ALP) were recorded for
Ulva fasciata
and
Ulva intestinalis
(17.0 and 3.0 g m
−2
year
−1
, respectively). The later was selected for further studies because it showed 14.8% higher REEC value than
Ulva fasciata.
Saturated fatty acids (SAFs) showed 73.4%, with palmitic acid as a dominant fatty acid (43.8%). Therefore, biodiesel showed high saturation degree, with average degree of unsaturation (ADU) of 0.508. All the measured biodiesel characteristics complied the international standards. The first route of biodiesel production (R1) from
Ulva intestinalis
showed biodiesel recovery of 32.3 mg g
−1
dw. The hydrolysate obtained after saccharification of the whole biomass (R2) and lipid-free biomass (R3) contained 1.22 and 1.15 g L
−1
, respectively, reducing sugars. However, bioethanol yield from R3 was 0.081 g g
−1
dw, which represented 14.1% higher than that of R2. Therefore, application of sequential biofuel production using R3 resulted in gross energy output of 3.44 GJ ton
−1
dw, which was 170.9% and 82.0% higher than R1 and R2, respectively. The present study recommended the naturally-grown
Ulva intestinalis
as a potential feedstock for enhanced energy recovery through sequential biodiesel-bioethanol production.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-3297</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020-09, Vol.27 (26), p.32481-32493 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410705878 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Algae Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Biomass Biomass energy production Carbohydrates Diesel Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Energy conversion Energy output Energy recovery Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Ethanol Fatty acids International standards Lipids Palmitic acid Productivity Research Article Saccharification Seaweeds Species Sugar Ulva fasciata Ulva intestinalis Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
| title | Screening of seaweeds for sustainable biofuel recovery through sequential biodiesel and bioethanol production |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A46%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20of%20seaweeds%20for%20sustainable%20biofuel%20recovery%20through%20sequential%20biodiesel%20and%20bioethanol%20production&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Osman,%20Mohamed%20E.%20H.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=32481&rft.epage=32493&rft.pages=32481-32493&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-020-09534-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432263387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432263387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |