Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems
The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities should reflect not only responses to host and soil environments, but also differences in functional roles and costs vs. benefits among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The coffee agroecosystem allows exploration of the effects of both l...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Mycorrhiza 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.513-527 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 527 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 513 |
| container_title | Mycorrhiza |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura Black, Katie L. Hartmann, Eliza D. L. Shivega, W. Gaya Schmaltz, Logan C. McGlynn, Riley D. Johnson, Peter G. Asheim Keller, Rebecca J. Vink, Stefanie N. |
| description | The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities should reflect not only responses to host and soil environments, but also differences in functional roles and costs vs. benefits among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The coffee agroecosystem allows exploration of the effects of both light and soil fertility on AMF communities, because of the variation in shade and soil nutrients farmers generate through field management. We used high-throughput ITS2 sequencing to characterize the AMF communities of coffee roots in 25 fields in Costa Rica that ranged from organic management with high shade and no chemical fertilizers to conventionally managed fields with minimal shade and high N fertilization, and examined relationships between AMF communities and soil and shade parameters with partial correlations, NMDS, PERMANOVA, and partial least squares analysis. Gigasporaceae and Acaulosporaceae dominated coffee AMF communities in terms of relative abundance and richness, respectively. Gigasporaceae richness was greatest in conventionally managed fields, while Glomeraceae richness was greatest in organic fields. While total AMF richness and root colonization did not differ between organic and conventionally managed fields, AMF community composition did; these differences were correlated with soil nitrate and shade. OTUs differing in relative abundance between conventionally managed and organic fields segregated into four groups: Gigasporaceae associated with high light and nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae with high light and low nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae and a single relative of
Rhizophagus fasciculatus
with shade and low nitrate availability, and
Claroideoglomus
/
Glomus
with conventionally managed fields but uncorrelated with shade and soil variables. The association of closely related taxa with similar shade and light availabilities is consistent with phylogenetic trait conservatism in AM fungi. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410361623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416304135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-751bf506d461e0598045a1825628dd8043dbcb678da62c7eb00bcd501e16da6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-q1TAQxoMoeLz6Aq4CbtxUJ0mbtEu5-A8uuLmuQ5pMe3Jpk2umVY-P4tMazxEEF66Gmfl93zB8jD0X8EoAmNcE0BnZgIQGYNCmMQ_YQbRKNqIf4CE7wNBCo5WGx-wJ0R2AMFqJA_t5677nlNfoOR3jtBGPibsy7uT3xRW-nnwu5Rh_uIVPe5pr8Xld9xS3iMS_xe1YhS4gdylwynHhdVXyjNXGl0xU-fQV0xZzcsty4qtLbsZw5nOZXaqnfZ4mrBZzyegznWjDlZ6yR5NbCJ_9qVfs87u3t9cfmptP7z9ev7lpvBr01phOjFMHOrRaIHRDD23nRC87LfsQaqfC6Edt-uC09AZHgNGHDgQKXUdBXbGXF9_7kr_sSJtdI3lcFpcw72RlK0BpoaWq6It_0Lu8l_rXmdIKWqG6SskLdf6_4GTvS1xdOVkB9ndc9hKXrXHZc1zWVJG6iKjCacby1_o_ql_5IJvV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416304135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura ; Black, Katie L. ; Hartmann, Eliza D. L. ; Shivega, W. Gaya ; Schmaltz, Logan C. ; McGlynn, Riley D. ; Johnson, Peter G. ; Asheim Keller, Rebecca J. ; Vink, Stefanie N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura ; Black, Katie L. ; Hartmann, Eliza D. L. ; Shivega, W. Gaya ; Schmaltz, Logan C. ; McGlynn, Riley D. ; Johnson, Peter G. ; Asheim Keller, Rebecca J. ; Vink, Stefanie N.</creatorcontrib><description>The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities should reflect not only responses to host and soil environments, but also differences in functional roles and costs vs. benefits among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The coffee agroecosystem allows exploration of the effects of both light and soil fertility on AMF communities, because of the variation in shade and soil nutrients farmers generate through field management. We used high-throughput ITS2 sequencing to characterize the AMF communities of coffee roots in 25 fields in Costa Rica that ranged from organic management with high shade and no chemical fertilizers to conventionally managed fields with minimal shade and high N fertilization, and examined relationships between AMF communities and soil and shade parameters with partial correlations, NMDS, PERMANOVA, and partial least squares analysis. Gigasporaceae and Acaulosporaceae dominated coffee AMF communities in terms of relative abundance and richness, respectively. Gigasporaceae richness was greatest in conventionally managed fields, while Glomeraceae richness was greatest in organic fields. While total AMF richness and root colonization did not differ between organic and conventionally managed fields, AMF community composition did; these differences were correlated with soil nitrate and shade. OTUs differing in relative abundance between conventionally managed and organic fields segregated into four groups: Gigasporaceae associated with high light and nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae with high light and low nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae and a single relative of
Rhizophagus fasciculatus
with shade and low nitrate availability, and
Claroideoglomus
/
Glomus
with conventionally managed fields but uncorrelated with shade and soil variables. The association of closely related taxa with similar shade and light availabilities is consistent with phylogenetic trait conservatism in AM fungi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; Availability ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coffee ; Colonization ; Community composition ; Composition ; Ecology ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Forestry ; Fungi ; Gigasporaceae ; Life Sciences ; Light effects ; Microbiology ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Nutrients ; Original Article ; Phylogeny ; Plant Sciences ; Relative abundance ; Shade ; Soil environment ; Soil fertility ; Soil nutrients ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Mycorrhiza, 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.513-527</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-751bf506d461e0598045a1825628dd8043dbcb678da62c7eb00bcd501e16da6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-751bf506d461e0598045a1825628dd8043dbcb678da62c7eb00bcd501e16da6d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9758-701X ; 0000-0001-9049-3483 ; 0000-0002-3215-5491 ; 0000-0002-7827-543X ; 0000-0003-3401-0496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Katie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Eliza D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivega, W. Gaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmaltz, Logan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Riley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asheim Keller, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vink, Stefanie N.</creatorcontrib><title>Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems</title><title>Mycorrhiza</title><addtitle>Mycorrhiza</addtitle><description>The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities should reflect not only responses to host and soil environments, but also differences in functional roles and costs vs. benefits among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The coffee agroecosystem allows exploration of the effects of both light and soil fertility on AMF communities, because of the variation in shade and soil nutrients farmers generate through field management. We used high-throughput ITS2 sequencing to characterize the AMF communities of coffee roots in 25 fields in Costa Rica that ranged from organic management with high shade and no chemical fertilizers to conventionally managed fields with minimal shade and high N fertilization, and examined relationships between AMF communities and soil and shade parameters with partial correlations, NMDS, PERMANOVA, and partial least squares analysis. Gigasporaceae and Acaulosporaceae dominated coffee AMF communities in terms of relative abundance and richness, respectively. Gigasporaceae richness was greatest in conventionally managed fields, while Glomeraceae richness was greatest in organic fields. While total AMF richness and root colonization did not differ between organic and conventionally managed fields, AMF community composition did; these differences were correlated with soil nitrate and shade. OTUs differing in relative abundance between conventionally managed and organic fields segregated into four groups: Gigasporaceae associated with high light and nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae with high light and low nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae and a single relative of
Rhizophagus fasciculatus
with shade and low nitrate availability, and
Claroideoglomus
/
Glomus
with conventionally managed fields but uncorrelated with shade and soil variables. The association of closely related taxa with similar shade and light availabilities is consistent with phylogenetic trait conservatism in AM fungi.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Gigasporaceae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Light effects</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Shade</subject><subject>Soil environment</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0940-6360</issn><issn>1432-1890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-q1TAQxoMoeLz6Aq4CbtxUJ0mbtEu5-A8uuLmuQ5pMe3Jpk2umVY-P4tMazxEEF66Gmfl93zB8jD0X8EoAmNcE0BnZgIQGYNCmMQ_YQbRKNqIf4CE7wNBCo5WGx-wJ0R2AMFqJA_t5677nlNfoOR3jtBGPibsy7uT3xRW-nnwu5Rh_uIVPe5pr8Xld9xS3iMS_xe1YhS4gdylwynHhdVXyjNXGl0xU-fQV0xZzcsty4qtLbsZw5nOZXaqnfZ4mrBZzyegznWjDlZ6yR5NbCJ_9qVfs87u3t9cfmptP7z9ev7lpvBr01phOjFMHOrRaIHRDD23nRC87LfsQaqfC6Edt-uC09AZHgNGHDgQKXUdBXbGXF9_7kr_sSJtdI3lcFpcw72RlK0BpoaWq6It_0Lu8l_rXmdIKWqG6SskLdf6_4GTvS1xdOVkB9ndc9hKXrXHZc1zWVJG6iKjCacby1_o_ql_5IJvV</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura</creator><creator>Black, Katie L.</creator><creator>Hartmann, Eliza D. L.</creator><creator>Shivega, W. Gaya</creator><creator>Schmaltz, Logan C.</creator><creator>McGlynn, Riley D.</creator><creator>Johnson, Peter G.</creator><creator>Asheim Keller, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Vink, Stefanie N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-3483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-5491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-543X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-0496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems</title><author>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura ; Black, Katie L. ; Hartmann, Eliza D. L. ; Shivega, W. Gaya ; Schmaltz, Logan C. ; McGlynn, Riley D. ; Johnson, Peter G. ; Asheim Keller, Rebecca J. ; Vink, Stefanie N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-751bf506d461e0598045a1825628dd8043dbcb678da62c7eb00bcd501e16da6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Gigasporaceae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Light effects</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Shade</topic><topic>Soil environment</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Katie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Eliza D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivega, W. Gaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmaltz, Logan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, Riley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asheim Keller, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vink, Stefanie N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycorrhiza</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aldrich-Wolfe, Laura</au><au>Black, Katie L.</au><au>Hartmann, Eliza D. L.</au><au>Shivega, W. Gaya</au><au>Schmaltz, Logan C.</au><au>McGlynn, Riley D.</au><au>Johnson, Peter G.</au><au>Asheim Keller, Rebecca J.</au><au>Vink, Stefanie N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Mycorrhiza</jtitle><stitle>Mycorrhiza</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>513-527</pages><issn>0940-6360</issn><eissn>1432-1890</eissn><abstract>The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities should reflect not only responses to host and soil environments, but also differences in functional roles and costs vs. benefits among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The coffee agroecosystem allows exploration of the effects of both light and soil fertility on AMF communities, because of the variation in shade and soil nutrients farmers generate through field management. We used high-throughput ITS2 sequencing to characterize the AMF communities of coffee roots in 25 fields in Costa Rica that ranged from organic management with high shade and no chemical fertilizers to conventionally managed fields with minimal shade and high N fertilization, and examined relationships between AMF communities and soil and shade parameters with partial correlations, NMDS, PERMANOVA, and partial least squares analysis. Gigasporaceae and Acaulosporaceae dominated coffee AMF communities in terms of relative abundance and richness, respectively. Gigasporaceae richness was greatest in conventionally managed fields, while Glomeraceae richness was greatest in organic fields. While total AMF richness and root colonization did not differ between organic and conventionally managed fields, AMF community composition did; these differences were correlated with soil nitrate and shade. OTUs differing in relative abundance between conventionally managed and organic fields segregated into four groups: Gigasporaceae associated with high light and nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae with high light and low nitrate availability, Acaulosporaceae and a single relative of
Rhizophagus fasciculatus
with shade and low nitrate availability, and
Claroideoglomus
/
Glomus
with conventionally managed fields but uncorrelated with shade and soil variables. The association of closely related taxa with similar shade and light availabilities is consistent with phylogenetic trait conservatism in AM fungi.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-3483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-5491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-543X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-0496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0940-6360 |
| ispartof | Mycorrhiza, 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.513-527 |
| issn | 0940-6360 1432-1890 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410361623 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Abundance Agricultural ecosystems Agriculture Agrochemicals Arbuscular mycorrhizas Availability Biomedical and Life Sciences Coffee Colonization Community composition Composition Ecology Fertilization Fertilizers Forestry Fungi Gigasporaceae Life Sciences Light effects Microbiology Nitrates Nitrogen Nutrients Original Article Phylogeny Plant Sciences Relative abundance Shade Soil environment Soil fertility Soil nutrients Soils |
| title | Taxonomic shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities with shade and soil nitrogen across conventionally managed and organic coffee agroecosystems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A07%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxonomic%20shifts%20in%20arbuscular%20mycorrhizal%20fungal%20communities%20with%20shade%20and%20soil%20nitrogen%20across%20conventionally%20managed%20and%20organic%20coffee%20agroecosystems&rft.jtitle=Mycorrhiza&rft.au=Aldrich-Wolfe,%20Laura&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=513-527&rft.issn=0940-6360&rft.eissn=1432-1890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00572-020-00967-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416304135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416304135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |