Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness

•A theory of awareness was tested by manipulating visual awareness and attention.•Awareness of task rules was not necessary for exogenous or endogenous attention.•Awareness of a stimulus was necessary for endogenous but not exogenous attention.•Attention control generalized from entrained locations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in neurobiology 2020-12, Vol.195, p.101844-101844, Article 101844
Hauptverfasser: Wilterson, Andrew I., Kemper, Casey M., Kim, Noah, Webb, Taylor W., Reblando, Alexandra M.W., Graziano, Michael S.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101844
container_issue
container_start_page 101844
container_title Progress in neurobiology
container_volume 195
creator Wilterson, Andrew I.
Kemper, Casey M.
Kim, Noah
Webb, Taylor W.
Reblando, Alexandra M.W.
Graziano, Michael S.A.
description •A theory of awareness was tested by manipulating visual awareness and attention.•Awareness of task rules was not necessary for exogenous or endogenous attention.•Awareness of a stimulus was necessary for endogenous but not exogenous attention.•Attention control generalized from entrained locations to untrained locations.•Each result was specifically predicted by the attention schema theory. In the attention schema theory (AST), the brain constructs a schematic, simplified model of attention. The model is associated with three cognitive processes: a model of one’s own attention contributes to the endogenous control of attention, a model of the attention of others contributes to theory of mind, and the contents of these models leads to the common human claim that we contain a non-physical consciousness or awareness inside us. Because AST is a control-engineering style theory, it can make specific predictions in complex situations. Here, over six experiments, we examined interactions between attention and awareness to test predictions of AST. Participants performed a visual task in which a cue stimulus affected their attention, as measured by their reactions to a subsequent target stimulus. The task measured both exogenous attention drawn to the cue and endogenous attention directed to a target location predicted by the cue. When participants were not aware that the cue predicted the target, both exogenous and endogenous attention effects remained. In contrast, when participants were not visually aware of the cue itself, the exogenous attention effect remained and the endogenous effect was impaired. In an additional two experiments, when participants learned an implicit shift of attention, the learning generalized from trained spatial locations to adjacent, untrained locations. Each of these findings matched predictions of AST. The results support the interpretation that attention control relies partly on an internal model that is responsible for claims of awareness.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101844
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410351652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030100822030099X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2410351652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7e1d0d070a4f52217b1cf57b3cdbf11c5ade4c04268231aed5adacf4f781c2cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5Alm5QZ23mwLIiXVIkNrC3HnqipkrjYCVL_noSUbllZuj7zOozdICwRML3bLnct9d4VlVty4L9pLuUJm2OeiThBzE_ZHARgDJDzGbsIYQsAqQBxzmaCy_ssSeWcPay6jtqucm1kXNt5V0e6tVG3oUgff4LZUKPH0Pl95MoRDaZyfWgphEt2Vuo60NXhXbDP56ePx9d4_f7y9rhax0Zy6OKM0IKFDLQsE84xK9CUSVYIY4sS0STakjQgeZpzgZrsEGhTyjLL0XBTiAW7nfruvPvqKXSqqYKhutYtDasoLhFEgmnCBzSbUONdCJ5KtfNVo_1eIahRoNqqo0A1ClSTwKHy-jCkLxqyx7o_YwOwmgAaTv2uyKvBBLWGbOXJdMq66t8hP9RJhyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2410351652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wilterson, Andrew I. ; Kemper, Casey M. ; Kim, Noah ; Webb, Taylor W. ; Reblando, Alexandra M.W. ; Graziano, Michael S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilterson, Andrew I. ; Kemper, Casey M. ; Kim, Noah ; Webb, Taylor W. ; Reblando, Alexandra M.W. ; Graziano, Michael S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>•A theory of awareness was tested by manipulating visual awareness and attention.•Awareness of task rules was not necessary for exogenous or endogenous attention.•Awareness of a stimulus was necessary for endogenous but not exogenous attention.•Attention control generalized from entrained locations to untrained locations.•Each result was specifically predicted by the attention schema theory. In the attention schema theory (AST), the brain constructs a schematic, simplified model of attention. The model is associated with three cognitive processes: a model of one’s own attention contributes to the endogenous control of attention, a model of the attention of others contributes to theory of mind, and the contents of these models leads to the common human claim that we contain a non-physical consciousness or awareness inside us. Because AST is a control-engineering style theory, it can make specific predictions in complex situations. Here, over six experiments, we examined interactions between attention and awareness to test predictions of AST. Participants performed a visual task in which a cue stimulus affected their attention, as measured by their reactions to a subsequent target stimulus. The task measured both exogenous attention drawn to the cue and endogenous attention directed to a target location predicted by the cue. When participants were not aware that the cue predicted the target, both exogenous and endogenous attention effects remained. In contrast, when participants were not visually aware of the cue itself, the exogenous attention effect remained and the endogenous effect was impaired. In an additional two experiments, when participants learned an implicit shift of attention, the learning generalized from trained spatial locations to adjacent, untrained locations. Each of these findings matched predictions of AST. The results support the interpretation that attention control relies partly on an internal model that is responsible for claims of awareness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101844</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32497564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Awareness ; Consciousness ; Endogenous attention ; Exogenous attention ; Internal model</subject><ispartof>Progress in neurobiology, 2020-12, Vol.195, p.101844-101844, Article 101844</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7e1d0d070a4f52217b1cf57b3cdbf11c5ade4c04268231aed5adacf4f781c2cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7e1d0d070a4f52217b1cf57b3cdbf11c5ade4c04268231aed5adacf4f781c2cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32497564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilterson, Andrew I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Casey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Taylor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reblando, Alexandra M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graziano, Michael S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness</title><title>Progress in neurobiology</title><addtitle>Prog Neurobiol</addtitle><description>•A theory of awareness was tested by manipulating visual awareness and attention.•Awareness of task rules was not necessary for exogenous or endogenous attention.•Awareness of a stimulus was necessary for endogenous but not exogenous attention.•Attention control generalized from entrained locations to untrained locations.•Each result was specifically predicted by the attention schema theory. In the attention schema theory (AST), the brain constructs a schematic, simplified model of attention. The model is associated with three cognitive processes: a model of one’s own attention contributes to the endogenous control of attention, a model of the attention of others contributes to theory of mind, and the contents of these models leads to the common human claim that we contain a non-physical consciousness or awareness inside us. Because AST is a control-engineering style theory, it can make specific predictions in complex situations. Here, over six experiments, we examined interactions between attention and awareness to test predictions of AST. Participants performed a visual task in which a cue stimulus affected their attention, as measured by their reactions to a subsequent target stimulus. The task measured both exogenous attention drawn to the cue and endogenous attention directed to a target location predicted by the cue. When participants were not aware that the cue predicted the target, both exogenous and endogenous attention effects remained. In contrast, when participants were not visually aware of the cue itself, the exogenous attention effect remained and the endogenous effect was impaired. In an additional two experiments, when participants learned an implicit shift of attention, the learning generalized from trained spatial locations to adjacent, untrained locations. Each of these findings matched predictions of AST. The results support the interpretation that attention control relies partly on an internal model that is responsible for claims of awareness.</description><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Endogenous attention</subject><subject>Exogenous attention</subject><subject>Internal model</subject><issn>0301-0082</issn><issn>1873-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5Alm5QZ23mwLIiXVIkNrC3HnqipkrjYCVL_noSUbllZuj7zOozdICwRML3bLnct9d4VlVty4L9pLuUJm2OeiThBzE_ZHARgDJDzGbsIYQsAqQBxzmaCy_ssSeWcPay6jtqucm1kXNt5V0e6tVG3oUgff4LZUKPH0Pl95MoRDaZyfWgphEt2Vuo60NXhXbDP56ePx9d4_f7y9rhax0Zy6OKM0IKFDLQsE84xK9CUSVYIY4sS0STakjQgeZpzgZrsEGhTyjLL0XBTiAW7nfruvPvqKXSqqYKhutYtDasoLhFEgmnCBzSbUONdCJ5KtfNVo_1eIahRoNqqo0A1ClSTwKHy-jCkLxqyx7o_YwOwmgAaTv2uyKvBBLWGbOXJdMq66t8hP9RJhyU</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Wilterson, Andrew I.</creator><creator>Kemper, Casey M.</creator><creator>Kim, Noah</creator><creator>Webb, Taylor W.</creator><creator>Reblando, Alexandra M.W.</creator><creator>Graziano, Michael S.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness</title><author>Wilterson, Andrew I. ; Kemper, Casey M. ; Kim, Noah ; Webb, Taylor W. ; Reblando, Alexandra M.W. ; Graziano, Michael S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7e1d0d070a4f52217b1cf57b3cdbf11c5ade4c04268231aed5adacf4f781c2cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Endogenous attention</topic><topic>Exogenous attention</topic><topic>Internal model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilterson, Andrew I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Casey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Taylor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reblando, Alexandra M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graziano, Michael S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neurobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilterson, Andrew I.</au><au>Kemper, Casey M.</au><au>Kim, Noah</au><au>Webb, Taylor W.</au><au>Reblando, Alexandra M.W.</au><au>Graziano, Michael S.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neurobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neurobiol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>195</volume><spage>101844</spage><epage>101844</epage><pages>101844-101844</pages><artnum>101844</artnum><issn>0301-0082</issn><eissn>1873-5118</eissn><abstract>•A theory of awareness was tested by manipulating visual awareness and attention.•Awareness of task rules was not necessary for exogenous or endogenous attention.•Awareness of a stimulus was necessary for endogenous but not exogenous attention.•Attention control generalized from entrained locations to untrained locations.•Each result was specifically predicted by the attention schema theory. In the attention schema theory (AST), the brain constructs a schematic, simplified model of attention. The model is associated with three cognitive processes: a model of one’s own attention contributes to the endogenous control of attention, a model of the attention of others contributes to theory of mind, and the contents of these models leads to the common human claim that we contain a non-physical consciousness or awareness inside us. Because AST is a control-engineering style theory, it can make specific predictions in complex situations. Here, over six experiments, we examined interactions between attention and awareness to test predictions of AST. Participants performed a visual task in which a cue stimulus affected their attention, as measured by their reactions to a subsequent target stimulus. The task measured both exogenous attention drawn to the cue and endogenous attention directed to a target location predicted by the cue. When participants were not aware that the cue predicted the target, both exogenous and endogenous attention effects remained. In contrast, when participants were not visually aware of the cue itself, the exogenous attention effect remained and the endogenous effect was impaired. In an additional two experiments, when participants learned an implicit shift of attention, the learning generalized from trained spatial locations to adjacent, untrained locations. Each of these findings matched predictions of AST. The results support the interpretation that attention control relies partly on an internal model that is responsible for claims of awareness.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32497564</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101844</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0082
ispartof Progress in neurobiology, 2020-12, Vol.195, p.101844-101844, Article 101844
issn 0301-0082
1873-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2410351652
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Awareness
Consciousness
Endogenous attention
Exogenous attention
Internal model
title Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A28%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention%20control%20and%20the%20attention%20schema%20theory%20of%20consciousness&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neurobiology&rft.au=Wilterson,%20Andrew%20I.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=195&rft.spage=101844&rft.epage=101844&rft.pages=101844-101844&rft.artnum=101844&rft.issn=0301-0082&rft.eissn=1873-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2410351652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2410351652&rft_id=info:pmid/32497564&rft_els_id=S030100822030099X&rfr_iscdi=true