Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting

Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye moveme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological trauma 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132
Hauptverfasser: Ironson, Gail, Hylton, Emily, Gonzalez, Brian, Small, Brent, Freund, Blanche, Gerstein, Myriam, Thurston, Fabian, Bira, Lindsay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 123
container_title Psychological trauma
container_volume 13
creator Ironson, Gail
Hylton, Emily
Gonzalez, Brian
Small, Brent
Freund, Blanche
Gerstein, Myriam
Thurston, Fabian
Bira, Lindsay
description Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned. Clinical Impact Statement This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-admin
doi_str_mv 10.1037/tra0000594
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409640700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2409640700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkNR6kd70x8gAW-KZWwyJ7OZXNpl2woLQtdC78KZ7ImO7MysSWZl_73RtQrmJi_nPLwcHsa-SHEuBejvKaDIrzLqAzuURpWFmZh_e6-5lgfsKMY7ISbK1NVHdgClMhMp1CFrZt6TS-2GeoqRD55f3wYi_iO0lHMgTB31KXI_BP6HXM55imOHqXV8tnnetT1HPh8eisVswadD1419m7Z8QSm1_c0ntu9xFenzy3_M_v6cXU9_F_OrX5fTi3mBUOtUgEaqPdSk0Cyb0pQ6j31Z1RWVUOeNQ1QKlmBMU3nloPI1Ki80NEqj0XDMvu5612G4Hykm27XR0WqFPQ1jtKUSZqKEFiKjp-_Qu2EMfb7umQLQWkGmznaUC0OMgbxdh7bDsLVS2Cfz9s18hk9eKsemo-Ur-l91Br7tAFyjXcetw5AVrii6MYSs8anMSrDSyhLgEQbTjMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409337743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay</creator><contributor>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay ; Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned. Clinical Impact Statement This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-969X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/tra0000594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32496104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Cognitions ; Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy ; Female ; Human ; Intervention ; Male ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Psychological First Aid ; Stress Management ; Symptoms ; Test Construction ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Psychological trauma, 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7562-872X ; 0000-0001-5108-5735 ; 0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Blanche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstein, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bira, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><title>Psychological trauma</title><addtitle>Psychol Trauma</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned. Clinical Impact Statement This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</description><subject>Cognitions</subject><subject>Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Psychological First Aid</subject><subject>Stress Management</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>1942-9681</issn><issn>1942-969X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkNR6kd70x8gAW-KZWwyJ7OZXNpl2woLQtdC78KZ7ImO7MysSWZl_73RtQrmJi_nPLwcHsa-SHEuBejvKaDIrzLqAzuURpWFmZh_e6-5lgfsKMY7ISbK1NVHdgClMhMp1CFrZt6TS-2GeoqRD55f3wYi_iO0lHMgTB31KXI_BP6HXM55imOHqXV8tnnetT1HPh8eisVswadD1419m7Z8QSm1_c0ntu9xFenzy3_M_v6cXU9_F_OrX5fTi3mBUOtUgEaqPdSk0Cyb0pQ6j31Z1RWVUOeNQ1QKlmBMU3nloPI1Ki80NEqj0XDMvu5612G4Hykm27XR0WqFPQ1jtKUSZqKEFiKjp-_Qu2EMfb7umQLQWkGmznaUC0OMgbxdh7bDsLVS2Cfz9s18hk9eKsemo-Ur-l91Br7tAFyjXcetw5AVrii6MYSs8anMSrDSyhLgEQbTjMk</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Ironson, Gail</creator><creator>Hylton, Emily</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Brian</creator><creator>Small, Brent</creator><creator>Freund, Blanche</creator><creator>Gerstein, Myriam</creator><creator>Thurston, Fabian</creator><creator>Bira, Lindsay</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-872X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><author>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cognitions</topic><topic>Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Psychological First Aid</topic><topic>Stress Management</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Blanche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstein, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bira, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ironson, Gail</au><au>Hylton, Emily</au><au>Gonzalez, Brian</au><au>Small, Brent</au><au>Freund, Blanche</au><au>Gerstein, Myriam</au><au>Thurston, Fabian</au><au>Bira, Lindsay</au><au>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</atitle><jtitle>Psychological trauma</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Trauma</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>1942-9681</issn><eissn>1942-969X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned. Clinical Impact Statement This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>32496104</pmid><doi>10.1037/tra0000594</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-872X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-9681
ispartof Psychological trauma, 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132
issn 1942-9681
1942-969X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409640700
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognitions
Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy
Female
Human
Intervention
Male
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Psychological First Aid
Stress Management
Symptoms
Test Construction
Trauma
title Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A38%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Three%20Brief%20Treatments%20for%20Recent%20Traumatic%20Events%20in%20a%20Low-SES%20Community%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20trauma&rft.au=Ironson,%20Gail&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=1942-9681&rft.eissn=1942-969X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/tra0000594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2409640700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409337743&rft_id=info:pmid/32496104&rfr_iscdi=true