Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting
Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye moveme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological trauma 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Psychological trauma |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ironson, Gail Hylton, Emily Gonzalez, Brian Small, Brent Freund, Blanche Gerstein, Myriam Thurston, Fabian Bira, Lindsay |
description | Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned.
Clinical Impact Statement
This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-admin |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/tra0000594 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409640700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2409640700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkNR6kd70x8gAW-KZWwyJ7OZXNpl2woLQtdC78KZ7ImO7MysSWZl_73RtQrmJi_nPLwcHsa-SHEuBejvKaDIrzLqAzuURpWFmZh_e6-5lgfsKMY7ISbK1NVHdgClMhMp1CFrZt6TS-2GeoqRD55f3wYi_iO0lHMgTB31KXI_BP6HXM55imOHqXV8tnnetT1HPh8eisVswadD1419m7Z8QSm1_c0ntu9xFenzy3_M_v6cXU9_F_OrX5fTi3mBUOtUgEaqPdSk0Cyb0pQ6j31Z1RWVUOeNQ1QKlmBMU3nloPI1Ki80NEqj0XDMvu5612G4Hykm27XR0WqFPQ1jtKUSZqKEFiKjp-_Qu2EMfb7umQLQWkGmznaUC0OMgbxdh7bDsLVS2Cfz9s18hk9eKsemo-Ur-l91Br7tAFyjXcetw5AVrii6MYSs8anMSrDSyhLgEQbTjMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2409337743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay</creator><contributor>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay ; Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned.
Clinical Impact Statement
This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-969X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/tra0000594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32496104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Cognitions ; Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy ; Female ; Human ; Intervention ; Male ; Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ; Psychological First Aid ; Stress Management ; Symptoms ; Test Construction ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Psychological trauma, 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7562-872X ; 0000-0001-5108-5735 ; 0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Blanche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstein, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bira, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><title>Psychological trauma</title><addtitle>Psychol Trauma</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned.
Clinical Impact Statement
This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</description><subject>Cognitions</subject><subject>Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</subject><subject>Psychological First Aid</subject><subject>Stress Management</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>1942-9681</issn><issn>1942-969X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF1LHDEUhkNR6kd70x8gAW-KZWwyJ7OZXNpl2woLQtdC78KZ7ImO7MysSWZl_73RtQrmJi_nPLwcHsa-SHEuBejvKaDIrzLqAzuURpWFmZh_e6-5lgfsKMY7ISbK1NVHdgClMhMp1CFrZt6TS-2GeoqRD55f3wYi_iO0lHMgTB31KXI_BP6HXM55imOHqXV8tnnetT1HPh8eisVswadD1419m7Z8QSm1_c0ntu9xFenzy3_M_v6cXU9_F_OrX5fTi3mBUOtUgEaqPdSk0Cyb0pQ6j31Z1RWVUOeNQ1QKlmBMU3nloPI1Ki80NEqj0XDMvu5612G4Hykm27XR0WqFPQ1jtKUSZqKEFiKjp-_Qu2EMfb7umQLQWkGmznaUC0OMgbxdh7bDsLVS2Cfz9s18hk9eKsemo-Ur-l91Br7tAFyjXcetw5AVrii6MYSs8anMSrDSyhLgEQbTjMk</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Ironson, Gail</creator><creator>Hylton, Emily</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Brian</creator><creator>Small, Brent</creator><creator>Freund, Blanche</creator><creator>Gerstein, Myriam</creator><creator>Thurston, Fabian</creator><creator>Bira, Lindsay</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-872X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</title><author>Ironson, Gail ; Hylton, Emily ; Gonzalez, Brian ; Small, Brent ; Freund, Blanche ; Gerstein, Myriam ; Thurston, Fabian ; Bira, Lindsay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-37ae8f38e4a9db2927387f2585e2388f3caa443d399b5f4c35f8a4f073b47a973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cognitions</topic><topic>Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Posttraumatic Stress Disorder</topic><topic>Psychological First Aid</topic><topic>Stress Management</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ironson, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylton, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freund, Blanche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstein, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bira, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ironson, Gail</au><au>Hylton, Emily</au><au>Gonzalez, Brian</au><au>Small, Brent</au><au>Freund, Blanche</au><au>Gerstein, Myriam</au><au>Thurston, Fabian</au><au>Bira, Lindsay</au><au>Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting</atitle><jtitle>Psychological trauma</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Trauma</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>1942-9681</issn><eissn>1942-969X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine whether brief treatments provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. Method: Participants (n = 105) who had experienced a traumatic event within the past 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 4-session treatments: individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). Measures administered pretreatment and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month posttreatment included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions (PTCI), and depressive symptoms (BDI). Results: The 3 treatment groups all showed significant declines in PTSD, PTCI, and BDI symptoms over time with large prepost effect sizes (median 1-month: 0.96, 3-month: 1.38, 6-month: 1.10). However, the treatment groups showed significantly different rates of decline, with the EMDR group showing the fastest declines-interaction PTCI: F(1, 237) = 5.85, p = .016; depression:, F(1, 239) = 4.90, p = .028-followed by the SMT and then PFA group. While there were significant differences between the EMDR and PFA groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, there were no significant differences in any of the 3 outcome measures at the 6-month follow-up, nor were there significant differences between groups on PTSD symptoms, F(1, 239) = 2.30, p = .131. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that any of these 3 approaches may be useful in low-resource community settings. Because it gives the quickest relief, EMDR is the preferred approach, followed by SMT, due its ease of administration. PFA provides a reasonable alternative. Where possible, booster sessions should be planned.
Clinical Impact Statement
This study demonstrates that brief treatments may provide psychological relief after traumatic events in low-resource communities. We observed reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, posttraumatic cognitions, and depression, after four sessions of either individual eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), group-administered stress management with a trauma focus (SMT), or group-administered psychological first aid (PFA). This study provides preliminary evidence that any of three approaches may be efficacious in resource-limited settings, or where immediate relief is desired. As EMDR gives the fastest relief, it would be the preferred approach, followed by SMT, which was group-administered and therefore more cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>32496104</pmid><doi>10.1037/tra0000594</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-872X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-4689</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-9681 |
ispartof | Psychological trauma, 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.123-132 |
issn | 1942-9681 1942-969X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2409640700 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cognitions Eye Movement Desensitization Therapy Female Human Intervention Male Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Psychological First Aid Stress Management Symptoms Test Construction Trauma |
title | Effectiveness of Three Brief Treatments for Recent Traumatic Events in a Low-SES Community Setting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A38%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Three%20Brief%20Treatments%20for%20Recent%20Traumatic%20Events%20in%20a%20Low-SES%20Community%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20trauma&rft.au=Ironson,%20Gail&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=1942-9681&rft.eissn=1942-969X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/tra0000594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2409640700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2409337743&rft_id=info:pmid/32496104&rfr_iscdi=true |