Intraoperative radiotherapy in early breast cancer: observational comparison with whole breast radiotherapy

INTRODUCTIONIn early breast cancer (EBC), a single dose of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) might be an option to standard whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). However, there is no consensus about its use and clinical results. AIMto analyse the morbidity and oncological outcomes of IORT as monotherap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cirugia española (English ed.) 2021-02, Vol.99 (2), p.132-139
Hauptverfasser: Oliver Guillén, José Ramón, Hernando Almudi, Ernesto, Molina Osorio, Guadalupe, Ibañez Carreras, Reyes, Font Gómez, José Antonio, Vicente Gómez, Isabel, García Mur, Carmen, Casamayor Franco, María Carmen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:INTRODUCTIONIn early breast cancer (EBC), a single dose of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) might be an option to standard whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). However, there is no consensus about its use and clinical results. AIMto analyse the morbidity and oncological outcomes of IORT as monotherapy in EBC. METHODSA single centre observational analytic study was performed. A prospective IORT cohort (2015-17) and a retrospective WBRT cohort (2012-17) were selected following the same criteria: ≥ 45 y.o., invasive ductal carcinoma or variants, radiological tumour size ≤ 3 cm, positive oestrogenic receptors, negative HER2, cN0; exclusion criteria: lymphovascular invasion, multicentricity/multifocality, BRCA mutation and neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical, histological, surgical, oncological characteristics and complications were collected. RESULTSA total of 425 cases were selected: 217 in IORT cohort and 208 in WBRT cohort. Average age in IORT and WBRT groups was 67±9.5 and 64.8 ± 9.9 y.o. respectively (p = 0.01). ASA 3 risk score patients were 17.7% in IORT and 24 cases in WBRT (p = 0.027). There were no differences in histological results or tumoral stage. Average follow up was 24.4 ± 8 months in IORT and 50.5 ± 18 months in WBRT (p < 0.001). No differences were detected in local recurrence, metastases or mortality. Complications that required reintervention or hospitalization were similar in both groups. A total of 3 and 14 cases developed early severe dermatitis in IORT and WBRT groups respectively (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONIORT as monotherapy in selected patients with EBC stands for an alternative option versus WBRT. It seems especially useful in advanced-age patients with severe comorbidities. IORT associates lesser early severe dermatitis.
ISSN:2173-5077
DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.04.024