Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objectives: This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO). Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JDR Clinical & Translational Research 2021-04, Vol.6 (2), p.174-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | JDR Clinical & Translational Research |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Al-Hamed, F.S. Hijazi, A. Gao, Q. Badran, Z. Tamimi, F. |
description | Objectives:
This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO).
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to March 6, 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Exclusion criteria were case series, observational studies, animal studies, and reviews. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted mean difference was used to compare the results.
Results:
Nine RCTs were included with a total of 407 patients. The numbers of joints treated were 262, 112, and 112 in the PC, HA, and saline groups, respectively. The quality of studies was rated as strong in 4 studies, moderate in 4 studies, and weak in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that PCs decreased pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores compared to HA by an average of −1.11 (CI, −1.62 to −0.60; P < 0.0001) and −0.57 (CI, −1.55 to 0.41; P = 0.26) at 3 and 12 mo follow-up respectively. Also, the average decrease in pain scores with PC compared to saline was −1.33 (CI, −2.61 to −0.06; P = 0.04), −2.07 (CI, −3.46 to −0.69; P = 0.003), and −2.71 (CI, −4.69 to −0.72; P = 0.008) at 3, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. Regarding MMO measurements, PC was comparable to HA, but it was significantly better than saline after 3 and 6 mo [2.9 mm (CI,1.47 to 4.3; P < 0.0001), and 1.69 mm (CI, 0.13 to 3.25; P = 0.03) respectively].
Conclusion:
PC reduces pain VAS scores compared to HA during the first 3 m after treatment, and when compared to saline, it reduces pain and increases MMO for longer durations. However, due to differences between groups regarding PC preparation protocols and study heterogeneity, further standardized RCTs are required.
Knowledge Transfer Statement:
This study provides researchers and clinicians with quantitative and qualitative analyses of the current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of platelet concentrate injections in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain control and maximum mouth opening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2380084420927326 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2408194047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2380084420927326</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2408194047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-25452fb18df5c7299a0183ff05b31cd55f3a1114418c15d69271bc7c44e7373b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRrNTuXcks3UTnmUnclfqEiqJ1HSaTO5KSZOrMROm_N6W1C8HVffCdA-cgdEbJJaVKXTGeEZIJwUjOFGfpATrZvBKSSXa434UYoUkIS0IITblSkh-jEWciFUTxE2RfGh2hgYhnrjPQRT-ceOFBx3a4ArbO4wW0K-ddq7uqLvtGe3xTB-cr8OEaT_HbOkRodawNfoWvGr7xAOIniDrRnW7WoQ6n6MjqJsBkN8fo_e52MXtI5s_3j7PpPDGcq5gwKSSzJc0qK41iea4Jzbi1RJacmkpKyzWlVAiaGSqrdAhOS6OMEKC44iUfo4ut78q7zx5CLNo6GGga3YHrQ8EEyWguiFADSrao8S4ED7ZY-brVfl1QUmwKLv4WPEjOd-592UK1F_zWOQDJFgj6A4ql6_2QP_xv-APgAYJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2408194047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Al-Hamed, F.S. ; Hijazi, A. ; Gao, Q. ; Badran, Z. ; Tamimi, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Hamed, F.S. ; Hijazi, A. ; Gao, Q. ; Badran, Z. ; Tamimi, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO).
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to March 6, 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Exclusion criteria were case series, observational studies, animal studies, and reviews. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted mean difference was used to compare the results.
Results:
Nine RCTs were included with a total of 407 patients. The numbers of joints treated were 262, 112, and 112 in the PC, HA, and saline groups, respectively. The quality of studies was rated as strong in 4 studies, moderate in 4 studies, and weak in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that PCs decreased pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores compared to HA by an average of −1.11 (CI, −1.62 to −0.60; P < 0.0001) and −0.57 (CI, −1.55 to 0.41; P = 0.26) at 3 and 12 mo follow-up respectively. Also, the average decrease in pain scores with PC compared to saline was −1.33 (CI, −2.61 to −0.06; P = 0.04), −2.07 (CI, −3.46 to −0.69; P = 0.003), and −2.71 (CI, −4.69 to −0.72; P = 0.008) at 3, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. Regarding MMO measurements, PC was comparable to HA, but it was significantly better than saline after 3 and 6 mo [2.9 mm (CI,1.47 to 4.3; P < 0.0001), and 1.69 mm (CI, 0.13 to 3.25; P = 0.03) respectively].
Conclusion:
PC reduces pain VAS scores compared to HA during the first 3 m after treatment, and when compared to saline, it reduces pain and increases MMO for longer durations. However, due to differences between groups regarding PC preparation protocols and study heterogeneity, further standardized RCTs are required.
Knowledge Transfer Statement:
This study provides researchers and clinicians with quantitative and qualitative analyses of the current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of platelet concentrate injections in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain control and maximum mouth opening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2380-0844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2380084420927326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32464073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Arthrocentesis ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Hyaluronic Acid ; Platelet-Rich Plasma ; Temporomandibular Joint ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - therapy</subject><ispartof>JDR Clinical & Translational Research, 2021-04, Vol.6 (2), p.174-183</ispartof><rights>International & American Associations for Dental Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-25452fb18df5c7299a0183ff05b31cd55f3a1114418c15d69271bc7c44e7373b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-25452fb18df5c7299a0183ff05b31cd55f3a1114418c15d69271bc7c44e7373b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9451-0452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2380084420927326$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2380084420927326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,315,781,785,793,21821,27924,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32464073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Hamed, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badran, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamimi, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>JDR Clinical & Translational Research</title><addtitle>JDR Clin Trans Res</addtitle><description>Objectives:
This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO).
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to March 6, 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Exclusion criteria were case series, observational studies, animal studies, and reviews. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted mean difference was used to compare the results.
Results:
Nine RCTs were included with a total of 407 patients. The numbers of joints treated were 262, 112, and 112 in the PC, HA, and saline groups, respectively. The quality of studies was rated as strong in 4 studies, moderate in 4 studies, and weak in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that PCs decreased pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores compared to HA by an average of −1.11 (CI, −1.62 to −0.60; P < 0.0001) and −0.57 (CI, −1.55 to 0.41; P = 0.26) at 3 and 12 mo follow-up respectively. Also, the average decrease in pain scores with PC compared to saline was −1.33 (CI, −2.61 to −0.06; P = 0.04), −2.07 (CI, −3.46 to −0.69; P = 0.003), and −2.71 (CI, −4.69 to −0.72; P = 0.008) at 3, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. Regarding MMO measurements, PC was comparable to HA, but it was significantly better than saline after 3 and 6 mo [2.9 mm (CI,1.47 to 4.3; P < 0.0001), and 1.69 mm (CI, 0.13 to 3.25; P = 0.03) respectively].
Conclusion:
PC reduces pain VAS scores compared to HA during the first 3 m after treatment, and when compared to saline, it reduces pain and increases MMO for longer durations. However, due to differences between groups regarding PC preparation protocols and study heterogeneity, further standardized RCTs are required.
Knowledge Transfer Statement:
This study provides researchers and clinicians with quantitative and qualitative analyses of the current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of platelet concentrate injections in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain control and maximum mouth opening.</description><subject>Arthrocentesis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid</subject><subject>Platelet-Rich Plasma</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - therapy</subject><issn>2380-0844</issn><issn>2380-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRrNTuXcks3UTnmUnclfqEiqJ1HSaTO5KSZOrMROm_N6W1C8HVffCdA-cgdEbJJaVKXTGeEZIJwUjOFGfpATrZvBKSSXa434UYoUkIS0IITblSkh-jEWciFUTxE2RfGh2hgYhnrjPQRT-ceOFBx3a4ArbO4wW0K-ddq7uqLvtGe3xTB-cr8OEaT_HbOkRodawNfoWvGr7xAOIniDrRnW7WoQ6n6MjqJsBkN8fo_e52MXtI5s_3j7PpPDGcq5gwKSSzJc0qK41iea4Jzbi1RJacmkpKyzWlVAiaGSqrdAhOS6OMEKC44iUfo4ut78q7zx5CLNo6GGga3YHrQ8EEyWguiFADSrao8S4ED7ZY-brVfl1QUmwKLv4WPEjOd-592UK1F_zWOQDJFgj6A4ql6_2QP_xv-APgAYJA</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Al-Hamed, F.S.</creator><creator>Hijazi, A.</creator><creator>Gao, Q.</creator><creator>Badran, Z.</creator><creator>Tamimi, F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-0452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Al-Hamed, F.S. ; Hijazi, A. ; Gao, Q. ; Badran, Z. ; Tamimi, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-25452fb18df5c7299a0183ff05b31cd55f3a1114418c15d69271bc7c44e7373b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arthrocentesis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid</topic><topic>Platelet-Rich Plasma</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Hamed, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badran, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamimi, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JDR Clinical & Translational Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Hamed, F.S.</au><au>Hijazi, A.</au><au>Gao, Q.</au><au>Badran, Z.</au><au>Tamimi, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>JDR Clinical & Translational Research</jtitle><addtitle>JDR Clin Trans Res</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>174-183</pages><issn>2380-0844</issn><eissn>2380-0852</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
This systematic review compared platelet concentrates (PCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or saline/Ringer’s solution injections as treatments of temporomandibular osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO).
Methods:
PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to March 6, 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Exclusion criteria were case series, observational studies, animal studies, and reviews. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted mean difference was used to compare the results.
Results:
Nine RCTs were included with a total of 407 patients. The numbers of joints treated were 262, 112, and 112 in the PC, HA, and saline groups, respectively. The quality of studies was rated as strong in 4 studies, moderate in 4 studies, and weak in 1 study. The meta-analysis revealed that PCs decreased pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores compared to HA by an average of −1.11 (CI, −1.62 to −0.60; P < 0.0001) and −0.57 (CI, −1.55 to 0.41; P = 0.26) at 3 and 12 mo follow-up respectively. Also, the average decrease in pain scores with PC compared to saline was −1.33 (CI, −2.61 to −0.06; P = 0.04), −2.07 (CI, −3.46 to −0.69; P = 0.003), and −2.71 (CI, −4.69 to −0.72; P = 0.008) at 3, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. Regarding MMO measurements, PC was comparable to HA, but it was significantly better than saline after 3 and 6 mo [2.9 mm (CI,1.47 to 4.3; P < 0.0001), and 1.69 mm (CI, 0.13 to 3.25; P = 0.03) respectively].
Conclusion:
PC reduces pain VAS scores compared to HA during the first 3 m after treatment, and when compared to saline, it reduces pain and increases MMO for longer durations. However, due to differences between groups regarding PC preparation protocols and study heterogeneity, further standardized RCTs are required.
Knowledge Transfer Statement:
This study provides researchers and clinicians with quantitative and qualitative analyses of the current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of platelet concentrate injections in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and disc displacement in terms of pain control and maximum mouth opening.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32464073</pmid><doi>10.1177/2380084420927326</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-0452</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2380-0844 |
ispartof | JDR Clinical & Translational Research, 2021-04, Vol.6 (2), p.174-183 |
issn | 2380-0844 2380-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2408194047 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Arthrocentesis Dentistry Humans Hyaluronic Acid Platelet-Rich Plasma Temporomandibular Joint Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - therapy |
title | Platelet Concentrate Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Platelet%20Concentrate%20Treatments%20for%20Temporomandibular%20Disorders:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JDR%20Clinical%20&%20Translational%20Research&rft.au=Al-Hamed,%20F.S.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=174-183&rft.issn=2380-0844&rft.eissn=2380-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2380084420927326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2408194047%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2408194047&rft_id=info:pmid/32464073&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2380084420927326&rfr_iscdi=true |