Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing

For flight payloads or systems in free flight, Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT) can provide an accurate laboratory reproduction of the flight vibration environment at multiple response locations. IMMAT is performed by controlling multiple shakers attached to the system of interest, usual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.) Conn.), 2020-06, Vol.44 (3), p.283-297
Hauptverfasser: Mayes, R., Ankers, L., Daborn, P., Moulder, T., Ind, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)
container_volume 44
creator Mayes, R.
Ankers, L.
Daborn, P.
Moulder, T.
Ind, P.
description For flight payloads or systems in free flight, Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT) can provide an accurate laboratory reproduction of the flight vibration environment at multiple response locations. IMMAT is performed by controlling multiple shakers attached to the system of interest, usually through slender rods so that the shakers impart negligible moments or shear forces at the attachment. The attachment usually requires that the shakers not physically support the system. Thus, IMMAT is different from other multi-degree of freedom testing where shakers for slip tables or with vertical bearings drastically change the impedance by their rigid attachment to the system or payload. Consequently, IMMAT shakers are generally smaller than used for traditional testing. In the laboratory IMMAT test, bungee cords can support the system to simulate free flight. For a system that is a flight payload, bungee cords can support a portion of the next level of assembly (such as a rack or rail) with the attached payload to greatly improve the laboratory reproduction of the payload environment with the approximate attachment impedance. Engineering judgment has historically been the basis for IMMAT test planning but provides no pre-test metrics to show whether the test setup can meet the desired requirements. For successful test planning, engineers need tools to optimize the number and location of shakers and predict the requirements for the shakers and amplifiers. Electrodynamic shakers and amplifiers have physical limitations such as maximum available amplifier current, voltage or power and shaker force or stroke. If shakers and amplifiers can barely meet required levels with a well-designed IMMAT test, improper shaker placement can cause exceedance of the limitations and failure of the test to meet required levels. We present a tool to optimize the number and locations of shakers with an objective function that performs a least square fit of the flight cross spectral density matrix while minimizing requirements on the amplifiers or shakers. In this work, an optimized IMMAT test with four shakers attached to a test article closely reproduces the vibration environment generated by a field acoustic test. The optimization is based on a model. The model consists of a modal model (derived from a finite element model) of the test article coupled to a simple calibrated electro-mechanical model of the shakers. The optimization selects shaker locations to minimize the req
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407767375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407767375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1bc1b7868dfe57e74ec5181367f6b794da9577449b8d563bf0e512390607f6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzj1yKWQNE2cHtE0vjS0A7tHaZeMjDYpSYsEv56wwpWDZct-X1t-ELok-JpgDDexxFBVOSYpMC0hhyM0I5AKwjgcoxkGWuRCEHGKzmLcY0wYgWqGntb9YDv7pQbrXeZN9vKq3nTIVr45tGJmfMiex3awfav_pkv3YYN3nXaDarONjoN1u3N0YlQb9cVvnqPN3XKzeMhX6_vHxe0qbygXQ07qhtQguNgazUBDqRtGBKEcDK-hKreqYgBlWdViyzitDdaMFLTCHCeFoXN0Na3tg38f02nZ2djotlVO-zHKIqEADhRYkhaTtAk-xqCN7IPtVPiUBMsfbnLiJhM3eeAmIZnoZIpJ7HY6yL0fg0sf_ef6BjDkcIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407767375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Mayes, R. ; Ankers, L. ; Daborn, P. ; Moulder, T. ; Ind, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayes, R. ; Ankers, L. ; Daborn, P. ; Moulder, T. ; Ind, P.</creatorcontrib><description>For flight payloads or systems in free flight, Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT) can provide an accurate laboratory reproduction of the flight vibration environment at multiple response locations. IMMAT is performed by controlling multiple shakers attached to the system of interest, usually through slender rods so that the shakers impart negligible moments or shear forces at the attachment. The attachment usually requires that the shakers not physically support the system. Thus, IMMAT is different from other multi-degree of freedom testing where shakers for slip tables or with vertical bearings drastically change the impedance by their rigid attachment to the system or payload. Consequently, IMMAT shakers are generally smaller than used for traditional testing. In the laboratory IMMAT test, bungee cords can support the system to simulate free flight. For a system that is a flight payload, bungee cords can support a portion of the next level of assembly (such as a rack or rail) with the attached payload to greatly improve the laboratory reproduction of the payload environment with the approximate attachment impedance. Engineering judgment has historically been the basis for IMMAT test planning but provides no pre-test metrics to show whether the test setup can meet the desired requirements. For successful test planning, engineers need tools to optimize the number and location of shakers and predict the requirements for the shakers and amplifiers. Electrodynamic shakers and amplifiers have physical limitations such as maximum available amplifier current, voltage or power and shaker force or stroke. If shakers and amplifiers can barely meet required levels with a well-designed IMMAT test, improper shaker placement can cause exceedance of the limitations and failure of the test to meet required levels. We present a tool to optimize the number and locations of shakers with an objective function that performs a least square fit of the flight cross spectral density matrix while minimizing requirements on the amplifiers or shakers. In this work, an optimized IMMAT test with four shakers attached to a test article closely reproduces the vibration environment generated by a field acoustic test. The optimization is based on a model. The model consists of a modal model (derived from a finite element model) of the test article coupled to a simple calibrated electro-mechanical model of the shakers. The optimization selects shaker locations to minimize the required amplifier output voltage, but one can minimize shaker force, current, control error or some combination with appropriate physical limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-1567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acoustic tests ; Amplifiers ; Attachment ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Computer simulation ; Cords ; Electric potential ; Environmental testing ; Finite element method ; Free flight ; Impedance matching ; Laboratories ; Level (quantity) ; Materials Science ; Mathematical models ; Model testing ; Multiaxis ; Optimization ; Payloads ; Research Paper ; Shakers ; Shear forces ; Vibration ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.), 2020-06, Vol.44 (3), p.283-297</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1bc1b7868dfe57e74ec5181367f6b794da9577449b8d563bf0e512390607f6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1bc1b7868dfe57e74ec5181367f6b794da9577449b8d563bf0e512390607f6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7805-7558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayes, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankers, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daborn, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulder, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ind, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing</title><title>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</title><addtitle>Exp Tech</addtitle><description>For flight payloads or systems in free flight, Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT) can provide an accurate laboratory reproduction of the flight vibration environment at multiple response locations. IMMAT is performed by controlling multiple shakers attached to the system of interest, usually through slender rods so that the shakers impart negligible moments or shear forces at the attachment. The attachment usually requires that the shakers not physically support the system. Thus, IMMAT is different from other multi-degree of freedom testing where shakers for slip tables or with vertical bearings drastically change the impedance by their rigid attachment to the system or payload. Consequently, IMMAT shakers are generally smaller than used for traditional testing. In the laboratory IMMAT test, bungee cords can support the system to simulate free flight. For a system that is a flight payload, bungee cords can support a portion of the next level of assembly (such as a rack or rail) with the attached payload to greatly improve the laboratory reproduction of the payload environment with the approximate attachment impedance. Engineering judgment has historically been the basis for IMMAT test planning but provides no pre-test metrics to show whether the test setup can meet the desired requirements. For successful test planning, engineers need tools to optimize the number and location of shakers and predict the requirements for the shakers and amplifiers. Electrodynamic shakers and amplifiers have physical limitations such as maximum available amplifier current, voltage or power and shaker force or stroke. If shakers and amplifiers can barely meet required levels with a well-designed IMMAT test, improper shaker placement can cause exceedance of the limitations and failure of the test to meet required levels. We present a tool to optimize the number and locations of shakers with an objective function that performs a least square fit of the flight cross spectral density matrix while minimizing requirements on the amplifiers or shakers. In this work, an optimized IMMAT test with four shakers attached to a test article closely reproduces the vibration environment generated by a field acoustic test. The optimization is based on a model. The model consists of a modal model (derived from a finite element model) of the test article coupled to a simple calibrated electro-mechanical model of the shakers. The optimization selects shaker locations to minimize the required amplifier output voltage, but one can minimize shaker force, current, control error or some combination with appropriate physical limits.</description><subject>Acoustic tests</subject><subject>Amplifiers</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cords</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Environmental testing</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Free flight</subject><subject>Impedance matching</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Level (quantity)</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Multiaxis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Payloads</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Shakers</subject><subject>Shear forces</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>0732-8818</issn><issn>1747-1567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzj1yKWQNE2cHtE0vjS0A7tHaZeMjDYpSYsEv56wwpWDZct-X1t-ELok-JpgDDexxFBVOSYpMC0hhyM0I5AKwjgcoxkGWuRCEHGKzmLcY0wYgWqGntb9YDv7pQbrXeZN9vKq3nTIVr45tGJmfMiex3awfav_pkv3YYN3nXaDarONjoN1u3N0YlQb9cVvnqPN3XKzeMhX6_vHxe0qbygXQ07qhtQguNgazUBDqRtGBKEcDK-hKreqYgBlWdViyzitDdaMFLTCHCeFoXN0Na3tg38f02nZ2djotlVO-zHKIqEADhRYkhaTtAk-xqCN7IPtVPiUBMsfbnLiJhM3eeAmIZnoZIpJ7HY6yL0fg0sf_ef6BjDkcIQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Mayes, R.</creator><creator>Ankers, L.</creator><creator>Daborn, P.</creator><creator>Moulder, T.</creator><creator>Ind, P.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-7558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing</title><author>Mayes, R. ; Ankers, L. ; Daborn, P. ; Moulder, T. ; Ind, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1bc1b7868dfe57e74ec5181367f6b794da9577449b8d563bf0e512390607f6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acoustic tests</topic><topic>Amplifiers</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cords</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Environmental testing</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Free flight</topic><topic>Impedance matching</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Level (quantity)</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Multiaxis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Payloads</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Shakers</topic><topic>Shear forces</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayes, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankers, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daborn, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulder, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ind, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayes, R.</au><au>Ankers, L.</au><au>Daborn, P.</au><au>Moulder, T.</au><au>Ind, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing</atitle><jtitle>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</jtitle><stitle>Exp Tech</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>283-297</pages><issn>0732-8818</issn><eissn>1747-1567</eissn><abstract>For flight payloads or systems in free flight, Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Testing (IMMAT) can provide an accurate laboratory reproduction of the flight vibration environment at multiple response locations. IMMAT is performed by controlling multiple shakers attached to the system of interest, usually through slender rods so that the shakers impart negligible moments or shear forces at the attachment. The attachment usually requires that the shakers not physically support the system. Thus, IMMAT is different from other multi-degree of freedom testing where shakers for slip tables or with vertical bearings drastically change the impedance by their rigid attachment to the system or payload. Consequently, IMMAT shakers are generally smaller than used for traditional testing. In the laboratory IMMAT test, bungee cords can support the system to simulate free flight. For a system that is a flight payload, bungee cords can support a portion of the next level of assembly (such as a rack or rail) with the attached payload to greatly improve the laboratory reproduction of the payload environment with the approximate attachment impedance. Engineering judgment has historically been the basis for IMMAT test planning but provides no pre-test metrics to show whether the test setup can meet the desired requirements. For successful test planning, engineers need tools to optimize the number and location of shakers and predict the requirements for the shakers and amplifiers. Electrodynamic shakers and amplifiers have physical limitations such as maximum available amplifier current, voltage or power and shaker force or stroke. If shakers and amplifiers can barely meet required levels with a well-designed IMMAT test, improper shaker placement can cause exceedance of the limitations and failure of the test to meet required levels. We present a tool to optimize the number and locations of shakers with an objective function that performs a least square fit of the flight cross spectral density matrix while minimizing requirements on the amplifiers or shakers. In this work, an optimized IMMAT test with four shakers attached to a test article closely reproduces the vibration environment generated by a field acoustic test. The optimization is based on a model. The model consists of a modal model (derived from a finite element model) of the test article coupled to a simple calibrated electro-mechanical model of the shakers. The optimization selects shaker locations to minimize the required amplifier output voltage, but one can minimize shaker force, current, control error or some combination with appropriate physical limits.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-7558</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-8818
ispartof Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.), 2020-06, Vol.44 (3), p.283-297
issn 0732-8818
1747-1567
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407767375
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Acoustic tests
Amplifiers
Attachment
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Chemistry and Materials Science
Computer simulation
Cords
Electric potential
Environmental testing
Finite element method
Free flight
Impedance matching
Laboratories
Level (quantity)
Materials Science
Mathematical models
Model testing
Multiaxis
Optimization
Payloads
Research Paper
Shakers
Shear forces
Vibration
Voltage
title Optimization of Shaker Locations for Multiple Shaker Environmental Testing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A53%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Shaker%20Locations%20for%20Multiple%20Shaker%20Environmental%20Testing&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20techniques%20(Westport,%20Conn.)&rft.au=Mayes,%20R.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=283-297&rft.issn=0732-8818&rft.eissn=1747-1567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40799-019-00347-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407767375%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407767375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true