Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents
BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358e |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 351e |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Cooney, Carisa M. Meyer, Meredith L. Aravind, Pathik Bello, Ricardo J. Rosson, Gedge D. Lifchez, Scott D. Cooney, Damon S. |
description | BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents.
METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test.
RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p < 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p < 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877).
CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407581696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407581696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFzeQGSOXka7q3u2owSXQMDgchOGXmqS0dnsnjHk7e0QFfGgBVVFFd9fBT8hJ4yeM5olF_P7h3P6IxKasR0yZhFkoQABu2RMKYeQ0QhG5MC5F0pZwuNon4w4iChLOIzJ86StO2nLZhHcdWhlX75jMEdbtLaWjcZAYb9CbIJpY7BDX5o-kI3xc48Lz6MJ5pV0famDh8Eu0K6De3TlhnNHZK-QlcPjz35Inq6vHie34ezuZjq5nIVaUMZCBKAKVFHIVMQpGGQKkWWoNZgIWFTESSFiZdKUK79WShuBhieQppLpjPFDcra929n2bUDX53XpNFaVbLAdXA6CJlHK4iz2qNii2rbOWSzyzpa1tOuc0Xzja-59zX_76mWnnx8GVaP5Fn0Z6YF0C6zaqkfrXqthhTZfoqz65X-3xR_SDRZHXIRAgdLMT6FPAfwDVVSVew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407581696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents.
METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test.
RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p < 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p < 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877).
CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32459732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - organization & administration ; Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards ; Surgery, Plastic - education ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2020American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aravind, Pathik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Gedge D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifchez, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents.
METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test.
RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p < 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p < 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877).
CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - education</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFzeQGSOXka7q3u2owSXQMDgchOGXmqS0dnsnjHk7e0QFfGgBVVFFd9fBT8hJ4yeM5olF_P7h3P6IxKasR0yZhFkoQABu2RMKYeQ0QhG5MC5F0pZwuNon4w4iChLOIzJ86StO2nLZhHcdWhlX75jMEdbtLaWjcZAYb9CbIJpY7BDX5o-kI3xc48Lz6MJ5pV0famDh8Eu0K6De3TlhnNHZK-QlcPjz35Inq6vHie34ezuZjq5nIVaUMZCBKAKVFHIVMQpGGQKkWWoNZgIWFTESSFiZdKUK79WShuBhieQppLpjPFDcra929n2bUDX53XpNFaVbLAdXA6CJlHK4iz2qNii2rbOWSzyzpa1tOuc0Xzja-59zX_76mWnnx8GVaP5Fn0Z6YF0C6zaqkfrXqthhTZfoqz65X-3xR_SDRZHXIRAgdLMT6FPAfwDVVSVew</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Cooney, Carisa M.</creator><creator>Meyer, Meredith L.</creator><creator>Aravind, Pathik</creator><creator>Bello, Ricardo J.</creator><creator>Rosson, Gedge D.</creator><creator>Lifchez, Scott D.</creator><creator>Cooney, Damon S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><author>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - education</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aravind, Pathik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Gedge D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifchez, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooney, Carisa M.</au><au>Meyer, Meredith L.</au><au>Aravind, Pathik</au><au>Bello, Ricardo J.</au><au>Rosson, Gedge D.</au><au>Lifchez, Scott D.</au><au>Cooney, Damon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351e</spage><epage>358e</epage><pages>351e-358e</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents.
METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test.
RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p < 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p < 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877).
CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>32459732</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407581696 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Clinical Competence Female Humans Internship and Residency - organization & administration Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data Male Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards Surgery, Plastic - education Time Factors |
title | Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Operative%20Performance%20between%20Independent%20and%20Integrated%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Cooney,%20Carisa%20M.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351e&rft.epage=358e&rft.pages=351e-358e&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407581696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407581696&rft_id=info:pmid/32459732&rfr_iscdi=true |