Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents

BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e
Hauptverfasser: Cooney, Carisa M., Meyer, Meredith L., Aravind, Pathik, Bello, Ricardo J., Rosson, Gedge D., Lifchez, Scott D., Cooney, Damon S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358e
container_issue 3
container_start_page 351e
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 146
creator Cooney, Carisa M.
Meyer, Meredith L.
Aravind, Pathik
Bello, Ricardo J.
Rosson, Gedge D.
Lifchez, Scott D.
Cooney, Damon S.
description BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test. RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p < 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p < 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407581696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407581696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFzeQGSOXka7q3u2owSXQMDgchOGXmqS0dnsnjHk7e0QFfGgBVVFFd9fBT8hJ4yeM5olF_P7h3P6IxKasR0yZhFkoQABu2RMKYeQ0QhG5MC5F0pZwuNon4w4iChLOIzJ86StO2nLZhHcdWhlX75jMEdbtLaWjcZAYb9CbIJpY7BDX5o-kI3xc48Lz6MJ5pV0famDh8Eu0K6De3TlhnNHZK-QlcPjz35Inq6vHie34ezuZjq5nIVaUMZCBKAKVFHIVMQpGGQKkWWoNZgIWFTESSFiZdKUK79WShuBhieQppLpjPFDcra929n2bUDX53XpNFaVbLAdXA6CJlHK4iz2qNii2rbOWSzyzpa1tOuc0Xzja-59zX_76mWnnx8GVaP5Fn0Z6YF0C6zaqkfrXqthhTZfoqz65X-3xR_SDRZHXIRAgdLMT6FPAfwDVVSVew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407581696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test. RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p &lt; 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p &lt; 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32459732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration ; Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards ; Surgery, Plastic - education ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2020American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aravind, Pathik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Gedge D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifchez, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test. RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p &lt; 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p &lt; 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - education</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFzeQGSOXka7q3u2owSXQMDgchOGXmqS0dnsnjHk7e0QFfGgBVVFFd9fBT8hJ4yeM5olF_P7h3P6IxKasR0yZhFkoQABu2RMKYeQ0QhG5MC5F0pZwuNon4w4iChLOIzJ86StO2nLZhHcdWhlX75jMEdbtLaWjcZAYb9CbIJpY7BDX5o-kI3xc48Lz6MJ5pV0famDh8Eu0K6De3TlhnNHZK-QlcPjz35Inq6vHie34ezuZjq5nIVaUMZCBKAKVFHIVMQpGGQKkWWoNZgIWFTESSFiZdKUK79WShuBhieQppLpjPFDcra929n2bUDX53XpNFaVbLAdXA6CJlHK4iz2qNii2rbOWSzyzpa1tOuc0Xzja-59zX_76mWnnx8GVaP5Fn0Z6YF0C6zaqkfrXqthhTZfoqz65X-3xR_SDRZHXIRAgdLMT6FPAfwDVVSVew</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Cooney, Carisa M.</creator><creator>Meyer, Meredith L.</creator><creator>Aravind, Pathik</creator><creator>Bello, Ricardo J.</creator><creator>Rosson, Gedge D.</creator><creator>Lifchez, Scott D.</creator><creator>Cooney, Damon S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</title><author>Cooney, Carisa M. ; Meyer, Meredith L. ; Aravind, Pathik ; Bello, Ricardo J. ; Rosson, Gedge D. ; Lifchez, Scott D. ; Cooney, Damon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4011-e220b2bffa84682de1bee19ecc2d5215f67f46bd883b19ebbcd4ed37288a1c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - education</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Carisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aravind, Pathik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosson, Gedge D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifchez, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, Damon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooney, Carisa M.</au><au>Meyer, Meredith L.</au><au>Aravind, Pathik</au><au>Bello, Ricardo J.</au><au>Rosson, Gedge D.</au><au>Lifchez, Scott D.</au><au>Cooney, Damon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351e</spage><epage>358e</epage><pages>351e-358e</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Anecdotally, faculty report that independent residents’ operative skills differ from those of their integrated peers. This study compared operative competency between integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) and independent plastic surgery residents. METHODS:The authors compared independent (postgraduate years 1 to 3) and integrated (postgraduate years 4 to 6) plastic surgery residents at their institution using operative performance data from the Operative Entrustability Assessment, a validated five-point assessment tool that provides residents with real-time feedback about their operative performance, documenting performance at the point of care. Independent postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 residents were categorized as postgraduate year 4, 5, and 6 residents, respectively, for comparison. The authors analyzed attending physician (evaluator) Operative Entrustability Assessment scores over time using the independent t test. RESULTS:From July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, Operative Entrustability Assessments were completed at one training program for residents in postgraduate years 4 to 61886 (47.4 percent) by independent [n = 12 (37.5 percent)] and 2094 (52.6 percent) by integrated [n = 20 (62.5 percent)] residents. Evaluator scores were lower for independent track residents throughout the first two quarters of postgraduate year 4 (quarter 1 delta, −0.49 point, p &lt; 0.001; quarter 2 delta, −0.36 point, p &lt; 0.001). However, this difference was no longer statistically significant during the third and fourth quarters of postgraduate year 4 (p = 0.192 and p = 0.228, respectively). No difference was detectable at postgraduate year 5 (p = 0.095) or postgraduate year 6 (p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS:Operative Entrustability Assessment data demonstrate that differences between independent and integrated plastic surgery residents regarding operative skills (0.49 of 5 points) and amount of time needed for independent residents to catch up (6 months) is minimal and resolves during the third quarter of independent postgraduate year 1. Programs can design curricula to facilitate independent residents’ plastic surgery skill acquisition during their first two quarters.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>32459732</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2020-09, Vol.146 (3), p.351e-358e
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407581696
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Clinical Competence
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency - organization & administration
Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data
Male
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards
Surgery, Plastic - education
Time Factors
title Comparing Operative Performance between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Operative%20Performance%20between%20Independent%20and%20Integrated%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Cooney,%20Carisa%20M.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351e&rft.epage=358e&rft.pages=351e-358e&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407581696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407581696&rft_id=info:pmid/32459732&rfr_iscdi=true