Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners

•Little is known about attitudes about partner HIV testing in prenatal care.•Attitudes about risk and testing history influenced partner testing decisions.•Logistical considerations of HIV testing influenced partner testing preferences.•Pregnant women were motivators for male engagement in testing a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexual & reproductive healthcare 2020-10, Vol.25, p.100513-100513, Article 100513
Hauptverfasser: Yee, Lynn M., Leziak, Karolina, Jackson, Jenise, Miller, Emily S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100513
container_issue
container_start_page 100513
container_title Sexual & reproductive healthcare
container_volume 25
creator Yee, Lynn M.
Leziak, Karolina
Jackson, Jenise
Miller, Emily S.
description •Little is known about attitudes about partner HIV testing in prenatal care.•Attitudes about risk and testing history influenced partner testing decisions.•Logistical considerations of HIV testing influenced partner testing preferences.•Pregnant women were motivators for male engagement in testing and healthcare.•Partner HIV testing programs must engage pregnant women and their partners. Primary prevention of maternal HIV seroconversion requires knowledge of the HIV status of sexual partners, but testing rates, particularly among urban minority heterosexual males, remain low. This study was initiated to understand the attitudes of pregnant women and their partners surrounding partner HIV testing. This was a qualitative study of pregnant women receiving publicly-funded prenatal care in a large urban hospital located in a high HIV prevalence area and their partners. Participants underwent in-depth individual interviews about HIV testing. Semi-structured interview guides were used to elicit participant attitudes. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method to determine themes and subthemes; analysis was organized by whether participants desired or declined partner testing. Of 51 participants, 29 were pregnant women and 22 were male partners of female participants. Reasons for desiring or declining HIV testing aligned within three major themes: risk perception, logistical considerations, and testing history. An individual’s perception of risk included evaluations of fetal safety as well as partner autonomy and fidelity. Logistical considerations included cost, test availability, and male partner geographic location. Individuals’ recent testing histories also influenced testing preferences. One cross-cutting theme was of the pregnant woman taking responsibility for family health, which could serve as a motivator to test or reason to decline. Pregnant women are often the linchpin of prevention of HIV transmission in the family unit. These data inform strategies to engage pregnant women and their partners to improve implementation of partner HIV testing in the prenatal setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100513
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407313298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877575620301361</els_id><sourcerecordid>2407313298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1c8b9d5d27a2e173af16c32155c8afba5bb9622e6c9c9c59ccba35a0573534303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoKto_4EKydOHUPCbzADciaguCG3UbMpk7NWUmGZPU0n9vSluX3sC94XLOIfkQuqJkSgkt7pbT4L_0lBG2XRBB-RE6p1VZZqIs8uO_uyjO0CSEJUnFaV4V9Sk64ywXec7Lc7R4iNHEVQsBR7dWvg14UD3gUflowePZ_BNHCNHYBVaDS71368xY7Qa4xYOxzpu4waOHhVU24nXaW6xsi-MXGH_ICZfopFN9gMl-XqCP56f3x1n2-vYyf3x4zTQXRcyorpq6FS0rFQNactXRQnNGhdCV6holmqYuGINC1-mIWutGcaGIKLngOSf8At3sckfvvlfp4XIwQUPfKwtuFSTLSckpZ3WVpGwn1d6F4KGTozeD8htJidwylku5ZSy3jOWOcTJd7_NXzQDtn-VANAnudwJIv_wx4GXQBqyG1njQUbbO_Jf_C8UEjhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407313298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yee, Lynn M. ; Leziak, Karolina ; Jackson, Jenise ; Miller, Emily S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lynn M. ; Leziak, Karolina ; Jackson, Jenise ; Miller, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><description>•Little is known about attitudes about partner HIV testing in prenatal care.•Attitudes about risk and testing history influenced partner testing decisions.•Logistical considerations of HIV testing influenced partner testing preferences.•Pregnant women were motivators for male engagement in testing and healthcare.•Partner HIV testing programs must engage pregnant women and their partners. Primary prevention of maternal HIV seroconversion requires knowledge of the HIV status of sexual partners, but testing rates, particularly among urban minority heterosexual males, remain low. This study was initiated to understand the attitudes of pregnant women and their partners surrounding partner HIV testing. This was a qualitative study of pregnant women receiving publicly-funded prenatal care in a large urban hospital located in a high HIV prevalence area and their partners. Participants underwent in-depth individual interviews about HIV testing. Semi-structured interview guides were used to elicit participant attitudes. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method to determine themes and subthemes; analysis was organized by whether participants desired or declined partner testing. Of 51 participants, 29 were pregnant women and 22 were male partners of female participants. Reasons for desiring or declining HIV testing aligned within three major themes: risk perception, logistical considerations, and testing history. An individual’s perception of risk included evaluations of fetal safety as well as partner autonomy and fidelity. Logistical considerations included cost, test availability, and male partner geographic location. Individuals’ recent testing histories also influenced testing preferences. One cross-cutting theme was of the pregnant woman taking responsibility for family health, which could serve as a motivator to test or reason to decline. Pregnant women are often the linchpin of prevention of HIV transmission in the family unit. These data inform strategies to engage pregnant women and their partners to improve implementation of partner HIV testing in the prenatal setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-5756</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-5764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32454437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chicago - epidemiology ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Heterosexuality ; HIV ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control ; HIV test ; HIV Testing ; Humans ; Male ; Minority Health ; Partner testing ; Perinatal HIV ; Poverty ; Pregnant Women - psychology ; Qualitative Research ; Sexual Partners - psychology ; Urban Population ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare, 2020-10, Vol.25, p.100513-100513, Article 100513</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1c8b9d5d27a2e173af16c32155c8afba5bb9622e6c9c9c59ccba35a0573534303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1c8b9d5d27a2e173af16c32155c8afba5bb9622e6c9c9c59ccba35a0573534303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575620301361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lynn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leziak, Karolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Jenise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners</title><title>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</title><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><description>•Little is known about attitudes about partner HIV testing in prenatal care.•Attitudes about risk and testing history influenced partner testing decisions.•Logistical considerations of HIV testing influenced partner testing preferences.•Pregnant women were motivators for male engagement in testing and healthcare.•Partner HIV testing programs must engage pregnant women and their partners. Primary prevention of maternal HIV seroconversion requires knowledge of the HIV status of sexual partners, but testing rates, particularly among urban minority heterosexual males, remain low. This study was initiated to understand the attitudes of pregnant women and their partners surrounding partner HIV testing. This was a qualitative study of pregnant women receiving publicly-funded prenatal care in a large urban hospital located in a high HIV prevalence area and their partners. Participants underwent in-depth individual interviews about HIV testing. Semi-structured interview guides were used to elicit participant attitudes. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method to determine themes and subthemes; analysis was organized by whether participants desired or declined partner testing. Of 51 participants, 29 were pregnant women and 22 were male partners of female participants. Reasons for desiring or declining HIV testing aligned within three major themes: risk perception, logistical considerations, and testing history. An individual’s perception of risk included evaluations of fetal safety as well as partner autonomy and fidelity. Logistical considerations included cost, test availability, and male partner geographic location. Individuals’ recent testing histories also influenced testing preferences. One cross-cutting theme was of the pregnant woman taking responsibility for family health, which could serve as a motivator to test or reason to decline. Pregnant women are often the linchpin of prevention of HIV transmission in the family unit. These data inform strategies to engage pregnant women and their partners to improve implementation of partner HIV testing in the prenatal setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chicago - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Heterosexuality</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>HIV test</subject><subject>HIV Testing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minority Health</subject><subject>Partner testing</subject><subject>Perinatal HIV</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Pregnant Women - psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Sexual Partners - psychology</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1877-5756</issn><issn>1877-5764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoKto_4EKydOHUPCbzADciaguCG3UbMpk7NWUmGZPU0n9vSluX3sC94XLOIfkQuqJkSgkt7pbT4L_0lBG2XRBB-RE6p1VZZqIs8uO_uyjO0CSEJUnFaV4V9Sk64ywXec7Lc7R4iNHEVQsBR7dWvg14UD3gUflowePZ_BNHCNHYBVaDS71368xY7Qa4xYOxzpu4waOHhVU24nXaW6xsi-MXGH_ICZfopFN9gMl-XqCP56f3x1n2-vYyf3x4zTQXRcyorpq6FS0rFQNactXRQnNGhdCV6holmqYuGINC1-mIWutGcaGIKLngOSf8At3sckfvvlfp4XIwQUPfKwtuFSTLSckpZ3WVpGwn1d6F4KGTozeD8htJidwylku5ZSy3jOWOcTJd7_NXzQDtn-VANAnudwJIv_wx4GXQBqyG1njQUbbO_Jf_C8UEjhg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Yee, Lynn M.</creator><creator>Leziak, Karolina</creator><creator>Jackson, Jenise</creator><creator>Miller, Emily S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners</title><author>Yee, Lynn M. ; Leziak, Karolina ; Jackson, Jenise ; Miller, Emily S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1c8b9d5d27a2e173af16c32155c8afba5bb9622e6c9c9c59ccba35a0573534303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chicago - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Heterosexuality</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>HIV test</topic><topic>HIV Testing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minority Health</topic><topic>Partner testing</topic><topic>Perinatal HIV</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Pregnant Women - psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Sexual Partners - psychology</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lynn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leziak, Karolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Jenise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yee, Lynn M.</au><au>Leziak, Karolina</au><au>Jackson, Jenise</au><au>Miller, Emily S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners</atitle><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><spage>100513</spage><epage>100513</epage><pages>100513-100513</pages><artnum>100513</artnum><issn>1877-5756</issn><eissn>1877-5764</eissn><abstract>•Little is known about attitudes about partner HIV testing in prenatal care.•Attitudes about risk and testing history influenced partner testing decisions.•Logistical considerations of HIV testing influenced partner testing preferences.•Pregnant women were motivators for male engagement in testing and healthcare.•Partner HIV testing programs must engage pregnant women and their partners. Primary prevention of maternal HIV seroconversion requires knowledge of the HIV status of sexual partners, but testing rates, particularly among urban minority heterosexual males, remain low. This study was initiated to understand the attitudes of pregnant women and their partners surrounding partner HIV testing. This was a qualitative study of pregnant women receiving publicly-funded prenatal care in a large urban hospital located in a high HIV prevalence area and their partners. Participants underwent in-depth individual interviews about HIV testing. Semi-structured interview guides were used to elicit participant attitudes. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method to determine themes and subthemes; analysis was organized by whether participants desired or declined partner testing. Of 51 participants, 29 were pregnant women and 22 were male partners of female participants. Reasons for desiring or declining HIV testing aligned within three major themes: risk perception, logistical considerations, and testing history. An individual’s perception of risk included evaluations of fetal safety as well as partner autonomy and fidelity. Logistical considerations included cost, test availability, and male partner geographic location. Individuals’ recent testing histories also influenced testing preferences. One cross-cutting theme was of the pregnant woman taking responsibility for family health, which could serve as a motivator to test or reason to decline. Pregnant women are often the linchpin of prevention of HIV transmission in the family unit. These data inform strategies to engage pregnant women and their partners to improve implementation of partner HIV testing in the prenatal setting.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32454437</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100513</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-5756
ispartof Sexual & reproductive healthcare, 2020-10, Vol.25, p.100513-100513, Article 100513
issn 1877-5756
1877-5764
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2407313298
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Chicago - epidemiology
Ethnicity
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Heterosexuality
HIV
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV Infections - prevention & control
HIV test
HIV Testing
Humans
Male
Minority Health
Partner testing
Perinatal HIV
Poverty
Pregnant Women - psychology
Qualitative Research
Sexual Partners - psychology
Urban Population
Young Adult
title Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20towards%20male%20partner%20HIV%20testing%20among%20low-income,%20minority%20pregnant%20women%20and%20their%20partners&rft.jtitle=Sexual%20&%20reproductive%20healthcare&rft.au=Yee,%20Lynn%20M.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=25&rft.spage=100513&rft.epage=100513&rft.pages=100513-100513&rft.artnum=100513&rft.issn=1877-5756&rft.eissn=1877-5764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407313298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407313298&rft_id=info:pmid/32454437&rft_els_id=S1877575620301361&rfr_iscdi=true