The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients

BRCA1/2 mutation status has increasing relevance for ovarian cancer treatments, making traditional coordination of genetic testing by genetic services unsustainable. Consequently alternative models of genetic testing have been developed to improve testing at the initial diagnosis for all eligible wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2020-08, Vol.158 (2), p.431-439
Hauptverfasser: Gleeson, M., Kentwell, M., Meiser, B., Do, J., Nevin, S., Taylor, N., Barlow-Stewart, K., Kirk, J., James, P., Scott, C.L., Williams, R., Gamet, K., Burke, J., Murphy, M., Antill, Y.C., Pearn, A., Pachter, N., Ebzery, C., Poplawski, N., Friedlander, M., Tucker, K.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 2
container_start_page 431
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 158
creator Gleeson, M.
Kentwell, M.
Meiser, B.
Do, J.
Nevin, S.
Taylor, N.
Barlow-Stewart, K.
Kirk, J.
James, P.
Scott, C.L.
Williams, R.
Gamet, K.
Burke, J.
Murphy, M.
Antill, Y.C.
Pearn, A.
Pachter, N.
Ebzery, C.
Poplawski, N.
Friedlander, M.
Tucker, K.M.
description BRCA1/2 mutation status has increasing relevance for ovarian cancer treatments, making traditional coordination of genetic testing by genetic services unsustainable. Consequently alternative models of genetic testing have been developed to improve testing at the initial diagnosis for all eligible women. A training module to enable mainstreamed genetic testing by oncology healthcare professionals was developed by genetic health professionals. Oncology healthcare professionals completed questionnaires before and 12 months post-training to assess perceived skills, competence and barriers to their coordinating genetic testing for women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic health professionals were surveyed 12 months post-training to assess perceived barriers to implementation of mainstreaming. 185 oncology healthcare professionals were trained in 42 workshops at 35 Australasian hospitals. Of the 273 tests ordered by oncology healthcare professionals post-training, 241 (93.1%) met national testing guidelines. The number of tests ordered by genetic health professionals reduced significantly (z = 45.0, p = 0.008). Oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to mainstreamed testing decreased from baseline to follow-up (t = 2.39, p = 0.023), particularly perceived skills, knowledge and attitudes. However, only 58% reported either ‘always’ or ‘nearly always’ having ordered BRCA testing for eligible patients at 12 months, suggesting oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers were not systematically addressed through training. Oncology healthcare professionals have demonstrated a willingness to be involved in the provision of genetic testing in a mainstreaming model. If oncology services are to hold responsibility for coordinating genetic testing, their readiness will require understanding of barriers not addressed by training alone to inform future intervention design. •Oncology professionals are willing to be involved in mainstreaming genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.•Formal training in mainstreaming genetic testing decreases perceived barriers.•Training alone does not address all barriers to mainstreaming testing of BRCA1/2.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825820310283</els_id><sourcerecordid>2406951170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8abbb3c1de3f0fb5a5ac9a959d18203161d8c026641a3120ecf0ae84259dc8273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO0zAUtRCIKQNfgIS8ZJNwbdeZZMECjYaHNBKbYW3dODepq9QuthvUz-FPcR-wZGXL97x8D2NvBdQCRPNhWx-now-1BAk16BpAPGMrAZ2umlZ3z9kKoIOqlbq9Ya9S2gKAAiFfshsl11oIqVbs99OG-EALzWG_I585-oHTgvMBswueh5Ej9-f7LzcQzxGdd37i-ximiDs-hsiDt2EO05FvCOe8Oc1GSqlwcE7ceZ6LSXlcXLpqTuQpO8szpXxSO6ssGB16btFbinxfTEug9Jq9GIsMvbmet-zH54en-6_V4_cv3-4_PVZW6S5XLfZ9r6wYSI0w9ho12g473Q2ilaBEI4bWgmyatUAlJJAdAaldy4KwrbxTt-z9RbcE_XkouczOJUvzjJ7CIRm5hqYrW7uDAlUXqI0hpUij2Ue3w3g0AsypG7M1527MqRsD2pRuCuvd1eDQ72j4x_lbRgF8vACofHNxFE2yZQWWBhfJZjME91-DP8kDpaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406951170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gleeson, M. ; Kentwell, M. ; Meiser, B. ; Do, J. ; Nevin, S. ; Taylor, N. ; Barlow-Stewart, K. ; Kirk, J. ; James, P. ; Scott, C.L. ; Williams, R. ; Gamet, K. ; Burke, J. ; Murphy, M. ; Antill, Y.C. ; Pearn, A. ; Pachter, N. ; Ebzery, C. ; Poplawski, N. ; Friedlander, M. ; Tucker, K.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, M. ; Kentwell, M. ; Meiser, B. ; Do, J. ; Nevin, S. ; Taylor, N. ; Barlow-Stewart, K. ; Kirk, J. ; James, P. ; Scott, C.L. ; Williams, R. ; Gamet, K. ; Burke, J. ; Murphy, M. ; Antill, Y.C. ; Pearn, A. ; Pachter, N. ; Ebzery, C. ; Poplawski, N. ; Friedlander, M. ; Tucker, K.M. ; the Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group ; Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>BRCA1/2 mutation status has increasing relevance for ovarian cancer treatments, making traditional coordination of genetic testing by genetic services unsustainable. Consequently alternative models of genetic testing have been developed to improve testing at the initial diagnosis for all eligible women. A training module to enable mainstreamed genetic testing by oncology healthcare professionals was developed by genetic health professionals. Oncology healthcare professionals completed questionnaires before and 12 months post-training to assess perceived skills, competence and barriers to their coordinating genetic testing for women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic health professionals were surveyed 12 months post-training to assess perceived barriers to implementation of mainstreaming. 185 oncology healthcare professionals were trained in 42 workshops at 35 Australasian hospitals. Of the 273 tests ordered by oncology healthcare professionals post-training, 241 (93.1%) met national testing guidelines. The number of tests ordered by genetic health professionals reduced significantly (z = 45.0, p = 0.008). Oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to mainstreamed testing decreased from baseline to follow-up (t = 2.39, p = 0.023), particularly perceived skills, knowledge and attitudes. However, only 58% reported either ‘always’ or ‘nearly always’ having ordered BRCA testing for eligible patients at 12 months, suggesting oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers were not systematically addressed through training. Oncology healthcare professionals have demonstrated a willingness to be involved in the provision of genetic testing in a mainstreaming model. If oncology services are to hold responsibility for coordinating genetic testing, their readiness will require understanding of barriers not addressed by training alone to inform future intervention design. •Oncology professionals are willing to be involved in mainstreaming genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.•Formal training in mainstreaming genetic testing decreases perceived barriers.•Training alone does not address all barriers to mainstreaming testing of BRCA1/2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32451123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; BRCA1 Protein - genetics ; BRCA1/BRCA2 ; BRCA2 Protein - genetics ; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial - genetics ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Female ; Genetic testing ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Genetics - education ; Health Personnel - education ; Humans ; Mainstreaming ; Medical Oncology - education ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2020-08, Vol.158 (2), p.431-439</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8abbb3c1de3f0fb5a5ac9a959d18203161d8c026641a3120ecf0ae84259dc8273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8abbb3c1de3f0fb5a5ac9a959d18203161d8c026641a3120ecf0ae84259dc8273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentwell, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiser, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow-Stewart, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamet, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antill, Y.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pachter, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebzery, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poplawski, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>BRCA1/2 mutation status has increasing relevance for ovarian cancer treatments, making traditional coordination of genetic testing by genetic services unsustainable. Consequently alternative models of genetic testing have been developed to improve testing at the initial diagnosis for all eligible women. A training module to enable mainstreamed genetic testing by oncology healthcare professionals was developed by genetic health professionals. Oncology healthcare professionals completed questionnaires before and 12 months post-training to assess perceived skills, competence and barriers to their coordinating genetic testing for women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic health professionals were surveyed 12 months post-training to assess perceived barriers to implementation of mainstreaming. 185 oncology healthcare professionals were trained in 42 workshops at 35 Australasian hospitals. Of the 273 tests ordered by oncology healthcare professionals post-training, 241 (93.1%) met national testing guidelines. The number of tests ordered by genetic health professionals reduced significantly (z = 45.0, p = 0.008). Oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to mainstreamed testing decreased from baseline to follow-up (t = 2.39, p = 0.023), particularly perceived skills, knowledge and attitudes. However, only 58% reported either ‘always’ or ‘nearly always’ having ordered BRCA testing for eligible patients at 12 months, suggesting oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers were not systematically addressed through training. Oncology healthcare professionals have demonstrated a willingness to be involved in the provision of genetic testing in a mainstreaming model. If oncology services are to hold responsibility for coordinating genetic testing, their readiness will require understanding of barriers not addressed by training alone to inform future intervention design. •Oncology professionals are willing to be involved in mainstreaming genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.•Formal training in mainstreaming genetic testing decreases perceived barriers.•Training alone does not address all barriers to mainstreaming testing of BRCA1/2.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>BRCA1/BRCA2</subject><subject>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial - genetics</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Genetics - education</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mainstreaming</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO0zAUtRCIKQNfgIS8ZJNwbdeZZMECjYaHNBKbYW3dODepq9QuthvUz-FPcR-wZGXL97x8D2NvBdQCRPNhWx-now-1BAk16BpAPGMrAZ2umlZ3z9kKoIOqlbq9Ya9S2gKAAiFfshsl11oIqVbs99OG-EALzWG_I585-oHTgvMBswueh5Ej9-f7LzcQzxGdd37i-ximiDs-hsiDt2EO05FvCOe8Oc1GSqlwcE7ceZ6LSXlcXLpqTuQpO8szpXxSO6ssGB16btFbinxfTEug9Jq9GIsMvbmet-zH54en-6_V4_cv3-4_PVZW6S5XLfZ9r6wYSI0w9ho12g473Q2ilaBEI4bWgmyatUAlJJAdAaldy4KwrbxTt-z9RbcE_XkouczOJUvzjJ7CIRm5hqYrW7uDAlUXqI0hpUij2Ue3w3g0AsypG7M1527MqRsD2pRuCuvd1eDQ72j4x_lbRgF8vACofHNxFE2yZQWWBhfJZjME91-DP8kDpaA</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Gleeson, M.</creator><creator>Kentwell, M.</creator><creator>Meiser, B.</creator><creator>Do, J.</creator><creator>Nevin, S.</creator><creator>Taylor, N.</creator><creator>Barlow-Stewart, K.</creator><creator>Kirk, J.</creator><creator>James, P.</creator><creator>Scott, C.L.</creator><creator>Williams, R.</creator><creator>Gamet, K.</creator><creator>Burke, J.</creator><creator>Murphy, M.</creator><creator>Antill, Y.C.</creator><creator>Pearn, A.</creator><creator>Pachter, N.</creator><creator>Ebzery, C.</creator><creator>Poplawski, N.</creator><creator>Friedlander, M.</creator><creator>Tucker, K.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients</title><author>Gleeson, M. ; Kentwell, M. ; Meiser, B. ; Do, J. ; Nevin, S. ; Taylor, N. ; Barlow-Stewart, K. ; Kirk, J. ; James, P. ; Scott, C.L. ; Williams, R. ; Gamet, K. ; Burke, J. ; Murphy, M. ; Antill, Y.C. ; Pearn, A. ; Pachter, N. ; Ebzery, C. ; Poplawski, N. ; Friedlander, M. ; Tucker, K.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8abbb3c1de3f0fb5a5ac9a959d18203161d8c026641a3120ecf0ae84259dc8273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>BRCA1/BRCA2</topic><topic>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial - genetics</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Genetics - education</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mainstreaming</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentwell, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiser, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow-Stewart, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamet, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antill, Y.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pachter, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebzery, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poplawski, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gleeson, M.</au><au>Kentwell, M.</au><au>Meiser, B.</au><au>Do, J.</au><au>Nevin, S.</au><au>Taylor, N.</au><au>Barlow-Stewart, K.</au><au>Kirk, J.</au><au>James, P.</au><au>Scott, C.L.</au><au>Williams, R.</au><au>Gamet, K.</au><au>Burke, J.</au><au>Murphy, M.</au><au>Antill, Y.C.</au><au>Pearn, A.</au><au>Pachter, N.</au><au>Ebzery, C.</au><au>Poplawski, N.</au><au>Friedlander, M.</au><au>Tucker, K.M.</au><aucorp>the Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</aucorp><aucorp>Australian Genetic Testing Mainstreaming Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>431-439</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>BRCA1/2 mutation status has increasing relevance for ovarian cancer treatments, making traditional coordination of genetic testing by genetic services unsustainable. Consequently alternative models of genetic testing have been developed to improve testing at the initial diagnosis for all eligible women. A training module to enable mainstreamed genetic testing by oncology healthcare professionals was developed by genetic health professionals. Oncology healthcare professionals completed questionnaires before and 12 months post-training to assess perceived skills, competence and barriers to their coordinating genetic testing for women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic health professionals were surveyed 12 months post-training to assess perceived barriers to implementation of mainstreaming. 185 oncology healthcare professionals were trained in 42 workshops at 35 Australasian hospitals. Of the 273 tests ordered by oncology healthcare professionals post-training, 241 (93.1%) met national testing guidelines. The number of tests ordered by genetic health professionals reduced significantly (z = 45.0, p = 0.008). Oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to mainstreamed testing decreased from baseline to follow-up (t = 2.39, p = 0.023), particularly perceived skills, knowledge and attitudes. However, only 58% reported either ‘always’ or ‘nearly always’ having ordered BRCA testing for eligible patients at 12 months, suggesting oncology healthcare professionals' perceived barriers were not systematically addressed through training. Oncology healthcare professionals have demonstrated a willingness to be involved in the provision of genetic testing in a mainstreaming model. If oncology services are to hold responsibility for coordinating genetic testing, their readiness will require understanding of barriers not addressed by training alone to inform future intervention design. •Oncology professionals are willing to be involved in mainstreaming genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.•Formal training in mainstreaming genetic testing decreases perceived barriers.•Training alone does not address all barriers to mainstreaming testing of BRCA1/2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32451123</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2020-08, Vol.158 (2), p.431-439
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951170
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
BRCA1 Protein - genetics
BRCA1/BRCA2
BRCA2 Protein - genetics
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial - genetics
Education, Medical, Continuing
Female
Genetic testing
Genetic Testing - methods
Genetics - education
Health Personnel - education
Humans
Mainstreaming
Medical Oncology - education
Middle Aged
Ovarian cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Young Adult
title The development and evaluation of a nationwide training program for oncology health professionals in the provision of genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A51%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20and%20evaluation%20of%20a%20nationwide%20training%20program%20for%20oncology%20health%20professionals%20in%20the%20provision%20of%20genetic%20testing%20for%20ovarian%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Gleeson,%20M.&rft.aucorp=the%20Australian%20Genetic%20Testing%20Mainstreaming%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=431-439&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406951170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406951170&rft_id=info:pmid/32451123&rft_els_id=S0090825820310283&rfr_iscdi=true