Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada

To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of pediatrics 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1
Hauptverfasser: Guttmann, Astrid, Saunders, Natasha Ruth, Kumar, Matthew, Gandhi, Sima, Diong, Christina, MacCon, Karen, Cairney, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 220.e1
container_issue
container_start_page 213
container_title The Journal of pediatrics
container_volume 226
creator Guttmann, Astrid
Saunders, Natasha Ruth
Kumar, Matthew
Gandhi, Sima
Diong, Christina
MacCon, Karen
Cairney, John
description To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics. Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening. In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347620303395</els_id><sourcerecordid>2406951080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCX4CEfORA0vFHnOTAAS1fK7VqJeBsee3J1qvEDnZ2pf73dbuFI6eR3rw3T_Mj5B2DmgFTl_t6P6PLNQcONYi6aC_IikHfVqoT4iVZAXBeCdmqc_I65z0A9BLgFTkXXDaMcbUiu800jzhhWMziY6BxoIbe3t1nb70JdBNsWfkj0tsUd8lMdIiJsq66jmG5o1_wiGOcn-Ij_WkTYvBhR32gN0VKPn6kaxOMM2_I2WDGjG-f5wX5_e3rr_WP6urm-2b9-aqyoumXStlGITjoOevsthGqMcAk77HrsFfWOdeiVO3Qqt51nWqNawaJqKRSTpmtFBfkw-nunOKfA-ZFTz5bHEcTMB6y5hJU3zDooFjFyWpTzDnhoOfkJ5PuNQP9SFjv9RNh_UhYg9BFK6n3zwWH7YTuX-Yv0mL4dDJgefPoMelsPRaOzie0i3bR_7fgAWwijWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406951080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics. Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening. In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32451126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infant ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Ontario ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Program Evaluation ; Reimbursement, Incentive - organization &amp; administration</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347620303395$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Sima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diong, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCon, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics. Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening. In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Reimbursement, Incentive - organization &amp; administration</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCX4CEfORA0vFHnOTAAS1fK7VqJeBsee3J1qvEDnZ2pf73dbuFI6eR3rw3T_Mj5B2DmgFTl_t6P6PLNQcONYi6aC_IikHfVqoT4iVZAXBeCdmqc_I65z0A9BLgFTkXXDaMcbUiu800jzhhWMziY6BxoIbe3t1nb70JdBNsWfkj0tsUd8lMdIiJsq66jmG5o1_wiGOcn-Ij_WkTYvBhR32gN0VKPn6kaxOMM2_I2WDGjG-f5wX5_e3rr_WP6urm-2b9-aqyoumXStlGITjoOevsthGqMcAk77HrsFfWOdeiVO3Qqt51nWqNawaJqKRSTpmtFBfkw-nunOKfA-ZFTz5bHEcTMB6y5hJU3zDooFjFyWpTzDnhoOfkJ5PuNQP9SFjv9RNh_UhYg9BFK6n3zwWH7YTuX-Yv0mL4dDJgefPoMelsPRaOzie0i3bR_7fgAWwijWg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Guttmann, Astrid</creator><creator>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creator><creator>Kumar, Matthew</creator><creator>Gandhi, Sima</creator><creator>Diong, Christina</creator><creator>MacCon, Karen</creator><creator>Cairney, John</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><author>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Reimbursement, Incentive - organization &amp; administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Sima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diong, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCon, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guttmann, Astrid</au><au>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</au><au>Kumar, Matthew</au><au>Gandhi, Sima</au><au>Diong, Christina</au><au>MacCon, Karen</au><au>Cairney, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>226</volume><spage>213</spage><epage>220.e1</epage><pages>213-220.e1</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><abstract>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics. Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening. In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32451126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3476
ispartof The Journal of pediatrics, 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1
issn 0022-3476
1097-6833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951080
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Immunization
Infant
Male
Mass Screening
Ontario
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Program Evaluation
Reimbursement, Incentive - organization & administration
title Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20Physician%20Incentive%20Program%20for%2018-Month%20Developmental%20Screening%20in%20Ontario,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Guttmann,%20Astrid&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=226&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=220.e1&rft.pages=213-220.e1&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406951080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406951080&rft_id=info:pmid/32451126&rft_els_id=S0022347620303395&rfr_iscdi=true