Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada
To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada. Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | The Journal of pediatrics |
container_volume | 226 |
creator | Guttmann, Astrid Saunders, Natasha Ruth Kumar, Matthew Gandhi, Sima Diong, Christina MacCon, Karen Cairney, John |
description | To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada.
Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics.
Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening.
In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347620303395</els_id><sourcerecordid>2406951080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCX4CEfORA0vFHnOTAAS1fK7VqJeBsee3J1qvEDnZ2pf73dbuFI6eR3rw3T_Mj5B2DmgFTl_t6P6PLNQcONYi6aC_IikHfVqoT4iVZAXBeCdmqc_I65z0A9BLgFTkXXDaMcbUiu800jzhhWMziY6BxoIbe3t1nb70JdBNsWfkj0tsUd8lMdIiJsq66jmG5o1_wiGOcn-Ij_WkTYvBhR32gN0VKPn6kaxOMM2_I2WDGjG-f5wX5_e3rr_WP6urm-2b9-aqyoumXStlGITjoOevsthGqMcAk77HrsFfWOdeiVO3Qqt51nWqNawaJqKRSTpmtFBfkw-nunOKfA-ZFTz5bHEcTMB6y5hJU3zDooFjFyWpTzDnhoOfkJ5PuNQP9SFjv9RNh_UhYg9BFK6n3zwWH7YTuX-Yv0mL4dDJgefPoMelsPRaOzie0i3bR_7fgAWwijWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406951080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada.
Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics.
Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening.
In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32451126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infant ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Ontario ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Program Evaluation ; Reimbursement, Incentive - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347620303395$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Sima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diong, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCon, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada.
Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics.
Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening.
In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Reimbursement, Incentive - organization & administration</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCX4CEfORA0vFHnOTAAS1fK7VqJeBsee3J1qvEDnZ2pf73dbuFI6eR3rw3T_Mj5B2DmgFTl_t6P6PLNQcONYi6aC_IikHfVqoT4iVZAXBeCdmqc_I65z0A9BLgFTkXXDaMcbUiu800jzhhWMziY6BxoIbe3t1nb70JdBNsWfkj0tsUd8lMdIiJsq66jmG5o1_wiGOcn-Ij_WkTYvBhR32gN0VKPn6kaxOMM2_I2WDGjG-f5wX5_e3rr_WP6urm-2b9-aqyoumXStlGITjoOevsthGqMcAk77HrsFfWOdeiVO3Qqt51nWqNawaJqKRSTpmtFBfkw-nunOKfA-ZFTz5bHEcTMB6y5hJU3zDooFjFyWpTzDnhoOfkJ5PuNQP9SFjv9RNh_UhYg9BFK6n3zwWH7YTuX-Yv0mL4dDJgefPoMelsPRaOzie0i3bR_7fgAWwijWg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Guttmann, Astrid</creator><creator>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creator><creator>Kumar, Matthew</creator><creator>Gandhi, Sima</creator><creator>Diong, Christina</creator><creator>MacCon, Karen</creator><creator>Cairney, John</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</title><author>Guttmann, Astrid ; Saunders, Natasha Ruth ; Kumar, Matthew ; Gandhi, Sima ; Diong, Christina ; MacCon, Karen ; Cairney, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6c56e0d09218cb5365a01429e88e96cddd7e467f769d8867ad5f4ee6466d6ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Reimbursement, Incentive - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Sima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diong, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCon, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairney, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guttmann, Astrid</au><au>Saunders, Natasha Ruth</au><au>Kumar, Matthew</au><au>Gandhi, Sima</au><au>Diong, Christina</au><au>MacCon, Karen</au><au>Cairney, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>226</volume><spage>213</spage><epage>220.e1</epage><pages>213-220.e1</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><abstract>To evaluate factors associated with uptake of a financial incentive for developmental screening at an enhanced 18-month well-child visit (EWCV) in Ontario, Canada.
Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data of children (17-24 months of age) eligible for EWCV between 2009 and 2017. Logistic regression modeled associations of EWCV receipt by provider and patient characteristics.
Of 910 976 eligible children, 54.2% received EWCV (annually, 39.2%-61.2%). The odds of assessment were lower for socially vulnerable children, namely, those from the lowest vs highest neighborhood income quintile (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), those born to refugee vs nonimmigrant mothers (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93), and to teenaged mothers (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71)). Children were more likely to have had developmental screening if cared for by a pediatrician vs family physician (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44), recently trained physician (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.29-1.48 for ≤5 years in practice vs ≥21 years) and less likely if the physician was male (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66). For physicians eligible for a pay-for-performance immunization bonus, there was a positive association with screening.
In the context of a universal healthcare system and a specific financial incentive, uptake of the developmental assessment increased over time but remains moderate. The implementation of similar interventions or incentives needs to account for physician factors and focus on socially vulnerable children to be effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32451126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-2253</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3476 |
ispartof | The Journal of pediatrics, 2020-11, Vol.226, p.213-220.e1 |
issn | 0022-3476 1097-6833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2406951080 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Child, Preschool Cohort Studies Female Humans Immunization Infant Male Mass Screening Ontario Practice Patterns, Physicians Program Evaluation Reimbursement, Incentive - organization & administration |
title | Implementation of a Physician Incentive Program for 18-Month Developmental Screening in Ontario, Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20Physician%20Incentive%20Program%20for%2018-Month%20Developmental%20Screening%20in%20Ontario,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Guttmann,%20Astrid&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=226&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=220.e1&rft.pages=213-220.e1&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2406951080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406951080&rft_id=info:pmid/32451126&rft_els_id=S0022347620303395&rfr_iscdi=true |