Females with cystic fibrosis have a larger decrease in sweat chloride in response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor compared to males

•Women compared to males have a larger sweat chloride response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment.•The basis of this sex difference is yet unexplained.•Sweat chloride response negatively correlates to patient weight.•Sweat chloride response lacks correlation with FEV1 response and BMI response. To ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cystic fibrosis 2021-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e7-e11
Hauptverfasser: Aalbers, B.L., Hofland, R.W., Bronsveld, I., de Winter-de Groot, K.M., Arets, H.G.M., de Kiviet, A.C., van Oirschot-van de Ven, M.M.M., Kruijswijk, M.A., Schotman, S., Michel, S., van der Ent, C.K., Heijerman, H.G.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Women compared to males have a larger sweat chloride response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment.•The basis of this sex difference is yet unexplained.•Sweat chloride response negatively correlates to patient weight.•Sweat chloride response lacks correlation with FEV1 response and BMI response. To explore which patient-related factors influence sweat test response to CFTR modulators, as well as examining the correlation between the sweat chloride response and ppFEV1 or BMI response, using systematically collected real-life clinical data. 160 CF patients were identified who had used lumacaftor/ivacaftor for at least six months. Of these patients, age, sweat chloride levels, ppFEV1 weight and BMI at the start of treatment and after 6 months were collected retrospectively. Pearson and Spearman tests were performed to assess correlations. Females compared to males in this group showed a larger response in sweat chloride (mean difference 10.6 mmol/l, 95% CI: 5.7–15.4) and BMI (mean difference 0.27 kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.01–0.54). A modest but significant correlation was found between patient weight and sweat chloride response (Pearson R = 0.244, p = 0.001), which diminished upon correction for the other factors. The correlation between sex and sweat chloride response remained; R = 0.253, p = 0.001. Sweat chloride response did not correlate with ppFEV1 change or BMI change at 6 months after start of therapy. Sweat chloride response is larger in females compared to males, which also explains the negative correlation of weight with the response in sweat chloride concentration after start of lumacaftor/ivacaftor. Sweat chloride response does not correlate with the responses in ppFEV1 and BMI. This information may help the interpretation of sweat test results acquired for the follow up and evaluation of CFTR modulating treatments, and warrants further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of sex differences in response to CFTR modulators.
ISSN:1569-1993
1873-5010
DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2020.05.004