HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial

Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) but were contraindicated for resection and radiofrequency ablation. Methods Patients between 20 and 80 years of age with 1–3 liver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.2306-2315
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Tong, Ng, Derry Minyao, Du, Nannan, He, Ning, Dai, Xiaoyu, Chen, Ping, Wu, Feng, Chen, Bo, Fan, Xiaoxiang, Yan, Kun, Zhou, Xinfeng, Dong, Mingjun, Zheng, Zhi, Gu, Lihu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2315
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2306
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 35
creator Yang, Tong
Ng, Derry Minyao
Du, Nannan
He, Ning
Dai, Xiaoyu
Chen, Ping
Wu, Feng
Chen, Bo
Fan, Xiaoxiang
Yan, Kun
Zhou, Xinfeng
Dong, Mingjun
Zheng, Zhi
Gu, Lihu
description Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) but were contraindicated for resection and radiofrequency ablation. Methods Patients between 20 and 80 years of age with 1–3 liver metastases from colorectal cancer were selected. Included patients have had their primary lesions removed with no evidence of extrahepatic metastasis prior to the study. Ultrasound-guided HIFU was employed and target regions’ ablation was achieved with repeated sonications from the deep to shallow regions of the tumors section by section. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled. The most common adverse events (AEs) were pain ( n  = 8), followed by fatigue ( n  = 7), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ( n  = 7), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ( n  = 5), and skin edema ( n  = 4). No grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred and while most patients (76.9%) achieved a complete response, three patients achieved a partial response. The objective response rate was 100% after the first HIFU treatment. Nine patients relapsed but the tumors were mostly isolated to the liver (8/9). The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7%, and the median PFS was 9 months. Notably, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8%, and the median OS was 25 months. Conclusion This study indicates that the HIFU treatment is safe, is able to achieve a good tumor response rate and long-term prognosis even when the foci were in high-risk locations, and should be considered for patients who were considered unsuitable for other local treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2405336262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515478258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-728a7e9d703f830d2f9625fbe262c7bf355791e6425aff7b85aa0329742bdc263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2G31D3gwJF68jDIfMMx4M421mzTxYs-EYT5cGoZZgbHZX-NfFXdbTTyYkBDC8z585CXkVcvetYyp95kx0YmGAWuY6oRoDk_IphUcGoC2f0o2bOCsATWIM3Ke8x2r_NDK5-SMg-By6GBDfl5vr26pWxItO6QloSkzxkIXRyfvnLdrKNQuYUloiwk0-B-Y6IzF5Low03tfdnSNefXFjAGpj5O3pvgl5qM2Ya7JeqQmTjSZyS8u4fcVoz3QmjiiH6ih-1310S21wcdqCHUYb8IL8syZkPHlw35Bbq8-fb28bm6-fN5efrxpLFeyNAp6o3CYFOOu52wCV38n3YjQgVWj41KqocVOgDTOqbGXxjAOgxIwThY6fkHenrz7tNThctGzzxZDMBGXNWsQTHLeVV1F3_yD3i1rinU6DbKVQvUg-0rBibJpyTmh0_vkZ5MOumX6d336VJ-u9eljffpQQ68f1Os44_Qn8thXBfgJyPUqfsP09-3_aH8Bgc-odA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515478258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yang, Tong ; Ng, Derry Minyao ; Du, Nannan ; He, Ning ; Dai, Xiaoyu ; Chen, Ping ; Wu, Feng ; Chen, Bo ; Fan, Xiaoxiang ; Yan, Kun ; Zhou, Xinfeng ; Dong, Mingjun ; Zheng, Zhi ; Gu, Lihu</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tong ; Ng, Derry Minyao ; Du, Nannan ; He, Ning ; Dai, Xiaoyu ; Chen, Ping ; Wu, Feng ; Chen, Bo ; Fan, Xiaoxiang ; Yan, Kun ; Zhou, Xinfeng ; Dong, Mingjun ; Zheng, Zhi ; Gu, Lihu</creatorcontrib><description>Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) but were contraindicated for resection and radiofrequency ablation. Methods Patients between 20 and 80 years of age with 1–3 liver metastases from colorectal cancer were selected. Included patients have had their primary lesions removed with no evidence of extrahepatic metastasis prior to the study. Ultrasound-guided HIFU was employed and target regions’ ablation was achieved with repeated sonications from the deep to shallow regions of the tumors section by section. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled. The most common adverse events (AEs) were pain ( n  = 8), followed by fatigue ( n  = 7), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ( n  = 7), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ( n  = 5), and skin edema ( n  = 4). No grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred and while most patients (76.9%) achieved a complete response, three patients achieved a partial response. The objective response rate was 100% after the first HIFU treatment. Nine patients relapsed but the tumors were mostly isolated to the liver (8/9). The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7%, and the median PFS was 9 months. Notably, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8%, and the median OS was 25 months. Conclusion This study indicates that the HIFU treatment is safe, is able to achieve a good tumor response rate and long-term prognosis even when the foci were in high-risk locations, and should be considered for patients who were considered unsuitable for other local treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32435962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Ablation ; Colorectal cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Liver ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Proctology ; Response rates ; Surgery ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.2306-2315</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-728a7e9d703f830d2f9625fbe262c7bf355791e6425aff7b85aa0329742bdc263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-728a7e9d703f830d2f9625fbe262c7bf355791e6425aff7b85aa0329742bdc263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3750-2939</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Derry Minyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xiaoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xinfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Mingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Lihu</creatorcontrib><title>HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) but were contraindicated for resection and radiofrequency ablation. Methods Patients between 20 and 80 years of age with 1–3 liver metastases from colorectal cancer were selected. Included patients have had their primary lesions removed with no evidence of extrahepatic metastasis prior to the study. Ultrasound-guided HIFU was employed and target regions’ ablation was achieved with repeated sonications from the deep to shallow regions of the tumors section by section. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled. The most common adverse events (AEs) were pain ( n  = 8), followed by fatigue ( n  = 7), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ( n  = 7), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ( n  = 5), and skin edema ( n  = 4). No grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred and while most patients (76.9%) achieved a complete response, three patients achieved a partial response. The objective response rate was 100% after the first HIFU treatment. Nine patients relapsed but the tumors were mostly isolated to the liver (8/9). The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7%, and the median PFS was 9 months. Notably, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8%, and the median OS was 25 months. Conclusion This study indicates that the HIFU treatment is safe, is able to achieve a good tumor response rate and long-term prognosis even when the foci were in high-risk locations, and should be considered for patients who were considered unsuitable for other local treatments.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2G31D3gwJF68jDIfMMx4M421mzTxYs-EYT5cGoZZgbHZX-NfFXdbTTyYkBDC8z585CXkVcvetYyp95kx0YmGAWuY6oRoDk_IphUcGoC2f0o2bOCsATWIM3Ke8x2r_NDK5-SMg-By6GBDfl5vr26pWxItO6QloSkzxkIXRyfvnLdrKNQuYUloiwk0-B-Y6IzF5Low03tfdnSNefXFjAGpj5O3pvgl5qM2Ya7JeqQmTjSZyS8u4fcVoz3QmjiiH6ih-1310S21wcdqCHUYb8IL8syZkPHlw35Bbq8-fb28bm6-fN5efrxpLFeyNAp6o3CYFOOu52wCV38n3YjQgVWj41KqocVOgDTOqbGXxjAOgxIwThY6fkHenrz7tNThctGzzxZDMBGXNWsQTHLeVV1F3_yD3i1rinU6DbKVQvUg-0rBibJpyTmh0_vkZ5MOumX6d336VJ-u9eljffpQQ68f1Os44_Qn8thXBfgJyPUqfsP09-3_aH8Bgc-odA</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Yang, Tong</creator><creator>Ng, Derry Minyao</creator><creator>Du, Nannan</creator><creator>He, Ning</creator><creator>Dai, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Chen, Ping</creator><creator>Wu, Feng</creator><creator>Chen, Bo</creator><creator>Fan, Xiaoxiang</creator><creator>Yan, Kun</creator><creator>Zhou, Xinfeng</creator><creator>Dong, Mingjun</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhi</creator><creator>Gu, Lihu</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-2939</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial</title><author>Yang, Tong ; Ng, Derry Minyao ; Du, Nannan ; He, Ning ; Dai, Xiaoyu ; Chen, Ping ; Wu, Feng ; Chen, Bo ; Fan, Xiaoxiang ; Yan, Kun ; Zhou, Xinfeng ; Dong, Mingjun ; Zheng, Zhi ; Gu, Lihu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-728a7e9d703f830d2f9625fbe262c7bf355791e6425aff7b85aa0329742bdc263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Derry Minyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xiaoxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xinfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Mingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Lihu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Tong</au><au>Ng, Derry Minyao</au><au>Du, Nannan</au><au>He, Ning</au><au>Dai, Xiaoyu</au><au>Chen, Ping</au><au>Wu, Feng</au><au>Chen, Bo</au><au>Fan, Xiaoxiang</au><au>Yan, Kun</au><au>Zhou, Xinfeng</au><au>Dong, Mingjun</au><au>Zheng, Zhi</au><au>Gu, Lihu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2306</spage><epage>2315</epage><pages>2306-2315</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) but were contraindicated for resection and radiofrequency ablation. Methods Patients between 20 and 80 years of age with 1–3 liver metastases from colorectal cancer were selected. Included patients have had their primary lesions removed with no evidence of extrahepatic metastasis prior to the study. Ultrasound-guided HIFU was employed and target regions’ ablation was achieved with repeated sonications from the deep to shallow regions of the tumors section by section. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled. The most common adverse events (AEs) were pain ( n  = 8), followed by fatigue ( n  = 7), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ( n  = 7), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ( n  = 5), and skin edema ( n  = 4). No grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred and while most patients (76.9%) achieved a complete response, three patients achieved a partial response. The objective response rate was 100% after the first HIFU treatment. Nine patients relapsed but the tumors were mostly isolated to the liver (8/9). The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7%, and the median PFS was 9 months. Notably, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8%, and the median OS was 25 months. Conclusion This study indicates that the HIFU treatment is safe, is able to achieve a good tumor response rate and long-term prognosis even when the foci were in high-risk locations, and should be considered for patients who were considered unsuitable for other local treatments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32435962</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-2939</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2021-05, Vol.35 (5), p.2306-2315
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2405336262
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Ablation
Colorectal cancer
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Liver
Medical prognosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Proctology
Response rates
Surgery
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
title HIFU for the treatment of difficult colorectal liver metastases with unsuitable indications for resection and radiofrequency ablation: a phase I clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A28%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIFU%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20difficult%20colorectal%20liver%20metastases%20with%20unsuitable%20indications%20for%20resection%20and%20radiofrequency%20ablation:%20a%20phase%20I%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Yang,%20Tong&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2306&rft.epage=2315&rft.pages=2306-2315&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-020-07644-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515478258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515478258&rft_id=info:pmid/32435962&rfr_iscdi=true