Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review

Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurocritical care 2021-02, Vol.34 (1), p.291-300
Hauptverfasser: Omidbeigi, Mahmoud, Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat, Meknatkhah, Sogol, Edalatfar, Maryam, Bari, Ausaf, Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 1
container_start_page 291
container_title Neurocritical care
container_volume 34
creator Omidbeigi, Mahmoud
Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat
Meknatkhah, Sogol
Edalatfar, Maryam
Bari, Ausaf
Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi
description Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2405304501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919332643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a47cabf0d462f508c181979fe5bda8ebf058909c452ed4af7f08c61bf35a11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRbH18AQ8S8OIlOvtKsp4sxUehomjvyyaZSEoedTdR-u3dmqrgwdMMzG_-M_wIOaFwQQHiS0cZsCQEBiGAUiyMdsiYShmFoCK6u-kFDSPF-YgcOLcEYLGK5T4ZcSY4JMDH5HqBFdbY2TILZk1nTWZNU5oqeLLoXG8xeGibsmtt2bxeBZPgZe06rE3n8Wd8L_HjiOwVpnJ4vK2HZHF7s5jeh_PHu9l0Mg8zHssuNCLOTFpALiJWSEgymlAVqwJlmpsE_UQmClQmJMNcmCIuPBPRtODSUGr4ITkfYle2fevRdbouXYZVZRpse6eZAMlBSKAePfuDLtveNv45zRT1NlgkuKfYQGW2dc5ioVe2rI1dawp6o1cPerXXq7_06sgvnW6j-7TG_Gfl26cH-AC41cYY2t_b_8R-AifVhI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919332643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Edalatfar, Maryam ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creator><creatorcontrib>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Edalatfar, Maryam ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><description>Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32430803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Catheters ; Clinical trials ; Cohort analysis ; Critical Care Medicine ; Epidural ; Intensive ; Internal Medicine ; Intracranial pressure ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Monitoring systems ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Review Article ; Sensors ; Surgeons ; Systematic review ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2021-02, Vol.34 (1), p.291-300</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a47cabf0d462f508c181979fe5bda8ebf058909c452ed4af7f08c61bf35a11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a47cabf0d462f508c181979fe5bda8ebf058909c452ed4af7f08c61bf35a11a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919332643?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21368,21369,27903,27904,33509,33510,33723,33724,41467,42536,43638,43784,51297,64361,64363,64365,72215</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edalatfar, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bari, Ausaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><title>Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description>Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.</description><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Epidural</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intracranial pressure</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring systems</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRbH18AQ8S8OIlOvtKsp4sxUehomjvyyaZSEoedTdR-u3dmqrgwdMMzG_-M_wIOaFwQQHiS0cZsCQEBiGAUiyMdsiYShmFoCK6u-kFDSPF-YgcOLcEYLGK5T4ZcSY4JMDH5HqBFdbY2TILZk1nTWZNU5oqeLLoXG8xeGibsmtt2bxeBZPgZe06rE3n8Wd8L_HjiOwVpnJ4vK2HZHF7s5jeh_PHu9l0Mg8zHssuNCLOTFpALiJWSEgymlAVqwJlmpsE_UQmClQmJMNcmCIuPBPRtODSUGr4ITkfYle2fevRdbouXYZVZRpse6eZAMlBSKAePfuDLtveNv45zRT1NlgkuKfYQGW2dc5ioVe2rI1dawp6o1cPerXXq7_06sgvnW6j-7TG_Gfl26cH-AC41cYY2t_b_8R-AifVhI4</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creator><creator>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creator><creator>Edalatfar, Maryam</creator><creator>Bari, Ausaf</creator><creator>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review</title><author>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Edalatfar, Maryam ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a47cabf0d462f508c181979fe5bda8ebf058909c452ed4af7f08c61bf35a11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Epidural</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intracranial pressure</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring systems</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edalatfar, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bari, Ausaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omidbeigi, Mahmoud</au><au>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</au><au>Meknatkhah, Sogol</au><au>Edalatfar, Maryam</au><au>Bari, Ausaf</au><au>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>291-300</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract>Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32430803</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-6933
ispartof Neurocritical care, 2021-02, Vol.34 (1), p.291-300
issn 1541-6933
1556-0961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2405304501
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Catheters
Clinical trials
Cohort analysis
Critical Care Medicine
Epidural
Intensive
Internal Medicine
Intracranial pressure
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Monitoring systems
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Patients
Review Article
Sensors
Surgeons
Systematic review
Transplants & implants
Traumatic brain injury
title Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A19%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telemetric%20Intracranial%20Pressure%20Monitoring:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Omidbeigi,%20Mahmoud&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=291-300&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919332643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919332643&rft_id=info:pmid/32430803&rfr_iscdi=true