Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population

To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD). A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2020-05, p.145561320923172-145561320923172
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xiaoxin, Xie, Lingwen, Zeng, Haicang, Xu, Yaodong, Xiong, Hao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145561320923172
container_issue
container_start_page 145561320923172
container_title Ear, nose, & throat journal
container_volume
creator Chen, Xiaoxin
Xie, Lingwen
Zeng, Haicang
Xu, Yaodong
Xiong, Hao
description To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD). A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0145561320923172
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404644713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2404644713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8f767e181ec472b19c68811af2484dc9d84f655a2a51cdb9a121de46bf094f0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsKdE_KRS8DrOC9upTylSiBauEaOs6ZGaVzsBKl_wGfjqoUDp33M7KxmCDkFdgGQZZcMRJKkEHNW8BgyvkeGUAgeZQnn-2S4gaMNPiBH3n8wFhYpHJJBzAVPgPMh-Z5aJRv6hs73nt5jiy6M4xZ9t0BvJNXW0WvZNNa29MY0sjOhsZoGmN72vpNqYWRL532FV3RMZ6Z9bzCaYNuhoy_YOetXqDrzhXTW9fWampZKOlmY8ALps131W81jcqBl4_FkV0fk9e52PnmIpk_3j5PxNFKxgC7KdZZmCDmgEhmvoFBpngNIzUUualXUudBpkkguE1B1VUjgUKNIK80KoRnGI3K-1V05-9kHm-XSeIVNI1u0vS-5YCIVIoM4UNmWqoIJ71CXK2eW0q1LYOUm__J__uHkbKfeV0us_w5-A49_AC4TgHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2404644713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chen, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Lingwen ; Zeng, Haicang ; Xu, Yaodong ; Xiong, Hao</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Lingwen ; Zeng, Haicang ; Xu, Yaodong ; Xiong, Hao</creatorcontrib><description>To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD). A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0145561320923172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32425122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal, 2020-05, p.145561320923172-145561320923172</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8f767e181ec472b19c68811af2484dc9d84f655a2a51cdb9a121de46bf094f0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8f767e181ec472b19c68811af2484dc9d84f655a2a51cdb9a121de46bf094f0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3733-8083</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Lingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Haicang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Hao</creatorcontrib><title>Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population</title><title>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description>To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD). A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.</description><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsKdE_KRS8DrOC9upTylSiBauEaOs6ZGaVzsBKl_wGfjqoUDp33M7KxmCDkFdgGQZZcMRJKkEHNW8BgyvkeGUAgeZQnn-2S4gaMNPiBH3n8wFhYpHJJBzAVPgPMh-Z5aJRv6hs73nt5jiy6M4xZ9t0BvJNXW0WvZNNa29MY0sjOhsZoGmN72vpNqYWRL532FV3RMZ6Z9bzCaYNuhoy_YOetXqDrzhXTW9fWampZKOlmY8ALps131W81jcqBl4_FkV0fk9e52PnmIpk_3j5PxNFKxgC7KdZZmCDmgEhmvoFBpngNIzUUualXUudBpkkguE1B1VUjgUKNIK80KoRnGI3K-1V05-9kHm-XSeIVNI1u0vS-5YCIVIoM4UNmWqoIJ71CXK2eW0q1LYOUm__J__uHkbKfeV0us_w5-A49_AC4TgHM</recordid><startdate>20200519</startdate><enddate>20200519</enddate><creator>Chen, Xiaoxin</creator><creator>Xie, Lingwen</creator><creator>Zeng, Haicang</creator><creator>Xu, Yaodong</creator><creator>Xiong, Hao</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-8083</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200519</creationdate><title>Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population</title><author>Chen, Xiaoxin ; Xie, Lingwen ; Zeng, Haicang ; Xu, Yaodong ; Xiong, Hao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8f767e181ec472b19c68811af2484dc9d84f655a2a51cdb9a121de46bf094f0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Lingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Haicang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Hao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xiaoxin</au><au>Xie, Lingwen</au><au>Zeng, Haicang</au><au>Xu, Yaodong</au><au>Xiong, Hao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2020-05-19</date><risdate>2020</risdate><spage>145561320923172</spage><epage>145561320923172</epage><pages>145561320923172-145561320923172</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><abstract>To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD). A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32425122</pmid><doi>10.1177/0145561320923172</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-8083</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-5613
ispartof Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2020-05, p.145561320923172-145561320923172
issn 0145-5613
1942-7522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404644713
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Versus%20General%20Anesthesia%20for%20Balloon%20Dilation%20of%20the%20Eustachian%20Tube:%20A%20Single-Center%20Retrospective%20Study%20in%20a%20Chinese%20Population&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Chen,%20Xiaoxin&rft.date=2020-05-19&rft.spage=145561320923172&rft.epage=145561320923172&rft.pages=145561320923172-145561320923172&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0145561320923172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2404644713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2404644713&rft_id=info:pmid/32425122&rfr_iscdi=true