Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials

Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. We performed a multicenter prospective coh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic oncology 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1361-1368
Hauptverfasser: Jeene, Paul M., Vermeulen, Bram D., Rozema, Tom, Braam, Pètra M., Lips, Irene, Muller, Karin, van Kampen, Daphne, Homs, Marjolein Y.V., Oppedijk, Vera, Berbée, Maaike, van Rossum, Peter S.N., el Sharouni, Sherif, Siersema, Peter D., Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1368
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1361
container_title Journal of thoracic oncology
container_volume 15
creator Jeene, Paul M.
Vermeulen, Bram D.
Rozema, Tom
Braam, Pètra M.
Lips, Irene
Muller, Karin
van Kampen, Daphne
Homs, Marjolein Y.V.
Oppedijk, Vera
Berbée, Maaike
van Rossum, Peter S.N.
el Sharouni, Sherif
Siersema, Peter D.
Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.
description Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with metastasized or otherwise incurable esophageal cancer requiring palliation of dysphagia from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were treated with EBRT in five fractions of 4 Gy. Data were compared with all patients treated with a single brachytherapy dose of 12 Gy in the SIREC (Stent or Intraluminal Radiotherapy for inoperable Esophageal Cancer) trial, both between the original cohorts and between 1:1 propensity score–matched cohorts. The primary end point was an improvement of dysphagia at 3 months without reintervention. The secondary end points included toxicity and time-to-effect. A total of 115 patients treated with EBRT and 93 patients who underwent brachytherapy were eligible for analysis. In the original cohorts, dysphagia improved after EBRT in 79% of patients compared with 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.058). Propensity score matching resulted in 69 patients in each cohort well-balanced at baseline. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 83% after EBRT versus 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.048). In responding patients, improvement of dysphagia at 2 weeks was observed in 67% after EBRT compared with 35% after brachytherapy, and the maximum effect was reached after 4 weeks in 55% and 33%, respectively. Severe toxicity occurred in 3% of patients after EBRT compared with 13% after brachytherapy. Short-course EBRT appears at least as effective as brachytherapy in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404046519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1556086420303798</els_id><sourcerecordid>2404046519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5115-52e5a7f95971e1b9493c6cc679552590a6f9b41ff7dc5f2f6f2256738b61decb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUjBCIlsIPcEA-cklqO7aTIC5tWApSERUsXC3HeSZeknWwky77MfwrjrLliKyn52fNjJ5nkuQlwRnBRFzust3UuYxiijPMMpzTR8k54VykJC_x49Mdl4KdJc9C2GHMOGbl0-QspwwXRcXPkz9fO-entHazD4A2vyfwe9Wja1AD-qJa66YOvBqP6Dv4MAd07ZXujg-Pxnl0p_reqsm6PXIGvTuGsVM_rEJ2jzbBLQNEwVrtNfg36Ap9UpPuoEW1G0blbVh524NDd96FEfRk7wFtvVV9eJ48MbHBi1O_SL6932zrD-nt55uP9dVtqjkhPOUUuCpMxauCAGkqVuVaaC3iDznlFVbCVA0jxhSt5oYaYSjlosjLRpAWdJNfJK9X3dG7XzOESQ42aOh7tQc3BxntikdwUkUoXaE6bhs8GDl6Oyh_lATLJRa5k0sscolFYiZjLJH06qQ_NwO0_ygPOUQAWwEH18cIws9-PoCXXbRu6iQmlOVlxdJFE5cY4zQWWWhvVxpEc-5tZARtITrdWh-NlK2z_1vrL2JZsCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2404046519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Jeene, Paul M. ; Vermeulen, Bram D. ; Rozema, Tom ; Braam, Pètra M. ; Lips, Irene ; Muller, Karin ; van Kampen, Daphne ; Homs, Marjolein Y.V. ; Oppedijk, Vera ; Berbée, Maaike ; van Rossum, Peter S.N. ; el Sharouni, Sherif ; Siersema, Peter D. ; Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeene, Paul M. ; Vermeulen, Bram D. ; Rozema, Tom ; Braam, Pètra M. ; Lips, Irene ; Muller, Karin ; van Kampen, Daphne ; Homs, Marjolein Y.V. ; Oppedijk, Vera ; Berbée, Maaike ; van Rossum, Peter S.N. ; el Sharouni, Sherif ; Siersema, Peter D. ; Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M. ; POLDER Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with metastasized or otherwise incurable esophageal cancer requiring palliation of dysphagia from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were treated with EBRT in five fractions of 4 Gy. Data were compared with all patients treated with a single brachytherapy dose of 12 Gy in the SIREC (Stent or Intraluminal Radiotherapy for inoperable Esophageal Cancer) trial, both between the original cohorts and between 1:1 propensity score–matched cohorts. The primary end point was an improvement of dysphagia at 3 months without reintervention. The secondary end points included toxicity and time-to-effect. A total of 115 patients treated with EBRT and 93 patients who underwent brachytherapy were eligible for analysis. In the original cohorts, dysphagia improved after EBRT in 79% of patients compared with 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.058). Propensity score matching resulted in 69 patients in each cohort well-balanced at baseline. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 83% after EBRT versus 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.048). In responding patients, improvement of dysphagia at 2 weeks was observed in 67% after EBRT compared with 35% after brachytherapy, and the maximum effect was reached after 4 weeks in 55% and 33%, respectively. Severe toxicity occurred in 3% of patients after EBRT compared with 13% after brachytherapy. Short-course EBRT appears at least as effective as brachytherapy in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-0864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32407795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brachytherapy ; Deglutition Disorders - etiology ; Deglutition Disorders - radiotherapy ; Dysphagia ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - complications ; Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; External beam radiotherapy ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; Palliation ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic oncology, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1361-1368</ispartof><rights>2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5115-52e5a7f95971e1b9493c6cc679552590a6f9b41ff7dc5f2f6f2256738b61decb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5115-52e5a7f95971e1b9493c6cc679552590a6f9b41ff7dc5f2f6f2256738b61decb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32407795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeene, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Bram D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozema, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Pètra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lips, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kampen, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homs, Marjolein Y.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppedijk, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbée, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Peter S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>el Sharouni, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siersema, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLDER Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials</title><title>Journal of thoracic oncology</title><addtitle>J Thorac Oncol</addtitle><description>Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with metastasized or otherwise incurable esophageal cancer requiring palliation of dysphagia from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were treated with EBRT in five fractions of 4 Gy. Data were compared with all patients treated with a single brachytherapy dose of 12 Gy in the SIREC (Stent or Intraluminal Radiotherapy for inoperable Esophageal Cancer) trial, both between the original cohorts and between 1:1 propensity score–matched cohorts. The primary end point was an improvement of dysphagia at 3 months without reintervention. The secondary end points included toxicity and time-to-effect. A total of 115 patients treated with EBRT and 93 patients who underwent brachytherapy were eligible for analysis. In the original cohorts, dysphagia improved after EBRT in 79% of patients compared with 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.058). Propensity score matching resulted in 69 patients in each cohort well-balanced at baseline. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 83% after EBRT versus 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.048). In responding patients, improvement of dysphagia at 2 weeks was observed in 67% after EBRT compared with 35% after brachytherapy, and the maximum effect was reached after 4 weeks in 55% and 33%, respectively. Severe toxicity occurred in 3% of patients after EBRT compared with 13% after brachytherapy. Short-course EBRT appears at least as effective as brachytherapy in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer.</description><subject>Brachytherapy</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>External beam radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1556-0864</issn><issn>1556-1380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUjBCIlsIPcEA-cklqO7aTIC5tWApSERUsXC3HeSZeknWwky77MfwrjrLliKyn52fNjJ5nkuQlwRnBRFzust3UuYxiijPMMpzTR8k54VykJC_x49Mdl4KdJc9C2GHMOGbl0-QspwwXRcXPkz9fO-entHazD4A2vyfwe9Wja1AD-qJa66YOvBqP6Dv4MAd07ZXujg-Pxnl0p_reqsm6PXIGvTuGsVM_rEJ2jzbBLQNEwVrtNfg36Ap9UpPuoEW1G0blbVh524NDd96FEfRk7wFtvVV9eJ48MbHBi1O_SL6932zrD-nt55uP9dVtqjkhPOUUuCpMxauCAGkqVuVaaC3iDznlFVbCVA0jxhSt5oYaYSjlosjLRpAWdJNfJK9X3dG7XzOESQ42aOh7tQc3BxntikdwUkUoXaE6bhs8GDl6Oyh_lATLJRa5k0sscolFYiZjLJH06qQ_NwO0_ygPOUQAWwEH18cIws9-PoCXXbRu6iQmlOVlxdJFE5cY4zQWWWhvVxpEc-5tZARtITrdWh-NlK2z_1vrL2JZsCI</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Jeene, Paul M.</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Bram D.</creator><creator>Rozema, Tom</creator><creator>Braam, Pètra M.</creator><creator>Lips, Irene</creator><creator>Muller, Karin</creator><creator>van Kampen, Daphne</creator><creator>Homs, Marjolein Y.V.</creator><creator>Oppedijk, Vera</creator><creator>Berbée, Maaike</creator><creator>van Rossum, Peter S.N.</creator><creator>el Sharouni, Sherif</creator><creator>Siersema, Peter D.</creator><creator>Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Copyright by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials</title><author>Jeene, Paul M. ; Vermeulen, Bram D. ; Rozema, Tom ; Braam, Pètra M. ; Lips, Irene ; Muller, Karin ; van Kampen, Daphne ; Homs, Marjolein Y.V. ; Oppedijk, Vera ; Berbée, Maaike ; van Rossum, Peter S.N. ; el Sharouni, Sherif ; Siersema, Peter D. ; Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5115-52e5a7f95971e1b9493c6cc679552590a6f9b41ff7dc5f2f6f2256738b61decb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Brachytherapy</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>External beam radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeene, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Bram D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozema, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, Pètra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lips, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kampen, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homs, Marjolein Y.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppedijk, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbée, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Peter S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>el Sharouni, Sherif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siersema, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POLDER Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeene, Paul M.</au><au>Vermeulen, Bram D.</au><au>Rozema, Tom</au><au>Braam, Pètra M.</au><au>Lips, Irene</au><au>Muller, Karin</au><au>van Kampen, Daphne</au><au>Homs, Marjolein Y.V.</au><au>Oppedijk, Vera</au><au>Berbée, Maaike</au><au>van Rossum, Peter S.N.</au><au>el Sharouni, Sherif</au><au>Siersema, Peter D.</au><au>Hulshof, Maarten C.C.M.</au><aucorp>POLDER Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1368</epage><pages>1361-1368</pages><issn>1556-0864</issn><eissn>1556-1380</eissn><abstract>Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with metastasized or otherwise incurable esophageal cancer requiring palliation of dysphagia from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were treated with EBRT in five fractions of 4 Gy. Data were compared with all patients treated with a single brachytherapy dose of 12 Gy in the SIREC (Stent or Intraluminal Radiotherapy for inoperable Esophageal Cancer) trial, both between the original cohorts and between 1:1 propensity score–matched cohorts. The primary end point was an improvement of dysphagia at 3 months without reintervention. The secondary end points included toxicity and time-to-effect. A total of 115 patients treated with EBRT and 93 patients who underwent brachytherapy were eligible for analysis. In the original cohorts, dysphagia improved after EBRT in 79% of patients compared with 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.058). Propensity score matching resulted in 69 patients in each cohort well-balanced at baseline. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 83% after EBRT versus 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.048). In responding patients, improvement of dysphagia at 2 weeks was observed in 67% after EBRT compared with 35% after brachytherapy, and the maximum effect was reached after 4 weeks in 55% and 33%, respectively. Severe toxicity occurred in 3% of patients after EBRT compared with 13% after brachytherapy. Short-course EBRT appears at least as effective as brachytherapy in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32407795</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.032</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1556-0864
ispartof Journal of thoracic oncology, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1361-1368
issn 1556-0864
1556-1380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404046519
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Brachytherapy
Deglutition Disorders - etiology
Deglutition Disorders - radiotherapy
Dysphagia
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal Neoplasms - complications
Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
External beam radiotherapy
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Palliation
Prospective Studies
title Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-Course%20External%20Beam%20Radiotherapy%20Versus%20Brachytherapy%20for%20Palliation%20of%20Dysphagia%20in%20Esophageal%20Cancer:%20A%20Matched%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Prospective%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20oncology&rft.au=Jeene,%20Paul%20M.&rft.aucorp=POLDER%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1368&rft.pages=1361-1368&rft.issn=1556-0864&rft.eissn=1556-1380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2404046519%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2404046519&rft_id=info:pmid/32407795&rft_els_id=S1556086420303798&rfr_iscdi=true