Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The lancet oncology 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739
1. Verfasser: de la Fouchardiere, Christelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 739
container_issue 6
container_start_page 738
container_title The lancet oncology
container_volume 21
creator de la Fouchardiere, Christelle
description Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404044419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S147020452030214X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425646600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grLgpR5WM9lkd3tRpPgFggcr9Bay2dk2pbupyVbtvzf90IMXCSTD8Mzk5SHkFOglUEivXoFnNGaUiz6jFwllwOPxHumGNo8Fz_P9Tb1FOuTI-xmlkAEVh6STMA4pzaBLrkf2U7nSRxOHqkUX6blypl1FponaKUbtul1j00a2ivTUzlUzMVYrp01ja3VMDio193iye3vk7f5uNHyMn18enoa3z7FOhPiKcwTUCUKmNMc8VHkIVfIE0iITCiuOZc5KznhRpAVLGEBW5ZkuM8j5QCQq6ZH-du_C2fcl-lbWxmuchzhol14yTsPhHAYBPf-DzuzSNSFdoJhIeZpSGiixpbSz3jus5MKZWrmVBCrXguVGsFzbC5fcCJbjMHe2274saix_p36MBuBmC2DQ8WHQSa8NNhpL41C3srTmny--ARkeiUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425646600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creator><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><description>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32416071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; Biliary tract ; Carcinoma ; Chemotherapy ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Drug therapy ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; ErbB-2 protein ; Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ; Genetic screening ; Genomes ; Isocitrate dehydrogenase ; Ketoglutaric acid ; Leukemia ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Mutation ; Solid tumors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2425646600?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982,64370,64372,64374,72224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32416071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>Biliary tract</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Isocitrate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Ketoglutaric acid</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grLgpR5WM9lkd3tRpPgFggcr9Bay2dk2pbupyVbtvzf90IMXCSTD8Mzk5SHkFOglUEivXoFnNGaUiz6jFwllwOPxHumGNo8Fz_P9Tb1FOuTI-xmlkAEVh6STMA4pzaBLrkf2U7nSRxOHqkUX6blypl1FponaKUbtul1j00a2ivTUzlUzMVYrp01ja3VMDio193iye3vk7f5uNHyMn18enoa3z7FOhPiKcwTUCUKmNMc8VHkIVfIE0iITCiuOZc5KznhRpAVLGEBW5ZkuM8j5QCQq6ZH-du_C2fcl-lbWxmuchzhol14yTsPhHAYBPf-DzuzSNSFdoJhIeZpSGiixpbSz3jus5MKZWrmVBCrXguVGsFzbC5fcCJbjMHe2274saix_p36MBuBmC2DQ8WHQSa8NNhpL41C3srTmny--ARkeiUc</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><author>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>Biliary tract</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Isocitrate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Ketoglutaric acid</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>738-739</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><abstract>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32416071</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-2045
ispartof The lancet oncology, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739
issn 1470-2045
1474-5488
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404044419
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Acute myeloid leukemia
Biliary tract
Carcinoma
Chemotherapy
Cholangiocarcinoma
Drug therapy
Epidermal growth factor receptors
ErbB-2 protein
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2
Genetic screening
Genomes
Isocitrate dehydrogenase
Ketoglutaric acid
Leukemia
Metastases
Metastasis
Mutation
Solid tumors
Tumors
title Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A29%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20greater%20clarity%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=de%20la%20Fouchardiere,%20Christelle&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=738-739&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2425646600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425646600&rft_id=info:pmid/32416071&rft_els_id=S147020452030214X&rfr_iscdi=true