Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma
Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The lancet oncology 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 739 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | The lancet oncology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | de la Fouchardiere, Christelle |
description | Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404044419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S147020452030214X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425646600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grLgpR5WM9lkd3tRpPgFggcr9Bay2dk2pbupyVbtvzf90IMXCSTD8Mzk5SHkFOglUEivXoFnNGaUiz6jFwllwOPxHumGNo8Fz_P9Tb1FOuTI-xmlkAEVh6STMA4pzaBLrkf2U7nSRxOHqkUX6blypl1FponaKUbtul1j00a2ivTUzlUzMVYrp01ja3VMDio193iye3vk7f5uNHyMn18enoa3z7FOhPiKcwTUCUKmNMc8VHkIVfIE0iITCiuOZc5KznhRpAVLGEBW5ZkuM8j5QCQq6ZH-du_C2fcl-lbWxmuchzhol14yTsPhHAYBPf-DzuzSNSFdoJhIeZpSGiixpbSz3jus5MKZWrmVBCrXguVGsFzbC5fcCJbjMHe2274saix_p36MBuBmC2DQ8WHQSa8NNhpL41C3srTmny--ARkeiUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425646600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creator><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><description>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32416071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; Biliary tract ; Carcinoma ; Chemotherapy ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Drug therapy ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; ErbB-2 protein ; Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ; Genetic screening ; Genomes ; Isocitrate dehydrogenase ; Ketoglutaric acid ; Leukemia ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Mutation ; Solid tumors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2425646600?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982,64370,64372,64374,72224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32416071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>Biliary tract</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Isocitrate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Ketoglutaric acid</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grLgpR5WM9lkd3tRpPgFggcr9Bay2dk2pbupyVbtvzf90IMXCSTD8Mzk5SHkFOglUEivXoFnNGaUiz6jFwllwOPxHumGNo8Fz_P9Tb1FOuTI-xmlkAEVh6STMA4pzaBLrkf2U7nSRxOHqkUX6blypl1FponaKUbtul1j00a2ivTUzlUzMVYrp01ja3VMDio193iye3vk7f5uNHyMn18enoa3z7FOhPiKcwTUCUKmNMc8VHkIVfIE0iITCiuOZc5KznhRpAVLGEBW5ZkuM8j5QCQq6ZH-du_C2fcl-lbWxmuchzhol14yTsPhHAYBPf-DzuzSNSFdoJhIeZpSGiixpbSz3jus5MKZWrmVBCrXguVGsFzbC5fcCJbjMHe2274saix_p36MBuBmC2DQ8WHQSa8NNhpL41C3srTmny--ARkeiUc</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</title><author>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355x-8e1ec3e17ac4e8c3e8045d4316b75aef4ed82d424bb6b232117f87cd7184953a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>Biliary tract</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Isocitrate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Ketoglutaric acid</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de la Fouchardiere, Christelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>738-739</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><abstract>Biliary tract carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumours, both at an anatomical and molecular level.1 For metastatic biliary tract carcinomas, treatment mainly relies on chemotherapy, which has shown modest but significant results in terms of overall survival.2,3 However, although EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenics failed to show any benefit in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy alone) in advanced biliary tract carcinomas,4,5 genome-wide analyses identified several actionable alterations (eg, IDH1/2, FGFR2, BRAF, HER2, MSI, NTRK) providing novel targets for drug therapies.6,7 Among them, the genes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) produce key metabolic enzymes that prevent cell oxidative damage by catalysing the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Gain-of-function IDH1/2 mutations result in a neomorphic ability to produce the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate from α-ketoglutarate.8 The rate of IDH mutations in biliary tract carcinomas ranges from 10 to 20%, the most common mutation in IDH1 occurring mostly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.8 Several IDH inhibitors are under investigation in solid tumours, such as the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with IDH-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. [...]the study by Abou-Alfa and colleagues reinforces the need for genetic testing for all patients with biliary tract carcinoma, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, to identify candidates for personalised treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32416071</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2045 |
ispartof | The lancet oncology, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.738-739 |
issn | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2404044419 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Acute myeloid leukemia Biliary tract Carcinoma Chemotherapy Cholangiocarcinoma Drug therapy Epidermal growth factor receptors ErbB-2 protein Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 Genetic screening Genomes Isocitrate dehydrogenase Ketoglutaric acid Leukemia Metastases Metastasis Mutation Solid tumors Tumors |
title | Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A29%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20greater%20clarity%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=de%20la%20Fouchardiere,%20Christelle&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=738-739&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30214-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2425646600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425646600&rft_id=info:pmid/32416071&rft_els_id=S147020452030214X&rfr_iscdi=true |