Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study
This study aimed to evaluate how 5 preservation solutions for static cold storage affected kidney transplant outcomes. It included all first single kidney transplants during 2010‐2014 from donations after brain death in the French national transplant registry, excluding preemptive transplants and tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.3426-3442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3426 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Legeai, Camille Durand, Louise Savoye, Emilie Macher, Marie‐Alice Bastien, Olivier |
description | This study aimed to evaluate how 5 preservation solutions for static cold storage affected kidney transplant outcomes. It included all first single kidney transplants during 2010‐2014 from donations after brain death in the French national transplant registry, excluding preemptive transplants and transplants of kidneys preserved with a hypothermic perfusion machine. The effects of each preservation solution on delayed graft function (DGF) and 1‐year transplant failure were evaluated with hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. The study finally included 7640 transplanted kidneys: 3473 (45.5%) preserved with Institut Georges Lopez‐1 solution (IGL‐1), 773 (10.1%) with University of Wisconsin solution, 731 (9.6%) with Solution de Conservation des Organes et Tissus (SCOT, organ and tissue preservation solution), 2215 (29.0%) with Celsior, and 448 (5.9%) with histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate. Primary nonfunction rates did not differ by solution. After adjustment for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, the DGF risk was significantly lower with IGL‐1 than with all other solutions (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48‐0.64). Conversely, SCOT was associated with a DGF risk significantly higher than the other solutions (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.21‐3.27) and triple that of IGL‐1 (OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.72‐4.16). One year after transplantation, the transplant failure rate did not differ significantly by preservation solution. The difference between the groups for 1‐year mean creatinine clearance was not clinically relevant.
This study compares outcomes in a French multicenter cohort of donation after brain death kidney transplants according to the 5 preservation solutions used for static cold storage, showing that preservation solution type was associated with differential risk of delayed graft function but not 1‐year graft survival. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajt.15995 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2402433733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402433733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-7ac44f8012a795cc3e783db7ff2bdd161eebaf3e5a91476979bd2c43b57249e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJTawKPUjiWN2FeIpBBKPdeQ44yolrYvtgPL3uAS6QGI2czU6czWai9AhJWc01kTNwxlNpUy30JBmhIwzmvDtjebpAO15PyeECpazXTTgLCFEMjpEH5fGgA7YGrxy4MF9qFDbJfa2adfCY2Md9iFONda2qaK2Ts0AR-itrpbQ4eDU0q8atQz9rm2Dtgvw53iKH75HqsFPMKt9cB1-Dm3V7aMdoxoPBz99hF6vLl8ubsb3j9e3F9P7seZ5no6F0klickKZEjLVmoPIeVUKY1hZVTSjAKUyHFIlaSIyKWRZMZ3wMhUskcD4CJ30vitn31vwoVjUXkMTjwXb-iL-gSWcC84jevwHndvWxdPXVJYRLkUuInXaU9pZ7x2YYuXqhXJdQUmxDqOIYRTfYUT26MexLRdQbcjf70dg0gOfdQPd_07F9O6lt_wCsO2U-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466039787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Legeai, Camille ; Durand, Louise ; Savoye, Emilie ; Macher, Marie‐Alice ; Bastien, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Legeai, Camille ; Durand, Louise ; Savoye, Emilie ; Macher, Marie‐Alice ; Bastien, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate how 5 preservation solutions for static cold storage affected kidney transplant outcomes. It included all first single kidney transplants during 2010‐2014 from donations after brain death in the French national transplant registry, excluding preemptive transplants and transplants of kidneys preserved with a hypothermic perfusion machine. The effects of each preservation solution on delayed graft function (DGF) and 1‐year transplant failure were evaluated with hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. The study finally included 7640 transplanted kidneys: 3473 (45.5%) preserved with Institut Georges Lopez‐1 solution (IGL‐1), 773 (10.1%) with University of Wisconsin solution, 731 (9.6%) with Solution de Conservation des Organes et Tissus (SCOT, organ and tissue preservation solution), 2215 (29.0%) with Celsior, and 448 (5.9%) with histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate. Primary nonfunction rates did not differ by solution. After adjustment for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, the DGF risk was significantly lower with IGL‐1 than with all other solutions (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48‐0.64). Conversely, SCOT was associated with a DGF risk significantly higher than the other solutions (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.21‐3.27) and triple that of IGL‐1 (OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.72‐4.16). One year after transplantation, the transplant failure rate did not differ significantly by preservation solution. The difference between the groups for 1‐year mean creatinine clearance was not clinically relevant.
This study compares outcomes in a French multicenter cohort of donation after brain death kidney transplants according to the 5 preservation solutions used for static cold storage, showing that preservation solution type was associated with differential risk of delayed graft function but not 1‐year graft survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15995</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32400921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Adenosine ; Allopurinol ; clinical research/practice ; Cold storage ; Creatinine ; Cryopreservation ; delayed graft function (DGF) ; France ; Glutathione ; health services and outcomes research ; Histidine ; Humans ; Insulin ; Kidney ; kidney failure/injury ; Kidney Transplantation ; kidney transplantation/nephrology ; Kidney transplants ; Kidneys ; organ perfusion and preservation ; Organ Preservation ; Organ Preservation Solutions ; organ procurement and allocation ; Perfusion ; Raffinose ; Registries ; Regression analysis ; Transplants & implants ; Tryptophan</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.3426-3442</ispartof><rights>2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-7ac44f8012a795cc3e783db7ff2bdd161eebaf3e5a91476979bd2c43b57249e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-7ac44f8012a795cc3e783db7ff2bdd161eebaf3e5a91476979bd2c43b57249e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9098-0203 ; 0000-0001-7752-1144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.15995$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.15995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32400921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Legeai, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoye, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macher, Marie‐Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastien, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate how 5 preservation solutions for static cold storage affected kidney transplant outcomes. It included all first single kidney transplants during 2010‐2014 from donations after brain death in the French national transplant registry, excluding preemptive transplants and transplants of kidneys preserved with a hypothermic perfusion machine. The effects of each preservation solution on delayed graft function (DGF) and 1‐year transplant failure were evaluated with hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. The study finally included 7640 transplanted kidneys: 3473 (45.5%) preserved with Institut Georges Lopez‐1 solution (IGL‐1), 773 (10.1%) with University of Wisconsin solution, 731 (9.6%) with Solution de Conservation des Organes et Tissus (SCOT, organ and tissue preservation solution), 2215 (29.0%) with Celsior, and 448 (5.9%) with histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate. Primary nonfunction rates did not differ by solution. After adjustment for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, the DGF risk was significantly lower with IGL‐1 than with all other solutions (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48‐0.64). Conversely, SCOT was associated with a DGF risk significantly higher than the other solutions (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.21‐3.27) and triple that of IGL‐1 (OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.72‐4.16). One year after transplantation, the transplant failure rate did not differ significantly by preservation solution. The difference between the groups for 1‐year mean creatinine clearance was not clinically relevant.
This study compares outcomes in a French multicenter cohort of donation after brain death kidney transplants according to the 5 preservation solutions used for static cold storage, showing that preservation solution type was associated with differential risk of delayed graft function but not 1‐year graft survival.</description><subject>Adenosine</subject><subject>Allopurinol</subject><subject>clinical research/practice</subject><subject>Cold storage</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>delayed graft function (DGF)</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Glutathione</subject><subject>health services and outcomes research</subject><subject>Histidine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>kidney failure/injury</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>kidney transplantation/nephrology</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>organ perfusion and preservation</subject><subject>Organ Preservation</subject><subject>Organ Preservation Solutions</subject><subject>organ procurement and allocation</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Raffinose</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Tryptophan</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQJTawKPUjiWN2FeIpBBKPdeQ44yolrYvtgPL3uAS6QGI2czU6czWai9AhJWc01kTNwxlNpUy30JBmhIwzmvDtjebpAO15PyeECpazXTTgLCFEMjpEH5fGgA7YGrxy4MF9qFDbJfa2adfCY2Md9iFONda2qaK2Ts0AR-itrpbQ4eDU0q8atQz9rm2Dtgvw53iKH75HqsFPMKt9cB1-Dm3V7aMdoxoPBz99hF6vLl8ubsb3j9e3F9P7seZ5no6F0klickKZEjLVmoPIeVUKY1hZVTSjAKUyHFIlaSIyKWRZMZ3wMhUskcD4CJ30vitn31vwoVjUXkMTjwXb-iL-gSWcC84jevwHndvWxdPXVJYRLkUuInXaU9pZ7x2YYuXqhXJdQUmxDqOIYRTfYUT26MexLRdQbcjf70dg0gOfdQPd_07F9O6lt_wCsO2U-Q</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Legeai, Camille</creator><creator>Durand, Louise</creator><creator>Savoye, Emilie</creator><creator>Macher, Marie‐Alice</creator><creator>Bastien, Olivier</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-0203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-1144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study</title><author>Legeai, Camille ; Durand, Louise ; Savoye, Emilie ; Macher, Marie‐Alice ; Bastien, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-7ac44f8012a795cc3e783db7ff2bdd161eebaf3e5a91476979bd2c43b57249e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adenosine</topic><topic>Allopurinol</topic><topic>clinical research/practice</topic><topic>Cold storage</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>delayed graft function (DGF)</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Glutathione</topic><topic>health services and outcomes research</topic><topic>Histidine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>kidney failure/injury</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>kidney transplantation/nephrology</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>organ perfusion and preservation</topic><topic>Organ Preservation</topic><topic>Organ Preservation Solutions</topic><topic>organ procurement and allocation</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Raffinose</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Tryptophan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Legeai, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savoye, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macher, Marie‐Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastien, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Legeai, Camille</au><au>Durand, Louise</au><au>Savoye, Emilie</au><au>Macher, Marie‐Alice</au><au>Bastien, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3426</spage><epage>3442</epage><pages>3426-3442</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate how 5 preservation solutions for static cold storage affected kidney transplant outcomes. It included all first single kidney transplants during 2010‐2014 from donations after brain death in the French national transplant registry, excluding preemptive transplants and transplants of kidneys preserved with a hypothermic perfusion machine. The effects of each preservation solution on delayed graft function (DGF) and 1‐year transplant failure were evaluated with hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. The study finally included 7640 transplanted kidneys: 3473 (45.5%) preserved with Institut Georges Lopez‐1 solution (IGL‐1), 773 (10.1%) with University of Wisconsin solution, 731 (9.6%) with Solution de Conservation des Organes et Tissus (SCOT, organ and tissue preservation solution), 2215 (29.0%) with Celsior, and 448 (5.9%) with histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate. Primary nonfunction rates did not differ by solution. After adjustment for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, the DGF risk was significantly lower with IGL‐1 than with all other solutions (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48‐0.64). Conversely, SCOT was associated with a DGF risk significantly higher than the other solutions (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.21‐3.27) and triple that of IGL‐1 (OR 3.37, 95% CI 2.72‐4.16). One year after transplantation, the transplant failure rate did not differ significantly by preservation solution. The difference between the groups for 1‐year mean creatinine clearance was not clinically relevant.
This study compares outcomes in a French multicenter cohort of donation after brain death kidney transplants according to the 5 preservation solutions used for static cold storage, showing that preservation solution type was associated with differential risk of delayed graft function but not 1‐year graft survival.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>32400921</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.15995</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-0203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-1144</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.3426-3442 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2402433733 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adenosine Allopurinol clinical research/practice Cold storage Creatinine Cryopreservation delayed graft function (DGF) France Glutathione health services and outcomes research Histidine Humans Insulin Kidney kidney failure/injury Kidney Transplantation kidney transplantation/nephrology Kidney transplants Kidneys organ perfusion and preservation Organ Preservation Organ Preservation Solutions organ procurement and allocation Perfusion Raffinose Registries Regression analysis Transplants & implants Tryptophan |
title | Effect of preservation solutions for static cold storage on kidney transplantation outcomes: A National Registry Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20preservation%20solutions%20for%20static%20cold%20storage%20on%20kidney%20transplantation%20outcomes:%20A%20National%20Registry%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Legeai,%20Camille&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3426&rft.epage=3442&rft.pages=3426-3442&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.15995&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402433733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466039787&rft_id=info:pmid/32400921&rfr_iscdi=true |