Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography

Thoracic tumours are increasingly considered indications for pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS-PT) treatments. Conservative robustness settings have been suggested due to potential range straggling effects caused by the lung micro-structure. Using proton radiography (PR) and a 4D porcine lung...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2020-07, Vol.65 (15), p.155014-155014
Hauptverfasser: Meijers, A, Seller, Oria C, Free, J, Bondesson, D, Seller Oria, Carmen, Rabe, M, Parodi, K, Landry, G, Langendijk, J A, Both, S, Kurz, C, Knopf, AC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155014
container_issue 15
container_start_page 155014
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 65
creator Meijers, A
Seller, Oria C
Free, J
Bondesson, D
Seller Oria, Carmen
Rabe, M
Parodi, K
Landry, G
Langendijk, J A
Both, S
Kurz, C
Knopf, AC
description Thoracic tumours are increasingly considered indications for pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS-PT) treatments. Conservative robustness settings have been suggested due to potential range straggling effects caused by the lung micro-structure. Using proton radiography (PR) and a 4D porcine lung phantom, we experimentally assess range errors to be considered in robust treatment planning for thoracic indications. A human-chest-size 4D phantom hosting inflatable porcine lungs and corresponding 4D computed tomography (4DCT) were used. Five PR frames were planned to intersect the phantom at various positions. Integral depth-dose curves (IDDs) per proton spot were measured using a multi-layer ionisation chamber (MLIC). Each PR frame consisted of 81 spots with an assigned energy of 210 MeV (full width at half maximum (FWHM) 8.2 mm). Each frame was delivered five times while simultaneously acquiring the breathing signal of the 4D phantom, using an ANZAI load cell. The synchronised ANZAI and delivery log file information was used to retrospectively sort spots into their corresponding breathing phase. Based on this information, IDDs were simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo dose engine on a dose grid of 1 mm. In addition to the time-resolved TPS calculations on the 4DCT phases, IDDs were calculated on the average CT. Measured IDDs were compared with simulated ones, calculating the range error for each individual spot. In total, 2025 proton spots were individually measured and analysed. The range error of a specific spot is reported relative to its water equivalent path length (WEPL). The mean relative range error was 1.2% (1.5 SD 2.3 %) for the comparison with the time-resolved TPS calculations, and 1.0% (1.5 SD 2.2 %) when comparing to TPS calculations on the average CT. The determined mean relative range errors justify the use of 3% range uncertainty for robust treatment planning in a clinical setting for thoracic indications.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/ab91db
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2401836551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401836551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d51d5bbc9a28170a53e0fe85ca3807761e4a824da4084e7e6dd50bbb9e9f7af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxTAQRoMoen3sXUmWLqxmmqaPpYgvENy4D0kzrdE2qUm7uP_eXK-6EiEwkDnzMXMIOQV2Cayur4CXkJWiZFdKN2D0Dln9fu2SFWMcsgaEOCCHMb4xBlDnxT454DlvclHwFemvY8QYR3Qz9R0NyvVIF9dimJV185paR4fF9dlg35HONsYl9aN1PVV08qG1Dr8AOr0qN_uRKmfoFPzsXUoz1vdBTa_rY7LXqSHiyXc9Ii93ty83D9nT8_3jzfVT1hZVNWdGgBFat43Ka6iYEhxZh7VoFa9ZVZWAhUonGFWwusAKS2ME01o32HSV6vgROd_Gpg0-FoyzHG1scRiUQ79EmRcMal4KAQllW7QNPsaAnZyCHVVYS2ByY1duVMqNSrm1m0bOvtMXPaL5HfjRmYCLLWD9JN_8Ely69b-88z_wadSJkrB5gkEhJ9PxT9bYk0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401836551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Meijers, A ; Seller, Oria C ; Free, J ; Bondesson, D ; Seller Oria, Carmen ; Rabe, M ; Parodi, K ; Landry, G ; Langendijk, J A ; Both, S ; Kurz, C ; Knopf, AC</creator><creatorcontrib>Meijers, A ; Seller, Oria C ; Free, J ; Bondesson, D ; Seller Oria, Carmen ; Rabe, M ; Parodi, K ; Landry, G ; Langendijk, J A ; Both, S ; Kurz, C ; Knopf, AC</creatorcontrib><description>Thoracic tumours are increasingly considered indications for pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS-PT) treatments. Conservative robustness settings have been suggested due to potential range straggling effects caused by the lung micro-structure. Using proton radiography (PR) and a 4D porcine lung phantom, we experimentally assess range errors to be considered in robust treatment planning for thoracic indications. A human-chest-size 4D phantom hosting inflatable porcine lungs and corresponding 4D computed tomography (4DCT) were used. Five PR frames were planned to intersect the phantom at various positions. Integral depth-dose curves (IDDs) per proton spot were measured using a multi-layer ionisation chamber (MLIC). Each PR frame consisted of 81 spots with an assigned energy of 210 MeV (full width at half maximum (FWHM) 8.2 mm). Each frame was delivered five times while simultaneously acquiring the breathing signal of the 4D phantom, using an ANZAI load cell. The synchronised ANZAI and delivery log file information was used to retrospectively sort spots into their corresponding breathing phase. Based on this information, IDDs were simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo dose engine on a dose grid of 1 mm. In addition to the time-resolved TPS calculations on the 4DCT phases, IDDs were calculated on the average CT. Measured IDDs were compared with simulated ones, calculating the range error for each individual spot. In total, 2025 proton spots were individually measured and analysed. The range error of a specific spot is reported relative to its water equivalent path length (WEPL). The mean relative range error was 1.2% (1.5 SD 2.3 %) for the comparison with the time-resolved TPS calculations, and 1.0% (1.5 SD 2.2 %) when comparing to TPS calculations on the average CT. The determined mean relative range errors justify the use of 3% range uncertainty for robust treatment planning in a clinical setting for thoracic indications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab91db</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32392543</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>lung-like tissue ; proton radiography ; range uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2020-07, Vol.65 (15), p.155014-155014</ispartof><rights>2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d51d5bbc9a28170a53e0fe85ca3807761e4a824da4084e7e6dd50bbb9e9f7af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d51d5bbc9a28170a53e0fe85ca3807761e4a824da4084e7e6dd50bbb9e9f7af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1573-2613 ; 0000-0003-3112-886X ; 0000-0002-0785-2009</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ab91db/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meijers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seller, Oria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondesson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seller Oria, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parodi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langendijk, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Both, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knopf, AC</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Thoracic tumours are increasingly considered indications for pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS-PT) treatments. Conservative robustness settings have been suggested due to potential range straggling effects caused by the lung micro-structure. Using proton radiography (PR) and a 4D porcine lung phantom, we experimentally assess range errors to be considered in robust treatment planning for thoracic indications. A human-chest-size 4D phantom hosting inflatable porcine lungs and corresponding 4D computed tomography (4DCT) were used. Five PR frames were planned to intersect the phantom at various positions. Integral depth-dose curves (IDDs) per proton spot were measured using a multi-layer ionisation chamber (MLIC). Each PR frame consisted of 81 spots with an assigned energy of 210 MeV (full width at half maximum (FWHM) 8.2 mm). Each frame was delivered five times while simultaneously acquiring the breathing signal of the 4D phantom, using an ANZAI load cell. The synchronised ANZAI and delivery log file information was used to retrospectively sort spots into their corresponding breathing phase. Based on this information, IDDs were simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo dose engine on a dose grid of 1 mm. In addition to the time-resolved TPS calculations on the 4DCT phases, IDDs were calculated on the average CT. Measured IDDs were compared with simulated ones, calculating the range error for each individual spot. In total, 2025 proton spots were individually measured and analysed. The range error of a specific spot is reported relative to its water equivalent path length (WEPL). The mean relative range error was 1.2% (1.5 SD 2.3 %) for the comparison with the time-resolved TPS calculations, and 1.0% (1.5 SD 2.2 %) when comparing to TPS calculations on the average CT. The determined mean relative range errors justify the use of 3% range uncertainty for robust treatment planning in a clinical setting for thoracic indications.</description><subject>lung-like tissue</subject><subject>proton radiography</subject><subject>range uncertainty</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxTAQRoMoen3sXUmWLqxmmqaPpYgvENy4D0kzrdE2qUm7uP_eXK-6EiEwkDnzMXMIOQV2Cayur4CXkJWiZFdKN2D0Dln9fu2SFWMcsgaEOCCHMb4xBlDnxT454DlvclHwFemvY8QYR3Qz9R0NyvVIF9dimJV185paR4fF9dlg35HONsYl9aN1PVV08qG1Dr8AOr0qN_uRKmfoFPzsXUoz1vdBTa_rY7LXqSHiyXc9Ii93ty83D9nT8_3jzfVT1hZVNWdGgBFat43Ka6iYEhxZh7VoFa9ZVZWAhUonGFWwusAKS2ME01o32HSV6vgROd_Gpg0-FoyzHG1scRiUQ79EmRcMal4KAQllW7QNPsaAnZyCHVVYS2ByY1duVMqNSrm1m0bOvtMXPaL5HfjRmYCLLWD9JN_8Ely69b-88z_wadSJkrB5gkEhJ9PxT9bYk0I</recordid><startdate>20200731</startdate><enddate>20200731</enddate><creator>Meijers, A</creator><creator>Seller, Oria C</creator><creator>Free, J</creator><creator>Bondesson, D</creator><creator>Seller Oria, Carmen</creator><creator>Rabe, M</creator><creator>Parodi, K</creator><creator>Landry, G</creator><creator>Langendijk, J A</creator><creator>Both, S</creator><creator>Kurz, C</creator><creator>Knopf, AC</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-2613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-886X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-2009</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200731</creationdate><title>Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography</title><author>Meijers, A ; Seller, Oria C ; Free, J ; Bondesson, D ; Seller Oria, Carmen ; Rabe, M ; Parodi, K ; Landry, G ; Langendijk, J A ; Both, S ; Kurz, C ; Knopf, AC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d51d5bbc9a28170a53e0fe85ca3807761e4a824da4084e7e6dd50bbb9e9f7af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>lung-like tissue</topic><topic>proton radiography</topic><topic>range uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meijers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seller, Oria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Free, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondesson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seller Oria, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parodi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langendijk, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Both, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knopf, AC</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meijers, A</au><au>Seller, Oria C</au><au>Free, J</au><au>Bondesson, D</au><au>Seller Oria, Carmen</au><au>Rabe, M</au><au>Parodi, K</au><au>Landry, G</au><au>Langendijk, J A</au><au>Both, S</au><au>Kurz, C</au><au>Knopf, AC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2020-07-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>155014</spage><epage>155014</epage><pages>155014-155014</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Thoracic tumours are increasingly considered indications for pencil beam scanned proton therapy (PBS-PT) treatments. Conservative robustness settings have been suggested due to potential range straggling effects caused by the lung micro-structure. Using proton radiography (PR) and a 4D porcine lung phantom, we experimentally assess range errors to be considered in robust treatment planning for thoracic indications. A human-chest-size 4D phantom hosting inflatable porcine lungs and corresponding 4D computed tomography (4DCT) were used. Five PR frames were planned to intersect the phantom at various positions. Integral depth-dose curves (IDDs) per proton spot were measured using a multi-layer ionisation chamber (MLIC). Each PR frame consisted of 81 spots with an assigned energy of 210 MeV (full width at half maximum (FWHM) 8.2 mm). Each frame was delivered five times while simultaneously acquiring the breathing signal of the 4D phantom, using an ANZAI load cell. The synchronised ANZAI and delivery log file information was used to retrospectively sort spots into their corresponding breathing phase. Based on this information, IDDs were simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo dose engine on a dose grid of 1 mm. In addition to the time-resolved TPS calculations on the 4DCT phases, IDDs were calculated on the average CT. Measured IDDs were compared with simulated ones, calculating the range error for each individual spot. In total, 2025 proton spots were individually measured and analysed. The range error of a specific spot is reported relative to its water equivalent path length (WEPL). The mean relative range error was 1.2% (1.5 SD 2.3 %) for the comparison with the time-resolved TPS calculations, and 1.0% (1.5 SD 2.2 %) when comparing to TPS calculations on the average CT. The determined mean relative range errors justify the use of 3% range uncertainty for robust treatment planning in a clinical setting for thoracic indications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>32392543</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab91db</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-2613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-886X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-2009</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2020-07, Vol.65 (15), p.155014-155014
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2401836551
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects lung-like tissue
proton radiography
range uncertainty
title Assessment of range uncertainty in lung-like tissue using a porcine lung phantom and proton radiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20range%20uncertainty%20in%20lung-like%20tissue%20using%20a%20porcine%20lung%20phantom%20and%20proton%20radiography&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Meijers,%20A&rft.date=2020-07-31&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=155014&rft.epage=155014&rft.pages=155014-155014&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab91db&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2401836551%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401836551&rft_id=info:pmid/32392543&rfr_iscdi=true