Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?

Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806
Hauptverfasser: Jansen, J., Schreurs, R., Dubois, L., Maal, T.J.J., Gooris, P.J.J., Becking, A.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 806
container_issue 7
container_start_page 801
container_title British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 58
creator Jansen, J.
Schreurs, R.
Dubois, L.
Maal, T.J.J.
Gooris, P.J.J.
Becking, A.G.
description Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2400531512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435620301704</els_id><sourcerecordid>2400531512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl6eQJAs3bTm0qQdQUQGbyC4cR_S9EQzTJuapIpvb8YZXbo6HPjO5f8QOqWkpITKi2XZLn0fS0YYKUlVEtrsoBkVnBV0XpFdNCNMyqLiQh6gwxiXhBDBqNhHB5zxhvKmniH9OKSg_QhBJ_cB2PX61Q2v2A3Yh9YlvcIBjB9iCpNJzg-X-M1_4s5DxC5hbS2YhNMb4NFHtwawtz-968eVHtL1MdqzehXhZFuP0Mvd7cvioXh6vn9c3DwVhot5KoS0tdGi7gQVsmadJKbtKK_onFTQypbVnTatsJo1DQPLaw2V5NBwKxuiKT9C55u1Y_DvE8SkehcNrPIP4KeoWJXTcyooyyjfoCb4GANYNYacO3wpStRarVqqH7VqrVaRSmW1eepse2Bqe-j-Zn5dZuBqA0BO-eEgqGgcDAY6lxUm1Xn374Fv6_qMTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400531512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32381387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CT scan ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Humans ; implant position ; Intraoperative imaging ; Orbit - surgery ; orbital fractures ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; orbital reconstruction ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maal, T.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooris, P.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><title>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</description><subject>CT scan</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant position</subject><subject>Intraoperative imaging</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>orbital fractures</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>orbital reconstruction</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl6eQJAs3bTm0qQdQUQGbyC4cR_S9EQzTJuapIpvb8YZXbo6HPjO5f8QOqWkpITKi2XZLn0fS0YYKUlVEtrsoBkVnBV0XpFdNCNMyqLiQh6gwxiXhBDBqNhHB5zxhvKmniH9OKSg_QhBJ_cB2PX61Q2v2A3Yh9YlvcIBjB9iCpNJzg-X-M1_4s5DxC5hbS2YhNMb4NFHtwawtz-968eVHtL1MdqzehXhZFuP0Mvd7cvioXh6vn9c3DwVhot5KoS0tdGi7gQVsmadJKbtKK_onFTQypbVnTatsJo1DQPLaw2V5NBwKxuiKT9C55u1Y_DvE8SkehcNrPIP4KeoWJXTcyooyyjfoCb4GANYNYacO3wpStRarVqqH7VqrVaRSmW1eepse2Bqe-j-Zn5dZuBqA0BO-eEgqGgcDAY6lxUm1Xn374Fv6_qMTA</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Jansen, J.</creator><creator>Schreurs, R.</creator><creator>Dubois, L.</creator><creator>Maal, T.J.J.</creator><creator>Gooris, P.J.J.</creator><creator>Becking, A.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><author>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>CT scan</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant position</topic><topic>Intraoperative imaging</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>orbital fractures</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>orbital reconstruction</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maal, T.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooris, P.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, J.</au><au>Schreurs, R.</au><au>Dubois, L.</au><au>Maal, T.J.J.</au><au>Gooris, P.J.J.</au><au>Becking, A.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral &amp; maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>801-806</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32381387</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4356
ispartof British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806
issn 0266-4356
1532-1940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2400531512
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects CT scan
Dental Implants
Dentistry
Humans
implant position
Intraoperative imaging
Orbit - surgery
orbital fractures
Orbital Fractures - surgery
orbital reconstruction
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
title Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20imaging%20in%20orbital%20reconstruction:%20how%20does%20it%20affect%20the%20position%20of%20the%20implant?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Jansen,%20J.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=801-806&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400531512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400531512&rft_id=info:pmid/32381387&rft_els_id=S0266435620301704&rfr_iscdi=true