Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?
Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 806 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 801 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Jansen, J. Schreurs, R. Dubois, L. Maal, T.J.J. Gooris, P.J.J. Becking, A.G. |
description | Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2400531512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435620301704</els_id><sourcerecordid>2400531512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl6eQJAs3bTm0qQdQUQGbyC4cR_S9EQzTJuapIpvb8YZXbo6HPjO5f8QOqWkpITKi2XZLn0fS0YYKUlVEtrsoBkVnBV0XpFdNCNMyqLiQh6gwxiXhBDBqNhHB5zxhvKmniH9OKSg_QhBJ_cB2PX61Q2v2A3Yh9YlvcIBjB9iCpNJzg-X-M1_4s5DxC5hbS2YhNMb4NFHtwawtz-968eVHtL1MdqzehXhZFuP0Mvd7cvioXh6vn9c3DwVhot5KoS0tdGi7gQVsmadJKbtKK_onFTQypbVnTatsJo1DQPLaw2V5NBwKxuiKT9C55u1Y_DvE8SkehcNrPIP4KeoWJXTcyooyyjfoCb4GANYNYacO3wpStRarVqqH7VqrVaRSmW1eepse2Bqe-j-Zn5dZuBqA0BO-eEgqGgcDAY6lxUm1Xn374Fv6_qMTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400531512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32381387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CT scan ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Humans ; implant position ; Intraoperative imaging ; Orbit - surgery ; orbital fractures ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; orbital reconstruction ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maal, T.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooris, P.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</description><subject>CT scan</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant position</subject><subject>Intraoperative imaging</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>orbital fractures</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>orbital reconstruction</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl6eQJAs3bTm0qQdQUQGbyC4cR_S9EQzTJuapIpvb8YZXbo6HPjO5f8QOqWkpITKi2XZLn0fS0YYKUlVEtrsoBkVnBV0XpFdNCNMyqLiQh6gwxiXhBDBqNhHB5zxhvKmniH9OKSg_QhBJ_cB2PX61Q2v2A3Yh9YlvcIBjB9iCpNJzg-X-M1_4s5DxC5hbS2YhNMb4NFHtwawtz-968eVHtL1MdqzehXhZFuP0Mvd7cvioXh6vn9c3DwVhot5KoS0tdGi7gQVsmadJKbtKK_onFTQypbVnTatsJo1DQPLaw2V5NBwKxuiKT9C55u1Y_DvE8SkehcNrPIP4KeoWJXTcyooyyjfoCb4GANYNYacO3wpStRarVqqH7VqrVaRSmW1eepse2Bqe-j-Zn5dZuBqA0BO-eEgqGgcDAY6lxUm1Xn374Fv6_qMTA</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Jansen, J.</creator><creator>Schreurs, R.</creator><creator>Dubois, L.</creator><creator>Maal, T.J.J.</creator><creator>Gooris, P.J.J.</creator><creator>Becking, A.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</title><author>Jansen, J. ; Schreurs, R. ; Dubois, L. ; Maal, T.J.J. ; Gooris, P.J.J. ; Becking, A.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-56f7ca57d515672d60cbd1341904eb6b27dacb5fa2882ef37ae463e83f680a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>CT scan</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant position</topic><topic>Intraoperative imaging</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>orbital fractures</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>orbital reconstruction</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreurs, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maal, T.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooris, P.J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becking, A.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, J.</au><au>Schreurs, R.</au><au>Dubois, L.</au><au>Maal, T.J.J.</au><au>Gooris, P.J.J.</au><au>Becking, A.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>801-806</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Intraoperative imaging enables the surgeon to control the position of the implant during orbital reconstruction. Although it might improve surgical outcome and avoid the need for revision surgery, it may also increase the duration of the operation and the exposure to radiation. The goal of this study was to find out whether intraoperative imaging improves the position of the implant in reconstructions of the orbital floor and medial wall. Two surgeons reconstructed complex orbital fractures in 10 cadavers. After the reconstruction a computed tomographic scan was made to confirm the position of the implant and, if required, to make any adjustments. Scans were repeated until the surgeon was satisfied. The ideal position was ascertained by scans that were obtained before and after creation of the fractures. The position of the implant achieved was compared with that of the ideal position of the implant, and improved significantly for yaw (p=0.04) and roll (p=0.03). A mean of 1.6 scans was required for each reconstruction (maximum n=3). The main reason for alteration was the rotation roll. Intraoperative imaging significantly improves the position of the implant in fractures of the orbital floor and medial wall. The surgeon has quality control of its position during the reconstruction to restore the anatomical boundaries.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32381387</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-8380</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.58 (7), p.801-806 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2400531512 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | CT scan Dental Implants Dentistry Humans implant position Intraoperative imaging Orbit - surgery orbital fractures Orbital Fractures - surgery orbital reconstruction Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Surgery, Computer-Assisted |
title | Intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction: how does it affect the position of the implant? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20imaging%20in%20orbital%20reconstruction:%20how%20does%20it%20affect%20the%20position%20of%20the%20implant?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Jansen,%20J.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=801-806&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400531512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400531512&rft_id=info:pmid/32381387&rft_els_id=S0266435620301704&rfr_iscdi=true |